Paper ID #7529Theme-based Teaching /Learning: A New Approach in Teaching Manufac-turing ProcessesDr. Masud Salimian, Morgan State University Faculty at the department of industrial engineering, Morgan State UniversityMr. Yaseen Mahmud, Morgan State UniversityMs. Avis L. Ransom, Morgan State University School of Engineering Early career engagement as a systems and logistics engineer by Department of Defense contractors, Avis Ransom, applied a bachelor’s degree in chemistry and an M.B.A. in the management and development of technology and in the application of engineering to address DoD requirements. Following fifteen years
Paper ID #11272Conforming a New Manufacturing Engineering Curriculum to the SME FourPillarsDr. Derek M Yip-Hoi, Western Washington UniversityDr. Jeffrey L. Newcomer, Western Washington University Dr. Jeffrey L. Newcomer is a Professor of Manufacturing Engineering and Chair of the Engineering and Design Department at Western Washington University. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Page 26.393.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
AC 2007-654: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO MANUFACTURING DESIGNRobert Creese, West Virginia University ROBERT C CREESE is a professor in the Industrial and Management Systems Engineering Department in the College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University in Morgantown, West Virginia. He obtained his BS, MS, and Ph.D. degrees from The Pennsylvania State University, The University of California-Berkeley, and The Pennsylvania State University. He is a member of ASEE and also a member of AACE International, ASM, AWS, AIST, ISPA, SCEA, AFS, and SME.Deepak Gupta, West Virginia University DEEPAK GUPTA is a graduate student in the Industrial and Management Systems Engineering
AC 2009-27: A TOP-DOWN APPROACH FOR TEACHING AN INTRODUCTORYENGINEERING MATERIALS COURSEPriya Manohar, Robert Morris University Dr. Priyadarshan Manohar is an Assistant Professor of Manufacturing Engineering at Robert Morris University, Pittsburgh, PA. He has a Ph. D. in Materials Engineering (1998) and Graduate Diploma in Computer Science (1999) from University of Wollongong, Australia and holds Bachelor of Engineering (Metallurgical Engineering) degree from Pune University, India (1985). He has worked as a post-doctoral fellow at Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (2001 – 2003) and BHP Institute for Steel Processing and Products, Australia (1998 – 2001). Dr. Manohar held the position
, Active Learning (SPIRAL) ApproachAbstractEngineering is continuously evolving and producing increasingly complex systems. The com-plexity of these systems requires a wider breadth of material to be covered, which makes it moredifficult to provide high quality education. Also, while student numbers are vastly increasing,faculty, staff, and resources are dwindling. The Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Uni-versity of Utah has been focusing on a new curriculum that covers multiple engineering subjects,design techniques, methodologies, and knowledge of skills in professional practice. This is knownas the Student-driven Pedagogy of Integrated, Reinforced, Active Learning (SPIRAL) approach.This paper describes teaching manufacturing using
meeting the requirementsof accreditation bodies within the stipulated time were challenging for both students andinstructors. This article explains how these challenges in engineering education and delivery ofskills were effectively addressed with the “Learning by Doing” paradigm while keeping in pacewith advanced manufacturing technologies such as 3D printing.2. Literature ReviewRecent interest in improving pedagogical approaches in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) fields has stimulated research in many universities. Several educationalmethodologies are reviewed in the context of manufacturing and through the lens ofsustainability. It is found that there is a need to identify and understand the STEM educationalchallenges
Page 24.1354.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Utilizing Rep-Rap Machines in Engineering CurriculumIntroductionIn this ABET accredited manufacturing engineering program, the lead author has been teachingthe Rapid Prototyping and Reverse Engineering course for 8 years at Robert Morris University(RMU). The basic curriculum has been well set other than the new developments. The newdevelopments are added to the course content on an annual basis due to the dynamic nature ofboth fields. In addition, the laboratories have been equipped with multiple relevant technologiesincluding Stereolithography (SLA Viper), Fused Deposition Modeling (Dimension Elite), and3D Printing (Prometal RXD
soldering, automated data acquisition, statistical process control, concurrent engineering and 0201 and 01005 component process development. His published management work includes: Concurrent Education: A Learning Approach to Serve Electronic Product Manufacturing and, ...Like Holding the Wolf by the Ears... the Key to Regain- ing Electronic Production Market Share: Breaking Free of the Division of Labor Manufacturing Model in High Cost Global Regions c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Concurrent Education – A New Post-Secondary Educational Model that Provides “Learning for Earning” as well as “Learning for Learning” in Rapidly Evolving Industries such as High
Paper ID #22068Additive Manufacturing Studios: a New Way of Teaching ABET StudentOutcomes and Continuous ImprovementDr. Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University Currently, Dr. Fidan serves as a Professor of the Department of Manufacturing and Engineering Tech- nology at Tennessee Technological University. His research and teaching interests are in additive man- ufacturing, electronics manufacturing, distance learning, and STEM education. Dr. Fidan is a member and active participant of SME, ASEE, ABET, ASME, and IEEE. He is also the Associate Editor of IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing
technologyprogram for their future careers in modern manufacturing companies, a new curriculum inRobotics Application Engineering has been developed and applied in the semester of spring 2008.This paper describes the course and laboratory of Robotics Application Engineering for studentsof manufacturing technology program (ITMT) in the Department of Industrial and EngineeringTechnology (IET).There are four Robotics courses offered in the IET Department spanning from 100 level to 400level to teach concepts, operation, programming, maintenance, interfacing, and applicationdevelopments of industrial robots. Robotics Application Engineering is taught as a 400 levelcourse for senior undergraduate students in the ITMT program. This course teaches
Manufacturing Engineersconceptualization of new layouts Managementand processes before they are Object based simulations Techniciansbuilt, permitting improved (Visual, Intuitive) Workersbrainstorming and idea Figure 5: Simulation Spectrum of Comprehension.generation.At our school additional simulation applications are planned or under evaluation for incorporationinto the technology curriculum. These include Delmia’s V5 DPM Powertrain, Process Engineer,and Workload Linebalance, along with other applications in demand by industry. Planning is alsoin progress for integration of the Delmia simulation applications into other University courses
, Page 13.204.4quality, teamwork, design for production, tool and fixture design, machine selection and design,engineering materials, manufacturing processes, machine controls, and manufacturinginformation systems.The 1995 paper “The Learning Factory – A new approach to integrating design andmanufacturing into engineering curricula” gave some insight into what a 21st century programshould contain. It stated that this new curriculum would integrate design and manufacturingtogether. Specifically the engineer would have the following qualities:Strong foundation in engineering science fundamentals;Well versed in the big picture of manufacturing and product realization, including the designprocess and business realities;Knowledgeable of current
opportunities for teaching fundamental concepts of measurements andmetrology to students. We have described and validated a suite of laboratory modules which can be selected andutilized for educational purposes in a wide range of engineering courses. The modules givestudents hands on experience with simple and more sophisticated instrumentation for optical,mechanical, and chemical characterization of surfaces. Future work will expand the range ofmaterials, include white light interferometry, continue robotics implementation for more of themethods, and include adding sandblasting, coatings, and solvent treatments to evaluate methodsof improving surface characteristics. We are investigating the application of new nanomaterialhydrophobic coatings
extended toacademics as well.While other approaches to curriculum development often mimic what has already been done orput into practice earlier, a quality based approach significantly improves the employability ofstudents. It imparts a set of marketable skills that. In order to accomplish this objective, theaforementioned approach places heavy emphasis on ‘how-to’ approach of problem solvingpertaining to safety engineering in this particular situation.The concept of safety management is more or less universal in nature. The kinds of accidents anemployee in any kind of workplace situation could be exposed to have been extensively studiedover the years. The only obstacle to implementation could result if an entirely new kind of causefor accidents
mistake found in the designing of these programs; the curriculum sheet associatedwith each program is created by taking a subset from a larger number of courses that are beingoffered. The proposed design in this paper is based on developing an educational informationmodel and a course structure layout for each program major prior choosing the courses. It isbelieved that following this approach, should result in a better program design. Program DesignUndergraduate engineering and technology programs can be designed based on three maineducational constituents [1, 2]. These are: Engineering Science, Engineering and TechnologyApplications, and Hands-on type of Experience. Figure 1 shows a pie chart that could be
composite materials. This paper details the pedagogy and theresearch paper activity.BackgroundManufacturing engineering is a relatively new and small program in the department (Refer Table1). Our “hands-on”, curriculum includes laboratory experiences in physics, chemistry, computer-aided design, manufacturing processes, RP, quality assurance, electronics, robotics,microelectronics manufacturing, simulation and computer integrated manufacturing. Themanufacturing engineering program is scheduled to undergo ABET accreditation in Fall 2007.Companies such as Toyota, Northrup-Grumann, Boeing, National Instruments, etc. asmanufacturing or process engineers have hired our graduates. We are in the process of collectingdata pertaining to number of students
semester, each student team is given 20 minutes to present their project results. This also provides an additional experience for students to learn from each other.A Representative Example of Student ProjectsThe above-described PB-ACL approach was implemented in an upper-division manufacturingengineering course – Machining Theory and Applications – which was taught by the author ofthis paper. A total of 22 students who enrolled in this course were grouped into six project teamswith three or four students on each team.A representative example of student projects is provided to demonstrate how the active andcooperative learning approach worked. In this example, the project team consisted of four seniormechanical engineering undergraduate
Paper ID #25400A Unified and Collaborative Approach to Risk Classification for Fabricationand Library SpacesDr. Daniela Faas, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Dr. Faas is a Senior Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering and the Director of Design and Fabrication Operations at Olin College in Needham, MA. Prior to joining Olin College, Dr. Faas was the senior pre- ceptor in design instruction at the John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Science at Harvard University. Dr. Faas was a Shapiro postdoctoral fellow in the Mechanical Engineering Department at MIT after receiving her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering and
, the idea of integrating GD&Tthroughout an engineering curriculum has found some traction. In a recent article18 published outof the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), researchers partnered with industry(mainly Caterpillar) to establish innovative, hands-on approaches to teaching GD&T throughoutseveral activities as part of a freshman engineering course on design and graphics. AlthoughGD&T was originally considered “difficult to teach and learn,” the new activities focused onmanufacturing and inspection, in addition to form, fit, and function of design. The new effortswere not assessed, but the authors do conclude that GD&T is a fundamental engineering tool thathas continued to gain emphasis in industry and
investment in new technologies and the extent to which thegrowth of manufacturing is influenced in the coming years. They may also determine theapproaches taken to develop the engineering and technological workforce needed to meetthe needs of the manufacturing industry.This paper reviews some of the factors affecting manufacturing in the USA andelsewhere, the strategies that are being considered to enhance manufacturing, and therole of education as a strategic element in enhancing the manufacturing activity. Itproposes the aspects of a curriculum that should be considered to develop a strongmanufacturing workforce. It also presents a set of strategies to enhance manufacturingeducation.2. Current Context of ManufacturingIn order to review the factors
current engineering classes, some necessary curriculum and teaching reformsare needed. A new course titled “Manufacturing Strategy and Lean Manufacturing” hasbeen developed at University of Bridgeport to provide our graduate students with theknowledge to face today’s challenges. The instructor brings the extensive US industrialand engineering experiences to the class and all the advanced technology proceduresintroduced and discussed in the class can be applied to the industries to improve the plantperformance in manufacturing flow, organizational functions, process control, metricsand logistics. Although this course was taught at the mechanical and manufacturingengineering majors, it can also be applied to the most areas of US industrial
. (Interdisiplinary Engineering, and holds a Six Sigma Black Belt from Mikel Harry's Six Sigma Management Institute. Page 13.1082.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Six Sigma: Does it belong in the Manufacturing Curriculum?AbstractSix Sigma has morphed through three generations: focus on quality to focus onprocess improvement (cost reduction) to focus on value (a strategic managementstrategy). This paper will discuss the three generations of Six Sigma, compare the tenets ofSix Sigma to Lean Manufacturing and evaluate whether it has a place in themanufacturing curriculum.IntroductionIn a recent review of several “Lean
. Page 22.1248.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Restructuring the Robotics Laboratory and Enhancing the Robotics Curriculum at RIT AbstractThe Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Technology department at the RochesterInstitute of Technology has been involved in an ongoing effort to improve itsjunior/senior/graduate level Robotics in Manufacturing laboratory and curriculum. The previouslaboratory provided interesting challenges for the students to be able to get into the laboratoryspace and effectively use the equipment. The new laboratory exercises incorporate research ofselected robotics topics, new laboratory equipment, part
that uses AM to supplement instruction in finite element analysis8 , orto model rocketry to enhance learning in undergraduate engineering design projects9. An inter-disciplinary approach of designing and developing of a 3D printer machine, by integrating theknowledge of CAD/computer aided manufacturing (CAM), and automation methods acquired inother courses10 enable deeper learning. A few institutions are offering courses in a moretraditional format into their engineering programs. For example, Austin Peay State Universityhas offered a concentration in their undergraduate manufacturing curriculum11. Ohio NorthernUniversity developed a curriculum on digital manufacturing and simulation12. Courses such asAdditive Manufacturing: Theory and
in two year engineering technology programs, due to both the significantinstructional workload on faculty, as well as a lack of funding to provide either release time orrequired equipment.Perhaps the most significant challenge of integrating new content into a two-year engineeringtechnology curriculum is the limited amount of degree credit hours available. This is especiallysignificant in light of recent modifications to funding in higher education within Ohio, whichshifts the funding metrics to degrees granted as opposed to enrollment. In light of thismodification, many programs have attempted to reduce the number of credit hours contained,thereby making the addition of new content challenging. One potential solution to this
Engineering Education, 2013 An Effective Learning Approach for Industrial Robot Programming AbstractProgramming an industrial robot by using a teach pendent is a tedious and time-consuming taskthat requires a considerable amount of work-related skills, robotics knowledge and experience.Robot applications design also requires a tremendous amount of programming skills andinput/output controls to make them useful. Obviously, a good robot programmer is a key factorof successful robot applications. In order to teach manufacturing engineering technology (MET)students to program industrial robots, we propose an effective learning approach for industrialrobot programming in our curriculum. Research indicates
process.In addition to the CAD (Computer-Aided Design) tools, design analysis through CAE(Computer-Aided Engineering) and CAM (Computer-Aided Manufacturing) programming areincluded within this graphics course. The integrated design approach of parts, tooling, andprocessing are coupled to introduce consumer product design. Motion studies, thermal andstructural analysis are also utilized for representation of mechanical design concepts and theirgraphics environment.Adding design components to this graphics course improved student excitement, performanceand consequent retention, compared to the other graphics courses taught in a traditional way inthe same institution during the same time frame. Examples of each activity employed as well aspossible
. Table 5. Recruitment and Dissemination InitiativesProposed Curriculum StructureCurriculum at NKU and CSTCC follow the general guidelines for accreditation defined by theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) [19]. Mechatronics curriculumdesign includes development of goals and objectives, programs of study and curriculum guides,courses, laboratories, textbooks, instructional materials, experiments, instructional sequencies andothe supplemental materials focusing to accomplish a wide range of educational goals [1].The cross-curricular approach reflected at the level of the targeted goals, of the targeted contents,the use of new technologies, of the computer as a working tool which will determine the student’seducational course
, Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) criteria [4] maintain that "students must be prepared for engineeringpractice through the curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on theknowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work and incorporating engineering standardsand realistic constraints that include most of the following considerations: economic,environmental, sustainability, manufacturability, ethical, health and safety, social, and political."While most SME's gaps and ABET's engineering practice criteria can and must be assimilatedthroughout the four-year curriculum, the capstone senior design course provides the mostappropriate framework for simultaneously addressing practically all of the gaps and
beoptimized, usually through designed software packages for modeling, analysis and optimization.In the last two decades there have been significant advances in renewable energy technologies,as well as increased demands for engineers and technicians trained in these areas, requiringinnovative curricula, new courses and laboratories to educate students to work in this rapidlydeveloping industry and to help professionals become acquainted with these new technologies.However, the pace of change in education curriculum is growing exponentially due to legislativechanges, financial or administrative constraints. Engineering education moves into the twentyfirst century charged with an environmental agenda due to response to wider changes in thesociety