Paper ID #10682Utilizing Concept Maps to Improve Engineering Course Curriculum in Teach-ing MechanicsRuben Pierre-Antoine, Stanford University Ruben is a senior undergraduate student at Stanford University studying Management Science & Engi- neering. He joined the Designing Education Lab in the winter of 2013. He has always had a passion for education and enjoys the integration of entrepreneurship into a curriculum. Ruben loves to play sports, videogames, and eat at new restaurants. He also explores entrepreneurship in his free time.Dr. Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor
. Page 13.1168.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Teaching Multi-Body Dynamics in an Undergraduate Curriculum: An Intuitive and Explicit Formalism Based on Parasitic ElementsAbstractTypical undergraduate mechanical engineering curricula in North America do not include acourse in multi-body dynamics. A rigid body dynamics course covering single-body kinetics isusually completed in early semesters, and often the material is not revisited before graduation.Students typically graduate without a sense of how to simulate the forward dynamics of evensimple multi-body systems such as slider-crank or four-bar mechanisms. Engineers should havesome increased depth of understanding in this
development engineer in crashworthiness. He hast taught extensively at both undergraduate and graduate levels in civil and mechanical engineering disciplines. Page 23.356.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 CURRICULUM DESIGN OF STATICS AND DYNAMICS: AN INTEGRATED SCAFFOLDING AND HANDS-ON APPROACHABSTRACT Statics and Dynamics are necessary fundamental components of the engineeringcurriculum for Mechanical Engineering (ME), Civil Engineering (CE), and some otherengineering disciplines. Students typically take these courses at the beginning of their second
have adopted the method forteaching their courses. However, the increased number of exams with the SMART approachcould provide significant stress on students if they are taking several classes that are taught withthe approach. By developing more useful study habits early in their curriculum while taking corecourses, it is hoped that these habits would stick and prove beneficial throughout theirundergraduate career.This paper provides other new instructors with a summary of the basic premise of the SMARTmethod and an example of modifications that allowed it to be successfully adopted in a newcourse.References 1. Prince, M. (2004), “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education, 93: 223-231. doi
is to reinforce and deepen students' knowledge of core subjecttheories in the mechanical engineering (ME) curriculum.Dynamics is not a traditional laboratory subject in the ME curriculum, probably because theanalysis of problems follows deductively from a pair of hypotheses (laws of linear and angularmomentum) which are time honored and well accepted. However, in recent years, there havebeen several efforts to introduce it into the laboratory. Most of these efforts involve themeasurement of one dimensional particle motion (using an accelerometer or LVDT) or planarrotation about a fixed point (using an optical encoder or RVDT).i (See, for example, 2,3,4.)The attempt of this paper is to facilitate experimentation with planar rigid body motion
gyroscope. Thestudents also made several suggestions to improve the lab, including having a graduate studentpresent to help explain the labs, linking the lab to additional homework problems, and providinga summary to clarify what was done in the lab. By implementing some of these suggestions, wehope to see even greater improvements in future quarters.Bibliography1. Tongue, B.H. and Sheppard, S.D. (2005) Dynamics: Analysis and Design of Systems in Motion, John Wiley & Son.2. Meriam, J.L. and Kraige, L.G. (2006) Engineering Mechanics, Volume 2, Dynamics, 6th Edition, John Wiley & Son r.3. Self, B.P. and Redfield, R. (2001) New Approaches in Teaching Undergraduate Dynamics. Proceedings, American Society for Engineering
the Texas A&M University in 1993. His research interests include the mechanics of nanostructures, the dynamic crack propagation in thermoelastic materials, and engineering education. Page 13.84.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 A Problem Centered Approach to DynamicsAbstractWhen teaching dynamics, one of our goals is to expose future engineers to a variety of real-worldproblems and modern engineering tools. Historically, we have done this via example problemsworked in class and homework problems we assign to the students. On the other hand, the theoryassociated with new ideas was
13.845.12Engineering Education, Oct., 2005, pp. 363-371.6. Steif, P.S. and Dollár, A., 2007, “An interactive web-based statics course,” Proceedings of the 2007 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.7. Steif, P.S. and Dollár, A., 2003, “A new approach to teaching and learning Statics,” Proceedings of the 2003American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.8. Dollár, A. and Steif, P.S., 2003, “Learning modules for the Statics classroom,” The International Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol. 22(2), pp. 381-392.9. Paul S. Steif, etal, “Work in Progress: Improving Problem Solving Performance in Statics through Body-CentricTalk”, 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session S2D-1
potential of the available tools throughout all of the formative phases of thecurriculum. Based on evidence from experience, we advocate for a new, consistent approach ofearly and continued exposure to FEA, beginning with the freshmen year, and continuing withsubsequent mechanics courses, in which students can learn and interpret results of FEA, withoutrequiring deep instruction in the underlying FE theory. We further argue that this concurrentFEA usage will improve students‟ understanding of mechanics theory and practice. We hope thatthis paper may provide a foundation and justification for considering the use of professionalsoftware in engineering education.1. IntroductionProfessional quality software for Finite Element Analysis is now routinely
and practitioners.For example, in a sophomore level mechanics course at WKU, engineering students worked inteams to perform a preliminary physical field inspection and analysis of a historic steel trussbridge located in Bowling Green, Kentucky.The focus of the paper is to present the work performed by the students and how the project wasintegrated into the course curriculum where the concepts of engineering mechanics discussed inclass were related directly to the bridge. Students appreciated this approach to learning whichoffers a unique hands-on experience where students actively participate by working in the fieldon an existing structure.I. IntroductionIn recent years, there has been a growing trend in engineering education to include
Paper ID #11389An Innovative Redesign of Statics: Approach and Lessons LearnedDr. Yufeng Hu P.E., Western Michigan University Yufeng Hu is an assistant professor in the Civil and Construction Engineering Department at Western Michigan University. Dr. Hu received his Ph.D. degree in Structural Engineering from University at Buffalo, the State University of New York. Dr. Hu is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of California. He teaches engineering fundamental mechanics, including statics, mechanics of materials, and fluid mechanics.Javier Martin Montefort, Western Michigan UniversityDr. Edmund Tsang, Western
bladder adaptive response, and (iii) understand the fundamental mechanisms that correlate the mechanical environment and the biological process of remodeling in the presence of an outlet obstruction. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Effects of a New Assessment Model on Female and Under-Represented Minority StudentsAbstractIn 2016, Michigan State University developed a new model of classroom education andassessment in their Mechanics of Materials course. This model used a modified masteryapproach that stresses formative assessment, guidance in the problem-solving process, andstructured student reflection. We now refer to this new approach as SMART
, civil, industrial,and aerospace engineering and engineering technology disciplines. It provides a fundamentalunderstanding of the mechanical properties of various materials which makes them useful for amultitude of applications. It also provides an introduction to the analysis of staticallyindeterminate structures which allows more complex problems to be solved than is possible withstatics analysis alone. These important topics are, however, approached in different ways fortraditional engineering, and engineering technology students here at Penn State. The similaritiesand differences in the two courses are addressed in this paper. The paper also explains theimportance of this comparison to the students and the educators in both
. A Multidisciplinary Capstone Teaching Model - An Integrated, Multilevel, Intradisciplinary Engineering Design Approach. in in Proceedings of the 27th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. 1997. Pittsburgh, PA: IEEE.6. Al-Masoud, N. Integrating MATLAB Graphical User Interface in Statics Course. in 2006 ASEE Conference and Exposition. 2006. Chicago, IL: American Society for Engineering Education.7. Harper, B.D., Solving Statics Problems in MATLAB. 2002, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.8. Kraige, L.G. and J.L. Meriam, Engineering Mechanics: Statics. 5 ed. 2002, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.9. Riley, W.F. and L.D. Sturges, Engineering Mechanics: Statics. 2 ed. 1996, New York: John Wiley & Sons
studentsenter disciplinary courses in their junior and senior years, the traditional depth is still present, butit is hoped that the students have a broader view of engineering and are more able to work in themultidisciplinary environment of the engineer of 2020.At the core of any problem in mechanics is a basic solutions approach that is common tothermofluid systems, electrical systems and other systems. The new curriculum emphasizesproblem solving for a variety of systems through the use of conservation and accountingprinciples2. This paper addresses how mechanics topics are threaded through the EAS sequenceof courses, and how mastery of these topics is being assessed in the first semester junior levelmechanics courses.Curriculum ChangesThe sequence
curriculums to be more innovative, integrated and inclusive of “real world”examples1-5. Universities are taking varied approaches in combining courses and presentingmaterial in new formats; the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at VillanovaUniversity (CEEVU) is no different.In 2007, the CEEVU began to look at the mechanics courses as the start of the curriculumrestructuring. Mechanics is at the root of a civil engineering curriculum. Within mechanics Page 14.54.2courses, fundamental concepts are introduced and students learn to solve problems. The toolsdeveloped in these courses are used continually throughout the curriculum. The need
. Implementation of physical labs and virtual labsPhysical labs were performed in teams of 4 students. Each team worked together to complete labactivities and a team lab report. Virtual labs were individual labs and each student was requiredto complete his/her FEA simulation and lab report. Since physical labs are universal forcolleges, we will not describe and explain them in detail in this paper. We will describe andexplain in detail the implementation of the three virtual labs.In the new set of strength labs, virtual labs were the FEA simulation labs. In our school, everystudent is given a laptop in their first semester. In the mechanical engineering curriculum,freshman learns how to use SolidWorks to create 3D models, the mechanical drawing
Spectrum of Active Learning Activities in Engineering Mechanics Keywords: Active learning, hands-on activities, learning styles, Myers-BriggsAbstractThe introduction of active learning exercises into a traditional lecture has been shown to improvestudent learning. Hands-on learning opportunities in labs and projects provide a primaryapproach in the active learning toolbox. This paper presents a series of innovative hands-onactive learning activities for mechanics of materials topics. These activities are based on aMethodology for Developing Hands-on Active Learning Activities, a systematic approach forefficient and effective activity development, and were robustly evaluated at three institutions ofhigher learning. These
provide another avenue for reaching the students 3. Introduce conceptual ideas with physical modeling exercises then reinforce with calculations 4. Infuse statics topics with related strength of materials topics “simultaneously” in the same course 5. Integrate 3-dimensional stability into the curriculum from the start 6. Insist on the same rigor of a traditional engineering courseThe critical change was increasing contact time with the students. The previous engineeringseries consisted of three (3) one-hour lectures with 32 students per section. The new seriesconsists of two courses, Structures I and Structures II. Each course consists of two (2) one-hourlectures plus a 2-hour activity session and a
motivation13, there are still a large number offaculty members who continue to favor “delivering content” using lecture-based approaches.Most faculty development efforts tend to use the “develop-disseminate model” using shortduration workshops. Although some of these efforts have had success4, in most cases they donot result in widespread adoption7. Workshops and presentations at Frontiers in Education andthe American Society for Engineering Education can help make faculty members aware of new Page 24.1020.2practices in engineering education, but the participants in these programs are typically alreadyengaged in pedagogical innovations. Survey data
educate young people to be self-reliant and confident in their abilities and to providemeaningful learning through instructor feedback.ReferencesBeer, F., E.R. Johnston, P. Cornwell, and B. Self. 2015. Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Dankert, J., and H. Dankert. 2011. Technische Mechanik. Statik, Festigkeitslehre, Kinematik/Kinetik: VIEWEG+TEUBNER.Dyer, John W, Theresa M Marks, Chris Ramseyer, James J Sluss, P Simin Pulat, and Kirk Duclaux. 2015. "A semester-long study abroad model for engineering students: The unified project approach." Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015 IEEE.Gross, D., W Hauger, J Schröder, and WA Wall. 2015. Technische Mechanik 3 – Kinetik: Springer
Paper ID #22303Standardizing the Statics Curriculum Across Multiple InstructorsDr. Kimberly B. Demoret P.E., Florida Institute of Technology Kimberly B. Demoret, Ph.D., P.E., teaches Statics and Aerospace Engineering Capstone Design at the Florida Institute of Technology. Prior to joining Florida Tech in 2015, she worked for eight years at Kennedy Space Center on development of launch systems in support of NASA’s space exploration goals. Before that she was a US Air Force officer for 20 years, supporting several aerospace programs as a developmental engineer and manager.Dr. Jennifer Schlegel, Florida Institute of
. As an alternative to experimental labs, the Internet can help schools provide virtualMEMS experiments to their students with a relative low cost. This allows students to work withMEMS simulations without their schools being concerned about maintaining hardware labfacilities. This would help students explore this new MEMS field and it would help developfuture engineers with a better understanding about MEMS. In this research various technologiesfor delivering MEMS content were examined and some of the best alternatives are identified.The following methods have been developed to bring the visual information from high-endsoftware packages to web-based tools. The following conversion methods were developed anddocumented:• ANSYS to Adobe
students do in the follow-on machinedesign course compared to the previous approach used. Page 22.987.13Bibliography1. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2011-2012 Review Cycle, ABET Inc., 111 Market Place, Suite 1050, Baltimore, MD, 21202, http://www.abet.org/forms.shtml.2. Beer, F.P., Johnston, E.R., and DeWolf, J.T., Mechanics of Materials, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2001.3. Beer, F.P. and Johnston, E.R., Mechanics of Materials, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1992.4. Craig, R.R., Mechanics of Materials, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2000.5. Pytel, A. and
process.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to describe the approaches to creating open online mechanicshomework problems by faculty in engineering and physics at three institutions. Very littleresearch has examined strategic approaches to curriculum practices for enhancing Physics andMechanical Engineering in diverse university contexts. We will focus on approaches to problemdifficulty level, usage plans, and development processes. Our research question is: Whatapproaches and strategies toward creating open online mechanics problems are being used, andhow are these approaches and strategies perceived by faculty and student developers?Integral to the primary research question are the following sub-questions (SQs):SQ1. What contextual factors influence the
students with lower levels of resilience. We hold thatresilience is essential to the development and formation of the professional engineers of thefuture. As such, we suggest that finding ways to inculcate professional skills such as resilience,along with the kind of technical skills taught in courses like statics, may help more students tosucceed through engineering degrees, be better prepared to engage with challenges inengineering workplaces, and be adaptable to the changing landscape of global engineeringpractice. In this paper, we describe our first efforts to explore this novel approach towardsupporting student success in core engineering courses.Literature ReviewDefinitionsResilience generally refers to a process of adapting well in the
covered in the course by integrating experiencesusing a FE analysis program, b) provide students with a basic understanding of FE theory, c)provide students with the skill set needed to model and analyze combined load problems using aFE analysis program; and d) provide students with an understanding of how element type, meshsize, support conditions, and other modeling decisions may impact FE analysis results.Previous studies have sought to incorporate FE modeling and analysis content as early as thefreshman year into the engineering curriculum. However, implementing these approaches inStrength of Materials courses often requires students to spend considerable time learning FEtheory before being able to use commercial FEA programs. A few studies
to teach higher-levelundergraduate and graduate courses in engineering curriculum. Examples include but not limitedto courses in structural and materials failure mechanisms [7], renewable energy courses [8], andsenior design mechanical courses [9].However, in PBL approach, student learning is significantly correlated with quality ofimplemented PBL. Students, who are provided with low quality PBL, even show a negativelearning growth [10]. High quality PBL has six criteria, each of which must be at least minimallymet in a project in order for it to be considered high quality. These six criteria are [11]: 1. Projects should not just be “fun activities” or “hands-on experiences”. They should require intellectual effort. 2. Projects
Education Leadership & Management at Harvard Graduate School of Education in 2012 and 2015. At Kettering University, Dr. Alzahabi provided significant and vital institutional and departmental leadership related to curriculum development, improvement, and assessment. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #23734These contributions were critical to Kettering receiving consecutive 6-year accreditationNGR (Next General review) ratings in two ABET reviews visits in 2003 and in 2009.Dr. Alzahabi is a highly recognized educator who won numerous educational awards.They include the ”Educational
Paper ID #21360Can It Work for Us Too? Results from Using West Point’s Fundamentals ofEngineering Mechanics and Design Course Redesign.Dr. Scott R. Hamilton P.E., York College of Pennsylvania Scott Hamilton is the Coordinator for the new Civil Engineering Program at York College of Pennsylvania. He is a registered Professional Engineer and has both a MS and PhD in civil engineering and a Masters in engineering management from Stanford University and a BS from the United States Military Academy, West Point. He is a retired US Army Corps of Engineers officer who has had assignments in the US, Germany, Korea, and Afghanistan