Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Actively Engaging Students

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daria Gerasimova, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University; Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

different needs andpreferences for teaching development. The two profiles were developed through an exploratory study conducted on the first yearof the groups. The data from the second year will be used to conduct a confirmatory study, whichwill verify the profiles and/or potentially identify new ones. We also aim to explore other effortsof group members that are not about their own teaching improvement. For example, somegroups’ work in our project included directions in educational research or department-levelteaching improvement, which may result in additional profiles. We are also interested in howdifferent group composition functions might impact the types and outcomes of participation thatoccur (e.g., including graduate students, the

Conference Session

Educating Students for Professional Success

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert J. Gustafson, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies, New Engineering Educators, Student

AC 2011-231: DETERMINING IMPACT OF A COURSE ON TEACHINGIN ENGINEERINGRobert J. Gustafson, Ohio State University Robert J. Gustafson, P.E., PhD, is Honda Professor for Engineering Education and Director of the Engi- neering Education Innovation Center in the College of Engineering and a Professor of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering at The Ohio State University. He has previously served at Ohio State as As- sociate Dean for Undergraduate Education and Student Services (1999-2008) and Department Chair of Food Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department (1987-1999). After being awarded his PhD. Degree from Michigan State in 1974, he joined the faculty of the Agricultural Engineering Department at

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

M.D. B. Sarder, University of Southern Mississippi

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #10921Improving Student Engagement in Online CoursesDr. MD B. Sarder, University of Southern Mississippi Dr. Sarder is an associate professor and program coordinator of the industrial engineering technology program at the University of Southern Mississippi (USM). He is also an assistant director of the center for logistics, trade and transportation. At the USM, he revamped his program by developing as many as fourteen new courses, implementing hands on experience in courses, and delivering online courses for distant students. Dr. Sarder is very active in engineering and technology education research. He has

Conference Session

Best of NEE

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Diane Carlson Jones Ph.D, University of Washington; Tamara Floyd-Smith, Tuskegee University; Nanette M. Veilleux, Simmons College; Caitlin Hawkinson Wasilewski, Seattle Pacific University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

influenced by faculty behaviors, using methods that involve extensive self-reports by students.15, 16, 17 Our study adds to this literature by using STEM classroom observations in addition to student self-reports to understand these connections between student engagement and faculty behaviors. 4. Instructional modes such as active and problem-based learning are known to impact student engagement.18, 19, 5 In this study, we look not at the impact of interventions on engagement but on the student engagement impacts of what faculty are already doing. 5. Some research has examined the role of informal academic communities (e.g., lab groups, study groups, learning communities) on student engagement.20, 13 This

Conference Session

Educational Research and the New Engineering Educator

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malcolm Drewery, National Academy of Engineering; Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering; Stefani A. Bjorklund

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

manner, and are basedon current and emerging research on student engagement, engineering education, practices ofeffective teaching and learning and engineering learning outcomes. The instruments wereinformed by the development of existing tools, yet the CASEE surveys are innovative in thatthey fill gaps in the assessment of engineering education. We have provided a well-developedresearch plan that has engaged a variety of engineering institutions in the piloting and on goingrefinement of the instruments. Our instruments have the potential to offer powerful formativefeedback for individual engineering colleges and departments, as well to provide nationalbaseline data on engineering education.Study Participants and MethodsMeasuring both student

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade II

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrian Ieta, State University of New York at Oswego; Rachid Manseur, Oswego State University College; Thomas E. Doyle, McMaster University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

success. However, although students accumulate more knowledge in different classes,creativity is not built into most technical courses2. A capstone course comes in much contrast toregular classes as it is supposed to be a peak experience of the undergraduate journey, aiming atdeveloping skills for working in multidisciplinary teams, unleashing technical creativity andimproving communication skills3. The capstone experience integrates theory and practice,providing genuine research experience4 through a hands-on learning process5, and open-endedinterdisciplinary questions. The experimental work to be conducted in capstone projects comesto demonstrate a different side of the neatly arranged theoretical concepts and represents anessential part in

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brock E. Barry, U.S. Military Academy; Maj Jonathan Bodenhamer, U.S. Military Academy, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering; James J O'Brien Jr., American Society of Civil Engineers

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

instruction, the relatively small percentage of communication thatoccurs verbally will primarily stimulate cognitive meanings (cognitive domain) for the student,while the more pervasive nonverbal communication (~93% of all communication) stimulates thestudents’ feelings and attitudes (affective domain) about the material (McCroskey, Richmond, &McCroskey, 2006). Thus, given the potential impact on student learning that nonverbalcommunication has, it would seem important that all instructors be mindful of their personaloutward nonverbal projection, as well as observation of student nonverbal cues.Communication, when done properly, is a two-way interactional process (Suinn, 2006). Thatstatement remains valid in the classroom, where, as instructors

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Brewer, University of Georgia; Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

engineering practice over qualitative and socialaspects; and iii) A ‘production mindset’ that gives precedence to quickly generating a largenumber of engineering professionals to inject into the workforce over recognizing the broadereducational aspirations of students. We argue that the definitions of engineering that emergeacross these conversations do not do justice to the diversity of student experiences of becoming,and wanting to become, an engineer. Based on these findings, we invite universityadministration, faculty, and staff to critically explore implicit messages that are communicated tostudents in order to be able to better respond to the diverse priorities and values students bring totheir education and carry throughout their professional

Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Actively Engaging Students

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samuel J. Dickerson, University of Pittsburgh; Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh; Anita Jain

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

has been working as an undergraduate researcher at the EERC since 2014 and plans to pursue a Master of Engineering degree in Engineering Management at Cornell University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 No Excuses: Use of Simple Active Learning in Electrical and Computer EngineeringAbstractStudent-centered active learning, in which students are called upon to “do” something duringclass beyond listening and note taking, should be used to some degree in STEM courses. Activelearning has a significant positive impact on learning, understanding, and retention ofinformation. Fortunately, active learning can be incorporated into a course in many ways

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Coso Strong, Georgia Institute of Technology; Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel; Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

teaching the core material.”Brian, on the other hand, appreciated the clear expectations and the detailed nature of hisBiochemistry II instructor’s notes: “Was taught by an experienced professor who gave extremely detailed, yet easy to follow, notes during class, and had very clear expectations of what we were supposed to learn by different points in the semester.”In Dynamics, David was impacted by the teaching approach of his instructor and how thematerial was communicated: “The instructor had a wonderful teaching method that both engaged the student, ensured retention of the material, and covered a large volume of material throughout the course.”One-third of the discussions focused on the interpersonal rapport of

Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Actively Engaging Students

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Clifton B. Farnsworth, Brigham Young University; Donna Harp Ziegenfuss, University of Utah; Matthew W. Roberts, Southern Utah University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

presentation strategies forvisual communication, including recommending an increased use of in-class board work (i.e.using the whiteboard or chalkboard) and appropriately using other types of teaching technologies(e.g. presentation software). Participants were also provided an overview of effective classroompresentation strategies for verbal communication, including maintaining a strong vocal presenceand using questioning techniques to enhance student engagement and learning. Similarly,participants were provided a session focusing on understanding the importance of effectivelyusing and reading nonverbal behavior.Another session introduced participants to Lowman’s 2D model of teaching, which suggests thatfaculty can become better teachers by increasing

Conference Session

Research on Diversification & Inclusion

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Lachney, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

Promotional Video: Student Diversity (left) and Economic Competitiveness (right)11In characterizing K-12 engineering programs as operating according to a logic of engagement,we do not mean to suggest that such initiatives are prominent within K-12 educational settings oreven that a majority of university engineering students have participated in such programming.They are on the rise, certainly, but K-12 engineering initiatives still reach only a fraction of K-12students in the US. This limited impact is due to a host of factors, including the historicalexclusion of engineering content from K-12 education as well as lack of earmarked budgeting forsuch programs. Teachers who have the interest, opportunity, and incentive to pursue K-12engineering

Conference Session

Perspectives on Engineering Education During COVID-19

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ziyan Bai, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Shruti Misra, University of Washington; Morgan Anderson, University of Washington, Seattle; Neha Kardam, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #34736Differences in Perceptions of Instructional Support between U.S. andInternational Students Before and During COVID-19Dr. Ziyan Bai, University of Washington Ziyan Bai holds a Ph.D. in educational leadership and policy studies with foci on higher education and mixed-method education sciences. She has over seven years of research and professional experience in the field of higher education. With a dedication to diversity, equity, and inclusion, she is committed to using qualitative and quantitive research to inform impact-driven decisions.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade I

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aly Tawfik, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Janis Terpenny, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Richard Goff, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Process of In-class Activities for Freshmen Can Dramatically Improve LearningAbstractThis paper discusses the impact of using informed instructional design and subsequent deliveryprocesses of classroom activities on learning outcomes in first-year engineering classes. Thepaper shows how minor additions or changes done by the instructor can lead to noticeably betterlearning outcomes, and higher student satisfaction and perception. In this study, learningoutcomes are evaluated by the instructor, while students’ satisfaction and perception is measuredusing direct surveys. Four previously tested and two suggested example hands-on activities arediscussed in the paper. In addition to the activities, the paper also

Conference Session

Perspectives on Engineering Education During COVID-19

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amr Hassan, University of Pittsburgh; Ahmed Dallal, University of Pittsburgh; Mohamed A. S. Zaghloul, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #32480A Survey-Based Study of Students’ Perspective on Different RemoteTeaching Styles During COVID-19Prof. Amr Hassan, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Amr Hassan (also know as Amr Mahmoud) received his B.Sc. degree in Electronics and Electrical Communications Engineering and the M.Sc degree in Engineering Physics from Cairo University, Egypt, in 2011 and 2015, respectively. He earned his PhD in Computer Engineering from the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the University of Pittsburgh, USA. Currently, he is an Assistant Professor with the same department, since August 2019. Dr. Hassan’s primary

Conference Session

Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Pedro E. Arce, Tennessee Technological University; Andrea Arce-Trigatti, Tallahassee Community College; Stephanie Jorgensen; Robby Sanders, Tennessee Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

engaging with the idea of exploring afunding opportunity. Other times, an intriguing Program Solicitation (e.g., NSF), Request forApplications (NIH), Broad Agency Announcement (DOD), Funding Opportunity Announcement(DOE), or another communication piece from funding agencies may aid in the generation of ideasfrom which proposal development coalesces from various seemingly unconnected pieces already inplace within the collaborating team. Ultimately, the pre-proposal submission process iscomplicated, highly non-linear, very interactive, and driven by the continued fuel from ideas byteam members. We argue that such a rich process is, at the same time, navigable and majorlysuccessful due to this driving force centered on teamwork, which requires a

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators 2: Success In and Out of the Classroom

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

David Gau, University of Pittsburgh; Deanna Christine Easley Sinex, University of Pittsburgh; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Steven Abramowitch, University of Pittsburgh; Sylvanus N. Wosu, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

university students as depicted by data from the National Center of EducationStatistics [4].In doctoral programs, the focus is always on research capabilities (particularly at R1 institutions),but professional skills are the elements that separate those who maintain successful academiccareers, and those who are not retained. While many will argue there are challenges faced byanyone, regardless of the representation, it is important to recognize that there are additionalfactors/challenges faced by graduate students of color who are qualified to pursue theseendeavors.Contributing Factors (in addition to competitiveness that may result in small URM pools): 1. Lack of community/sense of belonging/validation of experiences. Academic identity for

Conference Session

Developing New Engineering Educators

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee; Courtney S. Smith-Orr, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University; Alexandra Coso Strong, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Erin McCave, University of Houston

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

having an impact at our institution and in the fieldof engineering education. Initially, having a common goal helped us as we designed the initialstructure of the group and it created the framework for our weekly discussions. On a weeklybasis, having a common goal helps ensure that the time is valuable to all group members byframing our conversations and the areas we seek feedback from the group.5.2. Bring a friendAs previously mentioned, the group formed when four of the members who were also startingnew faculty positions engaged in a community building activity. A subset of these members eachasked another person who was starting a new faculty position to join the group. This helpedmake it so that no one person felt like a total outsider

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade II

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Chalmers, United States Military Academy; Eric Crispino, United States Military Academy; Joseph Hanus, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

student population in each section. The resultsshowed that each instructor had failure rates that did not necessarily relate to teachingexperience. Significantly, one of the seasoned instructors had no identified failures versusanother seasoned instructor had a 12% failure rate. The new instructors had statisticallycomparable results for failure rates. The significant conclusion from Table 1 is that teachingexperience may not necessarily impact the rate of student failure. This is counterintuitive, but isimportant to consider that a well trained teacher is as effective as a seasoned professional. Table 1 - Results of the statistical analysis which identified student failures. Instructor Experience Course Cadet Grade

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven Chene Chetcuti, United States Military Academy; Hans J. Thomas P.E., U.S. Military Academy; Brent J. Pafford, U.S. Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

problem, the authors studied and leveraged what theyconsidered to be the benefits of three major pedagogies, and apply them within the constraints ofthe program. The first pedagogy was that of ‘flipping the classroom’ which has become popularwithin the educational community. In this pedagogical methodology, class work is done at homeand homework is done in the class. This resurgence is due in large part to the popularity andsuccess of online instructional videos by Salman Khan, the founder of the Khan Academy. In theKhan Academy model, students are required to watch video lectures independently and completeexercises to evaluate the students’ understanding of the topic. Once the student achieves masteryof a topic, he or she moves on to the next

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators: Tricks of the Trade II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Claude Villiers, Florida Gulf Coast University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

classes were assigned to the author during four separate semesters as an instructorat The City College of New York (CCNY). Both graduate and undergraduate students wereenrolled in the classes. The classes were structured using various media including PowerPointpresentations and video clips. Each lecture was loaded on to the blackboards, a coursemanagement tool within the university. If done properly, the author believed that the use ofvisual aids would provide the ability to communicate effectively to the students, stimulateclassroom participation, create awareness on how student learn, present exciting and structuredlectures that were well defined, facilitate in depth coverage of the materials, avoid ineffective useof time, appeal to a number of

Conference Session

Perspectives on Engineering Education During COVID-19

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ahmed Dallal, University of Pittsburgh; Mohamed A. S. Zaghloul, University of Pittsburgh; Amr Hassan, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

and computerengineering classes.1. IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected education in different ways. Because of the closure ofuniversities and schools, in-person instructions transitioned to online instruction. Instructors andstudents had to adapt to remote teaching swiftly. Previous studies on distance education haveshown that online teaching requires a different pedagogy and set of skills from that of the in-personclassroom [1], [2]. Educators are faced with new pedagogical issues regarding student interactionsand communications, course content design and delivery, adopting new types of assignments andperformance expectations, and different assessment and evaluation techniques [3]. This new teaching environment urged decisions and

Conference Session

Two Body Solutions: Strategies for the Dual-Career Job Search

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley; Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University; Christopher M Weyant, Drexel University; Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University; Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University; Amber L. Genau, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Kristina M. Wagstrom, University of Connecticut; Daina Briedis, Michigan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing undergraduate education through hands-on learn- ing. As a volunteer for Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honor Society, Luchini-Colbry facilitates interactive seminars on interpersonal communications and problem solving skills for engineering students across the U.S.Dr

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade I

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beverly Kristenson Jaeger, Northeastern University; Kerri Liss, Northeastern University; Bea van den Heuvel; Ellen Wilson, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

benefit and college students are Page 23.1248.4engaged and retained in challenging classroom environments with complex STEM course work. Quality Managers. In previous research conducted at Northeastern University and published inthe paper, “ATLAS - Academic Teaching and Learning Assistants Study: The Use of Peers as‘Quality Managers’ in Engineering Class Instruction,” the role of undergraduate peer teachingassistants was introduced, explored and formally developed.1 This foundational work outlinedthe impact that these Quality Managers have on classroom learning experiences as well as on thequality of written materials used for coursework. The QM

Conference Session

Classroom Strategies – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University; John T. Solomon, Tuskegee University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

to the special section on motivation and efficacy", Journal of Educational Psychology Vol. 82, No. 1, 1990, pp. 3.[8] AMMES, C., and AMES, R., "Research on Motivation in Education. Vol. I, Student Motivation": Londres. Academic Press, 1984.[9] Nicholls, J.G.," Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance", Psychological review Vol. 91, No. 3, 1984, pp. 328.[10] "Engagement Indicators & High-Impact Practices", 2016.[11] Kuh, G.D., National survey of student engagement: The college student report: NSSE technical and norms report: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, 2001.[12] Sandholtz, J.H., Teaching with technology

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Hossein EbrahimNejad, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

work. Irrespectiveof the rigor of the grading system itself and any analyzable data it might generate, he is able to,through his engagement with his students and their work, make decisions that impact what he willdo in class this week to help his students’ learn as well as what he will do to improve the coursenext time it is offered.Quinn is an instructor in a multi-section course. She teaches one of many large sections. Whileactive learning strategies are employed, the size of the section is such that it is difficult to knoweach student. The grading is performed by teaching assistants. Quinn can look at the gradebookfor overall performance on an assignment and might even dig into a bit of student work, but thesection size limits her ability

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer L.W. Carter, Case Western Reserve University; Brian Yuhnke Jr, Case Western Reserve University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

studentsbuild a community of support that they will continue beyond this course. These anecdotal find-ing are consistent with more rigorous statistical studies of student involvement in active learningclassroom spaces.18 As the instructor is also the academic advisor for the sophomore class thatexperienced this active learning environment, she plans to ask students in two years if they thinkthe active learning experience changed how they interact with their peers.The flipped-classroom approach was not successful for this semester. There was marked change Page 24.134.9in student performance on formal assessments, both on the exam on the homework

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators 2: Success In and Out of the Classroom

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Julie P. Martin, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

the practical strategies that transform and sustain inclusive and productive organizations.Alice Pawley[6]’s career vision has also evolved in the years since she wrote her CAREERproposal. 2010 To do innovative, strongly grounded research that helps build engineering education institutions around the lives of diverse students. 2020 To help people, including the engineering education profession, develop a vision of engineering education as more inclusive, engaged, and socially just.There are advantages of writing your career vision beyond your CAREER proposal’s success. Ikeep mine taped on my computer monitor so I can see it every day and let it guide my decisions.When an opportunity arises, I

Conference Session

Classroom Management

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

contexts that are defined by thepursuit of particular objectives. Most teachers believe that no one does exactly what theydo, and therefore decide that they have little in common with other teachers in othersettings or content areas, and what they do has little impact beyond their educationalenclaves. If teachers define themselves only as content or skill experts within somerestricted domain, they effectively cut themselves off from a broader identity as agentsinvolved in helping students shape the world they live in. What is needed to counter thistendency towards isolation is an underlying rationale for college teaching thatacknowledges the importance of specialist curricula, skills and expertise, but at the sametime, would go beyond these to

Conference Session

Assessing Students and Programs

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ron Scozzari, University of Wisconsin, Stout; Jennifer Astwood, University of Wisconsin, Stout

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

communities will value as they strive to achieve a triple bottom line approach.Through the application of an interdisciplinary teaching approach, and a cross-disciplinarylearning environment, students will gain an understanding of environmental, social, andeconomic concerns associated with creating a sustainable future.Multi-disciplinary groups explored and compared cultures, business practices, technologies,design methods, and sustainable products of Scandinavia, creating a profound impact in theirlearning experience.Background.In November, 2007, Ronald Scozzari, from the Engineering and Technology department housedwithin the College of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics and Jennifer Astwood,from the Art and Design department, housed