Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Peter J. Clarke, Florida International University; Mandayam Thirunarayanan, Florida International University; Sai Chaithra Allala, Florida International University; Juan Pablo Sotomayor, Florida International University; Monique S. Ross, Florida International University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

as new evidence-based approaches toteaching become more widespread in the STEM community. Although many of these techniqueshave been gaining traction in most STEM disciplines [1, 2], the rate of adoption in the areas ofComputer Science (CS), Information Technology (IT), and Software Engineering (SE) is less thanexpected [3]. The increasing number of students entering undergraduate programs in CS/IT/SE[4] requires that the introduction of these evidence-based approaches be adopted at a faster rate.This is particularly true for students entering SE programs given that the effective developmentof software applications requires the use of a wide range of skills, including both technical andnon-technical skills [5, 6]. The technical skills needed

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ingrid Buckley, Florida Gulf Coast University; Peter J. Clarke, Florida International University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

interleaved.Advantages: 1. Students had more peer support and could problem solve technical issues with other teams. 2. Students had access to software testing tools and resources. 3. Students received an in-depth understanding of the software product because they were im- plementing it.Challenges: 1. Students struggled with programming-related skills. As a result, too much time was spent on implementing the application. 2. Some team members preferred to avoid the technical work and only contributed to the writing of the reports. 3. Students struggled to meet the statement and branch coverage requirements for testing.Approach 2: Capstone Group Project - with the development and testing phases interleaved.Advantages: 1. Students were

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Venkata Rama Chaitra Thota, University of Cincinnati; Nan Niu, University of Cincinnati; Wentao Wang, University of Cincinnati; Carla C. Purdy, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

Identification.Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-6, June 1993.[15] H. Hoodat and H. Rashidi. Classification and Analysis of Risks in Software Engineering, International Journalof Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, 3(8): 2044-2050, 2009.[16] W.-M. Han. Validating Differential Relationships between Risk Categories and Project Performance asPerceived by Managers. Empirical Software Engineering, 19(6): 1956-1966, December 2014.[17] J. S. Collofello and A. K. Pinkerton. Integrating Risk Management into an Undergraduate SoftwareEngineering Course. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Frontiers in Education, pp. 856-860,Pittsburgh, PA, USA, November 1997.[18] J. D. Herbsleb. Building a Socio-Technical Theory of Coordination

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luis Alberto Rojas Pino, Universidad Andres Bello; Maria Elena Truyol, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile; Juan Felipe Calderón, Universidad Andres Bello

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

learning readiness and project-based learning outcomes: the case of international Masters students in an engineering management course,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 453–465, Aug. 2007.[3] G. Zavala, M. E. Truyol, and A. Dominguez, “Professional development program on active learning for engineering faculty in Chile: First stage,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017, vol. 2017.[4] M. Marques, S. F. Ochoa, M. C. Bastarrica, and F. J. Gutierrez, “Enhancing the Student Learning Experience in Software Engineering Project Courses,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 63–73, Feb. 2018.[5] L. F. Capretz, “Bringing the human factor to software

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Chao Chen, Purdue University, Fort Wayne; Zesheng Chen, Purdue University, Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

questions from these two classes are notstatistically different.Due to the lack of individual responses to the survey questions from the CS survey results, thestatistical analysis regarding the internal consistency and difference between classes cannot beconducted regarding the CS courses. Table 3. Student Slack survey results of Q1-Q4Q1: Slack helps share information such as announcements.Class Participation 1 2 3 4 5 Median Mean SDCS 37200 17 73.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 35.3% 64.7% 5 4.65 0.48ACS 56700 23 85.2% 0.0% 0.0% 13.0% 43.5% 43.5% 4 4.30 0.69ECE 30300 21 95.5% 0.0% 0.0% 23.8

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mourya Reddy Narasareddy Gari, North Dakota State University; Gursimran Singh Walia; Alex David Radermacher, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

andfinished more activities that that of the English version users. Localization played animperative part and affected the excitement of the user to use the learning environment.Negative impacts of GEs: Despite the fact that there is more weight on positive outcomes,there is some negative effect of gamification on students. Barata showed that some studentsdid not find the gamified learning activity engaging and enthusiasm for utilizing the platformdiminished after two or three days [14]. Additionally, Auvinen reported that neither badgesnor heat maps influenced the behavior of majority of the students [3]. Haaranen indicated thatbadges had an exceptionally negative impact on a student that he “died internally” every timehe saw the badges [16].Quality

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cecilia La Place, Arizona State University; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

knowledge was broughtinto and out of a hackathon and did not address the process in which students worked on projects(La Place et al., 2017).MethodsTo extend the previous knowledge transfer work and software development work, we offer thefollowing research questions: 1. What technical knowledge do students use in capstones and hackathons? 2. Where do students learn the knowledge used in capstones and hackathons? 3. How does the software development process used by students differ between capstone and hackathon projects?This is a qualitative pilot study meant to fuel future research on knowledge transfer betweenhackathons and academic experiences. The nature of hackathons often results in participantsdesigning and developing a project

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eli Tilevich, Virginia Tech; Simin Hall, Virginia Tech; Peeratham Techapalokul, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

well.Being the central component of our study, the aforementioned tutorial proved remarkably effec-tive, so we take a closer look at its underlying design principles. To help with designing similareducational interventions, we identify the tutorial’s key principles and explain how they manifestthemselves. We attribute the success of our tutorial to having made careful design decisions basedon systematically researching the problem domain. Specifically, we followed a bottom-up exper-imental design approach, eventually creating a tutorial that provides a real-world context for theintroduced technical subject, while keeping the learners engaged and motivated. The retrospectiveinsights gleaned from the tutorial and its instructional strategies can serve

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Bruce R Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn; Jeffrey J. Yackley, University of Michigan, Dearborn

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

Card Part 4 Process Game The students play a card game [36], which simulates the decision- Models making processes found in the scrum framework.  Teams of 4 complete 3 simulated 3-day sprints.  Each sprint consists of a planning session, 3 daily standups during the days worked, and sprint review.  Teams use a simplified Kanban chart for planning and tracking purposes.  A burndown chart is used to plot velocity during each sprint.Requirements This unit focuses on activities that have teams modeling theModeling

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Priyadarshan A Manohar P.E., Robert Morris University; Peter Y Wu, Robert Morris University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

, Pittsburgh (2003 – 2004) and Assistant Manager (Metallurgy Group), Engineering Research Center, Telco, India (1985 – 1993). He has published over 70 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences including a 2007 Best Pa- per Award by the Manufacturing Division of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), three review papers and three book chapters. He has participated in numerous national and international con- ferences. He is a member of ASM International, TMS, ACerS, AIST, ASEE, and a registered Chartered Professional Engineer. Dr. Manohar’s research interests include mathematical and computer modeling of materials behavior, thermo-mechanical processing of steels and other metallic materials, microstructural

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Hoffman, Quinnipiac University; Stefan C. Christov, Quinnipiac University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

understand that programming is a small componentof the software development process. We also wanted students with solitary programmingexperience to understand that programming is typically a collaborative activity in theprofessional workplace.Students need to learn about and through workplace practice. Novice software developers oftenlearn by performing tasks, such as fixing bugs or implementing a non-critical feature [3]. Thesetasks are done within a community of practice [3,12] where novices learn by contributing to thecommunity’s work and receiving feedback from that community. For example, a novice learnsto be persuasive and technically accurate when explaining to a supervisor how a bug has beenfixed and arguing how it was determined that the

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zesheng Chen, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

people with visual or reading impairment. Moreover, the functionalities must be beneficial and practical for ACPL. (2) Eliminating errors. This project will not be continued by other students in the future. Therefore, the software system must be as bug-free as possible.To overcome these challenges, we apply the Scrum methodology in our project. Moreover, weconsider Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance standards [1] [2] andISO/IEC/IEEE International Standard 23026-2015 [3] in order to make our designed Websitemore accessible by people with disabilities.The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. We first discuss the issues with thetraditional project management method and introduce the Scrum methodology. We

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Walter W Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering; Brad Dennis, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

systems software companies in the Midwest. In addition to one U.S. patent, Schilling has numerous publications in refereed international conferences and other journals. He received the Ohio Space Grant Consortium Doctoral Fellowship and has received awards from the IEEE Southeastern Michigan and IEEE Toledo Sections. He is a member of IEEE, IEEE Computer Society and ASEE. At MSOE, he coordinates courses in computer organization, secure software development practices, network security, software verification, real time systems, and operating systems, as well as teaching embedded systems software development.Dr. Brad Dennis, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Brad Dennis is a new Software Engineering faculty member

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Danielle Marie Fredette, Cedarville University; Nathan Jessurun, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

Intro: The Engineering Design Process Fri, Aug 23 Design CH 2 Professor Project Selection & Needs Identificcation Team meeting Mon, Aug 26 Design CH 3 Professor Requirements Specification Wed, Aug 28 Professor Writing your proposals and requirements Work time, PCB officer designations Fri, Aug 30 Team Meeting meeting Mon, Sep 2 Labor Day Labor Day - No class Wed, Sep 4 Professor Technical Writing Work time. PCB Fri, Sep 6

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bruce R Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn; Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Stein Brunvand, University of Michigan-Dearborn; Marouane Kessentini, University of Michigan-Dearborn

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

Training International, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 381 – 389.12. Davis, C. and Wilcock, E. (2003): Teaching materials using case studies, UK Center for Materials Education, 200313. Kunselman, J.C. and Johnson, K.A., (2004): “Using the Case Method to Facilitate learning”, College Teaching, Vol. 52. No. 3 (Summer 2004).14. Grant, R. (1997): “A claim for the case method in the teaching of geography”, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 171 – 185.15. Manohar, P., Acharya, S., Wu, P., Hansen, M., Ansari, A., and Schilling, W. (2015): “Case Studies for Enhancing Student Engagement and Active Learning in Software V&V Education”, Journal of Education and Learning, Vol. 1, No. 1.16. Nespoli, O. and Lambert, S. (2010

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tamaike Brown, State University of New York at Oswego; Bastian Tenbergen, State University of New York at Oswego

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

systematic justification of engineering choices. Group discussions did not take place during the F2F lectures, as lectures were mostly used for technical explanations and examples. 2. Online synchronous lectures: In the classroom the instructor made use of Zoom to live stream the activities that were taking place face-to-face. One to two students would enter the Zoom meeting space for the first 4 weeks. Occasionally, the instructor would stop and check the chat feature to answer questions ask and to share online students’ ideas. 3. Online asynchronous lectures: This format was made available to students who were not able to attend face-to-face or online synchronous lectures because of limitations

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Kowalec, University of Michigan; Andrew Deorio, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

programming. Our goal inthis paper is to evaluate how different partnership characteristics affect student learningoutcomes.Past work has demonstrated a relationship between programming in partnerships and increasedstudent performance. In 2002, McDowell et al. 1 observed that students who partnered on projectsin an introductory computer science course tended to have higher project performance. In 2005and 2006, Mendes 2 3 found that students who partnered in a second semester computer sciencecourse performed better on individual work and had higher exam scores.Further, Woolley and Chabris et al. 4 , in 2010, found evidence of a collective intelligence factorwhich helps to explain a group’s performance on a variety of tasks. The intelligence factor

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Walter W Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

University of Toledo. He worked for Ford Motor Company and Visteon as an Embedded Software Engineer for several years prior to returning for doctoral work. He has spent time at NASA Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio, and consulted for multiple embedded systems companies in the Midwest. In addition to one U.S. patent, Schilling has numerous publications in refereed international conferences and other journals. He received the Ohio Space Grant Consortium Doctoral Fellowship and has received awards from the IEEE Southeastern Michigan and IEEE Toledo Sections. He is a member of IEEE, IEEE Computer Society and ASEE. At MSOE, he coordinates courses in software quality assurance, software verification, software

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ivan Cabezas, Universidad de San Buenaventura; Eileen Webb, Accreditation Preparation

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

Environment & Development”,Oxford University Press, 1987.[2] United Nations, “UN - Conference on Environment and Development”, [Online]http://www.un.org/geninfo/bp/enviro.html, Accessed January 31, 2019.[3] United Nations, “UN - World Summit on Sustainable Development”, [Online]https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/milesstones/wssd, Accessed January 31, 2019.[4] United Nations, “UN - Sustainable Development Goals”, [Online]hhttps://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/, Accessed January 31, 2019.[5] R. Amri and N. B. B. Saoud, "Towards a Generic Sustainable Software Model," Fourth International Conferenceon Advances in Computing and Communications, pp. 231-234, 2014.[6] M. Dick, S. Naumann, and N. Kuhn, “A model and

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Walter W. Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

record those defects in an appropriate fashion. The student shall demonstrate an ability to implement a class following a 500 design by contract approach. The student shall demonstrate an ability to graphically represent code, 600 design, and requirements analysis. The student demonstrates an ability to understand basic concepts 1100 related to software verification. The student will demonstrate an ability to communicate in a clear and 1200 concise fashion using appropriate technical writing skills. Figure 3: The key measurable concepts for Verification using a Standards Based Grading

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Western Michigan University; Luiz Fernando Capretz P.E., Western University; Sachin Narendra Pardeshi, R.C.Patel Institute of Technology, Shirpur

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

and 2 Years Industry Experience. He has done ME in Computer Engineering. He has 2 years industry experience in Software Testing. He has done ISTQB-FL and Agile certifications.He is authour of 2 books, published by International Publication. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Analyzing unpopularity of software testing careers in Canadian universityIntroduction As software systems are becoming more pervasive, they are also becoming susceptible tofailures, resulting in potentially lethal combinations. There have been catastrophic failures such asAriane 5[1], Therac-25[2], and the UK e-borders project[3], which led to the loss of life and capital.Many similar incidents are happening all

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

contribute to an open-source project, using the skills theywere learning in class. To facilitate this, the author sought out OSS projects that were lookingfor student contributions. Sponsors such as JFreeChart, Sahana, and OpenMRS contributedspecifications for student projects.It was never possible to get outside sponsors for all of the projects needed for the class. By 2011,the class had grown to over 100 students, which meant that 30 to 35 distinct projects wereneeded for each assignment. An outside sponsor would usually provide only about threeprojects. So the slack had to be taken up by internal projects. Several years earlier, we hadopen-sourced our Expertiza peer-assessment system, and we were adding features rapidly. Ourweb-based system had

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Bruce R. Maxim, University of Michigan - Dearborn; Thomas Limbaugh, University of Michigan - Dearborn

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

) “Effect of think-pair-share in a large CS1 class: 83% sustained engagement,” In Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research (ICER '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2013, pp. 137-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.249340823. Nagappan, N.; Williams, L.; Ferzli, M.; Wiebe, E.; Yang, K.; Miller, C.; and Balik, S. (2003) “Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming,” In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2003, pp. 359-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/611892.61200624. Porter, L.; Bouvier, D.; Cutts, Q.; Grissom, S.; Lee, C.; McCartney, R.; Zingaro, D.; and Simon

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Bruce R. Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn; Gail Luera, University of Michigan, Dearborn

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

for learning among students in an undergraduate management degree program", Revista de Gestão, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2018, pp. 160-177.17. James N. Warnock & M. Jean Mohammadi-Aragh (2016) Case study: use of problem-based learning to develop students' technical and professional skills, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 41, No, 2, 2016, pp.142-153,18. Dunlap, J. (2005) “Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession.” Education Technology Research and Development Vol. 53, No.1, 2005, pp. 65–83.19. Urbanic, R. (2011) “Developing design and management skills for senior industrial engineering students.” Journal of Learning Design, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2011

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kyle D. Feuz, Weber State University; Linda DuHadway, Weber State University; Hugo Edilberto Valle, Weber State University; Richard C. Fry, Weber State University; Kim Marie Murphy, Weber State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

Computer Science Course, ​Computer Science Education​, vol. 12:3, pp. 197-212,2002. DOI: ​https://doi.org/10.1076/csed.12.3.197.8618[10] M. Othman, F. Othman, and M. Hussain. "Designing Prototype Model of an OnlineCollaborative Learning System for Introductory Computer Programming Course, Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences 90, pp. 293-302, 2013.[11] M. Othman, N. Zain.. “Online Collaboration for Programming: Assessing Students’Cognitive Abilities. ​Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education​ , 16 (4) , 84-97, 2015.DOI: ​https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.88618[12] M. Muller and F. Padberg. “An empirical study about the feelgood factor in pairprogramming,” in ​Proceedings of International Software Metrics Symposium​, pp. 151–158,Chicago, IL

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Stefan Christov, Quinnipiac University; James Walker, Michigan Technological University; Mark Hoffman, Quinnipiac University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

as the Personnel Manager and Technical Manager roles. • Even with a clear division of responsibilities, three direct managers per TSP team could feel suffocating. • Many students noted that the involvement and usefulness of the managers dropped sharply after initial project planning.To address these issues, the instructor made several changes and applied them during the fall 2020semester. First, the SPM Scrum Master role was dropped (the Technical and Personnel Managerroles were retained) and three supporting roles were created, with each supporting role beingresponsible for 3-4 TSP teams. These new roles were: • Metrics Analyst: Responsible for assisting with scheduling, assigning tasks to developers

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cam Macdonell, MacEwan University; Heidi J.C. Ellis, Western New England University; Darci Burdge, Nassau Community College; Lori Postner, Nassau Community College; Gregory W Hislop, Drexel University (Computing and Informatics)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

spent 18 years working in government and industry, where his efforts included software development and support, technology planning and evaluation, and development and delivery of technical education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Use of HFOSS Projects in the Open Source Day at the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in ComputingAbstractThe Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing is the world’s largest meeting forwomen in technology. The Open Source Day, a hackathon using humanitarian free and opensource software (HFOSS) projects, has been held in conjunction with the conference for the pastseven years. Open Source Day provides an unusal opportunity to

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nusaybah Abu-Mulaweh, Purdue University, West Lafayette; William C. Oakes, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

reflections written by four students working on the same web application. Three themeswith four subthemes emerged from the data 1) how students perceived learning a) technical and b) professional skills, 2) how students perceived they were accomplishing project goals, and 3) the perceived relationship they had with the community partner a) the impact of their project and b) the impact of the community on themselves.This section will focus on unpacking each theme with supported quoted evidence from thereflections.Theme 1: Learning The first theme that emerged involved the perceived knowledge the students were acquiring.The knowledge ranged from technical software skills they learned in order to contribute

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University; Zachary Michael Steudel; Joshua Craig Hunter, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

Paper ID #33764Reverse Software Engineering as a Project-Based Learning ToolMs. Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University CYNTHIA C. FRY is currently a Senior Lecturer of Computer Science at Baylor University. She worked at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center as a Senior Project Engineer, a Crew Training Manager, and the Science Operations Director for STS-46. She was an Engineering Duty Officer in the U.S. Navy (IRR), and worked with the Naval Maritime Intelligence Center as a Scientific/Technical Intelligence Analyst. She was the owner and chief systems engineer for Systems Engineering Services (SES), a computer systems design

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Derek David Riley, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division

unless reuse coordination is emphasizedthroughout the semester, it is easy for young developers to ignore reuse in favor of completingother features or bug fixes.3. SPL courseSoftware engineering is a commonly-required course or pair of courses in many computer scienceprograms, and learning goals for these courses tend to be similar. At UW-Parkside, softwareengineering is taught as a senior-level course sequence over 2 semesters and students are expectedto work on a real-world project to gain practical experience that will prepare them for graduateschool or future careers.The UW-Parkside the courses aim to educate and provide experience for students working as ateam, using various software process models, doing requirements gathering, exercising