Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 1 - 30 of 37 in total
Conference Session
Service Courses for Non-Engineers
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Krupczak, Hope College; David Ollis, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. (2000). American Society for Engineering Education.40. Ollis, David, “Installing A New "Technology Literacy" Course: Trials and Tribulations, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2004). American Society for Engineering Education. .41. Ollis, David., “Technology Literacy: Connecting through Context, Content, and Contraption,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2005). American Society for Engineering Education. < http://www.asee.org/acPapers/2005-1313_Final.pdf >.42. Ollis, David, “Cross-College Collaboration Of Engineering With Industrial Design.” Proceedings of the 2005
Conference Session
Engineering and Technology for Everyone
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Krupczak
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
"Technology Literacy" Course: Trials and Tribulations, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2004). American Society for Engineering Education.44. Ollis, David., “Technology Literacy: Connecting through Context, Content, and Contraption,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2005). American Society for Engineering Education.45. Ollis, David, “Cross-College Collaboration Of Engineering With Industrial Design.” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2005). American Society for Engineering Education.46. Orr, J.A., D. Cyganski, R. Vaz, “A Course in Information Engineering Across the Professions
Conference Session
Service Courses for Non-Engineers
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Krupczak, Hope College; Timothy Simpson, Pennsylvania State University; Vince Bertsch, Santa Rosa Junior College; Kate Disney, Mission College; Elsa Garmire, Dartmouth College; Barbara Oakley, Oakland University; Mary Rose, Ball State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
AC 2008-807: A FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPING COURSES ONENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY FOR NON-ENGINEERSJohn Krupczak, Hope College Professor of EngineeringTimothy Simpson, Pennsylvania State University Professor of Mechanical EngineeringVince Bertsch, Santa Rosa Junior College Professor of Engineering and PhysicsKate Disney, Mission College Engineering InstructorElsa Garmire, Dartmouth College Sydney E. Junkins 1887 Professor of EngineeringBarbara Oakley, Oakland University Associate Professor of EngineeringMary Rose, Ball State University Assistant Professor, Department of Technology Page 13.40.1© American Society for Engineering Education
Conference Session
Installing & Assessing Technology Literacy Courses
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew Ohland, Clemson University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
devicesto related to electromagnetism and create activities to investigate phase change.24 The WesternMichigan engineering-education collaboration led to a partnership in which more advancedengineering and education students designed and built K-12 instructional devices.25The University of Wisconsin-Platteville used support from a BEE grant to offer an experimentalsection of Introduction to Engineering Projects to nine pre-service teachers in secondary- andmiddle-level mathematics education. Introduction to Engineering Projects is a 1-hour classrequired of all first-year engineering students. The researchers aimed to help pre-service teachersacquire content knowledge useful in creating lessons and gaining an insight into the professionthat would
Conference Session
Technology Literacy for Non-Engineers
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Ollis, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
of collaborative effortThe end-of-semester student questionnaire results appear in Table 1. Page 12.54.5 Proceedings of the 2007 American Society of Engineering Education Conference and Exposition Copyright @ 2007 American Society of Engineering EducationTable 1Student Survey Form and Results Summary:Did the lab component enhance achievement of course learning objectives ?________________________________________________________________________This brief survey explores the degree to which the addition of a ‘hands-on” laboratorycomponent to your course, “Spanish for Engineers: Language, Culture, Technology”, hasenhanced the
Conference Session
Teaching Technological Literacy - College Courses and Minors
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Krupczak, Hope College; Mani Mina, Iowa State University; Robert J. Gustafson, Ohio State University; James Young, Rice University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
Page 15.418.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Development of Engineering-Related Minors for Non-Engineering StudentsAbstractMany Americans lack even a rudimentary understanding of the principles underlying thetechnology essential for daily life. Engineering concepts are pervasive in decision making withinindustry, government, education, and health care, yet most decisions in these sectors are made bypeople with little or no formal engineering education. This research will develop minors to beoffered by engineering units as an approach to developing technological competence in non-engineers. A collaboration between Iowa State University, Ohio State University, Hope College,and Rice University is building on the promising
Conference Session
Engineering for Nonengineers: Ideas & Results
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mani Mina, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
. Page 13.897.2For such individuals, a fundamental understanding of the basis and concepts of technology,engineering, and technological developments are essential [3,4]The ProgramThe minor in engineering study at our school started with the main goal to address the need fortraining the non-engineering student to be able to work, collaborate, help, and manage theengineering force. If most of the CEOs, Policy makers, directors, and managers in this countrydo not have engineering education, it makes offer technological appreciation and training tothem. We know that this group will be making vital decision on technological issue.Consequently, our school embarked on a task to offer a minor degree, which is being offered toall non-engineering students
Conference Session
Teaching Technological Literacy - College Courses and Minors
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Austin Talley, University of Texas, Austin; Christina White, Columbia University; Kristin Wood, University of Texas, Austin; Richard Crawford, University of Texas at Austin
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
Page 15.366.7successful collaborative learning situations and improves the opportunity for developingengineering literacy.Scientific Literacies In a world increasingly shaped by science and technology, scientific and technological literacy is a universal requirement…it is vital to improve scientific and technological literacy17.Engineering education and the realization that engineering is an integral part of our dailylives are key components in developing educated persons in the 21st century18. Oureducational systems and curricula must consider new ways to cultivate a broadlyinclusive science and engineering workforce and expand the scientific literacies of allcitizens. One of the ways that this can be achieved is through the
Conference Session
Installing & Assessing Technology Literacy Courses
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Camille George, University of St. Thomas; Elise Amel, University of St. Thomas; Karl Mueller, University of St. Thomas
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A Solar-Powered Decorative Water Fountain Hands-on Build to Expose Engineering Concepts to Non-MajorsA creative replicable hands-on activity is described which introduces the engineering designprocess and exposes undergraduate students to issues of energy sustainability. The activity canbe used in a standard undergraduate science with lab requirement course as offered by physicsor engineering faculty or can be incorporated into an undergraduate engineering curriculum. Afountain metaphor symbolizes the human need for water and energy and is used to sensitize thestudents to the global inequities in water and energy resources. By focusing on a technologicalissue that impacts both the
Conference Session
Technological Literacy - Courses, Educational and Accreditation Standards
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yoojung Chae, Purdue University; Senay Purzer, Purdue University; Monica Cardella, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
their learning experienceas and how to promote students' learning who show giftedness in the Engineering and Technology areas.Senay Purzer, Purdue University Senay Purzer is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is also the Co-Director of Assessment Research for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE). She received a Ph.D. and a M.A in Science Education, Department of Curriculum and Instruction from Arizona State University. Her creative research focuses on collaborative learning, design & decision-making, and the role of engineering self-efficacy on student achievement.Monica Cardella, Purdue University
Conference Session
Technology Literacy for Non-Engineers
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Blake, Austin Peay State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
AC 2007-2594: INTRODUCING ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY TONON-MAJORS: BENEFITS, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES INOFFERING A TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY COURSEJohn Blake, Austin Peay State University Biographical Information JOHN W. BLAKE is an Associate Professor with the Department of Engineering Technology at Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Tennessee. Page 12.963.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Introducing
Conference Session
Technology Literacy for Non-Engineers
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lawrence Whitman, Wichita State University; James Steck, Wichita State University; David Koert, Wichita State University; Larry Paarmann, Wichita State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
AC 2007-710: A CLASS FOR UNDERGRADUATE TECHNICAL LITERACYUSING LEGO MINDSTORMSLawrence Whitman, Wichita State UniversityJames Steck, Wichita State UniversityDavid Koert, Wichita State UniversityLarry Paarmann, Wichita State University Page 12.12.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A CLASS FOR UNDERGRADUATE TECHNICAL LITERACY USING LEGO MINDSTORMSAbstractMuch effort is underway to encourage students to pursue careers in science, technology,engineering, and mathematics. There is a growing base of infusing these necessary skills andattitudes to stimulate the pursuit of these avenues as careers. There is also much effort aimed ataddressing the
Conference Session
Engineering for Nonengineers: Ideas & Results
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Deborah Mechtel, U.S. Naval Academy; Andrew McCue, U.S. Naval Academy; Keith Kintzley, U.S. Naval Academy; Robert Voigt, U.S. Naval Academy
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
AC 2008-1800: BUILDING ENGINEERING LITERATE NON-ENGINEERSDeborah Mechtel, U.S. Naval AcademyAndrew McCue, U.S. Naval AcademyKeith Kintzley, U.S. Naval AcademyRobert Voigt, U.S. Naval Academy Page 13.266.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Building Engineering Literate Non-EngineersAbstractAll students at the United States Naval Academy, regardless of major, must take twoelectrical engineering courses. The course topics include circuit theory, motors,generators, three-phase power distribution systems, communication systems, digital logic,and computer networks. These courses are taught to more than 600 non-engineeringstudents each year. A different
Conference Session
Engineering Courses for Non-engineers
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert J. Gustafson; Bruce Trott, Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
AC 2009-1564: TWO MINORS IN TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY FORNONENGINEERSRobert Gustafson, Ohio State University Director, Engineering Education Innovation Center Honda Professor for Engineering Education College of Engineering Ohio State UniversityBruce Trott, Ohio State University Lecturer College of Engineering Ohio State University Page 14.1286.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Two Minors in Technological Literacy for Non-EngineersAbstractUniversity-wide review of General Education at Ohio State University brought forth the need fortechnological literacy as an insight area within general
Conference Session
Improving Technical Understanding of All Americans
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary Kasarda, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Brenda Brand, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Michael Collver, Montgomery County Public Schools; Gabriel Goldman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
AC 2008-625: THE VIRGINIA TECH FIRST ROBOTICS PROGRAMPARTNERSHIP: TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY THROUGH SELF-EFFICACYMary Kasarda, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBrenda Brand, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityMichael Collver, Montgomery County Public SchoolsGabriel Goldman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Gabe Goldman is a Ph'D candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech Page 13.1282.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 The Virginia Tech FIRST Robotics Program Partnership: Technological Literacy through
Conference Session
Engineering and Technology for Everyone
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Patricia Carlson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
). Transforming middle-school curricula to reflect the new IT literacies of 21st century STEM careers. Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education National Conference, Honolulu, HI, 22 – 25 June.2. Carlson, P. (2008). “PRISM – Teaching STEM Digital Literacies for the 21st Century,” Proceedings, ASEE ILIN Section Conference, 3-5 April.3. Ferguson, E. S. (1977). The mind’s eye: Non-verbal thought in technology. Science, 197 (4306), 827-8364. Ioannou, A., & Hannafin, R. D. (2008). Course management systems: Time for users to get what they need. TechTrends, 52(1), 46-50.5. Morgan, G. (2003). Key findings: Faculty Use of Course Management Systems, Boulder, CO: Educause Center for Applied Research. Retrieved from http
Conference Session
Technological Literacy and K-12 Engineering
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nataliia Perova, Tufts University; Chris Rogers, Tufts University; David Henry Feldman, Tufts University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
AC 2009-2037: INVESTIGATION OF THE SUCCESSFUL EFFORT TO CHANGEEDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM FRAMEWORKS IN MASSACHUSETTS TOINCLUDE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYNataliia Perova, Tufts University Nataliia got her M.S. in Mathematics, Science, Technology and Engineering education from Tufts University in 2008 and M.S. in Electrical Engineering in 2005 from Tufts University and B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Suffolk University. Nataliia is currently a research assistant at Harvard Graduate School of Education where she is involved in the research project on mathematics education. She is also doing research on using engineering approaches to teach science to college students.Chris Rogers, Tufts
Conference Session
Defining Technological Literacy
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Douglass Klein, Union College; Robert Balmer, Union College
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering and a BS degree in Engineering Mathematics from the University of Michigan, and an ScD degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Virginia. He is the author of over 60 articles on a variety of theoretical and experimental engineering topics, and published an Engineering Thermodynamics textbook in 1990. His current research includes engineering education pedagogical research, the study of electrostatic energy generation in moving dielectric materials, and general applications of non-equilibrium thermodynamics. Page 11.893.1
Conference Session
Technological Literacy for K-12 and for Community College Students: Concepts, Assessment, and Courses
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Moshe Barak, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
AC 2010-317: PROMOTING TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY AMONGMATHEMATICS, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TEACHERS: A GRADUATESTUDIES COURSEMoshe Barak, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Page 15.1003.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Promoting Technological Literacy among Mathematics, Science and Technology Teachers: A Graduate Studies CourseAbstractThis paper addresses a graduate course aimed at fostering technological literacy amongK-12 mathematics, science and technology teachers. The course includes: 1) discussingbroad questions, such as what is technology and how technology relates to other fields,for example, mathematics
Conference Session
Technological Literacy for K-12 and for Community College Students: Concepts, Assessment, and Courses
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephen O'Brien, The College of New Jersey
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
AC 2010-2311: TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY IN A K-5 TEACHERPREPARATION PROGRAMStephen O'Brien, The College of New Jersey Page 15.1194.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Technological literacy through a K-5 teacher preparation program IntroductionAttaining a certain level of technological literacy in our society is important for a variety ofreasons. In this extremely technologically-rich age, citizenry will need to participateeffectively in our democratic society on a variety of complex problems; such as globalwarming, energy supply, quick-paced biomedical advances, complicated healthcare reformand statistical-based arguments
Conference Session
Improving Technical Understanding of All Americans
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary Rose, Ball State University; Jim Flowers, Ball State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Technology Assessment: A Graduate Course To Build Decision-Making SkillsAbstractThe decision to adopt and use a technological innovation is often accompanied with a broadrange of undesirable impacts upon the health and welfare of individuals, society, and theenvironment. As innovations become more complex, it becomes increasingly important thatengineers, consumers, and citizens build assessment skills which will enable them to make betterinformed, sound decisions regarding the choice to adopt, use, and dispose of innovations. Foralmost a decade, Technology Use and Assessment, a graduate online course, has providedopportunities for technology educators to develop
Conference Session
Defining Technological Literacy
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Greg Pearson, National Academy of Engineering; David Ollis, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
oversaw NSF-funded work related to making the case for technological literacy (resulting in publication of the 2002 report, Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology) and the NAE/NRC review of technology education content standards developed by the International Technology Education Association. He was staff lead for an internal NAE analysis of engineering ethics issues, a project chaired by NAE member Norm Augustine. He works collaboratively with colleagues within and outside the National Academies on a variety of other projects involving K-12 science, mathematics, technology, and engineering education, and the public understanding of engineering and science. He
Conference Session
Technological Literacy for K-12 and for Community College Students: Concepts, Assessment, and Courses
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Steve Macho, Buffalo State College
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
. Page 15.30.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A functional conceptual framework for teaching technological literacyAbstract This is a presentation of an epistemological framework for teaching technologysuch that it will bring about improved technological literacy in ALL K-12 students.Design, Living, Productivity, and Foundational Technical Concepts anchor ourconceptual framework for teaching technology educators. This conceptual framework forteaching technology literacy is functional, standards based, and can accommodatemultiple pedagogies. It meets the standards of ITEA/CTTE, the New York State Dept ofEd., NCATE, and others. It also aligns with drafts of the NAEP Technological LiteracyAssessment. We have
Conference Session
Installing & Assessing Technology Literacy Courses
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Ollis, North Carolina State University; John Krupczak, Hope College
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
2006-620: TEACHING TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY: AN OPPORTUNITY FORDESIGN FACULTYDavid Ollis, North Carolina State UniversityJohn Krupczak, Hope College John Krupczak is Associate Professor of Engineering at Hope College, and founding chair of the new Technological Literacy Constituent Committee of ASEE Page 11.1228.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Teaching Technological Literacy: An Opportunity for Design Faculty ?Abstract The National Academy of Engineering, the National Science Foundation, andvarious prominent engineering faculty and administrators have
Conference Session
Teaching Technological Literacy - College Courses and Minors
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard Doyle, Penn State University; Richard Devon, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
. Page 15.1184.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Teaching Process for Technological Literacy: The Case of Nanotechnology and Global Open Source PedagogyAbstractIn this paper we propose approaching the concern addressed by the technology literacymovement by using process design rather than product design. Rather than requiring people toknow an impossible amount about technology, we suggest that we can teach process forunderstanding and making decisions about any technology. This process can be applied to newproblems and new contexts that emerge from the continuous innovation and transformation oftechnology markets. Such a process offers a strategy for planning for and abiding the
Conference Session
Technology Literacy for Engineering Students
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Byron Newberry, Baylor University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
as officer and committee member within the Technology & Society Division of that organization. He is also a member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and is a committee member within the IEEE Society for Social Implications of Technology. He is also an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the Society for Philosophy and Technology (SPT), and the Society for History of Technology (SHOT). Dr. Newberry is a registered Professional Engineer in Texas, and spends his summers working as an aircraft structural engineer at L3 Communications, Integrated Systems, an aerospace company located in Waco, TX. He earned a B.S. in
Conference Session
Technology Literacy for Non-Engineers
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Barbara Oakley, Oakland University; Lorenzo Smith, Oakland University; Yin-ping (Daniel) Chang, Oakland University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
Ph.D. degree in 2002 and continues his research as an assistant professor at Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan. His current research interests include vehicle/tire modeling and dynamics analysis, snow/soil/terrain modeling, FEA computational solid mechanics, biomechanics, machine dynamics, machine design, and classical mechanism synthesis and analysis. Page 12.1478.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The Untapped Student GoldmineAbstractMany university programs in the liberal arts, humanities, and sciences depend ongeneral education credits to maintain viability. As a consequence, instructors in theseprograms have often
Conference Session
Engineering and Technology for Everyone
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mani Mina, Iowa State University; Ryan M. Gerdes, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
AC 2009-2456: IMPACT OF ENGINEERING: DESIGNING A CLASS FORTECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY DISCIPLINESMani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Electrical and Computer engineering and is the also the director of Minor in Engineering studies (A technological literacy minor) at Iowa State University. He is an active member of IEEE and ASEE. His research interest include applied EM, RF systems, Optical devices, and engineering education at all levels.Ryan M. Gerdes, Iowa State University Ryan M. Gerdes received a B.S. in computer engineering in 2004, and in 2006 both a B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering, all from Iowa State University. He is currently working towards his
Conference Session
Engineering for Nonengineers: Ideas & Results
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathryn Neeley, University of Virginia; W. Bernard Carlson, University of Virginia; Sarah Pfatteicher, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Bruce Seely, Michigan Technological University; Douglass Klein, Union College; Ronald Miller, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
AC 2008-1732: TECHNOLOGY IN CONTEXT: INTEGRATINGTECHNOLOGICAL "LITERACY" WITH SCIENCE REQUIREMENTS FORNON-MAJORSKathryn Neeley, University of VirginiaW. Bernard Carlson, University of Virginia Chair of Technological Literacy Constituent CommitteeSarah Pfatteicher, University of Wisconsin - Madison Former chair of Liberal Education Division of ASEEBruce Seely, Michigan Technological UniversityDouglass Klein, Union CollegeRonald Miller, Colorado School of Mines Page 13.1190.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Technology in Context: Integrating Technological “Literacy”1 with Science Requirements for Non
Conference Session
Installing & Assessing Technology Literacy Courses
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Krupczak, Hope College; Greg Pearson, National Academy of Engineering; David Ollis, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Technological Literacy Constituent Committee
Tools and Techniques (David Ollis, North Carolina State University) In the spring 2005, NSF sponsored and NAE hosted a faculty workshop on Page 11.243.6Technological Literacy of Undergraduates, attended by about 40 university educators and NSFand NAE personnel4,5. The majority of the participants have developed and taught technologicalliteracy courses in an undergraduate setting. The participants displayed both similarities anddifferences in their approaches to course organization, collaborative teaching and assessmenttools and techniques utilized.Student Learning Objectives Within the context of engineering education, student learning