Paper ID #18490Listening and Negotiation IIDr. Adjo A Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Adjo Amekudzi-Kennedy is Professor and Associate Chair for Global Engineering Leader- ship and Research Development in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Georgia Tech, with responsibilities for managing and expanding the School’s global/leadership education and research programs and impact, and directing the Institute’s Global Engineering Leadership Minor Program. Her research, teaching and professional activities focus on civil infrastructure decision making to promote sustainable
Program during her senior year at Northeastern. She is currently a graduate student at the University of Michigan.Allison Interrante, Northeastern University Allison Interrante is a student in Civil and Environmental Engineering in the College of Engineering at Northeastern University. She has been involved in the Connections Physics Review Program for the past two years as a student-teacher. She plans to continue her studies as a graduate student in Civil Engineering.Sara Wadia-Fascetti, Northeastern University Sara Wadia-Fascetti is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at Northeastern University where she is actively involved in a research program on structural condition assessment
, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on an NSF faculty development program based on evidence-based teaching practices. The overall goal is to develop dis- ciplinary communities of practice across the college of engineering. The approach is being promoted through semester-long faculty workshops and then through a semester of supported implementation of faculty classroom innovations. Changes in faculty beliefs and classroom practice should positively im- pact
professors fromanother discipline on a National Science Foundation (NSF) research project. The teaching andadvising roles are to (a) advise graduate students to help them find an advisor, (b) sponsor adiscipline specific student club, and (c) develop a new interdisciplinary course.As noted, three versions of the ARTALA have been developed – for engineering, biology, andphysics. Hereafter, the three versions are referred to as ARTALA-E (engineering), ARTALA-B(biology), and ARTALA-P (physics). Each ARTALA is contextualized per discipline. Forillustration, the tasks from ARTALA-B are provided in Table 1.Table 1. Tasks and Corresponding Domains from ARTALA-B (biology) Task Domain Act as
theory of self-authorship3 will be introduced as the theoreticalframework for looking at the individual through the lenses of context and institution, as well asthe larger cultural paradigm. Next, the methodological framework informing the research designand the research design and methods used throughout this study will be offered. Finally, theresearch findings of identity development and formation of females who have persisted inundergraduate engineering programs and how this impacts their professional choices will bediscussed.Literature ReviewResearch reflects increased enrollments of females in STEM majors; for example, women makeup the majority of those studying the physical and life sciences (57%). Yet the proportion ofSTEM major females
. Atkin, A. M.; R. Green and L. McLaughlin, (2002) “Patching the Leaky Pipeline,” Journal of College Science Teaching, 32(2):102-108.11. Nelson, D. (2007) “A National Analysis of Minorities in Science and Engineering Faculties at Research Universities,” October 31, 2007. http://cheminfo.ou.edu/~djn/diversity/Faculty_Tables_FY07/FinalReport07.html12. U.S. Department of Education (2003) “The Condition of Education, 2002,” National Center for Education Statistics, Washington D.C., USA.13. National Science Foundation (2007) “Science and Engineering Degrees: 1966-2004,” Division of Science Resources Statistics, January 2007, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf07307/content.cfm?pub_id=3634&id=214. Blum, L
activities, career seminars, and other program features, theserising seniors learn what engineers do and how engineering improves people’s lives. Pre- andpost-program surveys indicate participant interest in engineering as a field of study and careerchoice builds substantially as a result of the program: 64% of the participants report increasedinterest in the field. LITE’s impact on high school girls is significant, to be sure. We have alsofound that the LITE Program benefits everyone involved in the program: mentors, faculty, andthe University. Student mentors report renewed commitment to engineering. All of themdescribe their mentoring experience as personally “rewarding” and “fulfilling.” Faculty reportincreased satisfaction with teaching. And
professionalnetworks for students and faculty, engaged the local community in the University, andintroduced students to a broad range of topics in biomedical research from engineering,chemistry, physics, translational medicine, basic biology, sports medicine, and even the arts.The seminar series to date has served as a model at the University for creating a regulardialog among students and faculty on the topic of biomedical research and spurred thegeneration of weekly seminars in a variety of other departments across campus. From thefoundation of the series, the organization of these events has allowed the current organizers,two tenure-track female professors, to take on a leadership role, promote their research withinthe University and with the guest
teacher for 2009-2010. She received the WEPAN Engineering Educator Award 2009, ASEE Minorities Award 2006, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and the National En- gineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. Her awards are based on her mentoring of students, especially women and underrepresented minority students, and her research in the areas of re- cruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Ms. Anita Grierson, Arizona State University Anita Grierson, AZ State University ANITA E. GRIERSON is the Director of the METS Center in
iSTEM Dr. Dagley works to promote and enhance collaborative efforts on STEM education and research by bringing together colleges, centers, and institutes on campus, as well as other stakeholders with similar interest in STEM initiatives. Her research interests lie in the areas of student access to edu- cation, sense of community, retention, first-year experience, living-learning communities, and persistence to graduation for students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics programs.Dr. Nirmala Ramlakhan, Nee-Moh, Inc Situated in the unique space straddling both academia and industry, Dr. Ramlakhan uses her 13 years of experience in education, workforce and career development to drive STEM agendas. Currently
scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship be- tween educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co-developer of the Re- formed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 1500 times and his publications have been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Prof. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen
AC 2012-3203: ENGINEERING STUDENT INVOLVEMENTDr. Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame Kerry L. Meyers is a professional faculty member in the College of Engineering at Notre Dame and an instructor and coordinator in the First-year Engineering program, and she is also involved with students at a variety of levels, including a graduate student teaching apprentice program, an undergraduate peer men- toring program, and STEM outreach (Expanding Your Horizon’s program). She has a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Purdue University, M.S. in mechanical engineering from Oakland University, and com- pleted her Ph.D. in engineering education at Purdue University. Meyers has several years of industrial experience in
research questions: RQ1: What do female associate and full professors in engineering say were key factors of support within the institutions they have worked that contributed to their achieving tenure? 1a. Mentoring 1b. Institutional policies/processes (i.e. family-friendly policies, tenure policies, hiring policies, teaching and service policies) 1c. Other factors of support RQ2: For female associate and full professors in engineering, what were key challenges within the institutions they have worked that they had to overcome to achieve tenure? 2a. Gender bias 2b. Balancing demands of work with family 2c. Institutional policies/processes 2d. “Dual career” problems
disciplines.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as those pertaining to sustainability. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Exploring Barriers in the Engineering Workplace: Hostile, Unsupportive, and otherwise Chilly ConditionsAbstractPrevious studies of the engineering workplace often emphasize understanding why and
, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) programs in which they areunderrepresented. Models typically fall into one of two categories—parallel support programsfor women that exist separately from a STEM department and projects that attempt to enactinstitutional change by working through the STEM departments themselves—with some overlapoccurring between the two. Parallel support programs often offer support to female STEMstudents throughout their time in a college or university STEM program by providing servicessuch as mentoring, female-specific study groups, academic counseling, residential halls forfemale STEM students, additional research opportunities, summer bridge courses on basic skills,and/or events for the female STEM student
Journal cover (2008). She is an ac- tive mentor of undergraduate researchers and served as co-PI on an NSF REU site. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activi- ties in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne has been an active member of ASEE’s WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams since 2003 and during this time has contributed to numerous ASEE conference proceedings articles and educational journal publications.Babs Carryer, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA) Babs Carryer is director of faculty development and
degrees in Educational Psychology, Industrial Relations, and Organizational Leadership. She is a published author of several articles and two books.Ronald J. Bennett, Univeristy of Saint Thomas RONALD J. BENNETT PhD is Honeywell Fellow in Global Technology Management in the School of Engineering at the University of St. Thomas after having served as the Founding Dean. He holds a Ph.D. in Metallurgical Engineering and an MBA. With a background of more than 20 years in industry, Bennett teaches and publishes on diverse topics including materials engineering, technical innovation, technology transfer, leadership and engineering education. He is an EAC of ABET commissioner for SME
ID #17793 Michael N. Geselowitz is the senior director of the IEEE History Center, a joint program of IEEE Inc. and Stevens Institute of Technology. Through this arrangement, he is also industry associate professor of the history of technology at Stevens Geselowitz holds B.S. degrees in electrical engineering and in anthropology from the Massachusetts In- stitute of Technology, and M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in anthropology from Harvard University. His focus has been on the role of history and social relations of engineering and technology at all levels. He has worked as an electronics engineer for the Department of Defense and held teaching and research posi- tions relating to the social study of technology at
issues raised anddiscussed. A number of these are discussed below.In focusing on the influences impacting girls’ perceptions of engineering and applied sciencethe analysis identified two major underpinning factors: Educational; and Socio-Professional.Each one of these is now discussed in turn. - Educational FactorsIn planning how the interviews should be conducted the two teenage researchers reflectedupon their personal experiences of making the transition from Primary to SecondaryEducation. In particular, it was apparent that the way in which the girls were taught mathsand science at Primary School differed significantly to the learning and teaching approachesthey were later exposed to during High School. In keeping with the participatory
Paper ID #18595Women Building the US STEM PipelineDr. Christina L. Carmen, University of Alabama, Huntsville Dr. Carmen obtained a Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering degree as well as a Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, GA. While at Ga. Tech she worked with Dr. Warren Strahle, researching solid propellants. She obtained a Doctor of Philos- ophy in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) with a focus upon turbulent combustion modeling. Dr. Carmen is the capstone design class coordinator in the Mechanical and Aerospace
Paper ID #29896Dance-A-Bit: Integrating Dance with Teaching Algorithmic ThinkingMs. Litany H Lineberry, Mississippi State University Lineberry is currently a Ph.D. student in Engineering with a concentration in Engineering Education at MSU with a research focus in cybersecurity education. She received her MS in CS with a concentration in Information Assurance from North Carolina A&T University. Her BS in CS was received from Voorhees College. Previously, Lineberry was Area Coordinator and an Instructor in CS at Voorhees.Dr. Sarah B. Lee, Mississippi State University Sarah Lee joined the faculty at Mississippi State
. Albrecht is Coordinator/Counselor of Student Support Services Federal TRIO Programs at Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). She holds a Masters Degree in Guidance and Counseling and a Bachelors Degree in Home Economics Education. She is a licensed professional counselor and has 18 years of experience working with low-income, first generation and disabled students who are enrolled at MSOE. She also teaches Orientation classes and a variety of Psychology classes in the General Studies Department.Stephen Williams, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Stephen Williams is Program Director of Electrical Engineering and Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the
who join major-related student groups, are both more likely to persist in STEM. This driveshome the importance of peer relationships for women in STEM fields.Marra and her collaborators10, 11 looked at retention best practices in a large representativesample of engineering schools, and also found that women and men need somewhat differenteducational environment characteristics in order to be successful, in part because of theirsocialization12. Women place more emphasis on group affiliation, community, and collaborationthan men do13, 14.Research also shows that women are more likely than men to report that teaching styles, subjectmatter relevance, and the culture of the discipline affect their retention and eventual completionof the degree15
AC 2011-2124: WOMEN AND ALANA STUDENTS’ RETENTION ANDPROGRESS TOWARDS STEM DEGREES AT A PREDOMINANTLY LIB-ERAL ARTS INSTITUTIONSuzanne Keilson, Loyola University Maryland Suzanne Keilson currently serves as Associate Dean of Loyola College of Arts and Sciences at Loyola University Maryland. She is a member of the Engineering Department where she teaches courses in Introduction to Engineering, Signal Processing, and Electric and Magnetic Properties of Materials. Her research interests include auditory signal processing, universal and sustainable design, design education and STEM education especially for underrepresented groups. She has a Ph.D. in Applied Physics from Columbia University, New York.IRAH MODRY-CARON
AC 2011-335: USING AN EXTENSION SERVICES MODEL TO INCREASEGENDER EQUITY IN ENGINEERINGElizabeth T. Cady, National Academy of Engineering Elizabeth T. Cady is a Program Officer at the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education of the National Academy of Engineering in Washington, DC.Norman L. Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering (Washington) Dr. Norman L. Fortenberry is the founding Director of the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) at the National Academy of Engineering (NAE). CASEE facilitates research on and deployment of, innovative policies, practices, and tools designed to enhance the effective- ness and efficiency of systems for the formal
Education brought the broader and long-term institutional perspective.The Gordon Engineering Leadership Program brought expertise in teaching leadership.The objective of ReDI is to strengthen the base of future leaders for large research groups andresearch centers, particularly large multi institutional centers. The ReDI leadership program wasdeveloped using leadership theory and descriptions of first-hand experience gathered throughconversations with experienced center directors, research leaders, department chairs, and deans.Curriculum was adapted from the Gordon Engineering Leadership program and specific modelsfrom experts in leadership theory, negotiation, and communication. A focus group comprised ofassociate deans of faculty affairs and
AC 2011-2091: EXPLODING PIPELINES: MYTHOLOGICAL METAPHORSSTRUCTURING DIVERSITY-ORIENTED ENGINEERING EDUCATIONRESEARCH AGENDASAlice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Alice L. Pawley is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s Studies Program at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a Ph.D. minor in Women’s Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is Co-PI and Research Director of Purdue University’s ADVANCE program, and PI on the Assessing Sustainability Knowledge project. She runs the Research in Feminist
boards of the Community College Journal of Research and Practice and NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, as well as is the Technology Editor for Community College Enterprise. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Lowman’s 2D Model of Effective College Teaching: Justifying the Need for Faculty DiversityIntroductionAccording to the National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and EngineeringStatistics (NSF, NCSES, 2015), women represent 50.2% of the US Resident population, 12.9%of the engineering workforce, and 24.7% of the mathematics and computer science work force in2015. The percentage of employed females, ages 16-75, in science and engineering
Bureau of Labor Statistics published in 2000, theten fastest growing jobs through 2010 are in the technology and medical fields, with eight of theten in the STEM fields, i.e., Systems Analyst, Database Administrator, Desktop Publisher,Network Systems and Data Communications Analyst, Network and Systems Administrator,Systems Software Engineer, Support Specialist, Software Application Engineers.Concurrently, the Hawaii Department of Labor and Industrial Relations reported in 2002, thatthree of the top ten fastest growing Hawaii jobs from 2000 to 2010 will be in InformationTechnology. The State is also experiencing an expansion in the hi-tech sector with manyemerging companies employing Info Tech professionals and Engineers, involved with Research
includeddeveloping new cybersecurity learning modules, teaching foundational principles using malware,or wireless sniffing using autonomous drones. Every project is open to and welcomes anycurious student willing to participate in the research — from freshman to graduate. Many womenare not aware of what a career in cybersecurity can lead to or all the possibilities it holds, hencepromoting this information is an excellent recruitment strategy.By utilizing these 3 phases, it was hoped that recruitment and retention would be increased andheld until the ideal environment could be formed.FindingsThe methods the CSRL has utilized in the recruitment process are word of mouth, social events,major or career fairs, and physical advertisement. These recruitment