graduate student in Engineering because of her research work. Her Research work is related to last year internship in Northrop Grumman Ship Systems in Ocean Springs, MS. During that time, Yamilka was a link in a pilot project between the university and the company in where she apply what she learned in class and research at MSU, to the real shipboard power systems problems in the company. Her work is going to continue this summer, when she goes back to Northrop Grumman for second consecutive year as a summer intern. She is an active student in research, courses and extracurricular activities, especially sports. Some research interests include control techniques and the application in power systems
University in the Industrial and Man- ufacturing Systems Engineering Department. He graduated in 1999 from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a PhD. in Industrial Engineering in the Human Factors Program. His research interests focus on human factors, human-computer interaction, and adaptive systems that enable people to be effective in the complex and often stressful environments found in aviation, military, robotic, and space applications. His teaching methods include team projects and the application of team-based learning methods into the classroom.Cassandra DoriusJane Rongerude PhD, Department of Community and Regional Planning, Iowa State University Jane Rongerude is an assistant professor in the
science courses with content only 10% to Hispanics/Latinos [5]—these numbers are farrelated to biology, (2) cohorts of students that progress lower than one would expect based on these groups’ sharethrough the program together, and (3) a small group peer of the population. Indeed, today CS remains one of thementoring environment, and (4) facilitated least diverse STEM disciplines. In addition to signaling ainterdisciplinary research projects. Graduates from this substantial problem with educational equity [6], societyprogram, referred to as "PINC" - Promoting INclusivity in has increasingly come to realize that this lack of diversityComputing - will receive a
-analysis of intergroup contact studies that encounterswith minority groups can lessen prejudice and that it does so via three separate mechanisms: byincreasing knowledge about the group, by reducing anxiety, and by increasing empathy. Whilethey found all three to be important actors in reducing prejudice, the last two, affective aspects,were more important. It is important that whatever pedagogy and curriculum we develop, weconsider and tend to students’ hearts as well as their minds.Placement in CurriculumThe task before us is to identify where to place diversity education in the engineering curriculum.The research suggests that sustained experiences that are integrated with the wider curriculumare more effective. Incorporating significant
are discussedThe “Science of Team Science (SciTS)” is emerging as a research area to explore how large-scale research (initiated in the medical research context) endeavors can be best accomplishedacross multiple institutions and potentially hundreds of colleagues 1–3. The Science of TeamScience literature has high value in studying collaborations in engineering and particularly theways in which students learn to become collaborative members of their research teams. SciTSfindings have only recently been introduced in an engineering and graduate engineering studenteducational context 3. Most of these studies promote competency- or logistical- bases forsuccess: that by having the right conditions for success, all teams will be able to be
in this endeavor. Not all graduate programs include such acourse. NDSU’s Computer Science M.S. and Ph.D. programs do not have a requirement forsuch a course (nor is a course with this explicit topic offered as an elective). NDSU’s SoftwareEngineering M.S. and Ph.D. programs do offer an empirical methods course; however, thiscovers only a subset of the research methods that students might choose to use in a study ofsoftware engineering (or computing, more generally).Textbooks for research methods instruction, in the computing fields, exist specifically for humancomputer interaction [14] and cybersecurity [15]. There are also a wide variety of general-purpose research methods books that could be utilized for at least part of the requisite
micro-robotics. He is currently working on the locomotion of micro-robots with micro-sensors and actuators, and on artificial muscles using electroactive polymers. Page 25.608.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Experience Teaching a Graduate Research Methods CourseThe Research Methods course is designed for dual-degree mechanical engineering studentswishing to change from a non-thesis, course only, Bachelor of Science/Master of Engineering(BS/MEng) program to a research-based Bachelor of Science/ Master of Science (BS/MS)program where a thesis is required. The course
further approvals from the Provostand University president who then forwarded it to the state’s coordinating board for highereducation. Because of the substantial rationale and evidence that was presented there were noissues raised once the proposal was approved by the Graduate School.Professional Doctorate Program DescriptionThe resulting degree, i.e., the Doctor of Technology, will be awarded pursuant to successfulcompletion of a three-year program of study and an industry-relevant dissertation based onapplied research, i.e., use-inspired, technology-focused research. With all approvals in hand,the developing team then turned their attention to finalizing the specific features of thedegree. The program builds upon the knowledge and skills
. We also acknowledge the word “Research” has different implications in differentdisciplines. The worksheets are designed to be assist with the selection and filtering of ideas.Future implementations of the worksheet method will give students the option to seek feedbackfrom their research mentors as they complete the worksheets. Finally, we are preparing acomparative study among different cohorts to evaluate the perceived value of the worksheetsover time and determine at what point they are most effective.ConclusionThe design activity worksheets were introduced and implemented in a graduate level researchseminar to guide students through the process of identifying research topics, identifying aproblem to be addressed by their work and clearly
AC 2012-4156: STRATEGIC USE OF SUMMER UNDERGRADUATE RE-SEARCH EXPERIENCESMr. Matthew Pariyothorn, Texas A&M University Matthew Pariyothorn currently serves as the Program Coordinator for graduate studies and recruitment for the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. In his position he encourages un- dergraduates to pursue graduate education and promotes engineering graduate degree programs at various recruiting events. He also coordinates summer research experiences for high-achieving undergraduates (USRG and NSF-REU) and high school math and science teachers (NSF-RET). Pariyothorn also assists with graduate academic affairs and advising issues in the college. In addition to recruitment
Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) have been strongly supported throughthe National Science Foundation as a way to increase the number of students engaged with researchand potentially attend graduate school. This qualitative study examines the impact of a creativity-focused REU program in biomedical engineering on students’ conceptions of research and itsrelationship to the creative process. In addition, this study examines how faculty incorporateconcepts of the creative process in their work with the REU students. Results of the study showthat after participating in the program, students were likely to have a conception of research thatwas broader and more cyclical. Results also suggest that students recognize the connectionbetween research and
between gender and/or ethno-racial identity and the stereotype ofengineering as a field appropriate for white males can impede the development of STEM identities amongwomen and minorities. With the increasing importance of innovation, students who pursue engineering graduate degreesoften seek to build skills in conducting research (Brown and Linden, 2008). The social psychologicalconstruct of identity has emerged as a relatively new metric for assessing graduate student retention andsuccess. Studies suggest that graduate students’ identities correlate with their competency levels as wellas their professional and academic motivation (Alexander, 2011; Silver, Garver, and Watkins, 2011;Virgil, 2016). Importantly however, the literature
graduate studies using a survey was administered to thestudents. The students agreed that the research experience developed their scientific researchskills and their data collection, documentation and dissemination abilities and taught them thelogic of an engineering conference and journal articles. They also reported that the researchexperience in general served as an introduction/orientation for what to be expected at thegraduate level research, and that it was an excellent motivation for directing them towardgraduate school. They also felt that the research training and preparation were not encountered inother engineering courses.1. Introduction Recent trends point at the continued decline of the number of students attending graduateschools
President, Dr. Stephanie Adams,highlighted this issue, making graduate education a key initiative for ASEE in 2019 [5].Published studies of students in engineering doctoral programs in relation to professionaldevelopment tend to focus on the research experiences [6, 7] with an emphasis on theknowledge, skills, and abilities gained or on how students’ research skills change over time [8].However, the important question of how effectively the research experiences of engineeringPh.D. students prepare them for professional practice remains largely unanswered. In order tostrengthen the quality of research on engineering Ph.D. students are being prepared forprofessional practice, there is a need for high-quality assessments designed and
undergraduate education through hands- on learning. Luchini-Colbry is also the Director of the Engineering Futures Program of Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honor Society, which provides interactive seminars on interpersonal communications and problem solving skills for engineering students across the U.S.Ms. Mary Anne Walker, Michigan State University Mary Anne Walker serves as the Director of Global Engineering at Michigan State University. She has been working in the field of international development, research, education and training for 30 years. Mary Anne did her undergraduate work at Northeastern University (Comparative Int’l Politics) studied abroad through London School of Economics & Kings College with graduate
dissertation on transit network design and analysis. Page 26.604.1 He is currently a member of TRB Automated Transit Systems committee and associate editor of Korea Society of Civil Engineering Journal of Transportation Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Engaging Engineering Graduate Students in Applied Research at Morgan State University Page 26.604.2 Abstract Graduate study provides a passion and a pathway for students to pursue
services, residential life/housing, and undergraduate research. He has presented at academic and professional conferences in Canada, China, the U.K., and the U.S. Robert consults regularly with government agencies, policy centers, and postsecondary institutions in the U.S. and Canada. Robert holds a B.A. in Canadian Studies from the University of Vermont, a, M.A. in History from the University of Maine, and an M.P.A. (Public Administration) from the University of New Hampshire.Dr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A
thatdiffered in a variety of characteristics, including time in their graduate program, focus withinmaterials science engineering, and level of experience with independent laboratory research.Senior graduate students were responsible for facilitating an interdisciplinary research projectand delegating research work tasks to teams of other students. We present findings from a mixedmethods study which evaluates individual and team successes in collaborative multi-institutionaland interdisciplinary research. Implications of this work include helping programs developcompetencies for their graduate students that include “team science” and collaborative skills.I. IntroductionTo solve complex, ill-structured engineering and science problems in an
AC 2008-555: GRADUATE LEARNING THROUGH RESEARCH: HUMAN HANDTREMOR DETECTION AND ANALYSISBrant Price, Western Carolina UniversityJames Zhang, Western Carolina University Page 13.651.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Graduate Learning through Research: Human Hand Tremor Detection and Analysis Brant T. Price, James Z. Zhang Department of Engineering and Technology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723Abstract:Human tremors can impair any daily activity, including something as simple as signingchecks or eating food. Formally defined, human tremors are a rhythmic
Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The Engineering Institute – A Collaborative Graduate Education and Research ProgramAbstractLos Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and the University of California, San Diego (UCSD)have taken the unprecedented step of creating a collaborative, multi-disciplinary graduateeducation program and associated research agenda called the Engineering Institute. Thetechnology thrust of the Engineering Institute is damage prognosis, a multidisciplinaryengineering science concerned with assessing the current condition and predicting the remaininglife of a wide variety of structural systems. The mission of the Engineering Institute is todevelop a comprehensive approach for
types of graduatestudents must be understood. Unfortunately, graduate-level research deficiencies are citedsporadically in literature and are often studied using anecdotal data, so many deficienciesexisting globally have not been resolved definitively. Despite the lack of documented findings,we discovered much about student research proficiency in our environmental engineeringgraduate program through sustained student assessment.Academic preparation to perform research, organization in executing research, and researchprogress are general metrics we used to quantify research proficiency in two assessment studies.Analysis of more-specific variables indicated significant research deficiencies for a large numberof students assessed. Variances in
ResearchersAbstractThe future of engineering education research will depend on collaborations among educators,researchers, and students. Participation in research collaborations helps graduate students withinthe engineering education community gain an understanding of the challenges of such endeavorsas well as various ways of overcoming those challenges. Over the course of their program,engineering education graduate students will collaborate with a variety of people, includingfaculty members, members of industry, and, in some cases, their fellow students. Researchcollaborations among graduate students provide a means to diversify interests, develop researchskills, build relationships, and advance engineering education research.The purpose of this study was to
Page 24.1234.2with undergraduate researchers detracts from their own scholarship.The study described here is a preliminary effort to understand the experiences, attitudes andbehaviors of undergraduate research mentors at Michigan State University (MSU). By gatheringinformation about mentors’ preparation, interactions with students, and attitudes about workingwith undergraduates, we hoped to better understand the needs of graduate students and facultymembers serving in mentoring roles.Survey Instruments and MethodologyMSU has a large population of undergraduate researchers, and for several years has conducted anannual survey of students’ experiences, expectations and outcomes in research. Informalfeedback has been collected from faculty
Paper ID #38964Research on Governance of Higher Engineering Education Quality in Chinaafter Accessing the Washington AccordDr. Ming Li, Beijing Foreign Studies University Dr. Ming Li is an assistant professor at the Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies Univer- sity, Beijing, China. He received his PhD in Administration at the Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics. From March 2013 to June 2013, he visited the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University as a visiting scholar. He ever worked as a post-doctor at the Institute of Education, Tsinghua University from 2016 to 2018. His research
Engineering curriculum. Page 12.791.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Graduate / Undergraduate Teaming of ECET Students for Applied Research via Senior Projects Robert Adams, James Z. Zhang, Ken Burbank Kimmel School of Construction Management, Engineering and Technology Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723AbstractIn this paper, a method for mentoring undergraduates for future graduate study is presented.We introduce a teaming approach whereby undergraduates are teamed with graduate studentsin joint projects. The teaming approach prepares undergraduate
organic particulates. Page 14.872.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Measuring the Impact of Undergraduate Research Programs on Engineering Students’ Attitudes toward Graduate StudiesAbstractAttitudes toward graduate studies are an often overlooked, but potentially important factor inundergraduate engineering students’ decisions of whether or not to pursue graduate studies inengineering. Graduate work, especially the Ph.D., requires extensive research, a skill not oftenemphasized in undergraduate engineering programs. A survey was developed to measureengineering students’ attitudes toward graduate studies
AC 2009-1576: ROI: RETURN ON INVESTMENT AS A FACTOR IN DESIGNINGGRADUATE RESEARCH PROJECTS FOR MUTUAL BENEFITMichael Dyrenfurth, Purdue UniversityKathryne Newton, Purdue UniversityMark Schuver, Purdue UniversityStephen Elliott, Purdue University Page 14.1035.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009ROI: Return on Investment as a factor in designing graduate research projects for mutualbenefitIncreasingly, flagship engineering/industrial technology departments are expanding theirengagement with R&D (Research & Development) efforts that are of mutual benefit tolocal/regional industry as well as themselves. The benefits of such partnerships, ofteneducational
University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches design and en- trepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes.Ms. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a PhD student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan. She also earned a Master’s in Higher Education at Michigan and a Bachelor’s in
]. When studentsbegin their graduate studies, they are acculturated in a university, department, discipline, andresearch group. Each environment provides opportunities for development and integration.Orientation activities can serve as an important first step in this integration. Most orientationefforts, and the research related to them, have focused on department and university-wideinitiatives; however, the individual research group is where engineering graduate students investmost of their time and gain their training.BackgroundThere has been growing conversation around engineering graduate education in recent years [3],[4]. There are a number of drivers outside of academia and challenges within it that warrant acloser look at how the
, and practice, how to develop and manage their own data with an eye toward the nextscientist down the road.”[4] Thus, while a RDM requirement may be forced on scientists andengineers from the outside, the growth of our profession also offers a reason for education in thisarea. Therefore, from a top-down approach, RDM is a required part of many federal fundingopportunities. From the bottom-up, RDM leads to effective and efficient research progress. In a study of current RDM practice, Carlson et al. note that in today’s university researchlaboratories, “graduate students are often expected to carry out most or all of the datamanagement tasks for their own research.”[5] While literature studies have shown that facultyunderstand the need