explored in the field of education. TheAccreditation Board for Engineering Education and Technology (ABET) criteria require thatengineering programs demonstrate that their students attain “a recognition of the need for, andan ability to engage in lifelong learning”. To meet this requirement, a self-directed learningenvironment is implemented in senior level Process Control course in Plastics EngineeringDepartment at University of Massachusetts Lowell. This paper presents the pilot implementationand assessment of the self-directed learning modules through Facebook. Program outcomesassessment and student feedbacks are examined to assess the pilot implementation and developthe program further. Discussions on applicability of this system in other
lectures [1, 2], little is known about student differential levels ofcognitive engagement that underlie such improved learning. As part of a large program offederally-funded research, our research team has developed light-weight, portable, ultra-Low-CostDesktop Learning Modules (LC-DLMs) that enable students to employ systems experientially toillustrate the physics that underlie transfer processes and provide students with visual cues to helpdevelop robust understanding of the fundamentals of momentum, heat and mass transfer. Sixty-seven (67) participants used LC-DLMs to learn venturi concepts in an engineering course. Overall,preliminary results show that the majority of the participants reported that LC-DLMs helped fosteractive, constructive
attrition in the biomedical sciences," Journal of College StudentRetention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 205-226, 2020.[31] B. J. Barnes and J. Randall, "Doctoral student satisfaction: Anexamination of disciplinary, enrollment, and institutional differences," Researchin Higher Education, vol. 53, pp. 47-75, 2012.[32] E. Zerbe, G. M. Sallai, and C. G. Berdanier, "Projections as preparationfor persistence: Exploring expectations for engineering graduate school," in2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[33] M. Artiles and H. Matusovich, "Doctoral Advisor Selection in ChemicalEngineering: Evaluating Two Programs through Principal-Agent Theory,"2022.[34] M. Bahnson, M. Wyer, C. Cass, and A. Kirn, "Graduate
, and design choices related to process efficiency, product quality, economics,safety, and environmental considerations. The course consisted of one one-hour lecture and one90-minute discussion section per week for 15 weeks. The course participants were freshmen ortransfer students (typically juniors transferring from community colleges) intending to major inchemistry or chemical engineering. Students majoring in chemical engineering are required totake a second, more complete course in chemical process analysis following this introduction todesign. Students completed the problem-solving pre-assessment in week 3 and the post-assessment in week 15 for extra credit points in the course. In total, 12 of the 62 studentsenrolled completed both the
aspect of this class that is the most helpful for my learning is when you apply the concepts we are learning in class to real world situations. This helps me see exactly why the stuff we are learning in so important to design.” -Cadet Feedback, CE404 Another real dimension was added to the course with a guest lecturer. My course directorchose a lecturer that was a recent graduate of a structural engineering program. He felt selectinga recent graduate was more important than getting a prominent professional in the field. Havinga recent graduate lecture allowed the students to see what they may be doing with our coursematerial after graduation. The added benefit of getting a more recent graduate is that he or she istypically more available
School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs. His educational research interests include developing techniques for enhancing engineering design education, innovation in design, teaching technological entrepreneurship, global product design, and systems design.Mr. Andras Gordon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Andras Gordon is an instructor of engineering design in the School of Engineering Design, Technology and Professional programs. He is interested in applications of systems thinking in introductory engineer- ing design classes. He is also involved in optimizing ways of collaboration in virtual teams of engineering and other students in culturally diverse and geographically
published 100+ journal papers and conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Digital Construction, 3) BIM and VDC, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Construction Education, and 6) Sustainability. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Improving Construction Site Safety by Incident Reporting Through Utilizing Virtual Reality Author1 Name and Author2 Name (12 points, Bold, centered)AbstractThe construction industry consistently records one of the highest accident rates compared toother occupations, resulting in millions of workers suffering from construction-related injuriessuch as falls, trips, slips, and other
Fall 2022 to pursue her research interests in convergence in engineering education, global engineering education, and social issues in STEM research and practice. Recently, she has taken on new NSF projects to broaden participation in quantum engineering (IUSE Level 3), research abroad (IRES Track 1), and use-inspired research (Convergence Accelerator Track I). Having grown up in Australia, Canada, Korea, and Germany, she speaks three languages. Leveraging her international connections, she has served in leadership positions in the Korean-American Scientists and Engineers Association (KSEA, Vice President), Korean Society for Engineering Education (KSEE, International Relations Board Member), and the International
://gateway.lib.ohio-state.edu/tutor/les1/ 2003C. RICHARD G. HELPSRichard Helps is the Program Chair of the Information Technology program at BYU. He is also a TAC-ABETprogram evaluator. He spent ten years in industry as a control systems design engineer. He completed BS and MSdegrees at the U of the Witwatersrand, South Africa and a further graduate degree at the University of Utah inElectrical Engineering. His primary scholarly interests are in embedded and real-time computing with itsinstrumentation and control aspects and also in technology education.MICHAEL G. BAILEYMichael G. Bailey has electrical engineering degrees from Brigham Young University, the University of Southern
technology.In response to this expansion of the skills and knowledge required of the 21st century chemicalengineer, it is necessary to adopt a new paradigm for chemical engineering education. Forexample, many programs are now requiring biology classes in addition to the traditionalchemistry and physics classes. An increasing number of departments are changing their namesto include some reference to biology (e.g., chemical and biochemical engineering, chemical andbiomolecular engineering). Product design is either replacing part of or complementing processdesign in the capstone experience. There is a strong movement to alter the fundamental chemicalengineering curriculum common to virtually every program to include the colloid-scale, nano-scale
procedures, safety dress requirements, inspects processes and Page 6.969.4develops a safety manual for the company. Material Safety Data Sheets, Right-to-Know“Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition CopyrightO 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”information and other OSHA related information must be researched and used accordingly bythe company.The executive committee (the company president and department vice-presidents) meet eachclass session to plan strategy, form policy, examine the budget, compare department reports withgoals and schedules and attend to the many
four semesters in preparation for engineering courses. Themovement to first-year experiences in engineering is intended to introduce them to thetechniques of the profession early in their program of study, and to motivate the students to studyin the support courses. Often the students have no knowledge or experience to use as a base forsuch an introduction. Technical content of case studies for first-year must be (1) limited to thatwhich can be explained in the case study, or (2) is generic enough that all students can be Page 5.138.1expected to have some experience with the device or subject. In an introductory seminar, thecase study must
AC 2010-2123: INSTRUMENTATION FOR SHOCK AND IMPACT ANALYSISRandy Buchanan, University of Southern MississippiSteven Bunkley, University of Southern Mississippi Page 15.756.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Instrumentation for Impact AnalysisAbstractA test apparatus and appropriate instrumentation were designed by a student with the help of afaculty, to test the deceleration time of a specified impact force applied to a test subject. Theapparatus was made to be adaptable to different configuration requirements of future research.This apparatus utilized the accelerating force of gravity in a procedure known as “drop testing”,in which the
examples and opportunity for providing studentfeedback to the instructor for real time content delivery improvement. This paradigmshift brings student learning into limelight compared to teaching and creates a learningenvironment more conducive to help the students to be independent and critical thinkersby processing the information provided to them2.Materials and methods The course that is selected for introducing the CAT process is a junior levelundergraduate course, UET 331, Electronic Materials, which is required for allundergraduate students majoring in electrical and electronics engineering technology BSdegree at ASU. The undergraduate degree program is accredited by the TechnologyAccreditation Commission (TAC)/ Accreditation Board
investigation generates those linguisticindicators using transcripts from a multi-year, interview based study and compares them to aqualitative analysis of a subject’s conceptual understanding of various engineering topics. Ourintermediary findings indicate a correlation between changes in the linguistic indicatorsintroduced in this paper and a qualitatively coded analysis of conceptual understanding overtime. Future work will involve increasing the breadth of the dataset to further establish thefidelity of this approach and expand on the premise of using automatically generated linguisticindicators to aid the qualitative researcher.IntroductionImproving learning outcomes for students in our engineering programs may be an idea withcommon support but
the learning environment[6]. Mainly related to working adults, there has been a focus on teaching and learning principlesthat specifically revolve around the needs of the learners with different characteristics such asself-direction, problem-centered, real-world tasks, and relatable past experiences [6]. Theseneeds are not always met in adult education courses, potentially attributed to the teachingmethods implemented by educators. The focus of this study is to understand the approach andmethods of a highly-experienced educator who is active in teaching engineering professionaldevelopment courses [1], [6].Literature ReviewAdult Education and Workforce DevelopmentInvestment in adult education and workforce development is beneficial to the
modelling (SEM), hierarchical linear model (HLM), and item response theory (IRT).Malini Natarajarathinam (Associate Professor) Dr. Malini Natarajarathinam received her Ph.D. in Operations Management from The University of Alabama in 2007. Dr. Natarajarathinam joined the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University as an Assistant Professor in 2007. Dr. Natarajarathinam teaches undergraduate and graduate capstone courses. She also teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in logistics, distribution, purchasing, supplier, and customer relationship management. She developed the distribution customer experience course for the graduate program and she has made significant
throughout their academic life and howthis relates to academic performance and student engagement in school. The paper concludes bydiscussing the findings' implications and suggests future research directions.Keywords: Entrepreneurial Mindset, Comprehensive Entrepreneurial Mindset Scale, innovativethinking skills, academic performanceIntroductionThe number of entrepreneurship curricular or extracurricular programs for STEM students hastremendously increased in the last two decades. With the increased emphasis on entrepreneurshipand innovation, the term “entrepreneurial mindset” has been a buzzword, as many of theseprograms list fostering an entrepreneurial mindset in engineering students in thier programobjectives. In the broader definition, a
traditional and active classrooms. As such, team testing may be a relatively comfortable stepto take towards a more active classroom. Within computer science, team programming has beenshown to enhance learning and community (e.g., [9]). Team testing can augment a class usingteam programming or provide similar benefits when used alone.Feedback is generally considered important in learning and there is a growing body of work (andtechnology1) related to providing fast feedback (e.g., [3,10]). Unfortunately, not much, ifanything, has been published on the use of discussion as a fast feedback mechanism or the returnspeed of graded exams and assignments. However, structured discussion with peers is a well-known method for increasing engagement and
programming has beenshown to enhance learning and community (e.g., McDowell et al.14). Team testing can augment aclass using team programming or provide similar benefits when used alone.Feedback is generally considered important in learning and there is a growing body of work (andtechnology*) related to providing fast feedback (e.g., Chen et al.2 and Mehta3). Unfortunately, notmuch, if anything, has been published on the use of discussion as a fast feedback mechanism orthe return speed of graded exams and assignments. However, structured discussion with peers isa well-known method for increasing engagement and enhancing learning.15,16 Psychologyresearch has shown that reinforcement, through punishment and/or rewards, is important tolearning and that
Paper ID #35123Self-publish textbook for Embedded System Education using an MSP432microcontrollerDr. Byul Hur, Texas A&M University Dr. B. Hur received his B.S. degree in Electronics Engineering from Yonsei University, in Seoul, Korea, in 2000, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, in 2007 and 2011, respectively. In 2017, he joined the faculty of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. USA, where he is currently an Assistant Professor. He worked as a postdoctoral associate from 2011 to 2016 at the University Florida previously
be prioritized in engineering education.Collecting STEM student narratives is essential to get an understanding of their STEMexperience. By collecting stories, we illuminate the systemic barriers and opportunities presentwithin our specific educational landscape. Collecting stories allows for researchers andeducators to move towards creating a student-centered learning environment [16]. Just as theundergraduates are positioned as leaders in their institutional change projects, they arepositioned as creators of their own narratives for the research that is related to this project. Thismethod differs from other research where researchers develop the story for participants,granting participants ownership when crafting their own stories as a
professor at Sichuan University-Pittsburgh Institute, Department of Materials Science and Engineering. Since 2019, she worked as an assistant professor at Mechanical Engineering Department of Union College. Her research interests lie in the area of 2D materials and related devices. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Integrity independent lab into project: A modification made to the materials science Lab curriculum Yijing Y. Stehle,a, * a Department of Mechanical Engineering, Union College, Schenectady, NY 12308, Abstract Traditionally, materials science labs were independent weekly
biologicalor environmental research on difficult areas such as marshes.I. IntroductionThe ability to apply multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary concepts in real-worldengineering problems is critical for the future growth of students. To promote this abilityis therefore important for any engineering program. Starting from 2005, the departmentsof Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and BiologicalScience of Rowan University started a multi-disciplinary project to build an aquatic robotfor shallow water study and surveillance.Ecological and biological studies of aquatic habitats, especially those in shallow-water,are often hindered by difficulties of accessing remote sites or the cost of collecting highresolution data in space
,dynamics, and mechanics of fluids, and in some programs, other courses such as tooldesign 4,19. Many researchers believe that performance in these later courses can bedirectly correlated to success in fundamental concepts of engineering 4,5,19,20.Introductory solid mechanics courses have traditionally been taught in a lecture and note-taking approach. According to current understanding, humans think, learn, and solveproblems by making connections and associations to previous experiences 26,30.Numerous researchers have found that if one’s first exposure to fundamental conceptstakes place by passively hearing it in lecture or by reading it in a textbook, the experiencemay not be sufficiently significant or rich to build connections 26,30. Thus
teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, and in the ways hands-on activities and technology in general and games in particular can be used to improve student engagement.Dr. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by 14 years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering educa- tion. While at Oklahoma State, he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he
Session 2166 Weigh Dr. Lyons: An Application of Problem-Based Learning Jed S. Lyons, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Mechanical Engineering University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 20208AbstractA laboratory project is described that was developed for a mechanical engineering measurementsand instrumentation course. Each student designs, constructs, calibrates and uses a strain gagebased load cell to weigh the instructor. The project takes about three weeks to complete.Besides learning how strain gages work
Society for Engineering Education The model shows that Psychological Safety and Common Purpose contribute the most forexplaining variation on attitude. In other words, these variables are important predictors ofattitude toward teamwork.Conclusion As expected the results showed that attitude towards teamwork is highly related to eachof the seven characteristics considered essential for a team to become effective, however, all ofthem did not account for the explained variance on attitude. In fact, only six of thesecharacteristics were shown to contribute to the explanation of the variance on attitude towardteamwork. Therefore, the results show that mature communication, accountable interdependence,psychological safety, common purpose
• SVN is centralized, Git is decentralized • All work with Unix, Linux and Windows systems Server-side Java based • As it is compatible with semantic web technologies Groovy technologies technology Databases • CouchDB stores data as "documents", as one or more PostgreSQL SQL, NoSQL, field/value pairs expressed as JSON JSON, Google • App Engine Datastore provides a NoSQL schema-less Datastore, object datastore, with a query engine and atomic MySQL, transactions PostGreSQL • IMODS data is expected to have numerous relations and
2003, American Society for Engineering EducationThose databases provide the information needed to analyze and evaluate orders and what it willtake to fill them at the highest level. ERP can project costs to fill an order, determine sourcingoptions, and figure order profitability. When these and related factors for one order are evaluatedagainst the same parameters for other orders, the ERP system ultimately forecasts the impact onthe bottom line. Planning Execution MES ERP WMS SCP OMS