lookat students’ confidence. While none of the questions in the interview protocol specifically askedabout confidence, the topic did arise naturally in the course of the interview conversations.Students reported that specific experiences in either their education or work experience led totheir level of confidence. We conclude, therefore, that confidence was constructed based oninternal perceptions of experiences, and not on external validation of a student’s abilities orskills.IntroductionIt has been widely acknowledged that confidence is a factor in students’ success at all levels,including in graduate study. Students who lack confidence may not persevere throughdifficulties, as they do not believe that they can overcome them. Multiple studies
as Assistant Head for Academic Affairs and Associate Professor of Engi- neering Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering. His research background is in cellular biochemistry, tissue engineering, and engineering ethics. He is committed to developing effective ped- agogies for ethical reasoning and engineering design and for increasing the diversity and inclusion of engineering education.David Torres, Purdue University David is a third year doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University pursuing a PhD in Organizational Communication with a minor in data analysis and research methodol- ogy. His research interests reside at the intersection of organizational
Page 13.1.2design courses5 6 7 8 9. Most are team-based, but their scope is limited to the particular course andprovides students with a place where they can apply small amounts of their classroomknowledge.Outside of the classroom, opportunities for students to explore interdisciplinary environmentsexist in a variety of competitions, such as FIRST Robotics, concrete canoe competitions, lunarmodule competitions, etc. This paper will show how building Rube Goldberg machines is afantastic way for learners from various disciplines to get hands-on project experience in a teamenvironment. Intense brainstorming and work sessions result in unique and inventive machinesthat are fascinating for both participants and spectators to watch. In addition
Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention. Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 87, pp79-85.13. Imbrie P.K., Noonan, J.S., Oakes, W.C. (2006). First-Year Engineering Students’ Choice of a Major: When it is made and what Influences it. American Society of Engineering Education Indiana and North Central Joint Section Conference Proceedings. Fort Wayne, IN. Page 13.351.12
, and Journal of Engineering Education.Jennifer Sandlin, Arizona State University Arizona State University, where she teaches courses focused on consumption, learning, and education. Before joining the faculty at ASU she was an assistant professor in the Department of Educational Administration and Human Resource Development for five years at Texas A&M University, where she taught courses in adult learning, qualitative research methods, and adult education. Her research interests include adult education, public pedagogy, popular culture, informal learning, and various sites of ideological education. Her work has appeared in the Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, International
opportunity where engineeringstudents begin to translate the skills they have developed in courses that focus on well-structuredproblems to situations with ill-structured problems.This research study focuses on understanding how students use metacognition and epistemiccognition to justify the reasonableness of their solutions in senior design, both internally (to otherteam members) as well as externally (to advisors, industry representatives, and customers).Participants of the study include civil engineering students enrolled in a senior capstone designcourse at a large, public, R1 institution in the southeast.This work in progress will discuss the early stages of development of this research study, whichincludes the design of an ethnographically
the qualities engineering graduates shouldpossess and to promote changes in curricula, pedagogy, and academic culture needed toinstill those qualities in the coming generation of engineers.” 1Such a process will likely influence how change in engineering education will happeninside the academy, as well as areas of emphasis that will be funded in the future by NSF.Past efforts, such as the Engineer of 2020 2 have demonstrated the potential of theapproach in redirecting education reform. Engineering education professionals must takethem seriously, both in the positive change of course they may offer, as well as falsestarts that may distract from society’s larger interest in how engineers are educated.In a series of breakout sessions, KSAs
fill itscommunity college mission, the institution maintains an open-enrollment policy. To facilitateacademic robustness, UVU has implemented a structured enrollment policy that establishesrequirements which students must meet before they can engage in all the courses of their majorand provides additional access to advising and other resources [1]. These additional preparatorycourses increase students’ time to graduation but help them to succeed.As a large public university UVU has a very high number of low-income students (42%) – thehighest in the state. Around 35% of students are classified as non-traditional students (age 25 orolder), more than half of whom are married. Nineteen percent of students have children underthe age of five. UVU’s
these differences and tolearn if there were common themes for success and if there were ways to improve the programfor subsequent students.The case file for each student, therefore, included the following materials: Application to the program, which included: o Undergraduate academic transcripts o Two letters of reference o Personal statement. 2-4 evaluations of the student’s application. Statement of purpose written in Fall 2004 (in preparation for PhD program applications). Trip report on attending the NSF Human Resources Directorate Joint Annual Meeting (2004). Graduate academic transcripts
effective work is decentralized.”Regarding maintaining their own alumni/student databases 4. Many said that they “try” to keep their own student and/or alumni databases, intimating much frustration with accomplishing the task in a satisfactory fashion. 5. (No) “But we wish we did.” 6. “We are discouraged from doing so.” 7. Many indicated they were “starting” to do this. 8. “Primarily to keep track of advising.”Regarding “Decentralized career services” functions 9. “But the students use me a lot b/c they know I have a lot of connections.” 10. “Best contacts are usually the ones made at the college level rather than the overall university level. One obvious reason is that the focus is on companies that recruit our
Hinman CEOs and people seeking teamingopportunities with talented students. Our annual New Venture Challenge, formerlycalled the Business Plan Competition, provides experience in structuring and givingeffective presentations in a competitive entrepreneurial environment. Three types ofeducational opportunities are provided to the CEOs: formal academic courses, aninformal (seminar) class and experiential education.1.1. Hinman CEOs Program 2004-2005 Student ProfileThe current Hinman class is made up of about 89 undergraduate students withapproximately one-third majoring in an engineering discipline, one-third majoring insome area of business, and one-third studying a broad set of majors across many differentcolleges. Twenty-two percent are female
", Proceedings 2000 ASEE Annual Conference.5 Burghardt, M. David, "Developing the Field of Children’s Engineering", Proceedings 2000 ASEE AnnualConference.6 Tsang, Edmund, Newman, E. Jean, “Service-Learning’s Effect on Engineering Students and K-12 TeacherPartnership in an “Introduction to Mechanical Engineering” Course,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in EducationConference, pp. 1279-1282, 1998.7 Sullivan, Jacquelyn F., Davis, Steven E., deGrazia, Janet L., Carlson, Denise W., “Beyond the Pipeline: Building aK-12 Engineering Outreach Program,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 11b5-21 - 11b5-26, 1999.8 Sechrist, Chalmers, Anagnostopoulos, Constantine, Lewis, Peter, Coburn, Barbara, “Technological LiteracyCounts: Outcomes of a
their studies and improve their learning in many areas of professional and informallearning.As with any area where we are endeavoring to enhance critical thinking, it is important to defineterms and to question assumptions surrounding them. For this project we are using the terms‘Social Justice’ and ‘Environmental Justice’. We adopt Young’s idea of the “five faces ofoppression” as a way of expressing what we believe socially just engineers would be attemptingto avoid. These are: exploitation (benefiting at the expense of others), marginalization (beingpushed away from participation in social life), powerlessness (being unable to make one’s voiceheard due to lack of status or respect), cultural imperialism (the dominant culture becomes theway of
Jersey in need of rehabilitation. Many of thesedams were built in the early part of the 20 th century either as roadways across streams or toprovide power for local mills, but are currently used only for recreational purposes. When thedams were originally built, they generally had adequate protection regarding flood conditions.However, development in the region has changed the hydrologic conditions upstream of many ofthese dams significantly. The existing spillways at virtually all of these dams were designed forpre-development flows; with the excess flow brought by development, spillway modificationsmust be made to increase capacity and maintain dam safety.The State of New Jersey requires that deficient dams be improved and maintained or
given a budget that it was required toadhere to during the design process. The groups were also encouraged to find cost-effective off-the-shelf solutions to problems where possible.The design team organization was similar to the organization of an industrial engineering group.The team leaders reported to the project managers (the faculty project investigators) and wereresponsible for tasks within each subsystem. Initial meetings were held to determine therequirements for each subassembly, then the team leaders assigned subtasks to the workers ineach group and were responsible for documentation, meeting schedules, keeping work areasclean, and observing laboratory rules. The experience has been good exposure to industrypractices in engineering
section. A mechanical engineeringstudent capstone design team from SUNY Maritime Collegemodified a standard tagging gun for their GIGNY customersto use for attaching retail price tags to clothes. ProjectCREATE coordinated with GIGNY in identifying potentialdesign projects during the summer of 2012. GIGNY then Fig. 1. Typical tagging gun showing needle on upper right-hand side.invited the SUNY Maritime capstone design course instructor Students modified the design by adding a switch (A), auxiliary light (B), andto meet and discuss the scope of potential projects. One of the battery energy source (C).two chosen was the tagging gun
, what their strike participation encompassed, andwhat broader relationships they see between their position as engineering students, unionorganizing, and engineering as a discipline.Members of the Graduate Employees’ Organization, American Federation of Teachers local3550 (GEO) engaged in a strike from September 8th to September 16th, 2020, striking for a safeand just pandemic response at a large public university [1]. Strike demands centered on safetyand justice relating to both COVID-19 and policing. These demands centered common goodelements around a universal right to work remotely during a pandemic, improvements to parentand caregiver accommodations, the waiving of fees levied on the international studentcommunity, extensions to degree
oninstructional changes from the macro-, meso- and micro-levels [7 . Drawing on theview of institutional changes and the macro- and meso-level analytical lens in historicalinstitutionalism, this article examines the evolutionary path of HEE to NEE in Chinathrough a systematic analysis of policy documents and extant research literature sincethe founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949 to date. The developmentalphases of China’s HEE to NEE are divided into five stages: (1) exploratorydevelopment (1949-1965); (2) relative development (1966-1976); (3) adjustmentduring reform; (4) improvement through learning outwards; and (5) leading throughinnovation. This evolutionary path was further analyzed at the macro-level – thenational strategies in China
University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches design and en- trepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes.Ms. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a PhD student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan. She also earned a Master’s in Higher Education at Michigan and a Bachelor’s in
AC 2010-1277: WHAT IS GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOR?: THEMAKING OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATORSGary Downey, Virginia Tech Gary Downey is Alumni Distinguished Professor of Science and Technology Studies and Affiliated Professor of Engineering Education, Women and Gender Studies, and Sociology at Virginia Tech. He teaches the undergraduate course Engineering Cultures, an approach to international education for engineers at home. It is designed to help engineering students learn to work more effectively with people who define problems differently than they do, including non-engineers, by critically examining their own identities and predispositions. Current Chair of the ASEE Liberal Education
Inclusion, Diversity, and Academic Success. Trevion’s research interests center on three foci in Engineering Education: pedagogical strategies, prac- tices and policies that broaden minority participation, and curricular design for meeting workforce and industry needs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Lessons Learned from Successful Black Male “Buoyant Believers” in Engineering and Engineering-Related FieldsAbstractIn high-demand fields like science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), moresuccess strategies are needed to effectively recruit and retain college students. One-size fits-allapproaches (i.e., those that are supposed to work for all
Page 23.18.3single individual or a class of people;36-38 or a social entity such as a course, program,collaboration or project.39-41The case study as a research tool has been gaining respect among the engineering educationresearch community over the last 20 years.36, 42-48 Generally using a unit of analysis of a singlestudent or small group of students, recent examples include case studies built from differenttypes of data collection schema but with a common theme of applying the method to explaineducational phenomena as they relate to the contexts in which they occur. This paper reports onone SELECT at a large research university, located in the Southern Plains of the U.S.Data Sources:A quality case study uses multiple data sources to examine
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Exploring Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Understanding of PowerDynamicsIntroductionEngineering education in the United States has grappled with the issue of representation from itsinception, but in the last few decades, there has been a grand effort to improve diversity, equity,and inclusion in the field of engineering [1], in particular for minoritized students, or studentsfrom racial minority backgrounds. The goal of representation has been to have the demographicsof students in our field be representative of the demographics of our nation. Yet, even though wehave seen numbers fluctuate for different minoritized groups, either decreasing or slightlyincreasing, participation rates remain the
State University Olga Stavridis is the Assistant Director of OSU Women in Engineering (WiE) Program. She spent six years as a Senior Lecturer for the College of Engineering’s Engineering Education Department at The Ohio State University. She has been teaching Fundamentals for Engineering I and II for the Freshmen Engineering Scholars Program; Engineering Graphics and Spatial Visualization Courses for the last five years. She was previously the Director of the Engineering Co-op and Internship Program at Ohio State. Olga received her Bachelor’s Degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Ohio State and Mas- ter’s Degree in Industrial Engineering from Arizona State University. She has twelve years of industry
EWBprojects, with their explicit social justice mission, has already been shown to have a positive effecton students, attitudes towards community service, and career expectations [2–7]. Other work hasdocumented the effects of service learning participation on meeting ABET learning outcomes [6]and providing global engineering competencies [8, 9]. While the benefits of service learning forstudent education are enticing, there is also some evidence that participation in projects with localcommunities, in contrast to internationally-based field work, can achieve the same studentoutcomes in terms of technical and professional skills [10, 11].Integration of service learning into the curriculum also necessitates the consideration of impactson the
environment andculture for the establishment of student driven companies, improvement of commercialization ofuniversity intellectual property, enhancement of the ability to attract technology-basedbusinesses and provision of a living laboratory for student to work within the entrepreneurialenvironment. Just as is the case for the traditional research universities, business incubators atregional universities provide the supporting infrastructure that permits the university faculty totake advantage of SBIR and STTR programs to launch businesses and move university IP towardcommercialization. In addition, the formation of a university-managed business incubatorprovides an excellent environment for non-university established technology businesses
that these do not yet offercybersecurity infrastructures unique to wireless networks. Lixin Wang, et al paper [2] describedfour course modules on critical cybersecurity topics that can be adopted in college-level cyber-security courses. One of the modules is on wireless networking security and includes an NDGNETLAB+ based lab [3]. The lab was created to enable the students to decrypt WPA/WPA2 trafficusing the airdecap-ng tool and then analyze the decrypted 802.11 wireless packets with Wireshark.The lab lacks the opportunity for the students to gain practice on configuring wireless hardwarecomponents such as Access Points and Wireless Clients. Also, it is limited to personal WPA/WPA2security mode.We found the following non-academia resources to
influence on“current campus climate and practices” [8]. The organizational dimension considers thosestructures and processes that exist within an institution that may have unforeseen effects onindividuals or groups, while the compositional dimension uses objective measures (e.g., size,selectivity) to characterize social and ethnic groups. The psychological dimension illustrates “anindividual’s perception of institutional responsiveness” to the issue being explored [7]. Finally,the behavioral dimension describes “the context, frequency, and quality of [social] interactions”across groups within an institution [8]. These five dimensions of climate were complemented byexisting explorations of African American and Black students’ perceptions of their
centers on effective faculty mentoring practices, broadening participation in higher education, and the educational attainment and schooling experiences of Mexican descent youth in the mid-20th century.Dr. Sarah Elizabeth Cooksey, University of Colorado Colorado Springs Sarah Cooksey is a Ph.D. graduate from the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She currently works at UCCS as a Research Assistant and Lecturer in the department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations and on a grant with the National Science Foundation trying to understand the career decision making process of underrepresented minorities in STEM fields. Sarah is a special education teacher in the state of Colorado, whose specific research
for Engineering Education, 2018 A Size and Scale Laboratory Experiment for an Introductory Nanotechnology Course1 AbstractA size and scale laboratory experiment has been developed for an associate level course innanotechnology. This lab will assist students in conceptualizing the size of particles bycompleting three exercises: 1. Physically measuring an oleic acid molecule. 2. Comparingthe molecules length to other nano-sized objects by creating an enlarged scale which isthen compared to familiar objects at normal scale. 3. Examine the quantum effects ofquantum dots to introduce students to the unique properties of nanoparticles. This paperdetails these three exercies and evaluates their effectiveness in teaching