is a second year doctoral student at the University of Michigan in Higher Education. His research interests focus on organizational communication and curriculum planning in post-secondary education. Page 24.745.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Influences on Engineering Instructors’ Emphasis on Interdisciplinarity in Undergraduate CoursesIntroductionSolving many of today’s technological and social challenges will require interdisciplinarythought and action1-5, and the growth of interdisciplinary engineering programs6 suggests that
Impacts section.B. Second Academic Semester: Research Abroad The second academic semester is when the IRES students travel abroad for 10 weeks to their respective research sites acrossGermany. During this time, students work with their international supervisors to complete the research goals established duringthe previous semester with access to state-of-the-art and one-of-a-kind equipment to perform high-quality research and novelpublishable work. During this time, they additionally immerse themselves in the work culture and environment, learning toprofessionally develop themselves as well as develop their communication skills to a highly technical international audience.The IRES students also update their advisors in the US weekly on their
budget that supports travel and prototype development costs.Because the multidisciplinary capstone course is one of several options for senior engineeringstudents, instructors can be selective when accepting students. They screen students through anapplication process that includes submitting a resume and application letter. Often, personalinterviews are the deciding factor to ensure teams are formed with self-directed students.Students are asked to explain their interest in joining the program and to describe thecontribution they expect to make to their team. During this process, the coordinators look forstudents exhibiting professional skills including time management, leadership, teamwork,communication, and initiative.After the interview
Impact of the Cain Project on Undergraduate Student Performance in Professional Writing and Public Speaking at Rice.” Technical Report to Rice University, KSA Communication Research & Design, Inc.8. Adams, D. and Manion, W. (2005). “When Less is More: Integrating Technical Writing Instruction in a Large, First-Year Engineering Course.” Proceedings, 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland.9. Youra, S. (Ed.) (1999). Communications across the Engineering Curriculum. Language and Learning across the Disciplines, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Special Issue), University of Illinois, Illinois Institute of Technology, July.10. Adams, D. and Wallace, R. (2002). “Small
key factor of the proposed new and updated courses will be to update the curriculum to meetthe expectations of industry by supplying qualified technicians and technologists who haveextensive hands-on experience with current design tools. By developing a re-configurablecomputing lab, we will be able to provide students at universities and community colleges withstate-of-the-art training tools that match the expectations of industry. Likewise, by strengtheningpartnerships with diverse community colleges through this curriculum development project, weaim to increase the transition of students from two-year to four-year programs through alignedcurriculum planning. Our aim is not to take away from students attending or planning to attendcommunity
Paper ID #226812018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Comparative Study of the Effect of Numerical Majority and non-MajorityStatus on the Intersection of Professional and Cultural Identity of AfricanAmerican Engineering StudentsDr. Lesley M Berhan, University of Toledo Lesley Berhan is currently the Assistant Dean of Diversity, Inclusion, and Community Engagement for the College of Engineering and an Associate Professor in the department of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering at The University of Toledo. Her research interests are
experience program for College of Engineering(CoE) students at the University of Arkansas. The mission of the FEP is to nurture the academicsuccess, professional development, and individual growth of first-year engineering students byestablishing the foundation for their excellence in the study and practice of engineering.The FEP strives to be a national model for the first-year experience in engineering. In support ofthis vision, we strive to provide first-year engineering students with ≠ engaging and high-quality instruction in coursework that is relevant to the modern engineering student and is appropriate based on their individual K-12 preparation, ≠ meaningful experience in applying the engineering problem-solving approach and
written communication 93% (7%)Build / implement a design 95% (7%)* Sample is randomly assigned subset of the class, graded by a single instructor. For consistency, onlyassessments from this instructor are shown.Another window into Gizmo function is provided by the team- and individual- studentreflections that were completed after the Gizmo was built, demonstrated at the expo, andgiven away. As mentioned above, over 90% of students reflections capture insights onpossible improvements and design successes. This is a qualitative reflection, studentswill engage in quantitative assessment of projects later on in their curricula.ENGR 100 student evaluation of the experience is assessed both
to traditional forms of prejudice, in that the discriminatorybehavior is clear, but the target is left unable to defend themselves, such as derogatory graffitipainted on a wall. Sue later created a taxonomy which further categorized microinvalidations andmicroinsults into themes (see [13]).Critical Race Theory CRT draws from several domains to explain racial disparities in the United States, as wellas what measures must be taken to eradicate these disparities. When discussing the use of racialmicroaggressions targeting Latinx students in an engineering education setting, it can be arguedthat the most relevant aspects of CRT are the positions that racism is the U.S. has beennormalized and is ubiquitous. CRT also points to the impact of
elementary school grades [2, 3],suggesting that interventions at the elementary level may be a productive component of changingfemale students attitudes and interests. W-STOMP has been designed as an intervention forelementary students to address multiple potential areas of impact that have been identified withinthe research on STEM interests and girls. The program is based on another program at TuftsUniversity, STOMP (Student Teacher Outreach Mentorship Program), which placesundergraduate engineering students into local K-12 classrooms to support teachers engaged inengineering activities. W-STOMP is a variant on that program that focuses on female
networks” [1].IoT has shown significant proliferation in industry and our daily lives. As such IoT presents itselfas new technology and tools, offering teaching and learning environments for engineering andcomputer science students with hands-on engaged learning. The multidisciplinary nature of IoTsystems also lends itself to remote learning where students, individually or in teams, may focuson different aspects of engineering and computer science concepts, such as sensors, actuators,microcontrollers, embedded systems, wired and wireless communication, visualization, andinterfacing, to name a few.Remote learning became significantly more important during the COVID-19 pandemic forcinginstitutions of higher education to conduct teaching and learning
craft communication strategies toeffectively engage a range of audiences is a fundamental principle of technical communication.Guidelines for effective communication will be taught throughout the course. As individuals andin teams, students will submit multiple written assignments and give oral presentation to theclass. Students are assessed by multiple assignments, some of which include peer review.(5) An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situationsand make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions inglobal, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.Assessment: Apply principles of technical communication ethics through proper citationpractices. Identify and
Education, 2025 Examining Gender Differences in Engineering Students’ Reflections on Combating Systemic RacismAbstractBackground: Systemic racism is deeply embedded in various institutions and societal structures,perpetuating inequalities and shaping interpersonal interactions. Engineers play a crucial role inaddressing and dismantling these systemic issues as they influence shaping the built environmentand technological systems that impact diverse communities. Therefore, integrating social justiceprinciples and awareness of systemic inequities into the engineering curriculum is crucial forpreparing future engineers to create inclusive and equitable solutions. By examining howengineering students reflect on their roles in
Paper ID #9543Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Careers: Strate-gies for Engaging and Recruiting GirlsDr. Marilyn Barger, FLATE (Florida Advanced Technological Education Center of Excellence) Dr. Marilyn Barger is the Principal Investigator and Executive Director of FLATE, the Florida Regional Center of Advanced Technological Education, funded by the National Science Foundation and housed at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa, Florida since 2004. FLATE serves the state of Florida as its region and is involved in outreach and recruitment of students into technical career pathway; has produced
of disciplines, subfields, and sectors in which engineers practice,including as workplace roles and job demands continue to change and evolve over time [6], [7].In sum, more work is needed to understand how students and professionals understand andnavigate ethical issues, how such perceptions and abilities change over time, and how variouskinds of interventions and experiences (e.g., coursework, training, service or volunteer activities,workplace situations, etc.) impact individual engineers. Such objectives seem well aligned withempirical research methods and approaches employed by scholars in engineering education andother social science research fields. Yet conversations around the challenges of conductingrigorous research on engineering
couldbe having a very negative impact on that faculties’ research output, their ability to secure grants,and their contribution to the academic and scholarly community. Eventually, these deficits couldeven harm the students themselves directly.There follows a brief discussion of a typical representation of the objectives of some of the keystakeholders which have just been enumerated, and are summarized in Table 1. Engagedscholarship advocates argue the benefits of integrating practical knowledge within theeducational process. An example of how principles of engaged scholarship is being conducted inthe Industrial Distribution Program at Texas A&M University is presented. While this programis not perfect, it does an excellent job at considering
to participate, choosing mandatoryactivities to hold them accountable, our SETS program has to overcome several institutional andcollege level hurdles due to institutional-wide digital transformation and college and departmentallevel leadership change. In the paper, we will details the impact of the project has on students,faculty, programs, ET department, and College of Technology. In addition, we share ourcategorization of the decisions and choices we have to make while implementing the project,including promoting it among students, faculty, and administrators, as well as seeking outopportunities for our students to take the lead and reach out to their local communities. We hope thefindings will provide evidence based disciplinary
students who went on to careers in academia. Theresults were presented in Philip et al. 2 The response of these former students wasoverwhelmingly positive. They indicated that the ASEE student chapter had been instrumentalin helping them learn what life would be like as a professor, what issues were currentlyimportant in engineering education, and how to prepare for their job searches. Page 7.1046.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Despite the potential of ASEE student chapters, there
contributes to the ethical climate of the team is asimportant a skill as that engineer’s ability to make ethical decisions individually. As educators,then, we must have tools to measure both of these skill sets in pre-professional engineers. Propermeasurement allows educators to design appropriate educational interventions and to track thegrowth of students as they learn. Measurement data also would allow for further research intowhat effects, if any, individual ethical reasoning skills might have on a team’s ethical climate, or Page 22.1436.3vice versa. Past research has suggested a direct impact of team ethical climate on individualethical reason
knowledge to plant/agricultural sciences.2. Project JustificationStudent Interest: The millennial generation seems to have limited understanding or appreciationof plant/agriculture sciences in general. It is critical that we take initiatives to engage studentinterest in plant science research to make an impact in STEM training. The proposing team hasconducted a unique engagement activity in the form of “Plant Walks” around Tuskegee University(TU) campus. The Plant Walk activity was initiated to expose students to the flora and fauna oncampus, its development, identification, and potential as bio factories. To date, six such activitiesare conducted, which have attracted students, faculty and several community members asparticipants. From the surveys
after submitting an assessment. Everyone likely hastheir own story they can recall of strong feelings – good or bad – being attached to receivinggrades, and it has also been established in literature that grades elicit a wide range of emotionsand feelings amongst students (e.g., [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]). While the body of research on gradesand grading practices is growing as education researchers continue to explore assessmentstrategies and outcomes, not much is known about the impact of grades on students beyond theirlearning outcomes and learning achievements.Grades & Grading PracticesGrades are well-established as a global tool in the high school and higher education communitiesto summarize and communicate a student's achievement of
, surpassing traditional methods,demonstrate a positive impact on academic achievement (Ghosh et al., 2020).Practices aimed at preparing students for real-world applications, emphasizing collaboration andadaptability, have shown a beneficial effect (Fawns and O'Shea, 2018). Moreover, thenoteworthy acceptance of gamified assessment methods carries significant implications(Georgiou and Nikolaou, 2020).In the realm of online education systems, the importance of monitoring students' emotionsand behaviors is underscored, with effective strategies proposed, such as hidden tracking andtailored feedback (Jayasinghe et al., 2015). A notable shift from traditional exams to PaperReviews has resulted in heightened student engagement and relevance, aligning
Paper ID #37718Engineering Learning Community Introduction to ResearchAbroad A 5 year AssessmentMaria Claudia Alves (Senior Director, Halliburton Engineering GlobalPrograms) Dr. Maria Claudia B. Alves serves as Senior Director for Engineering Global Programs at the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. In this position since July 2012, she developed and implemented a multi-year strategic plan on global education programs that led to measurable outcomes such as increase in student participation and learning, as well as faculty engagement in global programs in the College of Engineering. Some of her most
been completed. These surveys aimed toaddress a range of inquiries, including participant learning experiences, program alignment withprofessional goals, and perceived impact on student learning. The surveys also exploredparticipant experiences with Network Improvement Communities, Capstone Projects,satisfaction ratings, and suggestions for improvement. Findings from surveys administeredacross three cohorts were presented, with some noted discrepancies in respondent numbers dueto survey instrument inconsistencies. Analysis consisted of summary statistics and T-tests wereused to assess the significance of difference between pre-, post-, and follow-up responses.The external evaluation consisted of a mixed-methods approach for data collection and
greater flexibility during the 10-week commitment.Goals of the internship include offering early-career college students: • real-world, discipline-specific experience through hands-on engineering, • mentoring from faculty, graduate students, and/or industry experts, • a competitive salary and living stipend, and • a vision and incentive to persist, transfer, and complete a B.S. in engineering.With Department of Defense funding, community college students applied to participate in 10-week, research-intensive internships, either at the University of Colorado Boulder, the Universityof Colorado Denver, or with an industry partner. Students who applied for internships throughEngineering Momentum were provided the opportunity to engage in mock
guide future devel-opment.6 RisksWe apply visualization and gamification techniques to wireless communications and introducethem to undergraduate engineering education not to substitute traditional teaching methods, butto complement them. Our hope is that the tools will engage students in the learning process andhelp grasping complex concepts. However, as pointed out in Section 3 of19, students often havedifficulty understanding what the visualization represents. Spectrum is neither visible nor tangi-ble and we provide a computer-aided visual representation of it, based on real measurements andsignal processing, called spectrum sensing. In other words, colors, shapes or other visual effectsrepresent physical phenomena, but are not phenomena
) research. One promising approach toincrease diversity of undergraduates in STEM disciplines focuses on communicating culturallyvalued outcomes of the research being conducted (Estrada et al., 2016). We aim to develop abetter understanding of how to support communication of the broader impacts and societalbenefits of research conducted within an National Science Foundation (NSF) funded engineeringresearch project. The main impact of this work is intended to be an increase in representationaldiversity in STEM through imparting the meaningfulness of research to URM students. Keywords: broader impacts, diversity, STEM, societal benefitsBROADER IMPACTS & SOCIETAL BENEFITS
problem solving and discussions did; 2) 77% felt reportingout to class did; and 3) 93% felt hands-on team engagement activities did. The Lecture Tools in-class interactive web platform will be able to now provide feedback on each team engagementactivity through the instructor feedback comments function. Acquiring such data previously wasdifficult, but now, such feedback should give the instructor insights on student thinking so he/shecan adjust learning strategies when necessary. Additionally, students will be able to sendquestions to the instructor in real time. This student feedback capability of LectureTools shouldfacilitate the desired principle of immediate feedback followed by fast feedback to the students.The positive impact of classroom
-appropriate, five-step engineering design process; and scaffolds their engagement in andreflection about an open-ended design challenge that permits many possible solutions. (Seeeie.org for more details about the curricular materials.) As we developed the curricular materials,we worked closely with educators, soliciting their ideas and feedback, observing and testing intheir classrooms, and analyzing data from their students.During our interactions with teachers, they shared the impacts that engineering was having ontheir students. English learners were one population they highlighted. Fueled by their anecdotesand testimonials, we began to think more deeply about the possibilities. A review of the literaturesurfaced no extant research about K-12
activitiesthroughout the academic year to build community and develop professional and academic skills.In the remainder of this paper, the authors outline the details of the SEED program as well as theresults of an investigation of its outcomes. The summative goals of the program are to improveretention and reduce time to graduation for academically-talented students with demonstratedfinancial need. As the first three cohorts accepted into the program have yet to graduate, we willlook at retention to this point as well as grades and credits earned. Evaluation of similarprograms often rely on student opinions and self-assessment as gathered from surveys and focusgroups. In order to generate a more objective evaluation of the impacts of SEED programactivities