, competency development, and understanding the experiences of traditionally marginalized people (e.g., Latinx, international students, Indigenous students) in engineering from an asset-based perspective. Homero is interested in understanding how to develop effective and culturally relevant learning environments that can promote the sustainable competencies engineering students require to succeed in the contemporary workforce. His goal is to develop engineering education practices that value the capital that traditionally marginalized students, bring into the field. Homero aspires to change discourses around broadening participation in engineering and promoting action to change. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs
Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Baylor University Copyright © 2009, American Society for Engineering Educationof engineering. Consistent feedback from campers shows that these strategies are effective inreaching students and teaching them about engineering.Given these effective strategies, it is also important to look at the camp demographics to insurethat this outreach is also having an impact on underrepresented groups in engineering. For 2008the overall ethnic demographic was African-Americans 20% and Hispanics 13% with theremainder of students White or Asian. While we would still like to increase these percentages,they are reasonable in terms of the
Analysis of Sprinkler Systems. Her research interests include fire protection systems, codes and stan- dards, as well as educational effectiveness and women in STEM. She serves as the advisor to the OSU SFPE Student Chapter and is an active member in the Oklahoma Chapter of SFPE. She is a licensed Fire Protection Engineer in Nevada, California and Oklahoma. Prior to returning to OSU, Ms. Charter was a Senior Consultant for the Las Vegas office of Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc. Ms. Charter has been heavily involved in large mixed-use properties egress design. She has developed performance specifications and conceptual drawings for fire alarm and automatic sprinkler systems, as well as construction design documents
Paper ID #15987Assessment of a Collaborative NSF RET Program Focused on Advanced Man-ufacturing and MaterialsDr. Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton Dr. Margaret Pinnell is the Associate Dean for Faculty and Staff Development in the school of engineering and associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Dayton. She teaches undergraduate and graduate materials related courses including Introduction to Ma- terials, Materials Laboratory, Engineering Innovation, Biomaterials and Engineering Design and Appro- priate Technology (ETHOS). She was director of the (Engineers in
Paper ID #11783Go Green on Campus Project: A Collaborative International Student ProjectProf. Patricia Fox, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Professor Patricia Fox is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Communication in the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University-Purdue Uni- versity Indianapolis (IUPUI). Pat has been a member of the faculty for over 32 years. She has previously served as Associate Chair and Associate Dean in the School. Pat teaches leadership, ethics, sustainabil- ity, and study abroad courses. She has held a number of
towards the common goal of the completed project. Once assessing the site, they wereable to inspect the existing infrastructure, take measurements, figure distances and elevations,calculate amount of material needed, and finally solidify our plan. Page 26.540.8The gutter teams’ major focus was to make sure the gutters were functional and feeding oursystem effectively. In order to do so, the team had to dissemble the gutters, clean them, re-setthe existing brackets, and seal the seams. The team’s biggest challenge was in having to re-usethe existing gutters and brackets. They did not anticipate the gutters being in such poorcondition. Stronger
constructs related to persistence and demographic items to capture therespondents’ various social identities. We used intersectionality first as a theory to guide theidentification of constructs and creation of items for the constructs and then as a methodologicalapproach to analyze data based on respondents’ multiple demographic identities.Persistence is defined as the personal tendency to endure through hardships to achieve goals orcontinue a course of action [13] [14]. We differentiate persistence as a personal measure orquality and retention as an organizational measure or quality [15]. The PEAS is designed toexplore the personal experiences of faculty as they continue in careers in the academy.Persistence is addressed in the literature with an
learning modules,13 an increasing number of ethicstexts, and online resources such as those provided by The Online Ethics Center for Engineeringand Science at Case Western Reserve University.14 Rather, our purpose is to spark thought in thehope that existing material can be improved upon and new material and approaches can bedeveloped.Organization of the PaperThe paper begins with a brief review of the attorney’s code of ethical conduct, the American BarAssociation’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Second, other sources of authority andadvice available to lawyers on ethical issues are described. Third, the ethics curriculum in legaleducation is discussed. Fourth, the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination that mostlawyers are
flexible work hours and carers‟ leave (all of which of course relate totheir reported higher rates of caring responsibilities for children and others).Despite the medium-to-high availability of these facilities to both groups, Table 3 also showshow comparatively little both groups utilise most of these provisions. Women engineers‟experience of the detrimental effects on their careers of utilising these family-friendly provisions(or fear of these effects) is well documented in the literature5,10,13,22,24. Bagilhole et al forexample remark that “Women still experience clear discrimination surrounding the issue ofmaternity leave and the return to work; requests for part-time contracts are often agreedalongside some kind of demotion of position within
mothering of children with learning disabilities," Learning Disability Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 7-18, 2018.[26] C. Alvarado and V. Modesto-Lowe, "Improving Treatment in Minority Children With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder," Clinical pediatrics, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 171-176, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0009922816645517.[27] C. Ong-Dean, A. J. Daly, and V. Park, "Privileged Advocates: Disability and Education Policy in the USA," Policy futures in education, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 392-405, 2011, doi: 10.2304/pfie.2011.9.3.392.[28] L. J. Graham, "Sally Tomlinson, The politics of race, class and special education: The selected works of Sally Tomlinson," Power and Education, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 364-366, 2015, doi: 10.1177
input voltage. In our experiment, the PWM signal is created by a microcontroller. Fig. 1. Buck Chopper Circuit TopologyIII embedded solutions An embedded solution can be created using any number of microprocessors, microcontrollers, single-board computers,FPGAs, or DSP boards. Some of the more common solutions seen at the undergraduate level include the Raspberry Pi single-board computer, the BeagleBone Black microcontroller, or an Arduino microcontroller. We’ve found that a Raspberry Pi requiresa bit more familiarity with operating systems and languages like LINUX and Python. Our students were introduced to theArduino Uno in an early course and this effort sought to build on that native
from 2000 through 2008, where he taught courses in environmental engineering, water resources, and environmental security. Dr. Manous has been actively involved with the ”professional” aspects of the engineering profession for over 20 years particularly through his involvement with the American Society of Civil Engineers where he chaired the ASCE Committee on Professional Practice, Post-Hurricane Katrina Critical Infrastructure Guidance Task Force, and Paraprofessional Task Committee. He is also chair of the Executive Board of the National Institute for Engineering Ethics (NIEE).Mr. Jon D Nelson, Tetra Tech, Inc. Jon D. Nelson, P.E. is a senior vice president in the central region of the Engineering and Consulting
faculty of Color offers to departments. For example, respondents who reportedhigh impact more strongly agreed with statements that having adequate representation of facultyof Color increases departmental rigor, helps best serve student needs, is vital to the strength ofthe department, and improves the department’s overall quality. BLI(M) faculty, by far, had thehighest faculty of Color impact scores (M=0.491, SD=0.434). Asian and white faculty hadcomparatively lower scores (Asian faculty: M=0.025, SD=0.813; white faculty: M=0.005,SD=0.939). The difference between BLI(M) and white faculty was statistically significant(p=.098). Furthermore, the faculty of Color impact score had a small standard deviation (0.434)for BLI(M) faculty, relative to all
result of having direct work experience inprofessional engineering settings. In other words, having work experience made students’ imagesof work more specific, while at the same time shifting them from the hopeful to the mundane. Inaddition to direct work experience, the authors note that students can gain familiarity withprofessional engineering work through their coursework or from family members who areengineers. With a few exceptions, this hopeful-to-mundane pattern characterized thedevelopment of students’ images of work during the course of their education.In this prior work authors described the images of work of students while they were still incollege, leaving open the question of how those images evolve when students pass the
Paper ID #24789Dilemmas in Co-Curricular Support: A Theoretical and Pragmatic Discus-sion on Current Practice and Future ChallengesDr. Stephen Secules, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Stephen is a Visiting Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acousti- cal engineer. His research focuses on equity and inclusion in undergraduate engineering education. He uses critical qualitative and ethnographic methodologies to investigate and improve engineering class
differences, shevalued his approach, as long as it solves the problem efficiently. She believed that he belonged incomputer engineering because he was knowledgeable about the courses in the curriculum andhighly interested in cybersecurity and other topics in the field. Other differences she discussedincluded students who were analytical and engaged in deep thinking, which she felt wasnecessary for their first-year engineering courses and physics.Mr. Rhee (student chosen pseudonym; electrical engineer) mentioned how his peers weredifferent from him because of their work ethic. He insisted that they had a “talent or knack forthe curriculum” which made them understand the material faster, due to their previousexperiences. He also described how the
above 40% over the last 15-plus years [13]. Many universities across the U.S. have taken active steps to improve faculty diversity andthe advancement of women and faculty of color. The National Science Foundation (NSF) hasplayed an important role in this regard through its NSF ADVANCE Program. This is a fundingprogram aimed at understanding and addressing gender-based inequities – and their interactionswith race/ethnicity – in academic STEM fields. The University of X (UX) has received two NSFADVANCE grants. The first is a smaller PAID grant to develop workshops and resources onfaculty recruitment and on formal mentoring for engineering and the natural sciences at UX.4The second is an ADVANCE Institutional Transformation (IT) grant. This
faculty teaching classes at RIT.Focus Group Observations Overall, RIT provides a very good environment in which to work, and the environment has improved over time, in part due to administrative initiatives. Contribution of women faculty is devalued. Work-life balance is either a challenge or strength (variable across campus, and strongly dependent on college/department). Women seem to lack the ability to negotiate/advocate for resources. Initial male student perception of women faculty is poor (i.e., women faculty must prove themselves).A number of studies published in the literature have resulted in similar lists of barriers that arefaced by women in the STEM fields and reasons why women may leave these jobs. These reportthat women in
university.For example, Steven points to his advisor as having a good balance between his faculty positionand life for an “R1” school, and that he just couldn’t see himself writing grants all the time.Samantha and Christopher had a similar hesitation about pursuing grants, and wanting to be ableto focus on teaching.On the other hand, even if these participants realized they didn’t want their advisor’s type offaculty position, their advisor still often played a critical role in supporting their graduatestudents to achieve their goal pursuing a position that focuses on teaching. In Steven’s andValerie’s cases, their advisors encouraged them to take courses on college teaching. In Obie’s,Samantha’s, and Christopher’s cases, their advisors afforded them the
technological literacy of anexpanding portion of the population, and improve the skills of the workforce [4, 5].For the past two decades, we have worked to design educational experiences that reach allchildren, particularly those who are currently underserved or underrepresented. We have studiedthe literature, developed inclusive design principles that guide our work [6, 7], and workedcollaboratively with educators who regularly teach students from underrepresented populationsas we designed curricular resources. The Engineering is Elementary (EiE) curriculum is designedto introduce students to engineering concepts and practices. Each of the 20 units focuses on afield of engineering (e.g., chemical, biomedical, industrial); introduces students to an age
AC 2012-3970: 3RS FOR ENGINEERING SCHOLARS: RESPONSIBILI-TIES, REPERCUSSIONS, AND REMEDIES ASSOCIATED WITH PRO-FESSIONAL PLAGIARISMMs. Susan H. Sarapin M.A., Purdue University Susan Sarapin is a doctoral candidate in Purdue University’s Brian Lamb School of Communication Divi- sion of Media, Technology, and Society. She studies the effects of TV viewing on the public’s perceptions of and attitudes toward crime, criminals, and the justice system. This extends to the exploration of persua- sion in the courtroom and the lay public’s understanding of scientific concepts, statistics, and techniques. Sarapin intends to combine teaching, research, mentoring undergraduate and graduate research, and con- sulting
create a computer model of their bridge and performan analysis of their design with the assistance of engineering students from the American Societyof Civil Engineers Student Chapter. A maximum of 30 teams were allowed to participate in thecompetition. In addition to the standard load test (30 pts), each team was also judged on meetingspecifications (20 pts), load/weight ratio (20 pts), project report (15 pts), and aesthetics (15 pts). The competition followed the same format through the 2017 competition. Quite frankly,the competition had grown stale and needed improvements. There were several areas ofimprovement needed with the existing format. 1. Some of the bridges were holding more than 100 lbs, which exceeded the capacity the
criteria wouldbe returned without review10. This amendment to the proposal granting process emphasized NSF’scommitment to funding projects that connect science and engineering to society, via broaderimpacts.In 2010, the America COMPETES Act11 reauthorized the National Science Foundation, mandatingthe retention of the Broader Impact criterion, and requested that NSF issue a report to Congressregarding the effects of this criterion. One of the requirements requested in the report by Congresswas to provide evaluations performed by the Foundation to assess the degree to which the Broader Impact aspects of research proposals were carried out and how effective they have been at meeting the goals described in the research proposals
. Page 12.428.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Cultural models of the admissions process in engineering: Views on the role of genderAt the University of West State (UWest), a flagship, state university on the westcoast of the United States, students generally apply to the engineering collegeafter they have finished 2 years of prerequisite courses. Admission to the collegeis highly competitive, and although the college regularly offers informationalsessions about the application process, our analysis shows that the processremains occluded to students. The mystery surrounding the process makesnavigation of the process difficult, so we find students attempting to construct anunderstanding of the process by
courses do students talk about when they discuss their entrance to majorexperiences?) In contrast, thematic analysis is more equipped to answer ‘why’ or ‘how’ questions(e.g., Why do students discuss passing courses differently? Or How do students’ experiences inintroductory engineering courses influence students’ career intentions?) Thematic analysis shouldidentify explicit and implicit ideas within data to develop themes that then provide answers to theresearch questions [24]. Explicit ideas are straightforward expressions repeated within the data.Implicit ideas require digging into the meaning behind the words to identify unspoken truths thatappear in subtle ways in the data. Coding contributes to systematically identifying these ideas thatcan
teaching in engineering courses are incompatible withengineering students’ learning style preferences [18]. In addition, little research has includedacademic faculty and practicing engineers as two distinct groups. Commonly these groups arecombined and defined as professionals. In order to better integrate ill-structured problems within the curriculum, the approach tothese problems associated with a person’s learning style should be examined, as well as thedifferentiation between learning styles among participant (faculty, student, practicing engineers)groups. This is important as differences between groups can be the result of significant externalfactors as well as influence educational instruction. The goal of this study is to explore
undergraduate engineering courses and a graduate course on entrepreneurship, she also enjoys teaching qualitative research methods in engineering education in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program at ASU. She is deputy editor of the Journal of Engineering Education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Conceptualization and Situating of Sense of Belonging Among International Engineering Doctoral Students: In Light of the Previous LiteratureIntroductionThis work aims to conceptualize and situate the concept of ‘sense of belonging’ amonginternational engineering doctoral students. This conceptual paper
allowsstudents from both Florida A & M University (FAMU) and the Florida State University (FSU) toattend a single, joint college located in Tallahassee, Florida. This COE is dedicated to botheducation and research across multiple engineering areas, allowing students and faculty theopportunity to engage in innovative research skills. The COE Library is a tight space confined intwo rooms within the COE building itself, managed by librarians and staff from FSU Libraries,while employing student assistants from both institutions. This case study explores how FSU’sCOE Librarians have used this distinctive opportunity to create a model of embeddedlibrarianship in both relationships and improve outreach to make an impact on the lives of thefaculty, staff
become an engineer. According to EWEP, ability is not the issue on the part of girlsand young women. Previous studies have found that girls, on average, are just as or more likelyas boys to have taken the high school science and math courses (biology, chemistry, physics, andadvanced algebra) necessary to enter engineering school.Curiously enough, Puerto Rico is the one location in the Western world where a very rigorous 5-year engineering school, the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez, UPRM, attracts roughly40% to any engineering area and significantly more females than males to Industrial Engineering(IE) in particular. While attrition and retention issues continue to be similar to those in otherparts of the United States, the University of
intensive advisement. The ASU plan followsthe recipe for success determined by others in the recent report: “A Matter of Degrees: PromisingPractices for Community College Student Success”.1 The same practices which work well at theCC work well for the transfer student, especially in their first year of transfer. According to thereport the fundamentals of a good success program include the following: a strong start; clear,coherent pathways; integrated support; high expectations and high support; intensive studentengagement; design for scale; and professional development.1A requirement of the NSF scholarships is that the students attend a one-semester creditAcademic Success Class each semester. The course content changes each semester