goals. She achieved her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Before engaging in Engi- neering Education research, she completed graduate degrees in Industrial Engineering and Statistics and contributed to a wide range of research areas including genetic disorders, manufacturing optimization, cancer biomarker detection, and the evaluation of social programs. Dr. Sanchez-Pena is passionate about teaching engineering students and First-Year Engineering students in particular, from whom she draws in- spiration because of their energy and creativity. She takes as her mission to foster such traits and support their holistic development, so they can find their unique engineering path and enact positive
Engineering at Miami Dade College. During his academic career, he has taught more than 25 different undergraduate and graduate courses in Argentina, Puerto Rico, Mexico, and the USA, most of them in the Civil and Construction En- gineering fields. He is a California licensed professional engineer and a member of ASCE. Currently, he is a faculty member at Georgia Southern University and his research interests include structural analysis and design, vibrations, earthquake and wind engineering, remote sensing and education.Dr. Shahnam Navaee, Georgia Southern University Dr. Navaee is currently a full professor in the Department of Civil Engineering and Construction in the Allen E. Paulson College of Engineering and Computing
Research Laboratory for Multifunctional Lightweight Structures”, funded by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (Leader’s Opportunity Fund) and Ontario Research Fund. His research interests include Design and Development of Light-Weight Structures for aerospace, automotive, and nuclear applications, Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Aerospace and Automotive systems, Multi-scale Simulation of Nano-structured Materials and Composites. He has supervised 18 PhDs, 65 Masters’, and 9 Post Doctoral Fellows. He has also published more than 230 papers, and 6 book chapters. He has been the recipient of many prestigious awards and recognitions such as the Research Fellow of Pratt and Whitney Canada and Fellow of the CSME
in their paper that portions of variance inacademic performance can be explained through different measures of effort and motivation onthe part of the student. They, further, state that these measures are true regardless ofsocioeconomic differences in the students’ backgrounds.[15] Marshall Geiger and Elizabeth Cooper,[16] tried to explain how expectancy theory andneeds theory variables could be used to predict student performance in college based on theirgrade point average.[16] Expectancy Theory as developed by Vroom[45] is defined as the“motivation to act is a combination of the perceived attractiveness of future outcomes and thelikelihood one’s actions will lead to these outcomes” and needs theory is defined as “individualmoated
as “engineering” by faculty and students, leading toan engineering workforce poorly trained in dealing with the social dimensions of sustainableengineering solutions. This important concept currently receives little attention within thestandard engineering curricula, particularly within the engineering sciences.The pilot-study research presented in this article uses a mixed-methods approach to assess thestate of social justice awareness of students as they enter an “Introduction to Feedback ControlSystems” (IFCS) class. Social justice interventions are integrated to support students as theylearn about the inherent, yet often invisible, connections between social justice and controlsystems engineering. Instruments, such as surveys and focus
programs as well as programs in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program. Her research interests include topics related to student persistence, STEM doctoral student experiences, faculty mentorship and development, modeling and analysis of complex manufacturing systems, and the development of new discrete event simulation methodologies. Bekki is the co-director of the interdisciplinary, National Science Foundation supported CareerWISE research program, which strives to: 1) understand the experiences of diverse women who are pursuing and leaving doctoral programs in science and engineering and 2) increase women’s persistence in science and engineering doctoral programs through the development and
Paper ID #7198A Descriptive Study of Engineering Transfer Students at Four Institutions:Comparing Lateral and Vertical Transfer PathwaysMs. Erin Shealy, Clemson University Erin Shealy is a master’s student studying Applied Sociology at Clemson University. Her bachelor’s degree is in Psychology, also from Clemson University. For the past two years, she has been serving as a graduate research assistant for an NSF-funded research project on engineering transfer students, part of the larger Multi Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development (MIDFIELD) study.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research
challenging, and poses uniqueeducational challenges to instructors of these students. This paper examines the application ofconference preparatory principles and practices to teach materials science through theincorporation of „conference style writing‟ as a teaching tool into an introductorymultidisciplinary (Bioengineering and Materials Science) laboratory course. The goal of thiswork was to enhance the academic and professional development of students during mentoredlaboratory activities. At Clemson University, the materials science laboratory course (CME241L, MetricsLaboratory) was designed to introduce sophomore engineering students to the use of equipment,instruments, and procedures required to formulate, prepare, and characterize ceramic
AC 2012-3758: SMALL-SCALE SMART GRID CONSTRUCTION ANDANALYSISMr. Nick J. Surface, University of Kansas Nick Surface is a British student studying in Kansas for a master;s degree in mechanical engineering. In 2007, he received his bachelor’s degree at City University London, followed by six months interning at BMW in Munich, Germany. His specific area of interest is automotive technology. The focus of his thesis is developing energy infrastructure for the purpose of charging electric vehicles and reducing reliance on fossil fuels.Mr. Bryan Anthony Strecker, University of Kansas Bryan Anthony Strecker has a B.S. in mechanical engineering, University of Kansas, and will have a M.S. in mechanical engineering
Incorporating Design Justice Activities in Engineering CoursesAbstractOne of the primary tasks that engineers must undertake is design. Engineers design and developsolutions that are supposed to satisfy human needs. Engineers also, through their work, intend tochange the life of everyone for the better. While all around us we see numerous examples ofcases/design solutions that have improved our lives, there is also another side of this story. Forexample, development of nuclear weapons during the second world war led to its use to destroycities and innocent lives, and a perpetual threat of the possibility of nuclear holocaust. Or, forexample, how early in the US history the growth of the country from its coastal colonies into theheartland was achieved
Immunology at UNC-Chapel Hill. Upon completing her Ph.D. in 1997, she joined the Biochemistry Department at Duke University for a short post-doc. When twins came into her life, she transferred to Elon University to teach as an adjunct for 2.5 years. In 2001, she returned to UNC-CH as a post-doctoral fellow in the Seeding Postdoctoral Innovators in Research and Education (S.P.I.R.E.) program, which gave her the opportunity to begin research on the developmental genetics of Drosophila melanogaster and teach at a variety of institutions, including NCA&T State University. In 2005, she joined the faculty at NCCU, where she continues her research on a gene important for DNA replication (former NIH/NIGMS-funded research
Paper ID #36984What Employers Look for in New Engineering GraduatesCharles E. Baukal (Director) Chuck Baukal is the Program Chair for the College Industry Partnership Division. He has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, an Ed.D., and a P.E. He is the Director of the Koch Engineered Solutions Institute which is part of John Zink Hamworthy Combustion located in Tulsa, OK where he has been since 1998.Carter StokeldLinda Ann Thurman (Director of Student Prof. Dev. & Employer Relations) Director of Student Professional Development & Employer Relations for the Lee College of Engineering, UNC Charlotte. CIEC
Engineering Education and Future Professoriate. (i) ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE: Miguel Andrés was Project Manager of PREINGESA where he has directed construction projects in the development of urban infrastructure for urbanizations such as earthworks, drinking water works, sewerage, underground electrical cables and fiber optics, roads, aqueducts, water reservoirs, housing construction, among others. He was also a Project Management Associate for a Habitat For Humanity housing project in the USA. (ii) RESEARCH: Miguel Andrés' research focuses on (1) decision-making for the design and construction of infrastructure projects, (2) the planning of sustainable, smart and resilient cities, and (3) the development of engineers who
populations were systematically selected out of the body of work included in ASEEconference proceedings since 2005. These were then analyzed for the extent to which theyaccounted for the complexity of AI/AN lived experiences using a framework developed fromTribal Critical Race Theory. Results indicated that extant work does largely center Indigenousparadigms and do include outcomes tied to AI/AN communities, while not contextualizing theeffects of colonization or accounting for the legal/political character of AI/AN identity. Thismanuscript therefore offers an analysis of recent work through a critical theoretical lens in anattempt to identify areas of focus where future work may have the most impact on engagingmore AI/AN students to pursue
Paper ID #37699From Online to Hybrid: The Evolution of Flipped Learningin a First-Year Engineering Mechanics CourseRania Al-hammoud (Dr.) Dr. Al-Hammoud is a Faculty lecturer in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she continuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She is also responsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the department to target
Paper ID #38157Forming Cognitive Connections: Desktop Learning Modules,Structural Analysis Software, and Full-Scale StructuresDavid Brian Dittenber (Associate Professor, Civil Engineering) Prior to joining the civil engineering faculty at Cedarville University in 2020, Dr. Dittenber taught at his alma mater, LeTourneau University in Longview, Texas, for seven years, serving as an associate professor and chair of civil engineering. His areas of specialization are structural and materials engineering, as well as engineering education. He believes that being a Christian and a civil engineer is an exciting pairing, as
) and may beasked to turn to a partner to discuss concepts (or comment in the chat).Table 1 also indicates whether the instructional format was in-person or remote. All of the classperiods studied were synchronous, although there were other asynchronous elements to thecourse. Eight class periods were conducted remotely via Zoom [30] throughout the semester forreasons related to Covid, but the majority of classes were held in-person. On occasion, individualstudents under quarantine attended in-person classes remotely via a Zoom connection to theclassroom.Survey results were monitored by a faculty member not directly involved with the teaching ofthe course such that students could respond freely without concerns that their responses
InvarianceKeywords: Engineering education, Goodness of fit, Measurement invariance, Multiple groupconfirmatory factor analysis, Validity. The Student Attitudinal Success Inventory III (SASI III):Construct Validity and Measurement InvarianceAbstractThe Student Attitudinal Success Inventory (SASI) has been a useful self-reported instrumentdesigned to quantify students‘ non-cognitive attributes that predict students’ success andpersistence in Engineering Education. Developed from its first version, the third version of SASIconsists 140 items quantifying 16 latent constructs, namely SASI III. The findings in this studyprovide evidence for the construct validity of the SASI III by talking time variables intoconsideration, both occasions (pre-survey vs. post
investigate two variants of simulations used inplace of in-person labs. Specifically, we contrast student engagement and learning across theface-to-face and simulation versions to identify aspects of these experiences that supportedstudents to make consequential decisions and develop a sense of ownership over the methods ofexperimentation, methods of analysis, interpretation, and conclusions. We therefore sought toanswer the following research questions: • What kinds of decisions did students make in the lab (both in-person and simulated)? • To what extent did students show ownership over the experimental methods, analytical methods, and their interpretation of the results?Theoretical FrameworkMany studies have contrasted face-to-face
approaches to a broader audience.Dr. Edwin van Hassel, University of Antwerp Edwin van Hassel is an assistant professor at the Faculty of Transport and Regional economics, Antwerp University where he is also teaching three courses. He has an engineering degree in naval architecture and he has a PhD in applied economics. His main research interest and expertise is in inland navigation, port hinterland transport, ship design and transport modelling. He holds a PhD with a topic in the field of inland waterway transport. More recently the scope of his work has been extended to maritime cost chain modelling. He also is involved in several research ranging from logistics projects to infrastructure cost benefit analysis and
characterize habits leading tosuccessful and unsuccessful outcomes. They found that the average exam scores were notimproved compared to historical data, but that there were “success stories” where students whofailed the first exam achieved passing final grades in the course. The rate improved from 5.5%historically to 11.9% in the courses that included metacognition activities.Stephan et al. [15] report on using exam wrappers as one part of an extensive cycle of activitiesdesigned to help first-year engineering students develop and enhance their study skills. The pre-exam activities include a time-tracking log for studying the week before the exam and areflective learning journal with assignments such as completing an exam wrapper. The
company based in Radford, where she held multiple roles of increasing responsibility dur- ing her nine years there. While at Kollmorgen Robin worked with Shingijutsu Global Consulting experts from Japan and earned black belts in the DBS kaizen areas of Standard Work and 5S and traveled globally to qualify suppliers in Asia and Europe. Most recently Robin worked as Senior Director of Project Man- agement for a small bio-tech company, Intrexon, located in the VT Corporate Research Center and had the opportunity to introduce manufacturing principles into a highly specialized DNA production facility. Since joining the faculty at her Alma Mater in 2015, Robin has been coordinating and teaching the Cap- stone Senior Design
. Homero Murzi is an engineering educator with 15 years of experience interacting withundergraduate engineering students. He has worked most of his academic career to improve theway students learn engineering concepts by making sure they are engaged and their personalexperiences are valued in the classroom. He is originally from Venezuela where he worked for11 years as a faculty member at a public technical university. Here in the U.S., he has alsoworked at a predominantly white institution and interacted as well as experienced how studentsfrom traditionally marginalized populations have barriers to become engineers. He hasintentionally tried to be aware of how to develop more inclusive experiences in both his researchand teaching practices, while
engineering, and industrial engineering programs. According to stu- dents’ feedback for this course, as well as similar courses offered at different engineering programs, the course is time-intensive, involves no critical thinking, requires limited class participation, and is not well connected with real-world manufacturing problems. The suggested teaching approach is developed to include several computer-based learning com- ponents that can help in creating an active/passive/constructive learning environment for the students. A simulation-based project is used to
Paper ID #18529Work In Progress: First-Year Student Signature Project - Design an Info-graphic on ”What is Technical Communication?”Dr. Jessica A. Kuczenski, Santa Clara University Dr. Jes Kuczenski joined the engineering faculty at Santa Clara University in 2014. She obtained her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame and her B.S. from Iowa State University all in Chemical Engineering. Dr. Kuczenski has been teaching since 2007 and focuses on courses which are commonly found in first years of an engineering education (e.g. introduction to engineering, engineering graphics, statics, and dynamics) or are heavily
. Shull’s peda- gogical efforts include meta-cognitive strategy learning to improve student academic success, an interest in women’s issues within the engineering environment, integrated, experiential techniques to improve engineering students’ social emotional development as applied to teamwork and communication, and program assessment methods that minimize stakeholders’ efforts while maximizing the effectiveness of the measurement tool. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Sustainable bridges from campus to campus: Progress after Year 2 (NSF IUSE #1525367)AbstractPurpose: The purpose of the Sustainable
learning strategies (ACL) are a good alternative. They hold thestudents’ interest and facilitate learning. Leading scholars in cognitive science and educationalmethodologies such as Patricia Cross5 identify active learning as an underlying principle of goodpractice in teaching.The Perry model25 is another way to view student development. The Perry model characterizesstudents’ intellectual development in terms of their view of knowledge, the roles of instructorsand students, the role of peers in the learning process, how evaluation of work should occur, andtheir intellectual capabilities. The model consists of nine stages that characterize the student in
, component, or process to meet desired project needs (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams including participation in a senior- level design project sequence (e) an ability to identify, formulate, analyze, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding and appreciation of all aspects of professionalism including ethical responsibility, participation in professional organizations, and service (g) an ability to communicate effectively developed through report writing and in-class presentations (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, sustainable, and societal context (i) a recognition of
AC 2009-2335: ELICITING UNDERSERVED MIDDLE-SCHOOL YOUTHS’NOTIONS OF ENGINEERS: DRAW AN ENGINEERTirupalavanam Ganesh, Arizona State University Tirupalavanam Ganesh, Ph.D., has degrees and experience in engineering, computer science, and education. He has brought this experience to bear in previous research that examined the use of technologies in K-12 settings with diverse students. He has worked with the Children’s Museum of Houston on the development and implementation of Robotics-based STEM programming for urban youth. He is the Principal Investigator of the National Science Foundation Award# 0737616, Learning through Engineering Design and Practice.John Thieken, Arizona State University
AC 2009-115: WRITING TECHNIQUES FOR IMPLEMENTINGPROJECT-DIRECTED MATHEMATICSJohn Schmeelk, Virginia Commonwealth University Qatar Branch John Schmeelk, Virginia Commonwealth University, Qatar Branch Campus Dr. John Schmeelk is a Professor of Mathematics at Virginia Commonwealth University, Doha Qatar Branch, where he is engaged in applied mathematics, generalized functions, image processing and educational pedagogy. He received his PhD from George Washington University in Washington, D.C. He was awarded many summer faculty grants to go to Fort Rucker, Alabama implementing procedures utilizing generalized functions. He has been an invited speaker to conferences in Australia