Paper ID #36946The accuracy of self-assessment in engineering mechanicsAmie Baisley (Faculty) I have a Ph.D. in engineering education from Utah State University and a M.S. in structural engineering from Arizona State University. My teaching and research interests are centered around the second year mechanics courses and how changes in those courses can impact student learning and persistence.Keith D. Hjelmstad (Chair) Keith D. Hjelmstad is President's Professor of Engineering at Arizona State University and chair of the civil engineering program. He is founder and architect of The Mechanics Project, an effort
in 2014, Dr. Rahman extensively conducted research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), USA for almost six years as a Research Scientist. He significantly contributed to research and development of the image processing, classification, and retrieval methods extensively used in the NLM’s Open-i Search Engine for biomedical literature. Dr. Rahman has good expertise in the fields of Computer Vision, Image Processing, Information Retrieval, Machine Learning, and Data Mining and their application to retrieval of biomedical images from large collections. Since joining Morgan, Dr. Rahman also has been actively involved in basic educational and instructional re- search by infusing several interactive and active
on two broad areas: achievement/retention in STEM and comprehension of illus- trated scientific textDr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering edu- cation research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research.Dale RobbennoltAnne Hart, University of Tennessee, Memphis ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Exploring the Landscape of Stressors Experienced by Doctoral Engineering
prototyping and visualizing, and theycan also aid in developing spatial visualization skills, especially when students design and printobjects they’ve designed using a CAD software tool. Printing can inspire students in extracurric-ular endeavors, and they are a useful tool to creatively explore new ideas for further development.This research is a first step in exploring how students are using 3D printing both in- and outside ofrequired coursework, along with the barriers felt by students in their use of this tool. The goal is togain insight into 3D printing habits and motivations of engineering undergraduates. Of particularinterest is determining any differences between genders in this area, and, if so, what barriers andmotivations exist and differ
classroom. He greatly enjoys problem-based learning and challenge-based instruction. Matt is the 2018 recipient of the American Concrete Institute’s Walter P. Moore, Jr. Faculty Achievement Award. He was awarded Teacher of the Year for the Illinois Indiana section of ASEE in 2017. Also, he was awarded the Daniel V. Terrell Outstanding Paper Award from ASCE. Matt is highly active in ASEE, currently serving as the ASEE CE Division’s Freshman Di- rector. In 2014, Matt received the ASEE CE Division Gerald R. Seeley Award for a paper highlighting a portion of his work regarding the development of a Master’s Degree at Rose-Hulman.Dr. J. Chris Carroll, Saint Louis University Dr. Carroll is an Associate Professor and the Civil
Paper ID #33159A Model Passive Solar Home Student Design ProjectDr. Matt Aldeman, Illinois State University Matthew Aldeman is an Assistant Professor of Technology at Illinois State University, where he teaches in the Renewable Energy and Engineering Technology programs. Matt joined the Technology department faculty after working at the Illinois State University Center for Renewable Energy for over five years. Previously, he worked at General Electric as a wind site manager at the Grand Ridge and Rail Splitter wind projects. Matt’s experience also includes service in the U.S. Navy as a nuclear propulsion officer
offer advice,answer questions, or perform a service.Chatbots have been used for a long time, for a variety of purposes. They were developed as earlyas in the 1960s [18]. Early chatbots were only passive beings. They could not retain informationor offer real responses to what the user said. They could only try to keep the user talking bysaying things like, “Go on,” or, “Tell me more.”Today, chatbots are capable of much more than just passively listening to the user. Zo is one oftoday’s most advanced chatbots [19]. Powered by machine learning, she can carry on a realisticconversation with the user. She even has her own Facebook profile, complete with personalinformation, posts, and a picture [20]. When speaking with Zo, the first thing you will
NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?” He has also been part of the teaching team for NSF’s Innovation Corps for Learning, and was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014. Dr. Jordan also founded and led teams to two collegiate National Rube Goldberg Machine Contest cham- pionships, and has co-developed the STEAM LabsTM program to engage middle and high school students in learning science, technology, engineering, arts, and math concepts through designing and building chain reaction machines. He has appeared on many TV
and resources that enable them to succeed. Thisincludes time and task management, assistance with planning an academic roadmap as well asinformation on co-curricular and extra-curricular activities that could develop one’s portfolio as achemical engineer, such as research, internships, co-ops, study abroad and (chemical)engineering clubs. Finally, the curriculum does not typically provide early information on thesteps necessary to prepare for one’s career. Failure to understand the answers to such questionscan result in students dropping the major, struggling academically, failing to make a connectionwith peers and resources, and facing challenges when applying for jobs due to inadequate careerpreparation.To address this gap in the curriculum
same topic class in atraditional classroom. As a follow up to a similar study conducted in the previous year[4], this paperhypothesized that there is no difference in the effectiveness of learning between a class in atraditional classroom setting and a virtual classroom setting and provide recommendations forenhancing effective teaching in a real-time distant learning environment. These results andrecommendations will benefit all faculty in their future planning when designing a distant Page 12.1225.3learning course. According to the United States Distant Learning Association (USDLA)10, distant learningis defined as the acquisition
AC 2009-1212: WHEN THE LIGHT GOES ON: ILLUMINATING THE PATHWAYTO ENGINEERINGSusan Freeman, Northeastern University Susan Freeman, Beverly Jaeger, and Richard Whalen are members of Northeastern University’s Gateway Team, a group of teaching faculty expressly devoted to the first-year Engineering Program at Northeastern University. The focus of this team is on providing a consistent, comprehensive, and constructive educational experience that endorses the student-centered and professionally-oriented mission of Northeastern University.Beverly Jaeger, Northeastern UniversityRichard Whalen, Northeastern University
; e-mail: gmn3@pitt.edu.Harvey Wolfe, University of Pittsburgh Harvey Wolfe is the William Kepler Whiteford Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. After many years working in the area of applying operations research methods to the health field, he is now active in the development of models for assessing engineering education. He is a co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press, 1997). He holds the B.E.S. in Industrial Engineering, M.S.E. in Operations Research, and Ph.D. in Operations Research (Johns Hopkins University).Mary Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh
2006-977: ENGINEERING SCHOOL, LIFE BALANCE, AND THE STUDENTEXPERIENCEHeidi Loshbaugh, Colorado School of Mines HEIDI G. LOSHBAUGH is an Assistant Research Professor for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education at Colorado School of Mines. She holds a Doctorate, Master’s Degree, and Bachelor’s Degree from the University of Denver. Dr. Loshbaugh taught in CSM’s Engineering Design program, for which she developed extensive course and faculty-support materials, and designed and implemented a leadership course. She also has experience in international education, corporate training and coaching, and academic editing.Tawni Hoeglund, Colorado School of Mines TAWNI J. HOEGLUND is
challenges of tomorrow. A number of authors working within the field of education theory have argued that increasing the efficacyof our educational initiatives requires a deeper understanding of student self-perceptions of their individual ability tolearn, increase intelligence, and develop professional talents (e.g., Dweck, 2006; Hattie, 2002). These self-perceptions have been related to the terms “fixed mindset” and “growth mindset” as a broad means of identifyingstudent preparedness to pursue educational objectives. Perhaps the most significant work on mindset has been performed by Dweck (e.g., Dweck, 2007; Ehrlingeret al., 2015). In particular, Dweck has assessed the impact of these two mindsets on student learning with the
, material properties and element geometry, (4) Theglobal linear algebraic equations in which the shared nodes are joined, (5) Application of theloading and restraints in the global linear algebraic equation, and (6) Stress/strain calculation.The best way to teach and to demonstrate these 6 key fundamental concepts of the finite elementmethod is through simple examples.Since the FEM theory can be considered extremely complicated for undergraduate students, asimplified treatment was warranted for students to familiarize themselves with somefundamental concepts of FEM theory. The authors collaborated to develop a simplified andstraight forward approach to do this in three weeks. It took a long time and lots of work tosummarize these examples for
Paper ID #25744The Effects of Infusing Diversity and Inclusion into a Design Problem in En-gineering Mechanics: StaticsMr. Amir Hedayati Mehdiabadi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Amir Hedayati is an Assistant Professor at Organization, Information & Learning Sciences department at College of University Libraries & Learning Sciences at University of New Mexico. He received a Ph.D. in Human Resource Development from University of Illinois in 2018. He has a B.S. degree in Computer Engineering from Sharif University of Technology and an M.B.A. degree from University of Tehran. He has presented his research
). She develops integrative education projects that transverse perspectives within and beyond the university. Her currently funded NSF projects include revolutionizing the VT ECE department, identifying practices in intentionally inclusive Maker spaces, and exploring professional identity development in Civil Engineer- ing students with disabilities. Her work in CENI focuses on building networks between the University and multiple community sectors and supporting engagement in science, engineering, arts, and design. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6654-2337Prof. Thomas Martin, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Tom Martin is a Professor in the Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer
shear force and bending moment diagrams during the course and even intheir senior year. Although the method of sections can produce all for drawing the diagrams, itbecomes tedious when a beam is divided into several segments. The graphical approaches byfree-hand sketch are discussed in every textbook and is a good approach for drawing thediagrams. But the procedures provided in textbooks are not easy to be followed effectively bystudents and could be improved. Many computer-based or similar programs for drawing thediagram are available, but their effectiveness is not validated by proper assessment. We hadstudied this issue in the past years and had developed a practical procedure for drawing thediagrams with a free-hand sketch in 2017. In the
, our innovation center houses competition teams, capstone projects, classprojects, and a maker space.Several maker programs have been described in the literature. The ‘BucknellMakers’ programmakes tools widely available, offers training and skill development, and encourages curricularand co-curricular experiences1. The Georgia Tech ‘Invention Studio’ is managed by studentsand supports over 1000 students per month engaged in both class and personal projects. Thecultural benefits of the studio for both students and the university are noted2.Results from the development and operation of maker spaces and centers have been reported.The acronym ‘SPACE’ has been suggested as providing important direction – Studentinvolvement, Pick a high traffic
of the Department of Mathematics within the School of Engineering, a researcher at the School of Education, and Associate Dean of Faculty Development at the School of Medicine and Health Sciences at the Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico. Also, she is currently collabo- rating with the School of Engineering at the University Andres Bello at Santiago, Chile. Angeles holds a bachelor degree in Physics Engineering from Tecnologico de Monterrey and a doctoral degree in Mathe- matics Education from Syracuse University, NY. Dr. Dominguez is a member of the Researchers’ National System in Mexico (SNI-1) and has been a visiting researcher at Syracuse University, at UT-Austin and at Universidad Andres Bello. She teaches
An Alternative to Videos for Lecture Preparation in a Flipped First-Year Engineering Computing CourseAbstractThis paper describes an evidence-based practice project. At the University of Cincinnati, twocourses, Engineering Models I and II, are offered to all first-year engineering students and form atwo-semester sequence in which students apply fundamental theories from algebra, trigonometry,calculus and physics to relevant engineering applications chosen from a variety of disciplines.MATLAB® is introduced and progressively developed as a computing tool to enable students toexplore engineering concepts, to investigate solutions to problems too complex for handsolutions, to analyze and present data effectively, and to
and underserved youth, and provides space education programs for teachers at students in her current position with Texas Space Grant Consortium. She has a Bachelor of Science degree from Texas State University, post-graduate work at Texas A & M University and a Masters in Education from The University of Houston.Dr. Wallace T. Fowler P.E., University of Texas, Austin Dr. Wallace Fowler has served on the faculty of the Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineer- ing Mechanics at the University of Texas at Austin since 1965. His early research focused on low thrust interplanetary trajectory optimization. In the 1970s, his research focus broadened to include spacecraft attitude dynamics, tumbling satellite
Paper ID #11150Ethics and Text RecyclingDr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud is a full professor in the Communication Department at Oregon Institute of Technology and regularly teaches classes in business and technical writing, public speaking, rhetoric, and ethics; she is part of the faculty team for the Civil Engineering Department’s integrated senior project. She is active in ASEE as a regular presenter, moderator, and paper reviewer; she has also served as her campus’ representative for 17 years, as chair of the Pacific Northwest Section, and as section newsletter editor. She was
Paper ID #12676Projectile Motion with Aerodynamic Drag: The Cubic LawDr. Jeffrey C. Hayen, Oregon Institute of Technology Jeffrey Hayen joined the faculty in the MMET Department at the Oregon Institute of Technology (OIT) in 2011. Before arriving at OIT, Jeffrey served as a Professor of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physics at Southwestern Oregon Community College for 16 years. Prior to that experience, he worked in the aerospace industry as a thermodynamicist and propellant analyst for high-performance upper-stage rock- ets at the Space Systems Division of the General Dynamics Corporation. He also has conducted research
Paper ID #19316A Socio-cognitive Framework and Method for Studying Technology-mediatedProblem SolvingDarren K. Maczka, Virginia Tech Darren Maczka is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His background is in control systems engineering and information systems design and he received his B.S. in Computer Sys- tems Engineering from The University of Massachusetts at Amherst. He has several years of experience teaching and developing curricula in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech.Dr. Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech Jacob Grohs is an Assistant Professor in Engineering
include AI and High Performance Com- puting.Dr. Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University Dr. Malini Natarajarathinam joined the faculty of Industrial Distribution Program at Texas A&M Univer- sity in 2007. Natarajarathinam received her Ph.D. in Supply Chain Management from The University of Alabama. She received her Bachelor of Engineering (Major: Industrial and Systems Engineering) from Anna University [Tamilnadu, India], her MS in Industrial Engineering from Auburn University, her MA in Management Science and MS in Applied Statistics from The University of Alabama. She has experi- ence working with many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution etc. on transportation and operations
-resourced schools. In 2016 she was a recipient of the U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). https://engineering.tufts.edu/me/people/faculty/kristen- bethke-wendellDr. Chelsea Andrews, Tufts University Chelsea Andrews is a post-doctoral researcher at Tufts University and University of Massachusetts-Boston in engineering education. She received a B.S. from Texas A&M University in ocean engineering, an S.M. from MIT in civil and environmental engineering, and a PhD from Tufts University in Engineering Edu- cation. Her current research includes investigating children’s engagement in engineering design through in-depth case study analysis.Dr. Tejaswini S Dalvi, University of
presentations such as a thesis defense,seminar for a job interview, and reports for work being done under contract or for an employer.3j. Acknowledgments SectionThe Acknowledgments should include any agency and grant or contract number that providedfunding for the research. The Acknowledgments should also include anyone who providedsignificant help such as other researchers in your laboratory, faculty members who provideduseful suggestions, and other technical and clerical personnel who provided special help.3k. ‘Thank You’ SlideThe ‘Thank You’ slide is a simple slide thanking the audience for their attention. It is a good ideato include your email address on this slide. This is particularly important if you are looking for apost-doctoral appointment
the University of Auckland in 1978, 1980 and 1984 respectively. He joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Auckland in 1984 where he is currently a Senior Lecturer. He is a member of the Department’s Radio Systems Group and his (disciplinary) research interests lie in the areas of radio systems, electromagnetics and bioelectromagnetics. Over the last 20 years he has taught at all levels and has developed a particular interest in curriculum and course design. He has received numerous teaching awards from his institution. In 2004 he was awarded a (National) Tertiary Teaching Excellence Award in the Sustained Excellence in Teaching category and in 2005 he
AC 2007-2102: USING FLUID MECHANICS RESEARCH EXAMPLES TOENHANCE AND STIMULATE UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERINGEDUCATION: PART IIOlga Pierrakos, Virginia Tech Olga Pierrakos is currently a National Academy of Engineering CASEE AGEP Postdoctoral Engineering Education Researcher (PEER) at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Pierrakos holds an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics and a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her Ph.D. work pertained to vortex dynamics in left ventricular flows. She has served as faculty advisor to over thirty mechanical engineering seniors involved in biomedical engineering design projects and taught several mechanical engineering fluid