York City schools to attend the full-time(five days a week for eight hours each day) PD program. This paper describes activities andoutcomes of this teacher PD program, which allowed participants to have authentic experiences inengineering, technology, entrepreneurship, and industry. Detailed overview of PD curriculum,activities, research projects, and teacher outcomes (e.g., technical quiz, self-perception, andexternal evaluation) are provided.2. Program Rationale Supported by Literature ReviewIn order to address the SEPs in NGSS, this teacher PD program incorporates the followingcomponents: learning about robotics and mechatronics; immersion in hands-on, collaborativeresearch; opportunities to foster entrepreneurial skills; and interactions
environments would be on UREM student engagement. Motivationalresearch is clear that the combination of increased classroom structure and classroom autonomy supportsignificantly contributes to student motivation and engagement (Jang et al., 2010; Reeve, et al., 2004;Soenens & Vansteenkiste, 2005), but future research is needed to determine if this relationship holds inengineering education contexts, and to what degree it improves the experiences of UREM’s. Intensity andquality of student engagement, particularly for UREM’s with prior experiences different from classmatesfrom dominant groups, may be shaped by cultural norms, peer influences, and contextual factors relatedto curriculum and the learning environment (in addition to instructional
.” Preprint.Vasconcelos, S. M., et al., (2008). “Researchers' writing competence: a bottleneck in the publication of Latin‐American science?” EMBO reports, 9(8), 700-702.Vest, D., Long, M., & Anderson, T. (1996.) Electrical engineers' perceptions of communication training and their recommendations for curricular change: Results of a national survey. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 39, no. 1: 38-42.Walton, R., Moore, K. & Jones, N. (2019). “After the social justice turn: Building coalitions for action.” Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429198748-3Weidinger, L., et al. (2023). "Sociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI Systems." arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11986.Wheeler, E., & McDonald, R. L
student coordinators/staff members? 3. The student coordinators/staff members 9.2 9.6 8.7 9.2 were approachable and made you feel welcome. 4. The camp schedule was adequately 8.8 8.5 8.2 8.5 involved. 5. The food provided was satisfying. 7.8 7.5 6.1 7.1 6. How would you rate your housing 8.1 8.3 7.5 8.0 experience? 7. The curriculum was interesting and 9.4 8.9 8.8 9.0 helped you learn. 8. The in-class lessons were applicable to 9.6 9 8.6 9.1 your projects and any assignments. 9. The professors were engaging and easy 8.6 8.6 7.4 8.2 to understand. 10. How would you rate your
techniques. Problem-based learning is an experiential process wherestudents learn by using their experiences and other knowledge to solve relevant problems.Problem-based learning was first coined by Donald Woods of McMaster University. He andothers developed a problem-focused approach for developing medical students. The techniquessimulated actual patient problems. [12] Hmelo-Silver states that problem-based learning is “wellsuited to helping students become active learners because it situates learning in real-worldproblems and makes students responsible for their learning.”[2] Chandrasekaran et al. describedesign-based learning (DBL) as “a type of problem or project-based learning. With DBL,students gain knowledge while designing a solution for a
perform a reality check on the software results. In most cases, the systems that engi-neers deal with have become complex and involve phenomena from multiple disciplinary do-mains. For example, digital logic, electric-circuit behavior, and heat transfer all play a role in de-signing computer chips. Does our engineering curriculum prepare our graduates to deal withsuch complexity?The authors suggest that the current approach to the engineering curriculum is out of step withthe current practice of engineering. A modification to the early engineering science courses, andpossibly the first-year science and mathematics courses, would serve to change the students’ ap-proach toward problem solving and better prepare them to apply what they learn to
the area of Rockport,IL.4 Seventy-two percent of the engineers surveyed were at the BS level and more than one halfwere under the age of 35. Due to the nature of the businesses in the area, the sample containedpredominantly mechanical engineers, 53%, with electrical engineers accounting for an additional22%. The survey was structured to investigate the participation of the engineers in the threemodes of learning proposed by Houle5 : instruction, inquiry, and performance. Cervero et al.summarize these three modes of learning as follows: “Instruction is the process of disseminating established skills or knowledge in traditional formats such as formal courses or seminars. Inquiry is the process of creating a new synthesis of
. The organization is open to any undergraduatestudents at UI and currently has students who majored in Mechanical Engineering, Electrical andComputer Engineering, and Computer Science.The competition team consists of three technical subgroups: (1) hull and propulsion, (2)software, and (3) hardware. The Naval S&T program courses support the team in many ways.Specifically, naval hydrodynamics courses address the technical challenges faced by the hull andpropulsion subgroup. On the other hand, the control and autonomous systems courses canprovide the needs of the software and hardware subgroups. The IMARC, therefore, providesstudents with an experience that is highly complementary to the curriculum and also teachesstudents who are unable to
progress they have achieved towards building up their engineering competencies as aresult of the introductory class in mechanical engineering. (Appendix 3 – Assessment t-2)The final technical report on their project is the beginning of their design portfolio.VII. ConclusionsAn introductory freshman course in mechanical engineering at Alabama A&M Universitywas designed to become the starting point of incoming engineering students entering theMechanical Engineering curriculum, with the purpose of building their engineeringcompetencies. The course content and delivery methods have been revised each time it hasbeen offered. The general response from the students to this course has been satisfactoryand self-rewarding.While is still early to assess
engineering design sequence which represents the spine of the curriculum for the Department of Engineering. The research and teaching interests of Dr. Nagel tend to revolve around engineering design and engineering design education, and in particular, the design conceptualization phase of the design process. He has performed research with the US Army Chemical Corps, General Motors Research and Development Center, and the US Air Force Academy, and he has received grants from the NSF, the EPA, and General Motors Corporation.Prof. Matt Robert Bohm, Florida Polytechnic University Matt Bohm is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Florida Polytechnic University (Florida Poly). He joined the University in 2016
objective of the laboratory modules is to teach studentshow to program robots to navigate in an uncertain environment and how to control the robot1.We also pilot-tested the developed case study in a graduate-level course in Electrical andComputer Engineering.In this paper, we first review the design example and laboratory module we have developed.We then describe the pedagogy used in delivering the materials developed. Evaluation resultswill be presented, which is followed by discussions on the experiences and lessons learned.Design Example of Pill-Sized RobotOur conceptual design of the capsule robot is inspired from the earthworm-like locomotivemechanisms proposed by Kim et al.2. In order to realize a 2-dimensional locomotive
indoor/outdoor applications. He is a member of Institute of Navigation (ION); and a senior member of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).Prof. John B Jackson, California State University, Fullerton Jackson is the Director of the Center for Entrepreneurship and the Small Business Institute (SBI) which deploy an applied learning model that engages undergraduate and graduate students with local businesses. These student-led consulting projects challenge the students to practice what they have learned in the classroom. Jackson’s student team was recently awarded first place in the nation at the Small Business Institute national competition. (LINK) John Bradley Jackson is also a Full-time Lecturer in
Session 1725 Integration of design in the engineering core: Teaching engineering science courses with design in mind. Josué Njock Libii Engineering Department Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne, Indiana 46805-1499 USAFor more than twelve years, design has been successfully integrated into two, erstwhile, lecturecourses in the ME curriculum of Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne. The coursesare Fluid Mechanics (a required course) and Vibration Analysis (a technical elective
Engineering Education, 2015 Leadership Capacity Building for Manufacturing EducationIntroduction Sinclair Community College in partnership with Purdue University Calumet and IvyTech Community College was awarded a National Science Foundation Advanced TechnicalEducation (NSF-ATE) project grant. The project is designed to: deliver a comprehensiveLeadership Capacity Building Program (LCBP), prepare effective academic leaders formanufacturing and manufacturing-related academic programs, prepare master teachers for highschool pre-engineering program, and align existing manufacturing curriculum with the FourPillars of Manufacturing Knowledge. The project is based on up-to-date research on teaching andlearning, and the problems experienced
semiconductor industry. The program's curriculum, strong partnerships, and focuson experiential training have contributed to the program success of the first phases.5. Acknowledgement of SupportThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNo. (NSF #2322734).References[1] L. Ross, “4 Reasons Why Manufacturing Is Resurging in the Midwest.” Accessed: Jan. 15,2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.thomasnet.com/insights/4-reasons-why-manufacturing-is-resurging-in-the-midwest/[2] A. Blatecky et al., “The Missing Millions,” NSF OAC 2127459, Oct. 2021. [Online].Available: https://www.rti.org/publication/missing-millions/fulltext.pdf[3] The White House. (2022, August 9). FACT SHEET: CHIPS and Science Act. The
, we recognized the importance of self-confidence in students'learning outcomes, as highlighted by Chiang, et al. [3]. Consequently, the camp's curriculum wasdesigned to build students' confidence in tackling coding tasks and solving complex problems,fostering a growth mindset in a supportive, collaborative environment.The iterative nature of the camp's development underscores the importance of flexibility andadaptability in educational design, especially in the face of unprecedented challenges like thepandemic. This paper focuses on the camp's 2023 and 2024 iterations, analyzing the impact ofthe program's structure and instructional strategies on student outcomes. By examining pre- andpost-survey data, we aim to contribute to the ongoing
specifically with science and engineering education) to develop a pictureof current best practices in developing critical thinking skills in engineering andtechnology students. This search included the Internet, Ei Compendex (IOP), ERIC, andInspire and focused on “critical thinking” in “engineering education”. Although there isconsiderable literature about critical thinking in other educational settings, we narrowedour focus to expedite our search for applicable methods. Our goal is to find teaching toolsand assignments that can be adapted and used in existing classes in our own curriculum.Therefore, articles that advocate a systemic overhaul of the entire curriculum are not ofinterest to us for the purpose of this project. From the remaining articles
take on a leadership role in an organization, develop studygroups with other members, connect with industry professionals, and participate on adesign team. Most student organizations are typically led by the top students within anengineering program. Typically, there is a president, vice president, secretary, andtreasurer for each of these student groups. The responsibilities for each of these positionsprovide students with leadership skills that will later be used in engineering practice upongraduation. Other valuable aspects of these organizations are the projects that areperformed within each. For example, many organizations participate in regional andnational design competitions, such as the ASCE Concrete Canoe and Steel
AC 2007-318: INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM TEACHING: LESSONS FORENGINEERING INSTRUCTORS FROM A CAPSTONE COURSE INENVIRONMENTAL STUDIESDavid Braun, California Polytechnic State University David Braun is a Professor in the Electrical Engineering Department at Cal Poly in San Luis Obispo. He worked at Philips Research Labs in Eindhoven, the Netherlands from 1992 to 1996, after completing the Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at U.C. Santa Barbara. Please see www.ee.calpoly.edu/~dbraun/ for information about his courses, teaching interests, and research.Emmit B. Evans, California Polytechnic State University Bud Evans teaches Contemporary Global Political Issues, World Food Systems, the Global Environment
battery technologies. The lessons learned from this effort led directly into a currentBEV construction (described later) and one of the battery storage mediums for renewable energyemployed in this paper. Furthermore, efforts on the reduced scale allowed a common threadwithin the curriculum as interdisciplinary cooperation became more feasible 9. As this information was learned, students actively published and presented their knowledgein order to enable others to take a similar sustainable path 10. Moreover, universityacknowledgement of the success of the program is illustrated through the University of KansasCenter for Sustainability Academic Project and Faculty Sustainability Leadership Awards, aswell as Student Organization of the Year Award
. Soc. justice Crit. Explor. Oppor. 85–109 (Springer, 2013). Page 24.491.103 Halsmer, D. et al. Exploring connections between engineering and human spirituality. in ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc. (2010)4 Hatchell, K. et al. Engineering That Makes a Difference: A Faith-based Approach to Community Development in the Ulpan Valley of Guatemala. in CEEC Conf. Proc. (2013)5 Bulanon, D. et al. Engineering Capstone Design Course with Integrated Christian Mission Service Projects. in CEEC Conf. Proc. (2013)6 Christian Engineering Education Conference (CEEC)- Available at: https://sites.google.com/site
more recent article, Andrews et al. described engineering curriculum-wide andmultidisciplinary efforts to build students’ writing skills in technical courses through help fromtechnical writing faculty in the English department [5]. The developed writing guidelines andWriting Center assistance resulted in improved writing skills among graduating seniors [5] in avariety of writing documents, including lab and project reports. Miley et al. presented a StudioModel used to assist undergraduate electrical engineering students with improving their technicalwriting skills through assignments and Writing Center facilitators [6]. Moving to writing among graduate students, Colwell et al. investigated writingchallenges among graduate students of
generation.Depending on how a sodium borohydride curriculum is developed, students can gain practicalskills in: 1) determining hydrogen gas production via water displacement; 2) chemical reactionand product characterization using light microscopy and FTIR spectroscopy methods; 3) reactioncalorimetry, and (4) gel and foam formation via the cross-linking of borate anions to simplepolymers like polyvinyl alcohol and acetate which alters hydrogen gas evolution duringhydrolysis.Senior Design ProjectThe hydrogen generation project described in this paper was conducted primarily by two seniorengineering students that had completed only one introductory course in chemistry (common inmany mechanical and electrical engineering programs). A key aspect of the project was
TELEFORMACIÓN” Project support. Also would like toacknowledge the support of the Complimentary Action TSI2007-31091-E “Objetos educativosreutilizables (para el EEES en las especialidades en las especialidades de las tecnologías de lainformación y las comunicaciones)”, as well as research projects DPI2005-09132-C04-04 andDPI2008-04872. And the support offered by the UNED Rectorate of the network projects (2007,2008 and 2009) to develop educational innovation adapting the curriculum according to theBologna Process. Page 14.191.8Bibliography1. Wiley, D. A. “Connecting Learning Objects to Instructional Design Theory: A Definition, Metaphor, and aTaxonomy
, aLightweight Fighter Design Project, a Glider Design Project, homework, two exams and acomprehensive final exam. The desire was to update the course with new approaches to teachingintroductory aeronautics. The framework for change came as a result of a Kern EntrepreneurialEngineering Network (KEEN) Innovating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial (ICE) MindsetWorkshop. Since 2007 Baylor University has been involved with the KEEN. KEEN is “a nationalpartnership of universities with the shared mission to graduate engineers with an entrepreneurialmindset so they can create personal, economic, and societal value through a lifetime ofmeaningful work” [1]. This is accomplished by incorporating entrepreneurially minded learning(EML) into the classroom
industry for the most prominent engineeringdisciplines. Specifically, for this paper, we sought to answer the following two researchquestions: 1) Which programming languages are most commonly listed in recent U.S. employerjob postings for some of the top engineering disciplines? 2) How do the programming languageneeds in these job postings vary by engineering discipline?To answer these research questions, nearly 130,000 U.S.-based job postings were collected fromthe engineering job site engineerjobs.com. Engineering disciplines used in the job postingssearch included: mechanical, electrical, civil, chemical, and biomedical engineering; since thesedisciplines are the most popular in engineering as measured by counts of undergraduateengineering
AC 2009-1577: CLASSROOM LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION INHIGH-SCHOOL PRECOLLEGE ENGINEERING SETTINGS: A VIDEO-BASEDANALYSISMitchell Nathan, University of Wisconsin, Madison Dr. Mitchell Nathan is Professor of Educational Psychology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where he is Chair of the Learning Sciences program. He holds appointments in Curriculum and Instruction, the Psychology Department, the Wisconsin Center for Educational Research, and the Center on Education and Work. Dr. Nathan received his PhD in experimental (cognitive) psychology from the University of Colorado at Boulder. He holds a B.S. in electrical and computer engineering, mathematics and history from
four-week summer session of a college preparatory program of future firstgeneration college students located in a northeastern urban center. The 22 students (14 female, 8male) were recruited into the college prep program in a school district where 86% of the studentswere minority and 75% low-income. The course was an engineering science course staged as anengineering firm reality television show where students had a weekly challenge that lead to finalprojects. The project of spotlight for this research was a medical device that would help improvelife in some manner involving a prototype and using electric circuits concepts learned over thecourse of the summer. The frame was applied to 26 video clips to evaluate the kinds ofengineering and
with and influencing other people so they conscientiously performingsome necessary work in accordance with a mutually agreed schedule” (p. 191), was identified asthe most prominent skill required in his studies of engineering practice.17 His later workcharacterizes engineering as a “combined human performance, in which expertise is distributedamong the participants and emerges from their social interactions” (p. 176)18 Consistent withthese findings, Brunhaver et al. conclude that “[i]n addition to doing technical work, youngengineers are responsible for non-technical tasks that require significant social interaction, suchas managing projects and coordinating the work of other people.”19 This conclusion is supportedby data from a large-scale
alleviating financial burdens through scholarships. The ELC program fosters peer connectionsby housing first-year engineering students together and ensuring they share at least two classeswith roommates. By providing both financial support and social networks, the program helpsreduce external pressures, allowing students to focus on academic success. According to Tinto [3], student persistence improves when institutions foster academicand social integration through four key elements: intensity and clarity of goal to graduate, self-efficacy, sense of belonging, and perceived curriculum relevance. The SSTEM project reinforcesthese elements through faculty advising, peer course enrollment, the ELC experience, and DEIworkshops. These workshops