Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Understanding the Socializer Influence on Engineering Students
international student perspective. We seek agreater understanding of the following: 1) experiences that contribute to international students’ perceivedsense of belonging, and 2) contributors to international students’ perceived quality of interactions with peersand faculty. A qualitative research approach using the critical incident technique with a constructivistperspective was used for this study. The overall results, and in particular understandings about the conceptof ‘sense of belonging’ that emerged from the students’ lived experiences, will provide insights fordeveloping an improved and inclusive institutional support structure for international students within U.S.engineering doctoral education.Sense of belonging Sense of belonging is
; Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”In attempting to satisfy institutional accreditation and the needs of various consumingstakeholders, previously mentioned, university-level academic departments develop “linkageprocesses” to effect collaboration and cooperation with stakeholders. [3], [4] However, evidencefrom interviews suggests that linkage processes, for example departmental advisory boards andself-reported surveys of a program’s graduates result in technically biased expectations forreasons beyond the scope of this research. However, the same evidence also suggests thatadvisory boards and surveys tend to generalize expectations from non-technical factors such as agraduate’s
and Technology (2012) 14 acknowledges increaseddeparture from STEM during the first two years of college due to perceived unwelcomingenvironments, lack of math preparation, and disengaging introductory engineering courses. Asstudents near their fourth year in college, they become dismayed not by the engineering content, Page 25.236.3but rather by an engineering education structure that emphasizes technical problem solving in aclosed environment and lacks preparation for professional practice and competencies (Sheppard,Pellegrino, & Olds, 2008) 15. Therein, only a third of engineering students actually persist intoan engineering career; 60
. Product Development4. Market Analysis5. Outreach6. International componentSelected teams would work closely with NASA experts in the development of NASA's BusinessPlan for the human exploration of Mars. Proposals were due in mid-December 1998. This paperdescribes the efforts of the team from Georgia Institute of Technology, (GT) which has won aplace in this program in both years of the competition to-date. In the first program year (1999),the GT team's strategic plan helped to focus attention on the critical role of space-basedinfrastructure in improving the prospects for establishing business in space. In 2000, thecompetition focus is on Customer Engagement. The GT team has enlisted the participation ofBusiness students at Emory University
United States.A primary focus of the consortia is the improvement of science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) education at all levels to enhance our nation’s high technology workforce.One of the 52 Space Grant Consortia has offered a four-to-five day summer program for K-12educators at NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) every year since 1990. Space Grant’s primaryfocus and highest leverage in pre-college education is the professional development of K-12educators. The objective of the LiftOff Summer Institute4 is to provide the attendees withmaterials that can be used both to excite their students about STEM learning across disciplinesand to meet state, national and common core standards. The consortium has established thefollowing
Page 23.1284.5with cost for a total of 35 items. Once these items were finalized in expert consultation, theywere piloted to conduct further validity and reliability tests. Note that the online survey alsocontained demographic questions and questions about engineering careers that we are notconsidering or discussing in this paper.Pilot Testing The survey was piloted over the course of two semesters on first year engineeringstudents enrolled in common first year engineering courses at a large public university in thesouthern United States. The survey was implemented on Survey Monkey one semester andQualtrics the next, but no other questions or circumstances were changed between semesters. Aresearcher not affiliated with classes in which
Commitment to Students. She has had over 7 million research funding in Bioelectromagnetics and engineering education. She has served as research mentor to postdoctoral fellows and many graduate students, and most recently served as mentor in the ASEE Minority Mentorship program.Dr. Ann-Marie Vollstedt, University of Nevada, Reno Ann-Marie Vollstedt is a teaching associate professor for the College of Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno (UNR). Dr. Vollstedt completed her dissertation at UNR, which focused on exploring the use of statistical process control methods to assess course changes in order to increase student learning in engineering. Dr. Vollstedt teaches courses in engineering design as well as statics
practices, future research efforts, and policy development.However, fewer than 10% of systematic reviews in engineering education have focused on pre-college education [18] despite a growing emphasis on research in this area [19], [20]. One ofthese was conducted in 2012 by Diaz and Cox, who looked at all pre-college engineeringeducation research from 2000-2011 [21]. The review led to about 50 articles, mostly involvingoutreach program settings, and found that studies generally focused on integrating math andscience content in a hands-on activity using the engineering design process. The review alsofound that the dominant goals of the interventions were to increase the number of engineers,improve math and science scores, and increase technology
provide start-up funding. Itwould seem that the time is ripe for technical education to include an international experience intheir programs as well.Some members of the university community are promoting the idea that all undergraduate degreeprograms must include a required core of foreign language courses. At first light this proposalwould seem to add yet another layer of non-technical requirements on the student with theinevitable result of decreasing the technical content of their degree. Although this proposal mayhave merit, discussions with graduates have indicated that unless this classroom experience in aforeign language is soon followed by an in depth international trip/exchange, the long-termsignificance will be minimal. Experience has
shownthat rewards, deadlines, competition, controlling contexts, and evaluation all have the power toundermine intrinsic motivation and well-being [15]. Conversely, intrinsic motivation,engagement, and wellbeing are supported in classrooms that promote autonomy [11], [16]. [17]used SDT research to design a needs-supportive computer engineering course. Despite previousresearch emphasizing autonomy support, it was relatedness that was most frequently mentionedin student interviews evaluating the course. The researchers noted that team projects promotedrelatedness, and relatedness contributed to the development of competency. From this study, anarea of ambiguity emerges. The vast majority of need-supportive interventions have focused onpromoting
productivity, and intention topersist. Furthermore, delayed access to care is known to be a factor in increased frequency ofrelapse and the course of the illness. In studying mental health in higher education, researchersoften group together graduate and undergraduate student populations. Yet, these studies may notaccount for major differences among these groups’ degree programs and academic fields ofstudy, including differing academic and social demands. Studies on engineering graduatestudents are particularly sparse, with most work focusing on the experiences of specificdemographic communities (e.g., Black, women, or international graduate students). Work donehighlights disparaging results, with engineering students exhibiting higher levels of self
pervasive, daily reality of racism in US society that serves to disadvantage people of color. 2. Expose and deconstruct seemingly “colorblind” or “race neutral” policies and practices that entrench the disparate treatment of people of non-white persons. 3. Legitimize and promote the voices and narrative of people of color as sources of critique of the dominant social order that purposely devalues them. 4. Revisit civil rights law and liberalism to address their inability to dismantle and expunge discriminatory socio-political relationships. 5. Change and improve challenges to race neutral and multicultural movements in education that have made white student behavior the norm. [24]These
thetraditional Navajo worldview? The intent of these research questions is to begin to consider how Navajo students may besupported in learning engineering through curricula that is contextualized to a Navajo philosophyof learning, logic, and reasoning. This study addresses these research questions byconceptualizing the traditional Navajo philosophy of learning used to direct and formulatepedagogy in K-12 and higher education on the Navajo Nation. To explicate such information, theauthors relied upon documentation and empirical work published by Navajo scholars andeducators as well as on education documentation by and for Navajo schools. One of the authorsalso took an on-site Navajo culture course at a Navajo higher education school, where
newEntrepreneurial Fellowship program [3]. A key component of entrepreneurship is howindividuals identify opportunities, understand the needs of potential customers, generate ideas,and then develop solutions to meet user needs. This thinking style is often associated with havingan entrepreneurial mindset (EM).The Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) was developed in 2005 to encouragethe development of EM in undergraduate engineering students [4], [5]. Over the course of itsexistence, KEEN has grown from an initial network that primarily included small privateundergraduate-focused institutions to a network of 55 partner institutions, including both privateand public institutions across a wide range of Carnegie Classifications [6]. In addition to
could improve role- and qualification-alignment to reduce underemploymentissues.Also investigating the alignment between engineering education and practice, Passow & Passow(2017) sought to understand the nature of engineering work in relation to undergraduateeducation practices and accreditation outcomes [17]. They noted that “engineering work istypically project based; therefore, engineering tasks and the required competencies are tied to thelife-cycle of a product, process, or system” [17]. This implies the situated nature of both practiceand on-the-job learning experiences. A systematic review of importance ratings of differentcompetencies suggests that prioritization does not change with graduation year or years ofexperience in
uneven quality of graduates. A variety of librarian trainingprograms existed with different entrance requirements. Some schools were affiliated withuniversities while others operated within public and state libraries. Only a handful of programsoffered advanced degrees in library science and few library school instructors had advanceddegrees. In 1948, the American Library Association (ALA) passed a resolution calling forlibrarian education at the graduate level only. A few years later, in 1951, new accreditationstandards were established for library schools. During the 1950s and early 60s, the master’s inlibrary science (MLS) became the norm for professional librarians [8].The 1940s also saw improvements to working conditions for academic
projects, as the shared paradigms and epistemologicalfoundations of engineering will ease the boundary work between disciplines. The argument is thathaving a sense of how other disciplines relate to their chosen line of study will prepare studentsbetter to enter into broader interdisciplinary contexts where they, to a larger extent, have to co-construct their understandings and approaches with other disciplines.In 2019, Aalborg University (AAU) launched AAU Megaprojects, allowing students to experiencebroad interdisciplinary projects crossing all faculties at the university. Over the course of a fullsemester, students have the opportunity to work on grand challenges related to the 17 SDGs [9].A study was conducted to follow and elaborate on
Paper ID #38711An Overview of State Developed P-12 Standards for Technological andEngineering Literacy (Other)Dr. Tyler S. Love, University of Maryland Eastern Shore Dr. Love is a Professor of Technology and Engineering Education, and Director of Graduate Studies in Career and Technology Education for the University of Maryland Eastern Shore at the Baltimore Mu- seum of Industry. He earned his master’s and Ph.D. in Integrative STEM Education from Virginia Tech. His bachelors degree is in Technology Education from the University of Maryland Eastern Shore. He previously taught technology and engineering (T&E) courses in
AC 2009-717: CHILDREN'S CONCEPTIONS AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OFTECHNOLOGY BEFORE AND AFTER PARTICIPATING IN AN INFORMALENGINEERING CLUBPamela Lottero-Perdue, Towson State University Dr. Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue is an Assistant Professor of Science Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She began her career as process engineer, taught high school physics and pre-engineering, wrote curriculum and was a master teacher for Project Lead the Way, and led two Project FIRST robotics teams. As a science teacher educator, she has added engineering content and pedagogy to her science methods courses for prospective elementary teachers. She teaches engineering to
determinism, specifically the triadic reciprocalrelationship of cognitive—personal—factors, behavior, and environmental factors. One’sbeliefs about his or herself have impact and influence on control and agency55,58,63. In SCT, aperson’s beliefs about their capabilities influence how they will behave more so than even theirskills and previous accomplishments55,58. However, SCT does not presume that people canexceed their capabilities by some positive belief system55,58.Self-efficacy originates in SCT as a method of determining how well knowledge and skills wereacquired58,60. Bandura defines self-efficacy as the “belief in one’s capabilities to organize andexecute the courses of action required to produce given attainments”56,p.3. Bandura’s
practices I observed (that is, fullyrespond to the first question), engaging with the complete diversity of technique at the site wasof vital importance to the analysis presented.Of course, this work builds from an assumption that there might indeed be “queer” technicalpractices that are worth identifying and learning about. Far from using this hypothetical categoryto essentialize “queer” as a personal or organizational identity that reliably modulates “non-queer” technical practice into a genre of technique that educators can systematically describe andreverse-engineer into “improved” technical education, I envision the category as a provocation tothe positionality of queer engineering students as outside-insiders, and to the notion that“queerness
revealing the identity of the female participant [34], and havingparticipants choose whether or not to have a pseudonym and honoring that choice in the writeup[7]. These choices were likely influenced by the researcher’s values of, for example, avoidingbias, keeping participants' identities confidential, or giving power to the participants in the waytheir stories were represented. However, these choices could have effects on readers, as the waythe author refers to the participant could influence how the reader relates to the participants, inmore humanizing or dehumanizing ways. This also appeared in the way that authors labeledparticipants. For example, some authors referred to participants as “informants” [49] while othersreferred to them as
Ann-Marie Vollstedt is a lecturer for the Dean’s Office at the University of Nevada, Reno. Dr. Vollst- edt completed her dissertation at the University of Nevada, Reno, which focused on exploring the use of statistical process control methods to assess course changes in order to increase student learning in engi- neering. Dr. Vollstedt teaches courses in engineering design as well as statics and continues to conduct research in engineering education.Dr. Jeffrey C. LaCombe, University of Nevada, RenoDr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student
Paper ID #28852A Pathway Towards STEM Integration: Embodiment, Mathematization, andMechanistic ReasoningDr. Paul Jason Weinberg Weinberg, Oakland University Dr. Paul J. Weinberg is an Associate Professor of Mathematics and STEM Education at Oakland Univer- sity (Rochester, MI), where he teaches methods courses for pre- and in-service secondary mathematics teachers. In addition, he teaches mathematics content courses, in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics, for elementary education majors. Dr. Weinberg’s research focuses on students’ reasoning within STEM disciplines, in the context of schooling; this focus has
and the transfer of dataacross devices and platforms. Although some core knowledge is relevant as these changes occur,there is also substantial demand to acquire new knowledge.Currently, a large number of formal degree programs prepare students for the cybersecurityworkforce. Some of these programs are specific to cybersecurity and some of them aretraditional engineering programs that have an emphasis – either though a minor or a certificate –on cybersecurity. In addition to college degrees professional development within cybersecurity isalso strongly driven by external certification courses and agencies such as CompTIA™. Theseprograms have found niche in training professionals precisely because the field is so dynamicand for professionals to
Interdisciplinary Design Skills1 INTRODUCTIONAt the Sunapee State University engineering majors are similar to those at other schools around thenation. Most students choose a specific major in an area of interest to them and their future career plans.Within the engineering major, these students follow a specific track of courses with little variation in theform of electives taken during the third and fourth years. With the only common courses between majorsbeing rooted in math, physics, chemistry, writing and some social sciences, it is unsurprising to find thatgraduates from different programs develop and exhibit a completely different set of technical skills. Theissue in this model surfaces when those graduates leave the university to begin their
design class using open-ended questions and identified aspects of theirexperiences that could lead to improved student retention in engineering13. Using multiple surveyinstruments, Demetry and Groccia evaluated and compared mechanical engineering students’experiences in two introductory materials science classes with one implementing active learningand cooperative learning strategies14. Torres et al. presented students’ experiences of learningrobotics within a virtual environment and remote laboratory, where students knowledge wasassessed via automatic correction tests and students opinions were collected using self-evaluationquestionnaires15. Grimes et al. evaluated civil engineering students’ experiences in a visualclassroom named VisClass
translational research forintellectual advancements. This continuum indicates that research on curriculum innovationtends to focus on description of educational practice or evaluation of new interventions, whileresearch on translational research values on creation or advancement of intellectualinfrastructure.Curriculum Innovation Translational Research Descriptive Research Evaluation Research Basic Research Translational ResearchTo establish a clear To determine effectiveness To improve theoretical to disseminate evidence-description of materials of human interventions understandings without the based innovations with aand phenomena
. Nomenclature Before proceeding further, there is an issue of nomenclature to deal with. The newFramework for Science Education does two things to improve terminology. By using the Page 25.359.3phrase “science and engineering practices” it makes clear the importance of inquiry as areflection of what scientists and engineers do, not just inquiry as a pedagogical strategy.Second, it explicitly includes engineering, thereby stressing its importance andtelegraphing that there are some differences between science and engineering. What is lacking, however, in the Standards documents and the field at large, areumbrella terms for science and engineering, and