● Can handle voltages well beyond the 14V that was 18” to allow the solar panel to rotate 45 degrees north to supplied. This is done because if even for an instant the south. battery supplies a voltage more than the controller can ● Have a built in potentiometer for position feedback to handle it will do harm to the circuits. know the current extended length so that the actuators are ● Can handle current well over the maximum current not commanded to extend or compress beyond their limits. motors is intended to experience. For the preferred design, ● Low Cost
betterequipped to act as facilitator-coach and provide individualized guidance to students,while further promoting the movement away from teacher controlled lecture environmentinto student controlled learning environments. In a similar nationwide survey of 550teachers in grades K through 12, Honey and Henriquez (2003) found that students, andteachers, might be provided with opportunities to move beyond the physical confines ofthe classroom for sharing information with others, without excessive costs or delay. Asexpressed by Dwyer, Ringstaff, and Sandholtz (1991), based on their studies of the AppleClassrooms of Tomorrow (ACOT) project, expectations of what students are capable ofaccomplishing may increase, and more material may be covered in a shorter
for the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) at Georgia Tech. He contributes to our undergraduate Global Engineering Leadership Minor, as well as our new Innovation & Entrepreneurship track, by infusing leadership, innovation, and team effectiveness into our engineering curriculum. He co-instructs our Innovation & Entrepreneurship in CEE Systems course, and is a member of the instructional team for several CEE undergraduate courses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Incorporating teamwork elements into a course to improve learning outcomesAbstract The use of teamwork in courses has many benefits for students beyond simply thedevelopment of collaboration
communicate effectively (orally and written);k. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.BackgroundAdditive ManufacturingThe rapid prototype process allows the fast creation of products’ prototypes eliminatingconsiderable amounts of resources and time spent on the project when compared to traditionaldevelopment design methods1. In Additive Manufacturing (AM),a model initially generatedusing a three-dimensional Computer Aided Design (3D CAD) system, can be fabricated directlywithout the need for process planning. Although this is not in reality as simple as it first sounds,AM technology certainly significantly simplifies the process of producing complex 3D objectsdirectly from CAD data
theclassroom response system has the added benefit of keeping the class attentive. To automate thisactivity an Apple iOS App, called Pikme, was developed that can be operated on an iPhone or aniPod Touch devices for instructional use. Pikme was designed to allow instructors to randomlyselect a student from the class and be able to quickly assess their response for latter evaluation.The app enables instructors to generate a photo-roster that can be shuffled through by shaking thedevice. This approach was utilized in two different courses on regular basis to gaugeunderstanding and simultaneously improve class participation. The paper highlights the featuresof Pikme, presents the key outcomes of this implementation from the instructor’s perspective,and
Refinement of Scalable and Effective Writing Exercises for Large-enrollment Engineering Courses," in American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[22] R. R. Essig, K. W. O'Connor, S. S. Moor and S. M. Thomas, "Encouraging First-Year Engineering Retention through Course Help and Campus Community Engagement," in First Year Engineering Experience Conference, Glassboro, New Jersey, 2018.[23] M. Kaddoura, "Think pair share: A teaching learning strategy to enhance students' critical thinking," Educational Research Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 3-24, 2013.[24] B. M. Capobianco, H. A. Diefes‐dux, I. Mena and J. Weller, "What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school
, Bold Type Books, 2019.[41] Human Rights Watch, “It’s a men’s club: Discrimination against women in Iran’s job market,” May 25, 2017. https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/05/25/its-mens- club/discrimination-against-women-irans-job-market[42] Minority Rights Group International and Ceasefire Center for Civilian Rights, “Beyond the veil: Discrimination against women in Iran,” September 2019. https://minorityrights.org/wp- content/uploads/2019/09/MRG_CFR_Iran_EN_Sept191.pdf[43] Rising Stars, “Academic Careers Workshop for Women in EECS,” 2019. https://publish.illinois.edu/rising-stars/participants/[44] S. Ebadi, Until We Are Free: My Fight for Human Rights in Iran, Random House, 2016.[45] K. Laub and M. Nasiri, “Iran women
expert for students in theirlearning process.This research aims to redefine the creation of engineering problems by utilizing generative AI,particularly ChatGPT. The study assesses student performance by conducting a mixed-methodapproach that combines both quantitative and qualitative analyses. By adopting a novel approachfor creating engineering problems beyond traditional textbook problems, we explore a way toimprove student learning outcomes and enhance the essence of engineering education.This research specifically addresses a major research question illustrated in Figure 1: Figure 1: Assessment of Research Question 2. Background 2.1. Pedagogy of Engineering ProblemSeveral recent studies focused on reshaping
course reliesheavily on current NASA missions and associated issues. Most of the systems engineeringexamples are derived from missions currently in development or recently launched. Finally,outcome (k) is achieved by teaching students various systems engineering tools, such asanalytical hierarchy process, Taguchi method, and cost estimation models.Finally, student feedback was provided regarding the pilot offering through two courseevaluations, an official university survey and an unofficial instructor-developed survey. Thesurveys were completed by twenty-one students. The official survey uses a five-point scale, withfive meaning a most favorable response and one meaning a least favorable response. Theseresponses are reflected in Table 2 below
. Page 24.893.33. Structured and Step ModelsStructured and step models are relatively generic fits in the design process world. Simple stepmodels often are included as “novice” design processes. Still other models prove to be morecomplex in structure. These models are often used to predict time and order of production. Theyinclude linear models18, 19, value chains20, Design Solution Matrices11, and evolutions of thesematrices12, 14. The following section walks through these structured designs.3.1 Linear Design ProcessesThe waterfall design process is often referred to as a novice process due to its simplicity.Designers progress through steps in a linear path, checking off each step as they pass through.The “waterfall” process is seen in many
through the 12 principles of greenengineering. 2003.7. Desha CJ, Hargroves KC, Smith MH, Stasinopoulos P. The importance of sustainability inengineering education: A toolkit of information and teaching material. Engineering Training andLearning Conference; 2007.8. Quist J, Rammelt C, Overschie M, de Werk G. Backcasting for sustainability in engineeringeducation: the case of Delft University of Technology. J Clean Prod. 2006;14(9-11):868-76.9. Glavič P. Sustainability engineering education. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.2006;8(1):24-30.10. Green M, Somerville M. Sustainability education: Researching practice in primary schools.Environmental Education Research. 2015;21(6):832-45.11. Pauw JB, Gericke N, Olsson D, Berglund T. The
in non-engineering fields; b) Providing students with necessary software and hardware tools such that they can continue their design project beyond laboratory time limits; c) Encouraging students from different disciplines to interact and collaborate towards an innovative design project; d) Promoting student creativity by asking students to utilize their knowledge and talents in solving a real-world problem.In order to successfully achieve the above objectives, we implemented the followingmethodology. First, we introduce students with the basic concepts in sensor technologies.Then, through demonstration and hands-on experiments, students become familiar withavailable hardware and software tools and their
, functional parts that are using in tool making such as molds and dies, and medicalmodels including pre-operative physical models and prostheses.3The medical industry was one of the early adopters of RP through “surgical planning andrealization,”5 (i.e. visualizing and planning out a surgery before performing it using rapidprototypes of organs and implants). One of the earliest uses was in CMF (Craniomaxillofacial)surgery where there “are congenital, system-bound growth disorders, facial craniosynostoses…and other congenital skull and face dysplasia.”5 The complexity and high variability of thepresentation of the disorders require patient specific treatments. Rapid prototypes of the facialstructure, made using the patient’s scans, have allowed
are often lost on the students while they strug-gle with the mathematics. The result is a lot of rote learning without much understandingand critical analysis. This problem is exacerbated when the course is a prerequisite forupper level courses and coverage of the syllabus is deemed important. Over the last fouryears we have been trying the approach of collaborative learning in small groups in a juniorlevel course in reactor analysis to overcome some of the de ciencies. We have found thatformal classroom lectures are important in such a course but student understanding canbe improved through mandatory collaborative learning sessions in small groups outside thelecture classes. Groups of two to three students meet in separate rooms once each
in undergraduateSTEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature,” Journal of Research inScience Teaching, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 952–984, Sep. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20439.[12] A. L. Beach, M. D. Sorcinelli, A. E. Austin, and J. K. Rivard, Faculty Development in theAge of Evidence: Current Practices, Future Imperatives. Stylus Publishing, 2016.[13] J. D. Emerson and F. Mosteller, “Development programs for college faculty: Preparingfor the twenty-first century,” in Educational media and technology yearbook 2000, R. M. Branchand M. A. Fitzgerald, Eds., Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Inc., 2000, pp. 26–42.[14] C. Henderson, N. Finkelstein, and A. Beach, “Beyond dissemination in college scienceteaching: An
are also presented with challenges that demand a broader scope of considerations dueto digitalization in the field [2]. Thus, engineering has taken on a new dimension that requires amultifaceted approach to the analysis of problems and a sensitivity to the interaction betweenpeople and technical infrastructure. As a universally applicable problem-solving approach, CTcan help engineering students navigate through complex situations. The practice of CTcompetencies (i.e., abstraction, algorithms, problem decomposition, pattern recognition,troubleshooting/debugging) is advantageous for developing analytical ability [3]. Additionally,CT is comprehensive rather than restrictive, as it builds upon computing processes [4]. As such,CT skills are
specifically, researchers found that women are notportrayed as frequently as men in STEM [10]. Yet, female characters in entertainment mediaworking in STEM served as role models for many women who chose to pursue a STEM degree.Unfortunately, the media may also further the underrepresentation through the roles and ways inwhich women STEM professionals are portrayed in negative and narrow ways [7, 12].Newscasters often highlight the “exceptionality” and attractiveness of women working in STEMprofessions rather than highlighting their accomplishments, competencies, and responsibilities[7]. In children’s television programming in the United Kingdom, a 2005-2006 study of twosample weeks found that not only do television shows need a more diverse
, K. A. Design for Manufacturability: It’s Role in World Class Manufacturing (Defense Resource Management Associates, Palos Verdes Estates, CA, 1989).5. Hoyle, D. QS 9000 Quality Systems Handbook (Butterworth-Heinemann, Newton, MA, 1997).6. Randal, R. C. Randall’s Practical Guide to ISO 9000: Implementation, Registration, and Beyond (Addison- Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995). Page 6.103.87. Imai, M. Gemba Kaizen (McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 1997). Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2001, American Society
The Design of a Four-Year ASCE BOK Compliant Program Tract Michael Robinson, P.E., Kevin Sutterer, P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyIntroductionThe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Task Committee on Academic Prerequisitesfor Professional Practice (TCAP3) developed a body of knowledge (BOK) that defines theknowledge, skills and attitudes (termed outcomes in the BOK) and their associated level ofcompetency considered necessary to practice as a licensed professional civil engineer.[1] TheBOK is to be achieved through both formal education and work experience
. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References 1. K. Haghighi, “Quiet no longer: Birth of a new discipline,” Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), pp. 351-353, 2005.2. National Research Council Board on Engineering Education; Engineering education: Designing an adaptive system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1995.3. D. F. Radcliffe, “Shaping the discipline of engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), pp. 263-264, 2006.4. J. Bordogna, E. Fromm, and E. W. Ernst, “Engineering education: Innovation through
initiative11, 27, 29. In considering studentcapacities, the teacher must consider all the developmental characteristics that will inform astudent’s learning experience. Although it is well beyond the scope of the present paper toexpound upon all such factors (as indeed, the research on this topic comprises an entire sub-discipline of psychology), briefly, these factors may be extrinsic (ex: family, society & culture,religion, etc.) or intrinsic (ex: biological, maturity level, intellectual functioning, self-esteem,etc.)11. Together these comprise the developmental-contextual framework of student learning, acomprehensive lens through which student capacities can be assessed11. When selecting anappropriate engineering design challenge, be it for a
communication principles ofuser-centeredness, accessibility, usability, and accuracy guided course instruction as well asserved as the grading criteria throughout the semester. The instructors also provided studentswith a self-assessment tool (knowledge survey) to help guide their writing and as a final check oftheir written submissions.Student achievement of the technical writing block objectives was assessed via pre and post self-assessment surveys as well as through multiple writing assignments. While results indicatestudents’ improved ability to appeal to the needs of their audience and moderate ability to self-assess technical writing ability, this paper focuses on the lessons learned while implementing ashort technical communication block. We
interests are in Power Systems including Renewable Power Supplies, Power Electronics, Controls and Motor Drives. He is currently working on Renewable Energy Generation, Micro Grid and Advanced Electric Vehicle Technology Systems.Dr. Keisha C. A. Antoine, Prairie View A&M University (DUPE) Keisha Antoine is an Assistant Professor in the chemical engineering department at Prairie View A&M University where she has worked since 2019. Prior to her foray into academia, she worked as a scientist and engineer working on glass processes and functionalization, carbon footprint and energy analyses at Corning Incorporated, a Fortune 500 technology company. Keisha also has experience in providing technical solutions through
focus very narrowly on how the arts cancontribute to STEM education. I find myself wondering why this narrow perception exists and Page 23.597.15what circumstances are fostering the pervasive structure of creativity= arts. Through Sparks ofGenius, we have explored thirteen creative thinking tools that have been found in individualsfrom a wide variety of disciplines. The problem posed by the authors is that our currenteducational systems from K-16 and beyond are not cultivating creative minds because of a lackof inter- or transdisciplinarity approaches to curricula. Creativity, then, is not equated with thearts but is something that transcends
., Jamieson, L. H. & Coyle, E. J. (2001). Meeting EC 2000 through service learning. 2001ASEE Annual Conference, June 2001.Oakes, W. C. & Rud, A. G. Jr. (2001). The EPICS model in engineering education: Perspective onproblem solving abilities needed for success beyond school. In Beyond Constructivism: A Models &Modeling Perspective, H. Doerr & R. Lesh, eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ.O’Hear, A. (1996). Verstehen and humane understanding, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Olson, G. M., Malone, T. W., & Smith, J.R. (2001). Coordination Theory and CollaborationTechnology, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods 2nd Edition, Sage: Newbury Park,CA.Peterson
Paper ID #38140Training for Life: Reimagining a Codes and RegulationsCourseMichelle Marincel Payne (Associate Professor) Michelle K. Marincel Payne is an assistant professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She completed her Ph.D. in environmental engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, her M.S. in environmental engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in nuclear engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla. During her graduate studies, Dr. Marincel Payne worked to evaluate the fate of pesticides in
component implemented to address this isa reference structure interleaved into course content throughout the semester. This referencestructure is the bridging connection between each component of the class which allows for avariety of approaches to appeal to different learning styles, and is integrated through a dualapproach in assignments. Assessment has included 6 years of anonymous student survey resultsand direct feedback from a survey distributed to alumni graduating in 1998 through 2019, allshowing positive learning experiences through the course. The method of interleaving thereference structure throughout the class is presented. The general concept could be implementedto varying degrees in many other courses.IntroductionDesign courses in
have been an option for post-secondary education with the premise of assisting students’ transition from school to workplace. Page 14.42.3These programs have been defined as structured educational strategies integrating academiclearning through productive work experiences in a field related to career goals 4, 5, 6.Groenewald7 determined that cooperative education has four core dimensions: “(a) an integratedcurriculum, (b) learning derived from work experience, (c) cultivation of a support-base, and (d)the logistical organization and coordination of the learning experience.” The basic concepts ofalternating school with work over a substantial
as practitioners. Her main research interest lies in evaluating programs that hold the promise of enhancing the lives of traditionally underserved populations (children, parents, and communities).Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica E. Cardella is the Director of the INSPIRE Institute for Pre-College Engineering Education and is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University.Tamecia R Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamecia Jones is currently a doctoral student in the Engineering Education department at Purdue Uni- versity with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and informal and formal learn- ing environments. She is a graduate of
about how to properlyimplement the RBIS within the course and achieve the desired student outcomes 2. Furthermore,the obstacles impeding wide spread integration into the engineering education seem to occur atlater stages of adoption beyond awareness and implementation such as a sustained effort tocontinue the use of the RBIS or discontinue 1,3. Therefore, it is important to understand how tosustain the implementation of RBIS’s and the research-to-practice gap in the context ofengineering curriculum.Related to the general lack of sustained implementation of RBIS’s in STEM is the research-to-practice gap in engineering education. Although, European education researchers covered theresearch-to-practice gap 4, the topic has been less covered in the