retrieved by the retrieval drone andthe delivery drones needed to be able to carry a payload. An important constraint was their finaldesign had to be easily maintained in the selected developing country. Another constraint wasthat each team had a budget of approximately $500 which came from their lab fees($100/student) for the course.The teams were selected based on each student’s self-assessment of their knowledge of drones,3D plastic printing, and renewable power generation. The instructor then divided the students sothat each drone team had at least one student with significant knowledge and experience withdrones. However, all students had to pass the FAA’s drone certification exam(https://trust.modelaircraft.org/) by about the midpoint of the
, the redesigned pattern provides more flexibility to students’ study plans, which canpotentially increase their graduation rates. In addition, the redesign process reduced the numberof prerequisites and co-requisites from 10 to 8. A more compact curriculum allows the importantlearning outcomes to be taught in a timely manner, which could increase the efficiency of students’learning process.Given the high complexity nature of engineering programs, it is important to explore various meth-ods to help students with their studies. In this paper, we proposed a way from the perspective ofrearranging the program-level learning outcomes from a curriculum, to reduce curricular complex-ity in the curricula design process. To assess the efficacy of this
broad applicability. Our practical recommendations, rooted in designprinciples, aim to enhance spatial awareness, object recognition, and user feedback. Recognizinglimitations, like a small participant pool, emphasizes the importance of ongoing testing andfeedback for refining the VR 3D printing experience. Our findings provide practical insights forcreating a more user-friendly and intuitive VR-enabled 3D printing environment.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2202598.References [1] F. Rebelo, P. Noriega, E. Duarte, and M. Soares, “Using Virtual Reality to Assess User Experience,” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Used in the Assessment of Engineering Education,” Journal of engineering education (Washington, D.C.), vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2004, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00789.x.[46] E. Colucci, “‘Focus Groups Can Be Fun’: The Use of Activity-Oriented Questions in Focus Group Discussions,” Qual Health Res, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1422–1433, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1177/1049732307308129.[47] M. M. Hennink, B. N. Kaiser, and M. B. Weber, “What Influences Saturation? Estimating Sample Sizes in Focus Group Research,” Qual Health Res, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1483–1496, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1049732318821692.[48] J. Manning, “In Vivo Coding,” in The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, 1st ed., J. Matthes, C
about New Graduates,” 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.aiche.org/sites/default/files/docs/conferences/2015che_academicindustryalig nmentstudy.compressed.pdf.[5] J. Stransky, C. Bodnar, L. Bassett, M. Cooper, D. Anastasio, and D. Burkey, “Engineering process safety research instrument: Assessing students’ moral reasoning in process safety contexts,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 42, no. July 2022, pp. 44–53, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2022.11.004.[6] P. Kouwenhoven, “Process safety education: A comparative study,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 36, pp. 128–142, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2021.05.001.[7] B. K. Vaughen, “An approach for teaching process safety risk engineering and management control concepts using
each solution. Students submit their program files for assessment and grading. The author ran Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 365 the programs and personally captured all the screen shots shown in this paper. An animation lasts a few seconds to almost a minute, depending on the parameters given by the user. The left picture of Figure 1 shows a giant bird flying in and a projectile launched from the left bottom corner. It didn’t hit the bird, but the building in the right panel shows an instance of destruction
is going to be faced with a plethora of benefits and challenges. Unfortunately, ChatGPT ishere to stay. It is not a fad or overnight sensation destined to be replaced by the next shiny object.So, the inevitable and complete integration of ChatGPT into the academic setting will be abalancing act that has the potential to define EPO-125’s pedagogical future. We need to ensurethe inevitable integration of ChatGPT complements EPO-125 instead of dominating it. Not justEPO-125, but all academic institutions will need periodic assessments to evaluate and, ifnecessary, recalibrate the utilization and integration of AI like ChatGPT as it perpetuallyimproves and evolves.Because EPO-125 students are veering away from traditional academic resources such
models and solutions in response to the MEA” [11, p.281]. MEAs are constructed based on six principles: (1) Model construction, (2) Reality, (3)Self-assessment, (4) Model-documentation, (5) Construct share-ability and re-usability, and (6)Effective prototype [12]. The MEAs principles are intentionally designed for students toconstruct mathematical systems that will be applied to address the needs of a client; this processis similar to what future engineers must learn to interpret constraints and affordances inengineering design [4]. Under the MMP approach, models can be defined as conceptual systems (consisting of elements, relations, operations, and rules governing interactions) that are expressed using external notation systems
offered due to students requesting another course to ‘learnmore’, which demonstrated the impact the first course had as supported by the data from the 4thQuestion.Assessment Methods: To determine if students had met the learning objectives the module wasdesigned to address, a student survey was delivered to assess specific learning objectives. Thefollowing four questions were asked in each class: 1. To what extent has your ability to develop an understanding of quantum computing increased during this class? 2. To what extent has your ability to observe trends about the changing world with a future-focused orientation/perspective increased during this class? 3. To what extent has your ability to consider a solving problem from
integrate with an open application-program interface from computing environments suchas C, ROS (Robot Operating System), or MATLAB. Although this paper focuses on a wheeledmobile robot, some of these characteristics would still stand. One-quarter of the respondents statedthat they taught their course with an articulated manipulator while another one-quarter usedground-based indoor mobile robots.2.3 Unified Robotics Curriculum Berry et al. [2] proposed that the benefits of robotics to all ages could be improved withthe creation of a unified curriculum that translates to multiple backgrounds. The authors concludethat having a standard framework for a robotics curriculum may provide a means to assess theeffectiveness and value of robotics
outlines everything the students willneed to be doing, from deciding upon a topic, to sharing the research tasks as a team, toorganizing for the debate, to practicing, to delivering it, and finally to writing a briefcommentary or retrospective assessment of the debate. The choice of debate topics we leave up to the teams -- usually a team consists ofabout 10 students (I simply split our class of twenty down the middle so that we willhave two different debate topics). We facilitate their discussion by putting their topicideas on the whiteboard and helping them try to reach consensus on a topic. When allare fairly happy with a decision, we warn them that they need to be willing to be on aside of the topic that they may not initially agree
National Science Foundation’s Division of Engineering Education and Centers, states: “We do not educate enough of our students with the broad perspectives and long-term aspirations to be decision makers, strategic thinkers, opinion shapers, and planners….”These observations no doubt must be reviewed, discussed, and critiqued. Future workshould define the nature of technical leadership in detail and evaluate the interests andmotivations of engineers to develop skills in technical leadership; the relationshipsbetween traditional management and technical leadership must be examined; the interestsof engineers and of business and industry in career development for “technical leaders”must be assessed. Additionally, the continuing
statistics about the differences in students’ answers.Usually a significant increase in correct answers occurs. This has been proven as a very valuabletool for formative assessment, giving the opportunity to the instructor to spend more time in“difficult” questions and speed through concepts that everyone understands. The traditionallecture is also enhanced by interactive computer-based activities using the Tools for ScientificThinking9 demonstrations, and the Physlet Physics13 and ActivPhysics14 simulations. Thelaboratory activities are now integrated throughout the course using the model presented by theReal Time Physics and the Socratic Dialogue Inducing Labs (SDI) 11 curricula. Richard Hake,the developer of SDI describes the curricula as
courses repeated, improvements upon prior attempts,cumulative GPA, and graduation rates. These data and analyses are intended to aid in thedeliberations on degree program requirements during the next several years.IntroductionIt is incumbent upon any long-time faculty member to assess the state of the student body indismal terms and to make sweeping pronouncements as to the current decline in undergraduateability, as compared to the days of yore. Nods of agreement emanate from all walks of theprofessoriate. But, the required self-study is often not initiated in an attempt to verify suchspeculation.The author of this study and a majority of the faculty in his academic department frequentlycomment on the high number of students repeating required
shown in Fig. 1 more than once. One student repeatedMAT 1214-Calculus-I five times.Fig. 1. Number of students repeating courses required for the BS degree in mechanical engineering SurveyA survey was conducted to assess the perception of students on graduation rate issues. It isrelatively well-known that faculty have ideas about retention. These ideas are reflected in thecurriculum and in the assignment of instructors to particular classes. There is less information Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, The University of Texas at Arlington, March 21 – 23, 2013. Copyright 2013, American Society for
andalternative energy. They developed as I-engineers by integrating engineering and technicalinnovation skills to incorporate strategies for feasibility into their designs. When the summer2011 team arrived in Ghana, the well from the previous year’s project was not functional. The team thoroughly assessed the well equipment and found significant issues. The team decided tomake all necessary changes in repairing and improving the water system. These changes includednew submersible pumps, relocation of electrical source, voltage protector, low level floatswitches, corrective plumbing, and the installation of safe features in the electrical subsystem.These repairs and improvements restored the well to an operational and sustainable state.Additionally, the
presented a paper comparing the online and on-campus version of teaching a sophomore-level introductory course in DC and AC circuits. The course included active hands-on labcomponents. National Instruments’ myDAQ was used as the lab equipment for this course.Online students were required to submit lab memos that included the purpose, procedure, theresults, and screenshots from the myDAQ and Multisim of the lab experiment. To assess studentoutcomes, ‘Lab Practical Exams’ were used in the course as well. Astatke3 mentioned thatMobile Studio IOBoard developed by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute is used in their Electricaland Computer Engineering (ECE) labs for their online sophomore level electrical engineeringcourses. Zhai4 compared three distance
Commission, Baltimore, Md., October 26, 2015. See http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-applied- science-programs-2015-2016/#outcomes.2 Shuman, L.J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., and McGourty, J. (2005). The ABET “Professional Skills” – Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1):41-55.3 Spodek, S.R., Gerhardt, L., and Mook, D.J. (2003). Study Abroad: Impact on Engineering Careers. Proceedings of Annual ASEE Conference, Nashville, TN.4 De Kryger, W.J. (2001). International Exchange Programs: Getting started. Proceedings of Annual ASEE Conference, Albuquerque, NM. © American Society for Engineering
based of scenarios forstand-alone microgrids. The MOOC is designed by a team of three engineers with the formationand the experience in this area of study. Real datasets associated with the electrical power systemof the Dominican Republic will be available to course takers via the Open Science platform [2].Also, student assessment will be included for every module.This paper presents the outcomes and objectives of the MOOC, listing the content of the onlinecourse as well as some of the results for laboratories or simulations in cybersecurity,optimization and state estimation that have been included as part of the MOOC. The real datasetsused in the simulations for cybersecurity have been made available through the Latin Americanand Caribbean
-Performance Enhancement by Cross-Course Project Assignments: A Case Study in Bioengineering and Process Modeling,” Chemical Engineering Education, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 128-133. 22. Golter, P., Van Wie, B., Windsor, J. and Held, G., 2006, “Practical Considerations for Miniaturized Hands- on Learning Stations,” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 23. Beyenal, N., Poor, C., Golter, P., Brown, G., Thiessen, D. and Van Wie, B., 2009, “A Miniature Open Channel-Weir for the Standard Classroom: Implementation and Assessment, “Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 24. Abdul, B
freshmanexperience is critical in the decision to stay with or leave engineering, specifically the mathcourse taken and grades received the first year. This is an indication that focus should be placedon these results in terms of advisement, mentoring, raising student awareness of tutoringprograms, and faculty awareness at the least or possibly faculty training.8. Bibliography1. Litzler, E. & Young, J., “Understanding the Risk of Attrition in Undergraduate Engineering: Results from the Project to Assess Climate in Engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, April 2012, Vol. 101, No. 2, pp. 319–345.2. Hartman, H. & Hartman, M., “Leaving Engineering: Lessons from Rowan University’s College of Engineering,” Journal of
electrical engineering program at UMD has one-year program for its capstone course. The design was decomposed into components as illustrated in Fig 3 for the teams involved in the project to allow assessment of students individually and as teams. The teams in the two engineering departments work with their senior design course instructors to accomplish their design tasks. Everyone including the instructors meet once per week to discuss overall project progress and challenges. Three design review meetings were held with AFRL personnel through teleconference over the duration of the project. During the design phases, decision matrix was used to select the best design among alternative concepts brought forward by the teams. Table 1 is a design
your opinion of active learning? In what way? 10) Describe a class you feel you learned the most in. Why do you think this was? 11) How would you describe your motivation to participate in class? What motivates you? What causes you to lose engagement? 12) If you were an instructor of a course, how would you teach the material? How would you set up the class? What would you do (and have students do) before/during/after class? How would you assess student learning?ThemesThe qualitative interviews conducted aimed to address three main points: identifying students’understanding of pedagogies of engagement, evaluating students’ satisfaction with theimplementation of active learning in the LEEP2 classrooms, and evaluating
there a specific sales course offered in the engineeringcollege; listed as a 1 credit sales seminar. Proceedings of the 2010 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 3Course Development and Deployment ProcessThe Sales Engineering Committee, along with the new Engineering Sales Advisory group, metand developed a weighted curriculum recommendation. An importance scale was developed (0= not important, 9 = critical importance) to assess the topic value and determine the number ofcontact hours which should be dedicated to the topic (Table 1). The total contact hours were93.4, so these would need to be normalized to
obtained by the method using moment-area theorems via aproper way. These answers have been assessed and verified to be in agreement with the answersthat were independently obtained for a problem involving the same beam but being solved usingan entirely different method – the conjugate beam method.10IV. ConclusionThere are advantages and disadvantages in using any of the several established methods for ana-lyzing deflections of beams. This paper contributes definitive concepts and detailed explanationsto expel ambiguities often encountered by students in applying the method using moment-areatheorems to solve problems. Furthermore, it points out a caveat to avoid a common unsuspectedpitfall when applying this method to solve problems involving
. Globalization may be thought of as a process (or set of processes) which embodies David Held (Professor of a transformation in the spatial organization of social relations and transactions – Political Science, London assessed in terms of their extensity, intensity, velocity and impact – generating School of Economics) transcontinental or interregional flows and networks of activity, interaction and the exercise of power Roland Robertson (Professor Globalization as a concept refers both to the compression of the world and the of Sociology, University of intensification of consciousness
or nonexistent for a larger proportion of students’. Thirty-six percent of students experience no significant improvement in learning (as measured by the Collegiate Learning Assessment) over four years of higher education.” 3This type publicity may not apply to engineering programs but is a good resource for a legislaturewanting to cut budgets!The classroom has moved from chalk and overhead transparencies to “smart classrooms” withcomputer capabilities and access to the internet. While we may occasionally cause student “deathby PowerPoint”, we have moved to a student centered learning environment and young faculty havebeen very adept at using today’s technology. In some cases we have probably gone too far. I havesat in classes
) of the ideas (e.g., Monte Carlo simulations) andthrough more structured processes (e.g., Cause and Effect Matrix). Innovative convergenttechniques enable the evaluation and selection of ideas through the analysis of approximateor soft information (e.g., Pugh Matrix) and using more qualitative assessments (e.g.,Kawakito Jiro Method).We propose to expand, adapt, and link this classification approach to the psychologicalinertia of the designer, providing a framework which instructors and students can use to makebetter choices about the techniques they adopt in the early stages of a design project. Inaddition, we propose that techniques can also be ordered in terms of cognitive level –specifically, in this case, in terms of the degree of
." College And University 59(1): 74-86.7. http://engineering-innovation.jhu.edu/8. Gore, P. A. (2006). "Academic self-efficacy as a predictor of college outcomes: Two incremental validity studies." Journal of Career Assessment 14(1): 92-115.9. Kirst, M. W. (2004). "The high school/college disconnect." Educational Leadership 62(3): 51-55.10. Urrestarazu, L. P., A. F. Salas, et al. "Multidisciplinary Education for New Landscape Engineering Concepts using Problem-Based Collaborative Learning. A Case Study in Spain." International Journal Of Engineering Education 27(1): 138-145.11. Kathleen Dowell, 2011, “Evaluation of the engineering innovation program” report prepared for Whiting School Engineering, Johns Hopkins University
Program of the National Science Foundationunder Award Number EEC-9986866.REFERENCES[1] Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education.New York: Cambridge University Press.[2] CTGV. (1992). The jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 291-315.[3] Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 313-350.[4] Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design-based modeling approach. The Journal of the