93.9 95.6 Engineering Economics I 88.6 92.9 Engineering Economics II 75.3 81.3 Material Selection 58 85.9 Design for Manufacture 97.6 80.3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis 77 87.7 Page 14.987.9Application in Other Disciplines Dym, et al14, 15, state that “the purpose of engineering education is to graduate engineers
have funded Pfefferkorn’s work. He is a recipient of the 2007 Kuo K. Wang Outstanding Young Manufacturing Engineer Award from the Society of Manufacturing Engineers and a Machine Tool Technology Research Foundation equipment loan award. Page 26.184.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 An Examination of ME449: A New Design and Fabrication Coursein the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin - Madison Page 26.184.2IntroductionThis paper details the development of a new design and fabrication course
opportunity that fosters the creative, innovative, and leadership capacity of the employed U.S. engineering workforce through the professional master’s and professional doctoral levels of engineering levels of proficiency, and better supports the lifelong developmental process by which experienced professionals learn, grow, and develop through all stages of growth, beyond entry-level, for increasing leadership roles of engineering responsibility [I through IX] in America’s industryThis is a bold educational initiative and challenge, but the United States is in a good position tomake this unique educational innovation happen through strong collaborative partnershipbetween federal government, America’s industry, and a coalition
”. 4.15±0.23 curriculum/goals: o Available at http://polymerambassadors.org/activities/ Presented tools o NGSS Met: HS-PS1-3, HS-PS3-2, HS-LS1-2 and activities I 4.33±0.26 can use:Demonstrations Provides • Demonstrations were shown to participants so that they could see the
School of Mines. While completing her M.S. in Environmental Science & Engineering, Cristal was a Lead Graduate Fellow for the Bechtel K-5 Educational Excellence Initiative, an element of the Trefney Institute at the Colorado School of Mines.Prof. Jennifer Strong, Colorado School of Mines Jennifer Strong is a Teaching Associate Professor in the Department of Applied Mathematics and Statis- tics at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). She is also the K-12 Outreach Program Manager for the Trefny Institute for Educational Innovation at CSM, whose goal is to strengthen on-campus endeavors in undergraduate and graduate education and strengthen CSM’s leadership role in education research, curriculum development, and
working in the private sector (not Government). Further,we assume that the professional has been successful and is leaving industry on his own accord.We will focus on the teaching transition and only lightly touch on research and serviceresponsibilities. Page 9.651.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for EngineeringThe next section contain an overview of the differences between industry and academe. This willprovide the reader with the background to appreciate the following section which identifies someof the
with ampleopportunities to practice design within the curriculum. It is estimated that 70 percent or more ofthe life cycle cost of a product is determined during design and employers find that recentengineering graduates are weak in this area [2]. Reasons for the inadequacy of undergraduateengineering design education include: weak requirements for design content in engineeringcurricula (many institutions do not meet even existing accreditation criteria); lack of trulyinterdisciplinary teams in design courses; and fragmented, discipline-specific, and uncoordinatedteaching [2].Emphasis on freshman design projects has been increasing in recent years [3-9]. These designprojects can give the students a creative outlet and are typically fun. A
interested in graduate level engineering education and faculty experiences.Andrea Mazzurco, Purdue University, West Lafayette Andrea Mazzurco is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He earned a B.C. in Aerospace Engineering at Politecnico di Milano, Italy, and a M.S. in Aeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University. His research interests include global engineering education, engineering for sustain- able community development, and social justice in the engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Becoming Boundary Spanning Engineers: Research Methods and Preliminary FindingsAbstractA growing body of
consistentwith the highly contextualized nature of professional engineering expertise [8]. Each of theseapplication activities provides students with opportunities to apply different component skillsfrom their engineering education, in different contexts and to different types ofproblems/situations [9]. Design courses in general and the capstone in particular serve as platforms to facilitate thisintegrative application of basic science and engineering principles on ill structured problems thatrequire students to first apply divergent thinking and then converge to one solution [10]. Eventhough project based design courses are introduced in the curriculum to provide engineeringstudents with “real world” and “hands-on” design experiences to facilitate
AC 2007-1390: COMMUNITY COLLEGE - INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIP TODEVELOP AN AUTOMATED TRAINING PLATFORMMarilyn Barger, University of South Florida MARILYN BARGER is the Executive Director of FL-ATE, the Florida Regional Center for Manufacturing Education funded by NSF and housed at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa Florida. She earned a B.A. in Chemistry at Agnes Scott College, and both a B.S. in Engineering Science and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of South Florida. She has over 20 years of experience in developing curriculum in engineering and engineering technology for elementary, middle, high school and post secondary institutions. She is a registered professional
AC 2011-2038: AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR ENRICH-ING MATHEMATICAL, CONCEPTUAL, AND PROBLEM-SOLVING COM-PETENCIESMorris M. Girgis, Central State University Morris Girgis is a professor at Central State University. He teaches undergraduate courses in manufactur- ing engineering. He recieved his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Hannover University, Germany. His current research in engineering education focuses on developing and implementing new educational tools and approaches to enhance teaching, learning, and assessment at the course and curriculum levels. Page 22.159.1 c
of Mechanical Engineering, Florida A&M – Florida State University b Lockheed Martin CorporationIntroductionLike most other programs, the curriculum of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at theFAMU-FSU College of Engineering is capped with a one-year senior design project in which thestudents work in teams to design and implement products or systems under the sponsorship of anindustrial partner. It has been recognized that capstone design courses represent an excellentvehicle to round out a good engineering education and they provide the appropriate platform forstudents to apply design thinking and transition into a professional career1. Many universitieshave adopted this
of Engineering, University of Georgia. She is also a graduate research assistant in Dr. Beshoy Morkos’s Model Group. Xiaoou Yang got her bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering in May, 2019 at Florida Institute of Technology and now she is doing her Master’s program at UGA. Her research field is Engineering Education in Design Manufacturing, and she is looking forward to make some friends and collaborate with researchers in the field in the future.Dr. Beshoy Morkos, University of Georgia Beshoy Morkos is an associate professor in the College of Engineering at the University of Georgia. His lab currently performs research in the areas of system design, manufacturing, and their respective education. His
, and the adoption of evidence-based teaching strategies.Dr. Sam Spiegel, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Spiegel is the Assistant Provost and Executive Director of the Trefny Innovative Instruction Center at the Colorado School of Mines. He previously served as Chair of the Disciplinary Literacy in Science Team at the Institute for Learning (IFL) and Associate Director of Outreach and Development for the Swanson School of Engineering’s Engineering Education Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh. Prior to joining the University of Pittsburgh, he was a science educator at Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS). Dr. Spiegel also served as Director of Research & Development for a multimedia development
andill-structured industry problems in mining, milling, and manufacturing. There are no courses inthe IRE curriculum; rather, every semester students generate (with the help of faculty) a series ofsyllabi that describe how they will meet the required technical and design competencies thatcomprise the IRE curriculum. A majority of IRE learning and assessment activities are organizedand indexed by the aforementioned team-based, semester-long industry projects. For example, anIRE team designed and implemented a condenser performance test to be applied to a powerplant’s power generation condenser. To solve the problem, students learned cycle analysis,conduction heat transfer, convection heat transfer, heat exchanger design, engineeringeconomics, and
the high-tech economy, it hasbeen said that stakeholders must now invest in people's skills [5]. A new stage in industrialproduction: Industry 4.0 incorporated technologies that quickly permeated in the form ofdisruptions such as cloud computing, the internet of things, big data, and artificialintelligence, which currently allow the fusion of the virtual and physical world and mark theadvent of intelligent manufacturing systems [6]. Since 2000, these technologies, mainlyrelated to digital technology and biotechnology, propitiate the creation of new jobs requiringa highly skilled workforce, mostly holding a college degree in STEM. Several crucialquestions have arrived: How can education sectors and industries work together to cope
agree with the relatively high scores on theEngineering Education Adoption instrument.In listing barriers to implementing engineering in their classrooms, none of the teachersmentioned their own understanding (or lack of), and only one listed the creation of curriculum,which would seem to indicate a high confidence in teaching engineering. Time, materials, andmoney, were cited by nearly half of participants as barriers to implementing engineering lessons.Two mentioned a lack of support of their co-workers or administration, and two mentioned lackof buy-in from their students, particularly those who are not accustomed to open-ended orproject-based lessons. The answers for what empowered teachers to enact engineering in theirclassroom were
that include mechatronics, automation and computer control algorithms.• Undergraduate students commented that subdividing the lab class into smaller lab sections would aid in the hands-on learning.References1. Kolb D. A. (1984) Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development New Jersey: Prentice-Hall (0 13 295261 0).2. Jung, C. G., Man and His Symbols, J.G. Ferguson Publishing Company, 1964.3. Felder, R.M. and Brent, R., "Understanding Student Differences", Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 2005, pp. 57–72.4. Briggs Myers, I and Myers, P.B, Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type, Davies-Black Publishing, Palo Alto, California, 1980.5. Mills, J., Ayre, M., Hands, D., &
AC 2010-2201: EFFECTS OF STUDENT-CUSTOMER INTERACTION IN ACORNERSTONE DESIGN PROJECTChristopher Williams, Virginia Tech Christopher B. Williams is an Assistant Professor at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, where he directs the Design, Research, and Education for Additive Manufacturing Systems (DREAMS) Laboratory. His joint appointment in the Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Education departments reflects his diverse research interests which include layered manufacturing, design methodology, and design education. As a member of an instructional team that orchestrated a service-learning design project for the first-year engineering program, Professor
AC 2009-1405: FIRST-YEAR DESIGN EXPERIENCE: ASSEMBLING THE “BIGPICTURE” THROUGH INNOVATIVE PRODUCT DESIGNKelly Crittenden, Louisiana Tech UniversityDavid Hall, Louisiana Tech UniversityMark Barker, Louisiana Tech UniversityPatricia Brackin, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Page 14.633.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 First-Year Design Experience: Assembling the “Big Picture” Through Innovative Product DesignAbstractAs part of the freshmen engineering curriculum at Louisiana Tech University, students developnovel solutions to problems that “bug” them. During the spring quarter, students are asked tospend several weeks
, at the Intense Pulsed Neutron Source (IPNS). Dr. Ilhem F. Hakem joined the Colloids, Polymers and Surfaces (CPS) Program and the Department of Chemical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University in 2018 as Teaching Professor to support and expand the educational activi- ties of the CPS Program. This involves teaching of undergraduate and graduate level courses, supervising undergraduate and Master students in research projects related to soft materials and finally develop and get involved in K-12 outreach activities. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: A Summer Outreach Program in Chemical Engineering Emphasizing
postdoctoral fellow at the University of Delaware. His expertise spans product design, advanced manufacturing, materials insertion, and knowledge-based systems integration. His current externally-funded research is on the design of real-time lightweight robotic systems, high-temperature materials, and micro-/nano-scale devices. He is a member of ASME, ASEE and the American Society for Composites (ASC). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 An Activity-Based Design Course for Conceptualizing Failure and Factor of SafetyAbstract—Teaching design throughout the eight-semesters of undergraduate studies, termed asthe design spine, is a hallmark of the engineering curriculum at our
Pure Adulteration: Cheating on Nature in the Age of Manufactured Food (2020) and Notes from the Ground: Science, Soil & Society in the American Countryside (2009), and co-editor of Technoscience and Environmental Justice: Expert Cultures in a Grassroots Movement (2011). He also writes widely on the history of food, the environment, science, and technology, and the ways engineers contribute to those stories. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 “Asking ‘why’ instead of ‘how’": Outcomes of an interdisciplinary degree program in Engineering StudiesAbstractThe Engineering Studies Program
Paper ID #30346WIP: Validating a Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)in an Active, Blended, and Collaborative (ABC) Dynamics LearningEnvironmentMs. Wonki Lee, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Wonki Lee is pursuing Ph.D. in Education, Curriculum Instruction, Language and Literacy program at Purdue University. She received her bachelors and masters, specializing Korean language education as second/foreign language from Seoul National University, South Korea. Prior her doctoral studies in United States, she worked as a Korean teacher for 6 years and pursued her Ph.D. in
epistemology development students.Dr. Nicole P. Pitterson, Oregon State University Nicole is a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She holds a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University and other degrees in Manufacturing Engineering from Western Illinois Univer- sity and a B.Sc. in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Technology, Jamaica. Her research interest is eliciting conceptual understanding of AC circuit concepts using active learning strategies.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor and Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmen- tal Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include
Paper ID #21738Motivational Attitudes and Behaviors in Capstone Projects: QuantitativeValidation of Assessment InstrumentsBashirah Ibrahim, Ohio State University Bashirah Ibrahim is a postdoctoral researcher in engineering education at the Ohio State University.Dr. Peter Rogers, Ohio State University Dr. Peter Rogers is a Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education The Ohio State University. He joined the university in October 2008 bringing with him 35 years of industrial experience. His career includes senior leadership roles in engineering, sales, and manufacturing developing products using
. She is currently investigating the use of Oral Discourse Method for con- ceptual development in engineering, the impact of a four-year hands-on design curriculum in engineering, the effects of service learning in engineering education, and informal learning in engineering.J. Pemberton Cyrus, Dalhousie University Dr. Pemberton Cyrus, P.Eng., FEC, is Associate Dean of Engineering at Dalhousie University. Prior to this, he served as the Head of Industrial Engineering. His research areas include routing and schedul- ing algorithms, and resource allocation problems. He recently led a redesign of the core engineering curriculum at Dalhousie and its Associated Universities
understand that the exposure to power tools, 3-d modeling, circuits, coding, and human-centered needs will be beneficial in the long run to my education and career.”“I found the interactions with 3D modeling and printing most interesting in this course. Thecourse does a good job at introducing students to the hands-on aspects of engineering that don'tinvolve high levels of experience. Introducing 3D printing, coding, and wiring were all thingsthat I liked being able to explore.”“Coding with the Arduino and seeing how versatile such a seemingly simple device is.”“I found the Arduino kit most interesting about this course because it is the perfect beginner's kitfor circuitry while it could also be used to build much more complex circuits.”Integrative
topic of uncertainty couldbe considered in teaching and learning of engineering design.’ as shown below: • R8.1: “Not only do I feel it is important to incorporate elements of technical uncertainty as it impacts functionality and failure modes, design and manufacturing costs, etc., but based on my extensive experience in product design, manufacture and marketing, uncertainty in the area of market acceptance is a critical element that must be fully embraced if the market is to accept products that otherwise have gone through a sound and competent engineering design process.” • R8.2: “Certainly uncertainty is important in engineering design.” • R8.3: “Uncertainty and ambiguity are both important
laboratory demonstrations and practical hands-on experience in engineeringdesign. The second element is year-round career workshops at local manufacturing and researchfacilities and weekly tutorial sessions facilitated by college students. The third one is a one-weeksummer program following high school graduation to improve math concepts, introduce studentsto faculty and upperclassmen and perform academic advising and placement testing amongothers. Data collected for ten years shows that this platform increased access and retention ofunder-represented students pursuing STEM careers. A 66% (45 out of 68 participants) majoredin a STEM academic area and 94% pursued college education. The retention rate for the summerprogram from year to year was