what they termed as a “consensus curriculum.”This was then presented to the Institute for approval in April. The Institute approved thecurriculum that came to be known as the Sophomore Engineering Curriculum (SEC).Serendipitously the Electrical and Computer Engineering department, who were in themidst of a departmental curricular revision, adopted the SEC and required it for all theirsophomore students that coming fall. This decision meant the SEC would be offered foran entire department without piloting it first.In summer 1995, another team was formed to work out the details of the SEC. Twelvefaculty members, some of whom served on the conceptual team the previous summer, aswell as three students, met to develop the details of the program
curricular change to increaseflexibility, frequently stating that the ABET accreditation3, BOK2 requirements, and/or complexnature of the civil engineering profession cannot be adequately taught in fewer required courses.If students are taught about these curriculum drivers they may feel somewhat less negative aboutthe constrained curriculum, instead recognizing its value as strong preparation for a rewardingcareer.The first goal of this project was to introduce the BOK2 to first year civil engineering studentsand determine what information they perceived as most important and/or motivational. Thestudent responses were explored to determine if there were differences in student attitudes basedon gender or ethnicity. One of the primary goals of the
50% of universityprograms in construction had a dedicated course in construction. In 1998, a surveyinvestigation by Coble et al. [11] looked at 4-year ACCE-accredited construction programsand the extent with which safety is integrated in their curriculum. The results showed that atthe time 45 of the 55 programs had a dedicated course in safety, primarily offered at thejunior/senior level, concentrating on OSHA standards for construction. Less than half of theprograms at the time provided an OSHA outreach training certificate to the students, while75% of the program faculty surveyed stated that they address safety in other courses.A survey of employers from 27 firms was conducted in 1998 by Smith and Arnold [12],which focused on the
; 2005; Jamieson et al., 2009; Mena et al., 2012; Hundley et al., 2012;Knight, 2012; Spinks et al., 2006; Bourn and Neal, 2008). In the Middle East, the GCC, andQatar an investigation similarly has not been conducted, hence this study sheds an importantperspectives bridging an empirical gap in the literature and contributing to better design offuture engineering education in Qatar.There are four main dimensions that are driving Qatar’s economy into a KBE: 1- QatarNational Vision 2030, 2- World Cup 2022 and the associated mega projects, 3- Instability ofOil and Gas prices, and 4- Regional growth and competition for skills, products, andinvestments in the GCC region mainly led by UAE and Saudi Arabia.Qatar is increasingly investing in knowledge
curricula and fine-tuneinstructional methods. Along with new curriculum, educators should develop and researchmeaningful assessments and measurable impacts of innovation courses and programs. Sinceinnovation education is an emerging field, there is limited research on how to effectivelymeasure its impact on the field of engineering as a whole. Additionally, research is needed tosupport the development or modification of accreditation criteria and examine the roleaccreditation can play in insuring quality and consistency among entrepreneurship andinnovation educational programs.Bibliography1. Kuhn, T.S., The structure of scientific revolutions1996, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.2. Ferguson, D.M., et al., Engineering innovativeness
demand for ET program to update theeducational infrastructure along with technology trend. To address this concern, the authorsutilize networking and information technologies to improve laboratories, to help student developappropriate professional skills through college education.Methodologies LabVIEW has proven to be effective in facilitating engineering laboratories by creating adynamic learning environment, from hands-on labs to student design projects. In recent years,LabVIEW has been successfully utilized in online remote education with its remote accesstoolbox9,10. ELVIS (Educational Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Suite) is a LabVIEW-baseddesign and prototyping environment for university science and engineering laboratories
Paper ID #36361Full Paper: First-Year Computing Course with Multiple ComputingEnvironments - Integrating Excel, Python and MATLABDr. Sean P Brophy, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Sean Brophy is a learning scientist, computer scientist and mechanical engineer with expertise in developing and research effective learning environments. His research centers on developing engineering students’ expertise to adapt to new problem solving contexts.Dr. John H Cole, Purdue University John H. Cole (S’10–M’12) received the B.S.E.E. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
electrical and mechanical instructors to theleast (the focus in civil engineering is also noted in Bielefeldt et al, 2017). First year andcapstone design courses also emphasized the importance of ethics more than those teachingtechnical courses. This study looked primarily at specific instructor characteristics and how thesemight impact perceptions of ethics. The authors found that male engineering instructors placedmore emphasis on ethics in their own teaching, while female instructors had stronger beliefsaround the importance of the curriculum as a whole emphasizing engineering ethics. Theinstructors with industry experience also seemed to more strongly prioritize ethics in their ownteaching, congruent with the idea that instructors make
statedobjective of the UB undergraduate program of achieving a range of graduate attributesincluding the ability to work in a team.Formal cooperative learning as outlined by Johnson, et al in [7] relates most closely to theteamwork based around task focus that was such a large part of this project. However even thisstructure is only discussed in terms of organised class sessions [7]. At UB instead we have Page 4.54.2developed a range of activities that can last from a one hour class session up to a ten weekassessment task incorporating the teamwork paradigm.In an organisational context, teamwork skills development is seen as vital to the process
get industry representatives actively involved in the students’ efforts at solving the problem. Faculty should learn how to utilize industry projects for education and reconsider how to structure a curriculum considering such time-consuming and sometimes unpredictable experiences. • Improve Communications skills (18) The ability to communicate with a wide variety of professionals is increasing critical for today’s manufacturing engineering graduates. Students must have the ability to write clearly and succinctly to explain ideas and propose projects. They should get practice making effective oral and visual presentations and utilizing computer graphics. Students should learn to teach others
,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005, doi: j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.[2] A. H. Greer et al., “Design of a Guided Inquiry Classroom Activity to Investigate Effects of Chemistry on Physical Properties of Elastomers,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 915– 923, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00528.[3] D. MacIsaac, “Report: AAPT Recommendations for the Undergraduate Physics Laboratory Curriculum,” The Physics Teacher, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 253–253, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1119/1.4914580.[4] W. Odell, “Aims and Methods of the Teaching of Physics 1,” Nature, vol. 31, no. 808, pp. 578–580, Apr. 1885, doi: 10.1038/031578g0.[5] R. A. Millikan and L. B. Avery, “SYMPOSIUM ON THE PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION
engineering and engineering educationresearchers from two public land-grant research universities, University of Florida, andUniversity of Minnesota. The primary goal of the project is to enhance undergraduateengineering education in Quantum Information Science and Technology (QIST), specifically inresponse to pressing national challenges, such as the growing need for a QIST workforce.The study aims to reduce the technical and cognitive barriers to enhance accessibility of QIST. Itreports on “Introduction to Quantum Computing” (EEE 4423), which was initially offered in theyear 2020 as a special topics course in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering(ECE) at University of Florida. The course, now offered every Fall semester, adopts
most impactful time toenergize students about careers in STEM is in K-12 settings. To emphasize and spotlight the importance ofbuildings on humans, along with providing an interactive learning experience for potential future STEMstudents, a five-day summer camp focused on multi-disciplinary building design was held at (insertuniversity name). The camp curriculum included hands-on, design-oriented projects from severaldisciplines: architecture, mechanical, structural, construction, sustainability, acoustics, and lighting. Inaddition, tours of several buildings on campus were conducted along with after-hours relaxation time forcampers. The implementation of activities and the well-designed hands-on projects not only increased thestudents
culturaleducation in many institutions. The educational foundation is there for combining technologywith culture in the engineering curriculum. These selective models: concentrations andminors, cultural courses and cultural components in dual degree and simultaneous degreeprograms, global simulation projects, international internships and team projects, studyabroad and global courses are different educational models currently in place ininstitutions.Cross-Cultural Education through International Minors and ConcentrationsAn International Minor in Engineering is a concentrated effort to include international studiesinto the four-yearengineering curriculum. This is donethrough selection of global courses tofulfill humanities, social science, and free elective
collaborative workon projects (Simkins).Collaborative Learning and Engineering EducationThat engineering educators have been slow to adopt collaborative learning techniques shouldcome as no surprise given the open-ended nature of the method. Yet, the trend in engineeringeducation is also to include more cooperative and collaborative learning activities. At theUniversity of Arizona, electrical and computer engineering faculty have teamed up with Englishcomposition faculty to teach a combined six-credit course to freshmen. The faculty concludedthat the approach “resulted in more collaborative learning and holistic thinking” (Ostheimer,Mylrea, and Lonsdale). Cornell University’s College of Engineering added a program ofAcademic Excellence Workshops, one
research experience as part ofan undergraduate engineering education. Every engineering curriculum includes a culminatingevent, usually a senior design project. Most curricula include some opportunity for independentor small group research, even if it is only limited to a literature review on a specific topic.Another research opportunity available to most undergraduate engineering students is anindependent study course. Research is also an important experience for undergraduate studentsconsidering going on to graduate school.There is a great deal of literature describing the value of undergraduate research, especially forscience and engineering students. The National Science Foundation (NSF), The NationalInstitutes of Health (NIH), and the
Paper ID #41283Developing the Design Reasoning in Data Life-Cycle Ethical ManagementFrameworkDr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University Senay Purzer is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research is on engineering design reasoning.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University Carla B. Zoltowski is an associate professor of engineering practice in the Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and (by courtesy) the School of Engineering Education, and Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program within the College of Engineering at Purdue. She holds a
University Dr. Wei Zheng is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at Jackson State University (JSU). He received his Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2001 and has over 10-year industrial experience. Since becoming a faculty member at JSU in 2005, he has made continuous efforts to integrate emerging technologies and cognitive skill development into engineering curriculum. He serves as a freshmen advisor for the First Year Experience Program at JSU and is the Principle Investigator for ongoing CCLI-Phase I Project funded by NSF. He has led the new course module development for CCLI-Phase I project and integrated its implementation in his course at the Department of Civil
–154 (2012).4. Besterfield-Sacre, M. E. et al. Essential factors related to entrepreneurial knowledge in the engineering curriculum. In 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (2012).5. Purzer, Ş., Fila, N. D., & Nataraja, K. M. Evaluation of current assessment methods in engineering entrepreneurship education. Advances in Engineering Education, 5, 1-27 (2016).6. Charyton, C., Jagacinski, R. J., Merrill, J. A., Clifton, W. & DeDios, S. Assessing creativity specific to engineering with the revised creative engineering design assessment. J. Eng. Educ. 100, 778–799 (2011).7. Genco, N., Hölttä-Otto, K. & Seepersad, C. C. An experimental investigation
second year of their studies, thecompulsory design module comprises of a term-long group project in which students have togo through the entire design process from ideation, embodiment design, manufacture,assembly and testing (this group project has previously included gas propelled vehicles,winches, and an electric scooter). This project precedes Design Week which takes place inthe Spring term of the second year. This curriculum leads to an academic year long groupproject in the third year known as DMT (Design, Make and Test), whereby students work insub-teams in the development of a larger, super project (super projects are typically formedof three sub-teams).Design week has been curated to the meet the curriculum requirements, whilst
Paper ID #26094Improving Technical Writing Skills Through Lab ReportsDr. Ilan Grav´e, Elizabethtown College Ilan Grav´e received B.Sc. in Physics and Electrical Engineering and M.Sc. in Physics from Tel-Aviv University in Israel, and a PhD in Applied Physics from Caltech, in Pasadena, California (1993). In the past he has lead high-tech R&D avionics projects at the Israeli Aircraft Industries; has been a se- nior researcher and adviser at the Fondazione Ugo Bordoni, in the Ministry of Post and Communications in Rome, Italy; and has been on the faculty of the Department of Electrical Engineering at the Univer- sity of
, and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He served as Project Director a Na- tional Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized innovative undergraduate engineering curricula. He has authored over 70 papers and offered over 30 workshops on faculty development, curricular change processes, cur- riculum redesign, and assessment. He has served as a program co-chair for three Frontiers in
distinguishes betweenformative and summative feedback. While in academic settings both types of feedback aretypically provided by instructors, studies have shown that formative feedback provided bystudent peers has many benefits. When students review their peers’ work they engage in thecognitive processes of analysis, diagnosing problems, and suggesting solutions. Similarly, whenfeedback is utilized within a team setting, it supports the project goals by assessing the project’scurrent state, which tends to positively impact team effectiveness [1], [2].Giving and receiving feedback effectively improves students’ ability to work collaboratively.Specifically, Nicola et al. [2] suggest the following behaviors can improve team performance: i)accepting
appropriatetechnology movement in shaping our purpose and the role of service-learning in shaping ourprogram. The paper concludes with the case study of an international service-learning project ofMessiah College Engineering.I. Responsible EngineeringPersons outside of the profession, and sometimes engineers themselves, do not understand thenature of engineering work very well. Ron Howard’s film about the troubled Apollo 13 moonshot depicts the response of engineers to crises. In one scene, the astronauts’ lives are injeopardy as carbon dioxide accumulates in a disabled spacecraft. Ground crew engineersworking under severe time constraints, and using only those supplies available to the astronauts,must make square filtration canisters work in round
Paper ID #36711Work in Progress: Let’s Play — Improving Our Teaching by Reversing Rolesand Being a Learner with Board GamesDr. Peter Jamieson, Miami University Dr. Jamieson is an associate professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at Miami University. His research focuses on Education, Games, and FPGAs.Dr. Eric James Rapos, Miami University Dr. Eric Rapos is an Assistant Professor of Software Engineering at Miami University, specializing in research in tool and interface design aimed at collaboration and user interaction. Recent projects have involved virtual reality, voice interfaces, and sketch
introductory biology course into an active learningexperience that resonates with a wide range of undergraduate students. Backward course designled to an innovative curriculum that (1) is based on biology’s big ideas, (2) has measurablelearning outcomes, and (3) encourages development of higher order thinking skills. Our studioclassroom design maximizes interactions; cantilevered workstations distributed throughout theroom encourage student-instructor and student-student interactions. Group discussions occur atwhiteboards as students solve problems, create concept maps, plan experiments and interpretexperimental data. Workstation computers and dual monitors support whole-class instruction aswell as student-led group explorations. The classroom design
responsible engineers.2 This focus has not only shifted howengineering students are taught necessary technical skills to address the demands of rapidlychanging technologies, but also toward developing the skills essential as citizens in a globalized Page 23.596.2world.Vanasupa et al. argue that social responsibility is at the heart of the Engineer’s Creed.3 Theybelieve that engineering curriculum should go beyond developing technical knowledge andshould take a socially responsible approach that takes into account the ethical, social, andenvironmental impact of engineering solutions. With this increased focus on preparingengineering students to be
increase in the efficiency of pumps, turbines, and electric motors. Contact one or more pump, turbine, and motor manufacturers and obtain information about the efficiency of their products. In general, how does efficiency vary with rated power of these devices? (p. 242)Such a problem can easily demonstrate to students a typical activity they might need to do as partof a position in industry, including the ability to perform and discuss a comparison of devices.Elger et al.: This textbook included many different types of writing scattered throughout the end-of-chapter homework problems, with no dedicated sub-sections. However, it offered little to nosupport for students regarding appropriate types of responses for different
(The Mathworks, Inc.), met thisconstraint. Four laboratory projects were implemented: Digital Sound Effects, Touch-ToneDialing, a Voice Scrambler/Descrambler, and an exploration of Sampling and Aliasing in thecontext of the Telephone System. Each presented fundamental concepts, such as sampling andaliasing, in the context of a realistic problem. Students experienced the effects of signalprocessing manipulations aurally, visually, and in real-time, solidifying their understanding andincreasing their engagement in the material.1. IntroductionDigital signal processing (DSP) is central to modern Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE)undergraduate curricula. The discipline of signal processing combines an extensive mathematicalbackground with
algorithm (Kolarevic & Parlac, 2015).Electro-mechanical technology used in responsive facades is a mature technology. Electro-mechanical technology is considered to be reliable technology, which possesses significantadvantages such as standardization of parts, modularized design components, inexpensive initialcost, and centralized monitoring and control (Decker & Zarzycki, 2013). The drawbacks of thistechnology include complexity of heavy mechanical parts (Tashakori, 2014), high potential failureof material fatigue (Kolarevic & Parlac, 2015), difficulty in parts replacement, high costs inmaintenance and repairing (Adriaenssens et al., 2014), limited components durability (Khoo,2013), dependency on electrical powers (Adriaenssens et al