evaluator and psychometric expert on several federally funded projects in education, natural science, and engineering. His focus is to conduct rigorous quantitative and qualitative measurement and program evaluation utiliz- ing validated assessment tools with published psychometric properties, qualitative rubrics with reliable scoring procedures, and developing and validating assessments in-line with the recommendations of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.Isaias Cerda , Rice University As the Associate Director for Science Education and English Language Learners for the Rice Office of STEM Engagement (R-STEM) and a former participant in our professional development programs, Isaias provides
the lab setting, they and develop new initiatives to meet these challenges.acquire troubleshooting knowledge and hands-on Content knowledge alone does not prepare studentstechnical skills. In this reading intensive course, sufficiently for the disciplinary literacy they need to bestudents need to read the lab manual and a textbook of successful in their careers. Disciplinary literacy isover 700 pages. Therefore, reading and understanding significant because it is the “specialized knowledge andthe textbook is a main concern., Given the breadth and abilities possessed by those who create, communicate, anddepth of materials covered in the course, instructors use knowledge” within
Paper ID #37067Designing Local Food Systems: Results from a Three-Year PilotDr. Daniel B. Oerther, Missouri University of Science and Technology Professor Daniel B. Oerther, PhD, PE, BCEE, BCES joined the faculty of the Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2010 as the John A. and Susan Mathes Chair of Civil Engineering after serving ten years on the faculty of the University of Cincinnati where he was the chair of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.Sarah Hultine Massengale, University of Missouri - St. LouisSarah Oerther, Saint Louis University ©American Society for
nonprofits including the Computer Science for All and Nation of Makers. Andrew was also the lead author on the Maryland Access Task Force report to Maryland’s Governor Larry Hogan. His work has been recognized by Baltimore Business Journal, The Daily Record, Forbes Magazine, Baltimore Sun, Education Week, and K12 Magazine. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Using Retrospective Surveys to Assess the Impact of Participating in an Afterschool Maker Learning Program on Youth (RTP)AbstractAs the number of afterschool technology-rich maker learning programs for youth increases, it isimportant to investigate effective assessment tools that can be
introductory courses arelecture-based and may be supplemented with discussion sections and presentations by guestspeakers or alumni. While these activities offer students exposure to the engineering discipline,they lack the hands-on component commonly used to enhance learning [15]. Many introductory-level courses do not offer students a laboratory experience since first-year students lack thebackground necessary to apply engineering principles, and many activities would requireextensive laboratory and calculation time [16]. Additionally, it has been shown that highlycompetitive introductory math and science courses that lack engagement may discouragestudents from earning a STEM degree [17]. For example, it has been shown that struggles in firstyear
Electrical Engineering department at California Polytechnic State Uni- versity. He has a BS in Engineering with a Computer concentration from LeTourneau University and a PhD in Engineering with an emphasis on Microelectronics from Louisiana Tech University. His current activities focus on project based learning and online student assessment.Dr. Bridget Benson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Bridget Benson received a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering at California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obipso in 2005, a Master’s degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of California Santa Barbara in 2007 and a PhD degree in the Computer Science and Engi- neering at
-school. By encouraging early STEMeducation we hope to influence high-school coursework, as well as career and educationalpathways. The real world applications of engineering and the inquiry-based, hands-on nature ofthe engineering design process can serve as a means to integrate mathematics and science inways that connect youth to the joy of learning, and to applying knowledge and skills to sociallyrelevant challenges.3,4Recent science education reform focuses on the concerns that students are not gaining the skillsets necessary to maintain America’s economy.5 There has been a general call to change schoolexperiences to prepare students’ for life and work in today’s global economy.6 Meadows5 statedthat learning science by inquiry is central to
diversity with people with the same beliefs, so ideologies arerarely challenged. Inclusive teaching strategies can promote gender equity through thoughtfulselection of course materials, cross-cultural communication, using teaching methods that includestudents of diverse learning styles, encouraging student confidence, interaction, and classparticipation, and using assessment and evaluation methods that provide meaningful data on eachstudent’s experiences and knowledge gained within the class. Lastly, intervention programs arespecialized programs to help students from underrepresented groups succeed in STEM. Theseresources improve students’ success and retention in engineering programs and promote equity inengineering education [10]. Qualitative
practices and promotion of open data in science,” Sci Ed, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3–9, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.6087/kcse.149.[2] D. R. Berg and K. E. Niemeyer, “The case for openness in engineering research,” F1000 research, vol. 7, pp. 501–501, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/3SH2PpQ[3] A. Johri, S. Yang, M. Vorvoreanu, and K. Madhavan, “Perceptions and Practices of Data Sharing in Engineering Education,” Advances in engineering education, vol. 5, no. 2, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://bit.ly/3Ur54hJ[4] B. Suhr, J. Dungl, and A. Stocker, “Search, reuse and sharing of research data in materials science and engineering—A qualitative interview study,” PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 9 September, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone
Session 2480 Illuminating Engineering Laura J. Bottomley and Elizabeth A. Parry North Carolina State University/Science SurroundAbstractEngineering is a difficult profession to explain to the average person, much less student, and isprobably one of the most frequently misunderstood. The session described in this paper wasdeveloped to put engineering in common terms for the lay person, as well as provide aninteresting and fun way to explore different concentration areas of the profession. Thedemonstration has been given to children as young as six years old, to
Curriculum MaterialsDe Putter . International Journal of Science Education Vol 34.3 Knight, D. W. (2007). Improving Engineering Student Retention through Hands-On, Team-Based, First Year Design Projects. International Conference on Research in Engineering Education (pp. 1-13). Honolulu, HI: American Society for Engineering Education.4 Del Vitto, C. (2008). "Cross-Cultural "Soft Skills" and the Global Engineer: Corporate Best Practices and Trainer Methodologies. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education Vol. 3 Iss. 1, 1-9.5 Kedrowicz, A. A., & Taylor, J. L. (2013). Engineering Communication and the Global Workplace. International Professional Communication Journal, 81-105.6 National Academy of Engineering
students to explore and innovate, as reflected in theirheightened level of collaboration. The findings emphasize the significance of integratingexperiential learning methods into environmental engineering education to enhance activeengagement and skill development among students. Importantly, these results hold broaderimplications for educational practices, highlighting the crucial role of hands-on, experientiallearning methodologies in nurturing collaborative skills vital for the future success ofengineering professionals. The limitation identified was the use of a single group for thisexperimental study as well as the small sample size.AcknowledgementThis study is part of the work that was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant
-tional programming language Logo, constructionism builds on and distinguishes itself from Pi-agetian constructivism [1]. It assumes that young people learn new information by actively re-constructing it within their existing knowledge frameworks but adds that this is best done whenmaking and doing things. This material learning through design lends itself to the focus on con-structing, building, and making that is encouraged in pre-college engineering education [2],[3].In school, constructionism has supported teachers’ implementation of sandbox software (e.g.Scratch) and modular hardware (e.g. LEGO) to move engineering design across curricula, in-cluding science, technology and math [2],[4]. In after-school or out-of-school contexts, construc
microelectronics manufacturing and cleanroom fabrication (e.g., electrical, computer,material science, and chemical engineering fields). Activities are lab-based as well as social andinclude engagement with corporate and industry partners. At the request of the MU directors andbecause this program was being offered for the first time, only pre- and post-camp focus groupsoccurred.UPSILON ProgramUPSILON program (summer bridge) is aimed at incoming first-year engineering students. Thisfive-week program provides a head start on college life by offering academic support, mentoring,and exposure to engineering coursework before the start of the fall semester. Given the extendedduration and the target audience, we employed a more rigorous assessment method
principles in physics can be crucial––using theheart to illustrate the principles of a pump was found to interest girls more than an oil rig; and theneed “to put effort into making sure the way the material is presented reflects girls’ interests inhuman service occupations, human needs, and biological systems” was stressed 1.Researchers also agree that mentors and role models are important from the early grades andthroughout a woman's career in science or engineering 4, 10, 11, 12. Programs for girls combininghands-on activities, role models, mentoring, internships, and career exploration have improvedgirls' self-confidence and interest in STEM courses and careers 13,14.For both genders, hands-on experiences such as using tools and equipment have
Paper ID #37814How Does Working on an Interdisciplinary Service-Learning Project vs. aDisciplinary Design Project Affect Peer Evaluators’ Teamwork Skills?Isaac Koduah Kumi, Old Dominion University Isaac K. Kumi is a Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. student at Old Dominion University. He has a B.Sc in Biomedical Engineering from the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana, and an M.E. from Old Dominion University in Mechanical Engineering. His research interests are in biomechanics and biomechanical modeling and simulation.Dr. Stacie I Ringleb, Old Dominion University Stacie Ringleb is a professor in the
the century there was, “enough solar energy educational materials(such as textbooks) available for traditional undergraduate and graduate courses in science andengineering.” It is notable that this study did not make any mention of two-year engineering ortechnical schools, or high school STEM education programs; despite the fact that the majority ofjobs in the solar industry require less than a four-year degree [12]. More recent studies haveexamined the renewable energy and green jobs landscape, and have documented the need forworkers with “middle skills” training in engineering and technical fields [13, 14, 15].As recently as 2009, it was observed that “most engineers are not trained to use these renewableenergy technologies and most are not
system, materials corrosion and prevention, non-destructive testing and analysis, nanomaterials behavior and electrochemical reactions for energy conversion devices, electron and phonon transport modeling and experiments, thermal fluid sciences application and analysis, bio-fluid mechanics application using particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique, and turbulence analysis, jets, bluff bodies, and airfoils.James A Obermeyer, University of DaytonDr. Philip Appiah-Kubi, University of Dayton Dr. Philip Appiah-Kubi is an Associate Professor at the Department of Engineering Management, Systems, and Technology (EMST). He has served as coordinator for three undergraduate programs and Director of two Graduate Programs. From
-solving education in the Biomedical engineering space. She specializes in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Design, and integrating teaching strategies that include accessible, experiential, student-driven learning and capstone-design programming. She has also been engaged in research exploring diversity, equity, and inclusivity in the field of engineering.Dr. Jenna Felice Usprech, University of British Columbia Dr. Jenna Usprech is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in the School of Biomedical Engineering at the University of British Columbia. She is particularly passionate about student wellness, science communication, and classroom strategies that promote critical thought and retention of material. Dr
Paper ID #42792Effectiveness of Active Learning Methods on Students’ Self-efficacy, LearningMotivation and Academic Performance in Numerical Methods in MechanicalEngineeringDr. Golnaz Mirfenderesgi, The Ohio State University I am an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State University. I have been teaching Numerical Methods and Mechanics classes such as Statics, Mechanics of Materials, and Dynamics since 2018. my research interests lay in the area of engineering education, numerical modeling, optimization algorithms, and machine learning methods with the
me, so I decided to retake the class. It hasbeen an interesting experience, and I have recorded some of my observations, from theperspective of a student who has taught as a materials science and engineering professorfor nearly twenty years.Observation #1, Help Students Connect! Students don’t reach out to each other much.At first, in the class, hardly anyone spoke to each other. After hearing the professoractively encourage group study sessions, I became relatively proactive in the back of theroom, and got students exchanging cell numbers with me, and with each other, and evenput one student in charge of distributing the information about informal study sessionsthey subsequently organized. I am pretty sure that this study session, involving
assessment,demonstrating that the module was effective for middle school outreach. Pre/post-surveyassessments showed no significant differences in attitudes towards STEM, which was likely dueto the fact that students in YES had a strong predisposition for STEM. Overall, results motivatethe use of this module, or similar hands-on IBL modules, for outreach with K-12 students who areunderrepresented in STEM.IntroductionBiomaterials is an interdisciplinary field that employs knowledge from biology, chemistry,materials science, and engineering to create materials that improve human health [1]. To date,biomaterials have been used as medical implants, methods to promote tissue healing, molecularprobes and biosensors, drug delivery systems, and scaffolds to
Paper ID #13876Not engineering to help but learning to (un)learn: Integrating research andteaching on epistemologies of technology design at the marginsDr. Prashant Rajan, Iowa State University Prashant Rajan is an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of English and the Communication Studies Program at Iowa State University. He has a B. Eng. in polymer engineering from Pune University, an M.S. in materials science and engineering from the University of Cinainnati, and a Ph.D.in Organiza- tional Communication with Ph. D. minors in research methods and critical-cultural theories from Purdue University. He is
AC 2012-5247: A NEW VISION FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN INSTRUC-TION: ON THE INNOVATIVE SIX COURSE DESIGN SEQUENCE OFJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering
continue identifyingthe ideal mechanisms for truly and effectively integrating the domains of engineering and thearts. Like others who have pursued STEAM-like approaches, members of our team have facednumerous challenges through this journey, and it is from these challenges that we have listed thethought-provoking questions that conclude the preceding section. In the future, we plan tocontinue addressing these questions. In addition, we hope to develop a taxonomy for integratingthe arts and engineering by reflecting on Gess’s proposed hallmarks in light of our experiences.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1633426. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations
equipment in mind. The traditional and blended hybrid modalities utilizeclassrooms where social distancing measures can be implemented. The flexible modality allows asmall number of alternating students to be physically present in the classroom while others attendsynchronously online. The remote virtual and online modalities are performed onlinesynchronously and asynchronously, respectively. They exclude any face-to-face instruction.In this paper, we seek to answer: how do faculty members prefer to teach during the pandemic andwhat are the implications? The research is focused on the engineering and computer science facultyat our university because they individually select the teaching modality that fits their class. Thefaculty included in this
related sustainability issues (Appendix I).Three teachers developed hands-on, engineering-focused lesson plans that included the digestertechnology: microbiology (biology); pH, acids and bases (chemistry); and water resources(environmental science). The biology lesson was the first lesson conducted, and the evaluationand results of this lesson are reflected in this paper. Table 1 shows the biology lesson objectives,instructional activities, and assessment items used to analyze changes to student knowledgebefore and after the lesson (additional details can be found in Appendix II). TABLE 1. Instructional activities for each learning objective and associated NGSS standards. Learning Objective Instructional
linear algebra courses. In fact, the only pre-requisites for thecourse are Applied Strength of Materials, Applied Thermodynamics, and two courses in aComputer-Aided Engineering sequence.Instead of solving the problem individually, as had been done on the test with the previouscohort, it was presented as a group project. Collaborative assignments and projects areconsidered High-Impact Educational Practices at Montana State University. Small groupcollaboration has been shown to improve performance on cognitive learning outcomes andstudent attitude [12]. In-class collaboration is better for the latter [12]. This project was mainlydone in-class for this, and other reasons. First, the class period is 110 minutes long and needs tobe broken down into
development net- work (ePDN), a new initiative dedicated to preparing teachers to engage their students in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) through the use of NASA-developed learning materials and resources. She also serves a the lead evaluator on several NSF-funded Noyce Scholarship programs. She has direct experience leading or contributing to evaluations of leadership, and STEM-related innovations.Dr. Tamra Williams Ogletree, University of West Georgia Page 25.1312.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Impact of Participation in VEX Robotics
GPA Capstone Grade Peer Evaluations EMFFigure 1. Data for WBDS15 Project TeamCRVS15 (Figure 2): This project involved a concrete “hands-on” effort involving the design andconstruction of an experimental test apparatus. The team was academically balanced with anaverage 3.25 GPA (range of 3.09 to 3.58). Only three of the team members had engineeringinternship experience, with the remainder of the team having only coursework (possible“engineering experience” imbalance). The team included four mechanical, two electrical andone materials engineering students. One thing that stands out about this capstone project team isthat there was one team member with a dominant (personality style) who served as a team leaderand who also earned