Ronald Bennett & Elaine Millam Weekly SeminarAll scholars are expected to participate in the weekly seminar. In 2011, the scholars program wasextended to include 3-5 engineering students at a satellite campus located 280 miles from themain campus. These students at the satellite campus participate in the seminar via ITV or videoconference using Skype or Adobe Connect. The curriculum of the seminar is designed toincrease familiarity with university resources, provide useful information about a wide array ofpersonal and career issues, and foster relationships with students and faculty across disciplines.Instructional methods for the seminar vary from week to week as the MAX faculty mentors taketurns serving as the lead instructor. The
diversity, inclusion, and equity. After establishingthe current literature taking on issues of equity in engineering as well as a summary of thenetwork analysis already conducted through our ROAR grant, we will describe our owntheoretical framework, initial analysis of outcomes from other educational organizing campaigns,and initially planned actions for the CoNECD event and how it fits into our research.Background and FrameworkMany scholars have explored the problem of equity, diversity, and social responsibility inengineering as a discipline more broadly [1], [2], [3], [4], but there is little work done on the fieldand positionality of academics in engineering education specifically and their change-makingstrategies or interests for seeding
non-disclosureagreement. The purpose of this practice paper is to examine the impact of silencing with non-disclosure agreements, the current legal landscape, and the movements to end their misuse in USHigher Education, including NDAFreeCampus.Attorney Neil Mullin, who represented Gretchen Carlson in her lawsuit against Fox News, said“If you want to eradicate discrimination, harassment and sexual misconduct, you should let thelight of day shine” [1]. The quote is from an article in the Michigan Daily concerning the use ofNDAs by the University of Michigan [1]. The use of NDAs to silence survivors andwhistleblowers stops that light from shining and keeps stakeholders and communities in the dark.NDAs are properly used when they protect privacy
areoften extended to form credentials, certificates and concentrations. Some institutions havecreated minors or degrees at the undergraduate and graduate level. Faculty have discussed andmay have had to develop new synergies/interactions between these new programs and existingprograms. Another approach is incorporating AI Literacy into curricula.There are many opportunities for broad-based research about and using AI. For example, the roleof machine learning, artificial intelligence and data science in academic research is of criticalimportance. Furthermore, the evolution of research computing resources (aka CPU vs GPUbalance), data repositories, data management policies and data accessibility are central to anacademic institution and often
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”hysteria was fueled by the apparent daily rise in Internet-related issues traded on the NASDAQMarket. For a time it seemed as if every one shifted focus to this new phenomenon, and whocould argue otherwise if this was the place where money was being made. This came to an abruptend when the market peaked in March 2000 and slowly deflated over the past three years. Whenthe bubble burst, many believers thought it was a temporary pause after which the market wouldresume its progress. It has been a painful three years’ period for those believers. Now that thedust has almost settled, people are
2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Teaching Unit Operations Lab in the Pandemic Christi Patton Luks Missouri University of Science and TechnologyAbstract2020 was a year of many changes. Faculty suddenly needed to convert their courses to an onlineformat. For lecture classes there were many issues to address, but laboratory courses had aspecial set of concerns. When the lab instructor also left during this year, the author suddenlyfound herself thrust into teaching unit operations lab. The university was beginning to open up,but there were more students scheduled to be in the lab facilities than the university
andengineering students on a broad set of engineering design and practice competencies, manydifferences were found between the expectations of the practitioners and the perceived abilitiesof the students.15 Some of the most significant concerns were in oral and writtencommunication, teamwork, and creativity. These elements and others discussed in the surveyportray a significantly lower than expected capability in the expected skills of graduatingengineering students.In the same year, another survey commissioned by Engineers Canada and the Canadian Councilof Technicians and Technologists produced similar results. “Employers expressed a high level ofsatisfaction with the science-based skills of new hires, but a lower level of satisfaction with non
program: including the management philosophy forboth the funded program and the individual client projects. Also covered is a discussion of theunderlying project objective – allowing students to run a project, with limited faculty oversight, inan effort to allow engineers to become better acquainted with the business world and morecapable of effectively handling interactions between entrepreneurs and large companies. The mainfocus of the paper will be on the benefits and opportunities provided by allowing students to workon exciting new ideas and projects and on developing their own intellectual property in a multi-disciplinary setting. Specifically to be included are the interactions among different engineeringdisciplines, interactions between
available for the campus. Consequently, implications from Figure 2 should beconsidered within the current context of defined measures for at risk.Given the above disclaimers, Figure 2 does provide some compelling evidence indicating theneed for further refinement and analysis of at risk and student retention. More specifically,quadrant I would support faculty concerns that students lack the necessary preparatory skillsneeded for success in engineering and science. Quadrant IV would suggest that while somestudents have the necessary background to be successful, they may not be motivated enough forthe rigors of an engineering or science curriculum. Of primary interest to us however is quadrantIII which shows academically successful students who
development of the course. After a brief course sub-committeemeeting in the summer of 2011, the decision was made to launch the inaugural course as anexperimental offering that fall, co-taught by one full-time faculty member and one volunteerindustry representative from the IAC. The full-time faculty member (author Farmer Cox) was atenure-track member of the Engineering Education department with an interest in the industrialenvironment and topics around engineering education, policy, and leadership. Her researchexplored the preparation of engineering Ph.D. students for careers in academia and industry.Informed from some of her research findings, this course addressed several issues of concern byengineering Ph.D. holders working in nonacademic
seminars for local industry on topics including forecasting, inventory control, production planning, project management, transportation logistics, procurement, and supply chain management.Dr. Leslie Pagliari, East Carolina University Dr. Leslie Pagliari serves as Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering and Technology and Associate Professor in the Department of Technology Systems. Her research interests center on STEM initiatives, leadership, global supply chain issues, and new technologies in the distribu- tion and logistics sector. She was one of three professors in the United States recognized in an Inbound Logistics Article featuring leading professors in today’s supply chain curriculum
and honest communication with educators,students, and parents. Transparency builds trust and collaboration. An important aspect ofcommunication is active listening. A leader fosters effective teaching by listening to concerns,feedback, and ideas from educators. They have a duty to act on valid concerns and involveteachers in decision-making processes.Successful leaders should encourage innovation. They must support innovative teaching methodsand projects. They ought to allow educators the freedom to experiment with new approaches.They need to seek professional development opportunities for faculty and staff. They have a duty 2024 ASEE Southeastern Section Conferenceto provide opportunities for educators to enhance
enrolling in the 2-year school instead of a 4-year college or university?(Check all that apply) Figure 1: Main reasons for enrolling in a 2-year school before transferring to a 4-year collegeOnce again, as one would expect, the biggest issue for their going to a 2-year school initially wasfinancial. For the second cohort 15 out of 23 or 65% listed financial concerns as one of theirmain reasons for enrolling initially in the 2-year school. For the first cohort the result was 20 outof 25 respondents (80%). The combined result for both cohorts was 35 out of 48 or 72% of thestudents initially enrolled at a 2-year school for financial reasons. The major difference betweenthe two cohorts was that for the first cohort half of those responding said
program is actively involving business andindustry experts in the development of their curricular activities. Yet, while faculty andadministrators argue that the new curriculum has immense value for advancing undergraduateeducation, they simultaneously worry that such collaborations will circumspect thetransdisciplinary goals of their curriculum. As one academic stakeholder reflected, the degreeprogram has the potential to transform how the university thinks about individual learning plansfor undergraduates that exist outside of traditional disciplinary frameworks, but it also “shouldn’tbecome a pipeline for business and industry.”Alongside this tension—and partly in response to it—the authors of this paper were hired toconduct an external
immerse students in the design process and a multi-disciplinary teamwas selected not only to address the community partner needs, but also to pilot a college-widecapstone experience. Management of the project with this new academic experience provides anopportunity to research and share best practices related to such an opportunity. The design projecthas engaged students and faculty from materials science, mechanical engineering, and civilengineering through an entire academic year experience. While the student design team ischallenged with developing a final product that integrates all aspects of their engineeringdisciplines, the faculty team is also charged with ensuring the students gain a valuable academicexperience within this project. To
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Assessing Challenges and Affordances of a Traditional Instructor’s Pedagogical Change During Guided Implementation of Innovative PedagogyAbstractIn order to improve the understanding of issues that arise during implementation of innovativematerials and practice, progressive pedagogical materials (developed using research basedprinciples) were integrated into an introductory materials engineering course taught by anengineering instructor who had teaching with traditional classroom practice. To do this, agraduate research associate worked with the faculty member to support implementation ofstudent engagement modules for four topics in the
AC 2008-1774: ENHANCING THE ASEE CAMPUS REPRESENTATIVEPROGRAM - A SECTION CHAIRS PERSPECTIVECharles McIntyre, North Dakota State University Charles McIntyre is the Chair of the Department of Construction Management and Engineering at North Dakota State University. He received his Ph.D. from Penn State in 1996. As an active member of the North Midwest Section of ASEE, Dr. McIntyre is currently the Chair of the North Midwest Section and the Campus Representative at NDSU. As a Campus Rep he has won number awards for recruiting and retaining faculty for membership in ASEE. He has several ASEE publications in the areas of active and cooperative learning. At NDSU he is very active in a
computer science curriculum provides thestudents with the management, leadership, communications, and other skills, described by manyas essential for the 21st Century. Systems engineering can be incorporated with other engineeringdisciplines to achieve similar results. Systems engineering courses may be included as an area ofconcentration or as technical electives of the discipline. Systems engineering principles andpractices may be incorporated into specific courses within the curriculum.An ongoing concern within the Department is maintaining the balance between the twodisciplines, while providing the opportunity for faculty development in both fields. Havinggraduate programs in both fields within the SCS Department ensures this opportunity
discoveringand implementing new advances in science and engineering. However, it has been observed thatwhile universities in developed countries are teaching global design, engineeringentrepreneurship, and forming alliances and consortiums to establish international collaborations,most of the educational institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean are behind in this type ofinitiative, with practically no engineering design and entrepreneurship courses, and fewinternational projects. This lack of formation of Latin American and Caribbean engineers in thecritical issues affecting the global market makes it difficult to generate a technology revolution inthese countries, placing the whole region at a disadvantage compared to other regions.Therefore
ABET Accreditation ProcessAbstract As the faculty from the new Industrial Engineering Program at Texas A&M University-Commerce (TAMUC) prepared for its first-ever program accreditation assessment from theEngineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) of the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET), the self-study team was able to create a thorough and effective plan toassess the processes used in the new IE Program. The internal assessment team, comprised ofthree tenure-track faculty members and assisted by various internal and external stakeholders,was able to create a well-structured self-study document which helped us better understand theneed for continuous improvement processes across the educational system and to
within the working group itself,and helpful to think towards how we might do better and keep these dynamics in mind.Another issue that we had to consider (and with which we still contend) is how to reach outbeyond the scope of engineering educators, students, faculty, and administrators who are alreadyon-board or currently working in the field against injustice and systemic oppression towardsequity. How might we reach those who work in the realm of depoliticized and disengagedengineering, with no concern or interest in the #EngineersShowUp movement, or other suchcauses [8]? How might we engage in constructive conversations that bring people in, withoutturning them off or having them shut down? Or do we even concern ourselves with them
flexible and independent, more willing and able to view issues from multiple perspectives, with a better understanding of the world, and in summation, better able to think outside of the box.”Additional accounts reinforce Spodek et al.’s [4] claims. For example, an account by BrighamYoung University (BYU) faculty regarding the development of seven engineering study-abroadprograms over the 2006-2007 school year highlights the cross-cultural skills and competenciesdeveloped by students working on humanitarian-oriented design projects [12]. The BYUprograms center around different formats, including mentored travel, extended field-trip, service-learning, and international design. Indeed, small scale study abroad programs
Asession1454@ From Senior Design to Starting a Company-A Model for Entrepreneurship Lynn S. Nored, P.E., David Compton Oklahoma Christian University / Commack LLCAbstractEntrepreneurship and education have gotten engaged in the last few years, and will either enjoy ablissful marriage or require some counseling to prevent a breakup. Some universities might rejectthe idea of creating new companies or products based on faculty or student research. There couldbe nostalgia for pure research, where scientific research funds do not depend on businessmarketing
, identify with role models, andestablish a sense of belonging within the engineering discipline. Such acceptance is one of themost critical aspects of minority student retention (Matthews, 2017). Furthermore, multiple studies shows that the informal communication and accessibility offaculty role models to provide moral, educational, and cultural support to students wouldultimately result in students maintaining their enthusiasm, confidence, and retention in STEMdisciplines (Lisagor et al., 2013; Concepción et al., 2009). These studies reported that bybuilding rapport, both the students and the faculty were equally benefited. The participatingfaculties in these studies gained an understanding of URM students’ pressing issues, such asimmigration
management software (ANGEL). The challenge to each team:develop a new venture concept that could grow to $50M in annual revenue by year 5. The coursedeliverables were an executable plan, an elevator pitch, and a formal investor presentation. Thestudents learned about and then implemented solutions to entrepreneurial issues includingbootstrapping, opportunity identification, intellectual property and financial management includingfund-raising. Thus they experienced an integrated learning experience around a real-worldentrepreneurship activity. In addition, the students were required to undertake on-line and libraryresearch as they sought answers to the challenges they uncovered.The PBL approach of this course was aimed at approximately one half of
challenges, shortcomings and frustrations, students from both groupsbroadly admitted that it was worthwhile and that direct interactions exposed them to issues theywould have never learned otherwise. They also recognized the need for joint team expertise inaddressing complexities of product development and launching a new business. Thanks to available funds from a Ministry of Education grant it was possible to conduct asmall scope study of entrepreneurial attitudes among undergraduate students from both businessand engineering faculties. The study was designed as a questionnaire survey. The measures usedin the questionnaire were adapted from previous theoretical and empirical work, and included thefollowing: • Trust in teammates
readily justifiable); importantly, the core objectives of the newprogram are rather different from those of either the existing Statistics BS/BA program, or theexisting Data Science track within the Computer Science program. For these reasons, there waslittle concern about potential negative impact on any of the existing programs; however, severalfaculty shared concerns about (primarily faculty/instructional) resources for the new program.Therefore, those in charge of the curriculum development for the new program were advised, tomaximize utilization of the existing courses and related resources already provided byDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, School of EECS, College of Business and otheracademic units participating in the new data
“...engage the discipline of engineering educationin a difficult but needed conversation about repairing the harm experienced by Black Americansas they study and practice engineering.”[3] To address the issue of anti-blackness in engineeringeducation, as highlighted by the author’s position, it is necessary to consciously center this con-cern across all extant and new systems and programs. This approach is necessary to mitigate thedamage caused by discriminatory systems that have impacted Black Americans in engineering ed-ucation, who presently have fewer options than the majority group, White males. At the same time,the widely shared goal of inclusion in existing institutions and epistemics of engineering withoutcritical reflection on those
Industrial Engineering in 2001 and is currently a member of the full time faculty as an Assistant Professor. She is the course coordinator and one of the lecturers of the “Ethics in Engineering” course offered to student’s studying engineering. In May 2003 Dr. Atasoylu was appointed Vice Dean for the Faculty of Engineering. She is on the board of directors of the Research Center for Water and Marine Sciences at EMU since November 2002, on the board of directors of the Advanced Technology Research and Development Institute since December 2004 and an Advisory Board member of the EMU Continuing Education Center since September 2004. She is also an active member of several committees
orally in one-on-one and group settings. d. Solve challenging problems. e. Use knowledge and understanding to generate and explore new questions. 3. Integration and Application of Knowledge: The ability to use information and concepts from studies in multiple disciplines in their intellectual, professional, and community lives. a. Apply knowledge to enhance personal lives, meet professional standards and competencies and further the goals of society. 4. Intellectual Depth, Breadth and Adaptiveness: The ability of students to examine and organize disciplinary ways of knowing and to apply them to specific issues and problems. a. Demonstrate substantial knowledge and