Business: A Summary of the Research Sponsored by the Ethics in Business Research Fund. Charlottesville, VA. Available at http://www.aicpa.org/download/ethics/Ethics_Business_Research_Fund-12.pdf4. Ethics Resource Center. 2007 National Business Ethics Survey. http://www.ethics.org/nbes2003/2003nbes_summary.html5. IEEE Spectrum, December 20026. Clancy, E. A., Quinn, P., and Miller, J.E. 2005. Assessment of a Case Study Laboratory to Increase Awareness of Ethical Issues in Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Education. Vol. 48, No. 2. Page 14.720.9 “Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationIn mass transfer, presented in the context of a transport phenomena course, students start with thedesign of a gas absorption tower. They are shown both laboratory equipment and pictures ofindustrial towers used to remove an impurity from a gas stream. If possible, they performexperiments on a laboratory gas absorption tower and observe the gas and liquid flowing overthe packing material and measure inlet and outlet gas concentrations. Next, they use a simplemodel of the tower with a constant overall transfer unit height. The students then proceed tolearn about the overall mass transfer coefficients, individual phase
on the Guaranteed 4.0 Plan,” 37th h ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, Milwaukee, WI, October 2007, 9 pages.16. Johnson, D.O. and Chen, Y.C., Guaranteed 4.0, JCYC Studio, Dallas, Texas, 2004.17. Donaldson, K., The Engineering Student Survival Guide, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York City, New York, 2002.18. “Where There’s A Will There’s an ‘A’,” © Better Grades Seminars, LLC, SL2276.19. Anderson-Rowland, M.R., “Evaluation of a Program to Encourage Underrepresented Minority and Women Students to Become Interested in Research and to Attain Graduate Degrees,” Proceedings of the 2006 WEPAN Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2006, 13 pages, CD-ROM
Paper ID #18381How Role-Playing Builds Empathy and Concern for Social JusticeLeslie Dodson, Worcester Polytechnic InstituteDr. David DiBiasio, Worcester Polytechnic Institute David DiBiasio is Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering and Department Head of ChE at WPI. He received his ChE degrees from Purdue University, worked for the DuPont Co, and has been at WPI since 1980. His current interests are in educational research: the process of student learning, international engineering education, and educational assessment. Collaboration with two colleagues resulted in being awarded the 2001 William Corcoran Award from
, which proposes a challenge in educating the entire class to the samelevel of technical ability. To illustrate this challenge the USAF TPS has in the past admitted flighttest engineers with technical backgrounds in biochemistry, operations research, and solid statephysics.Traditionally most engineering students fall into the Myers-Briggs category of sensors 6 . This isespecially true for USAF TPS students, since they have spent a considerable amount of their timebefore coming to USAF TPS in an operational military environment. They have been trained tolearn information quickly that is useful to their current task, and to filter out everything else. Thisstudent mindset requires a very specific type of instructor that has significant practical
Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(4), 239-250. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/38479.2 Robinson, M. and Sutterer, K. (2003). “Integrating sustainability into civil engineering curricula.” Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Conference, June 22-25, 2003, Nashville, TN.3 Turner, C.D., Li, W.-W., Martinez, A. (2001). “Developing sustainable engineering across a College of Engineering.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, June 24-27, 2001, Albuquerque, NM.4 Barger, M. and Hall, M.W. (1998). “Sustainability in environmental engineering education.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, June 28 - July 1, 1998, Seattle, WA.5 Hansen, K. and Vanegas, J. (2006). “A guiding vision, road map, and principles for researching and
. Brummel, The University of Tulsa Dr. Brummel is an Associate Professor of Industrial/Organizational Psychology at The University of Tulsa. He received his PhD from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.He conducts research on training and development and individual differences in the workplace. He also investigates the use of role play simulations for teaching ethics.Dr. Jeremy S. Daily P.E., The University of Tulsa Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Using the Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT) for Ethics InstructionThe purpose of this paper is to describe an innovative approach of ethics instruction forengineers. This
chemical engineering and related disciples are exposed to safety issues routinely inteaching or research labs, and in machine shop environments. Safety has become the new normalin chemical engineering education and gets tremendous emphasis from ABET and AIChE.Several chemical engineering organizations (including AIChE, IChemE, SAChE, and ECCE)and commercial organizations have instituted educational programs such as workshops, hands-onmodules, and online learning modules for safety13. The module we developed will use some ofthese materials. Safety is intuitive, though in the complex situation of a chemical or biochemical processguidelines for safety compliance should to be clearly laid out. Despite the increasing focus onprocess and lab
students to gain experience in design, but experience alonedoes not guarantee learning of skills and knowledge, or the ability to transfer this knowledge tonew situations. Researchers and theorists have long trumpeted the value of reflective practice asa differentiating factor in the effectiveness of practitioners. As shown by the growing number ofpublications on the topic in engineering education literature, teaching students the process andvalue of reflection is increasingly recognized as an essential component of engineering designeducation.To support teaching and learning of reflection in engineering capstone design courses, this studyseeks to understand how students reflect—individually and as a team—as they are engaged in adesign project
paper provides an analysis of the undergraduate civil engineering curriculum at [UniversityA], a small-to-medium sized program at a land-grant research university, with respect to theproposed educational outcomes of the BOK2. A number of ‘challenging’ outcomes arespecifically identified and discussed.The undergraduate civil engineering curriculum of [University A] includes 132 semester credithours. The program is currently governed by 13 outcomes, which comply with currentbaccalaureate-level general and program criteria as defined by the EAC of ABET. The currentcurriculum addresses, in some fashion, all 24 BOK2 outcomes. The program fully addresses, tothe recommended level of achievement, 6 of the 24 BOK2 outcomes; the remaining 18 BOK2outcomes
thestudents can interrogate to understand either the question(s) or the answers better.The important observation about millennial generation students is that all of the notedattributes should be respected, and that the education system should adjust to deliveringthese customer expectations at a high quality level. In this paper some tested pedagogical aswell as advanced educational technology methods and tools are discussed, anddemonstrated to satisfy the above requirements for both live and eLearning / distancelearning (DL) classes.The objective of our case-based multimedia research, that the author has started over 25 yearsago, was to create a case-based / problem-based teaching and learning curriculum for Millennialgeneration engineering and IT
mental health, socialization, access toresources, and additional responsibilities besides their education, among others. It is important tounderstand these impacts in order to provide effective resources and learning opportunities for allstudents. Therefore, in this work, we aim to better understand and contextualize the experiencesthat diverse undergraduate engineering students had through these transitions.Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, research on online learning in higher education institutionsfound that it has both benefits and drawbacks. While students learning online are less likely tocollaborate, interact with faculty, and engage in discussions with diverse others when compared tostudents learning in person, they report increased
/whuitt/col/cogsys/piaget.html. 4. Johnson, K. K., et al. (1997). “Focus groups: A method of evaluation to increase retention of female engineering students,” ERIC Documentation Service No. ED399875 Online, ERIC, February. 5. Tinto, V. (1997). “Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student Page 15.936.15 persistence,” Journal of Higher Education, 68, 599-623.6. Tinto, V. (1998). “Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously,” Review of Higher Education, 21, 167-177.7. Tinto, V. (2002). “Taking Retention Seriously: Rethinking the First Year of College
technological growth has put new demands on engineering and engineeringtechnology educators. Industry seeks graduates with up-to-date technical knowledge. Thehalf-life of an engineer's technical skills − how long it takes for half of everything anengineer knows about the field to become obsolete − is becoming strikingly short [1].The pace of technological change has also imposed new challenges on facultydevelopment and technical currency of programs. Faculty professional development activities and technical currency play animportant role in promoting student learning and success. Especially for non-research(purely teaching) institutions that offer technology driven programs, one of the mostimportant factors determining student success is the
the use of social media. We also review thedemographics of our 124,000+ MOOC students, who represented nearly 200 countries and over35 academic disciplines, as well as statistics related to their enrollment, retention, and coursecompletion. Finally, we discuss the implications of MOOCs for engineering education in bothface-to-face and online formats, our recommendations for the development of MOOCs, thechallenges and limitations of our work here, and our plans for future research in this domain.1. IntroductionAlthough new on the educational scene, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are already thesubject of great debate in terms of their educational value, academic rigor, financialsustainability, and role in higher education3,4,11,13,14
in engineering programmes. Euro J Eng Educ37(5)8. National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council (2009). Engineering in K- 12 education: understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.9. DA Chubin, GS May, EL Babco (2005). Diversifying the engineering workforce. Journal of Eng Educ 94(1): 73-8610. RM Felder and R Brent (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Eng Educ 94:57-7211. Johnson K, Leydens JA, Moskal B, Silva D, Fantasky JS. Social justice in control systems engineering. ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle WA, 201512. Lucena JC, Leydens JA. From sacred cow to dairy cow: challenges and opportunities in integrating of social justice in
Methodology to Improve Product Development and Design Learning at MSU," in Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, 2012.[14] U. Schiefele, "Interest, learning, and motivation," Educational psychologist, vol. 26, no. 3- 4, pp. 299-323, 1991.[15] K. Weber, "The relationship of interest to internal and external motivation," Communication Research Reports, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 376-383, 2003.[16] J. B. Hylton and L. Funke, "Journey towards competency-based grading for mechanical engineering computer applications," in Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[17] K. M. DeGoede, "Competency Based Assessment in Dynamics," in Paper presented at
. University of Alabama. Available at:https://ethicaldevelopment.ua.edu/uploads/8/4/9/8/84986096/norms-for-dit2__05-09_.pdfAccessed September 1, 2022.[13] P.M. King and M.J. Mayhew. “Theory and Research on the Development of MoralReasoning Among College Students.” in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research,J. C. Smart (Ed.), Springer Netherlands, 2004, pp. 375–440.[14] P.W. Odom and C.B. Zoltowski. “Statistical Analysis and Report on Scale ValidationResults for the Engineering Ethical Reasoning Instrument (EERI).” 2019 ASEE AnnualConference. Paper ID #26859. 2019.
Brandenberg, University of California, Los Angeles Scott is a Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Associate Dean for Diversity and Inclusion for the Samueli Engineering School at UCLA.Anabella Gonzalez American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 NSF BEATSCreating an Academic Innovation Ecosystem to Drive Student SuccessThe overriding objective of the National Science Foundation funded Broadening EcosystemAttributes for Talented Scholars (BEATS) project is to recruit, retain, develop, mentor andgraduate low-income, underrepresented engineering and computer science students.Historically underrepresented engineering
Paper ID #16932Into the Light: Diffusing Ccontroversy and Increasing Transparency in theFaculty Salary Equity Study ProcessDr. Carol Elizabeth Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Dr. Carol Marchetti is an Associate Professor of Statistics at Rochester Institute of Technology, where she teaches introductory and advanced undergraduate statistics courses and conducts research in statis- tics education, deaf education, and team work. She is a co-PI on RIT’s NSF ADVANCE IT project, Connect@RIT, and leads grant activities in the Human Resources strategic approach area.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey P.E., Rochester
Support Tech Pharma & Health Enabling S&T Education &Train Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 21 Research Opportunities All opportunities published at www.grants.gov Search for AFRL Research Interests of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research - BAA- AFOSR-2014-0001 Human-Centered Intelligence, Surveillance - BAA-HPW-RHX-2014-0001 Space Vehicles (RV) University Grants Program -FOA-RVKV-2013-0001 AFRL/RXC Structural Materials Open/Open BAA Program - BAA-RQKM- 2014-0003 AFRL Research Collaboration Program -BAA-RQKM-2013-0005 Sensor Innovative Research -BAA-12-02-PKS University Small
world after all. New York Times. Retrieved February 1, 2007, from http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1378440/posts3. Wang, X.C., Hinn, D.M., & Kanfer, A.G. (2001). Potential of computer-supported collaborative learning for learners with different learning styles. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 75-85.4. Farmer, R. (2005). Instant Messaging: IM online! RU? EDUCAUSE, 6, 49-62.5. Goldsborough, R. (2004). Managing the risks and rewards of instant messaging. Black Issues in Higher Education, 21(13), 36.6. Gunawardena, C. & Boverie, P.E. (1993, November). Impact of learning styles on instructional design for distance education. Paper presented at the World Conference of the
Paper ID #24719Strategies to Improve Student Engagement in a Facilities Planning Coursethrough Hands-on Learning ActivitiesDr. Gonca Altuger-Genc, State University of New York, Farmingdale Dr. Gonca Altuger-Genc is an Assistant Professor at State University of New York - Farmingdale State College in the Mechanical Engineering Technology Department. She is serving as the Graduate Program Coordinator for the School of Engineering Technology. Her research interests are engineering education, self-directed lifelong learning, virtual laboratories, and decision-making framework development for de- sign and manufacturing
Paper ID #28884Cantilever Beam ExperimentDr. Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology Gloria Ma is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Wentworth Institute of Tech- nology. She has been teaching robotics with Lego Mindstorm to ME freshmen for several years. She is actively involved in community services of offering robotics workshops to middle- and high-school girls. Her research interests are dynamics and system modeling, geometry modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing.Prof. Siben Dasgupta, Wentworth Institute of Technology Prof. Dasgupta received his
Paper ID #30702Charge Up! Wireless Power Transfer Activity for High School StudentsAkshay Sarin, University of Michigan Akshay Sarin received the MS degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan in 2017 and the B.Tech degree in Electrical Engineering from Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee in 2013. He is presently a PhD candidate in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Uni- versity of Michigan, Ann Arbor. His research interests include modeling and control of power electronics. He is currently working on developing efficient techniques for multiple access Wireless Power
Faculty Award for Excellence in Service-Learning. Dr. Vernaza does research in engineering education (active learning techniques) and high-strain deformation of materials. She is currently the PI of an NSF S-STEM.Dr. Saeed Tiari, Gannon UniversityDr. Scott Steinbrink, Gannon University Dr. Scott Steinbrink is an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering.Dr. Lin Zhao, Gannon University Lin Zhao received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada in 2006. She received the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in electrical engineering from Shandong University, Jinan, China, in 1993 and 1996 respectively. From 1996 to 2002, she was a Faculty Member with the School of
Paper ID #14124A Scaffolding Case Study for Teaching Engineering Problem Solving to Un-derrepresented MinoritiesDr. Morris M. Girgis, Central State University Morris Girgis is a professor at Central State University. He teaches undergraduate courses in manufactur- ing engineering. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Hannover University, Germany. His current research in engineering education focuses on developing and implementing new educational tools and approaches to enhance teaching, learning and assessment at the course and curriculum levels
AC 2007-1240: REAL-TIME ACCESS TO EXPERIMENTAL DATA USINGTABLET PC’SGregory Mason, Seattle University Dr. Mason received a BSME from Gonzaga University, an MS in Computer Integrated Manufacturing from Georgia Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Washington-Seattle. He developed a robotics laboratory for the Department of Defense in Keyport, WA and was involved in numerous automation projects, including a robotic container welding system and a robotic torpedo fueling system. While at the University of Washington Dr. Mason did post-doctoral research for NASA, designing a multirate flutter suppression system for a commercial jet. His current
undergraduate engineering education.Ramesh Chawla, Howard University Dr. RAMESH C. CHAWLA is Chair and professor of chemical engineering at Howard University. He has over thirty years of experience in teaching, research and industrial consulting in the fields of chemical and environmental engineering. His research and teaching interests include engineering education, separation processes, environmental engineering, and physical, chemical and biological treatment of hazardous wastes.Joesph Cannon, Howard University Dr. JOSEPH CANNON is Professor of chemical engineering at Howard University. He has over 35 years of teaching, research and industrial experience in the areas of biomedical and
(2), pp. 24-33, 1986. 3. Bertoline, G.R., “The implications of cognitive neuroscience research on spatial abilities and graphics instruction”, Proceedings ICEGDG, 1, Vienna, pp. 28-34, 1988. 4. Sorby, S. A., Baartmans, B. J., “The development and assessment of a course for enhancing the 3-D spatial visualization skills of first year engineering students”, J. of Engineering Education, July 2000, pp. 301-307. 5. Miller, C.L., “Enhancing spatial visualization abilities through the use of real and computer-generated models”, Proceedings, 1990, ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE, 1990, pp. 131-134. 6. Pleck, M.H., “Visual literacy – An important aspect of engineering design”, Proceedings, 1991, ASEE Annual Conference