University of Michigan,© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 technical staff at Bell Telephone Laboratories. In 1974, he joined the University of Michigan, where he is now the William Gould Dow Distinguished University Professor of Electrical Engin-eering and Computer Science, the J. Reid and Polly Anderson Professor of Manufacturing Technology, and Professor of Biomedical Engineering. He is a Fellow of the IEEE and the AIMBE and a member of the United States National Academy of Engineering.Michel M. Maharbiz, University of Michigan Michel M. Maharbiz is an assistant professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
help transition engineersdevelop into ethical and equity-minded professionals while adapting successfully to theirchanging roles and responsibilities, we need to understand how early career engineers experienceand perceive issues related to ethics and equity in their workplace. This understanding will allowfor the development of a comprehensive educational curriculum, professional developmentinitiatives, and leadership skills, for personal and professional growth. This study presents the findings from research carried out by interviewing 13 early careerengineers from diverse engineering disciplines across North America, delving into theireducational backgrounds, current work projects, and challenges related to professional ethics
grades. Her main focus has been in the intermediate grades. Presently, she “loops” with her class from 4th to 5th grade, thus keeping them for two years. Deborah has experience writing curriculum using the Backwards Design Process and has worked with the state to create, revise and edit the math questions used on the statewide test for fifth grade.Marilyn Barger, University of South Florida MARILYN BARGER is the Executive Director of FL-ATE, the Florida Regional Center for Page 12.937.1 Manufacturing Education housed at Hillsborough Community College. She earned a B.A. in Chemistry at Agnes
pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding.Dr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford UniversityDr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a research scientist in the Designing Education Lab in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of ePortfolio Initiatives in the Office of the Registrar at Stanford University. She is also a member of the research team in the National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter). Helen earned her undergraduate degree from UCLA and her PhD in Communication with a minor in Psychology from Stanford University in 1998. Her current research interests include: 1) engineering and entrepreneurship education; 2) the pedagogy of
AC 2012-3869: UNDERGRADUATE DESIGN AND MODIFICATION OF ATENSILE TESTING FIXTURE FOR BIOMATERIALSDr. Barry Dupen, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne Barry Dupen is an Associate Professor of mechanical engineering technology at Indiana University- Purdue University, Fort Wayne (IPFW). He has nine years’ experience as a metallurgist, materials en- gineer, and materials laboratory manager in the automotive industry. His primary interests lie in materials engineering, mechanics, and engineering technology education. He is also an experienced contra dance caller. Page 25.1385.1
, Sensor networks, Mobile Robotics, Evolutionary Optimization and Swarm Intelligence for optimization and engineering applications. Dr. Tewolde is a Member of the IEEE Computer Society and the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Innovative Course Modules for Introducing ECE to Engineering Freshmen Girma S. Tewolde Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Kettering University, Flint, MI 48504Abstract:The curriculum for all Engineering majors in our institute includes an inter-disciplinary coursethat exposes all freshman
. Considering these benefits of robotics-based K-12STEM education, robotics-based lessons are being implemented in many K-12 schools on pilotbasis [9-12]. Nonetheless, despite its tremendous potential, robotics remains to be widelyincorporated in K-12 STEM curricula.Based on our prior experiences, we have come to realize that a plethora of activities need to beperformed beforehand to incorporate robotics-based lessons into K-12 STEM curricula. Forexample, to select, develop, and implement effective robotics-based lessons we suggest: (i)identifying appropriate illustrative scenarios, informed by situated cognition [7,9], for teachingSTEM topics using robotics kits so that the robot plays a central role in the teaching and learning[10-12]; (ii) carefully
, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
Paper ID #37326Work-in-Progress: Right out of the Gate: Supporting AppliedTechnology and Engineering Students in Inroductory DigitalLogic Courses Using Logisim-Evolution and Basys 3Jeritt Williams Jeritt Williams is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology at Illinois State University where he teaches courses in Engineering Technology and Computer Systems Technology. Prior to joining the university faculty, Jeritt worked in manufacturing and logistics, taught Technology and Engineering Education at the middle and high school levels, and served as the coordinator for STEM education at
). Now in the fourth semester ofuse, IronCAD™ has seen success in a multitude of projects, both in a variety of class assignmentsand wholly student initiated applications. As such solid modeling has now migrated into a numberof other undergraduate and graduate courses and is well on the way to integration across thewhole curriculum. Examples of ways students and faculty are utilizing this powerful tool are Page 7.1055.1discussed below.Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationTo monitor
that these projectssample substantial real world design challenges.1.0 IntroductionCSM is fortunate to have a multidisciplinary Engineering Design Program (EDP). In manyinstitutions, such a program is desirable, but historical precedents and disciplinary biases makeimplementations difficult. Yet, in the professional world, multidisciplinary design teams arequite common, and the ability for recent graduates to be able to effectively contribute tomultidisciplinary design teams is prized. ABET recognizes this professional reality through itsstudent educational outcomes, often simply denoted as the a-k criteria.This paper describes the program operating at CSM. While our curriculum is not appropriate forall institutions, we believe that there are
problems, an application was made to the Manufacturing ResearchCorporation of Ontario (MRCO), subsequently renamed Materials and Manufacturing Ontario (MMO) toprovide funding for projects with industry, which would simultaneously serve as Fourth Year UndergraduateThesis Projects. The MMO is primarily a research funding organization, with a mandate to support thetraining of highly qualified personnel, hence the MMO initiative is consistent with the overall MMO mandate. Page 9.870.1 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 82004
and is currently the Director of the Aeropropulsion, Mechatronics and Energy Center established in 2012. He is also the coordinator of the ME Senior Capstone Design Curriculum since 2008. Page 24.566.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Expanding and Improving the Integration of Multidisciplinary Projects in a Capstone Senior Design Course: Experience Gained and Future PlansAbstract Over the last several years, the multidisciplinary capstone Senior Design Project programimplemented by the departments of Mechanical
prototype designs is the key futurechallenge.References1. ASM Handbook: Vol 21 Composites, ASM International, Material Park, Ohio, 20012. Advanced Composites Manufacturers Association, http://www.acmanet.org/professionals/statistics.cfm, accessed Jan. 16, 20073. Koehn, E., Assessment of Communications and Collaborative Learning in Civil Engineering Education, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Oct 2001, pp. 160-165.4. Daniel, I. M. and Ishai, O., Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Inc., 2005 Project Category Example Specific Projects Transportation autos, busses, trains, aircraft Infrastructure
support a wide range of stakeholders inthe capstone space. The gathered data will be analyzed and developed into a paper to inform thecommunity of the results. The key stakeholders who will benefit from this work include: • Capstone course instructors and staff • Engineering curriculum committees and • Engineering education researchersThe questionnaire is intended to give an opportunity for capstone instructors to make visible thedesign choices they may or may not have explicitly made in the design of their capstones, andunderstand the landscape of engineering capstone courses and where their course sits within thislandscape. For faculty who are considering modifications to their courses, the results of thisquestionnaire will
@wit.eduAbstract - First Year Design courses are commonplace in effects on the overall student experience [5]. In first yearmany engineering curriculums. Although the focus of engineering education, the overall student experience relatesthese courses typically revolves around introducing directly to student retention [6]. Therefore, it is imperativestudents to various multistep design processes as well as that, while maintaining an authentic design experience,improving student skills in written and oral attention is also made to provide a positive studentcommunication techniques; they can be limited in experience.replicating the experience of working in a real world
, Publisher: The M.I.T. Press,19622. Von Glaserfield, 1987, 19953. Benbasat, I., et al., "The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems." MIS Quarterly11(3): 369-386. (1987).4. Herreid, C. F., "Case Studies in Science: A Novel method of Science Education." Journal of CollegeScience Teaching(February): 221-229. (1994).5. Abraham, M. R., et al.. "The Nature and State of General Chemistry Laboratory Courses Offered byColleges and Universities in the United States." Journal of Chemical Education 74(5): 591-594, (1997).6. Yadav, A., et al.. "Teaching science with case studies: A national survey of faculty perceptions of thebenefits and challenges of using case studies." Journal of College Science Teaching 37(1): 34-38, (2007).7. Herreid, C
, though the program might not have had a positive impact on student self-efficacy inSTEM.Keywordsbroadening participation, engineering education, high schoolIntroductionIt is well established that the domestic need for a qualified, technical workforce is increasinglyimportant, and increasingly unmet. This need is especially acute in the greater Detroit area withits historical reliance on the automotive and manufacturing industries. Such need provides animperative to improve pathways for our nation’s youth to enter STEM fields. This is true, inparticular, for students from groups historically underrepresented in STEM professions. As of2017, only 4.1% of engineering bachelor’s degree in the U.S. were awarded to Black studentsand only 11.1% to
worked in a joint teamfor one semester to develop a tail-gate opening mechanism that could be used in a commerciallysold sports utility vehicle (SUV) manufactured in Alabama, USA; the project was selected by thestudent team. This team of four students from Auburn was part of a larger class of 19 cohorts inthe BET program. Page 10.1171.1 ************ Insert Table 1 about here************“Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.& Exposition Copyright© 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”A comparison of overseas collaborative team programs (Table 1) There have been a
engineering degree [1]-[3]. program must formulate a set of program student outcomes The Universidad Panamericana is a young private (PSO) (knowledge, skills, attitudes) that directly address theuniversity with 50 years of creation. It has three campuses in educational objectives and have specific outcomes. Thesethe main cities of Mexico: Guadalajara, Aguascalientes and PSO must be the ultimate goal acquired by the students whenMexico City. The School of Engineering at Mexico City has they complete the bachelor program. Table I show the PSO36 years of creation and offers the following Engineering in EAC commission [4].programs: Industrial, Mechanical, Innovation and Design
harmoniccontent of CLF’s from three manufacturers. It also proposes a voltage-controlled harmonicmodel for studying the impact of harmonics in the secondary circuits of power distributionsystems. In particular, the model focuses on how the number of CFL’s affects voltage totalharmonic distortion (THD). The paper examines the educational benefits of the researchexperience through a student report and personal interview. These methods examine how thestudent researcher applied concepts and skills learned during the research experience to currentcoursework.Experimental MethodThe project examined the harmonic current distribution of CFL’s produced by threemanufacturers. Table 1 lists the ratings and manufacturers tested. The experiments used 26 wattCLF’s
Page 10.970.7Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education • Students Comments On the back of the survey sheet, students were asked to write comments regarding this media based tutorial tool. The comments of students included the following: • This tutorial is so helpful. • I like watching the steps and follow them at the same time. • This is good, but it will be better if there is an associated audio. • I like the fact that it shows a step by step procedure of how to construct a Gantt Chart
national and inter- national conferences. Dr. Genis has five U.S. patents. As a team facilitator, he worked on the development of the curriculum for the ”Partnership for Innovation in Nanobiotechnology Education” program in col- laboration with the University of Pennsylvania and several Community Colleges.Warren Rosen, Drexel University (Eng.Technology) Dr. Warren A. Rosen received his Ph.D. in physics from Temple University in 1978. Between 1978 and 1985 Dr. Rosen served as assistant professor of physics at Colby and Vassar Colleges where he carried out research in optical physics, solar physics, and medical physics. From 1985 to 1996 he worked at the Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division in Warminster, PA where
interests lie in exploring questions of critical pedagogical and educational responsibility within dominant neoliberal, increasingly neoconservative, and (post/de)colonial discourses that frame curriculum and teaching practices.Dr. Christoph Johannes Sielmann P.Eng., University of British Columbia Dr. Sielmann is an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of British Columbia in the Department of Mechanical Engineering supporting both Mechatronics and Manufacturing Engineering programs. His research interests including multi-campus instruction, decolonization in engineering, and engineering ethics. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Pedagogy of Engagement
Manufacturing and Material Design Lab at Rensselaer, he leads research and education efforts in the areas of advanced manufacturing and material design. Besides research, Johnson is also passionate about training and developing the next generation of manufacturing engineers in the US. He is the 2014 recipient of the National Science Foundation CAREER Award. He was also awarded the 2014 - Rensselaer Class of 1951 Outstanding Teaching Award and the 2015-Rensselaer School of Engineering Education Innovation Award in recognition of his manufacturing education innovation efforts at RPI. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Biomanufacturing Outreach Module for Middle School Students Using
, 2002. Session 1566.3. N. T. Younis, “Establishing and Assessing Educational Objectives for Engineering Programs,” Proceedings of the2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. June 22-25, 2003.Session 1360.4. M. Bailey, R. B. Floershiem, and S.J. Ressler,”Course Assessment Plan: A Tool for Integrated CurriculumManagement,” Journal of Engineering Education, October 2002.5. D. T. Rover, “Learner-Centered Assessment,” Journal of Engineering Education, January 2004.6. G. Rogers, “Lessons Learned: Things I Wish I had known,” ABET Communications Link, Spring 2003.7. J. D. Lang, S. Cruse, F. D. Mcvey, and J. Mcmasters, “Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A survey toAssist Curriculum Designers
courses), becausethe majority of students were working adults employed full time who generally enrolled in oneor two courses per semester. The sixty-nine students were concentrated in a few program areas,but the enrolled students included those interested in almost every one of the eight program areasoffered by the School.DiscussionThe following discussion touches upon some of the numerous issues that arose in the less-than-a-year time period that followed the approval of the degree. The topics included for commentinclude scheduling and curriculum, faculty and resources, marketing, international enrollments,assessment and some suggestions for others facing these issues.While the topic of graduate education was addressed recently in the Journal of
by education and/or experience at the filed of application. 3. Equipped with general knowledge (can be specific if necessary) on the basis on which CAD/CAM systems operate such as: Geometric modeling, solid modeling, surface modeling, computer graphics, etc. 4. Is capable of customizing the CAD/CAM system. 5. Is capable of discussing his/her needs and communicate effectively with the R&D staff. 6. Performs maintenance and develops short cut solutions to improve system utilization. 7. Be able to develop, direct, and mange projects intended to develop subroutines, sub- programs or work relate material intended to serve the CAD/CAM system.3. Building a Curriculum Program for Intelligent
National Science Foundation. Untilthat time, the vast majority of NSF grants were awarded to faculty at four-year colleges anduniversities – the grantee institutions. This change in policy was embodied in the AdvancedTechnological Education Program that is managed in the Division of Undergraduate Education(DUE) in cooperation with the Division of Elementary, Secondary, and Informal Education(ESIE). This program has a goal of promoting exemplary improvement in advanced technologyeducation at both the regional and national level through support of curriculum development andprogram improvement at both the undergraduate level and the secondary school level. The
curriculum, proved challenging butattainable given the strong administrative support and leadership for this program, and UTEP’sdesire to provide innovative undergraduate engineering education that leads toward increasedretention and advancing opportunities for serving underrepresented populations.BackgroundLeadership Engineering (LE) is defined as an emerging engineering sub-field that integratesdisciplinary knowledge and practice with communication, business, and leadership skills. Thisinnovative approach to engineering has emerged as a direct result of industry’s immediate andlong-term need for a new kind of engineer: one with a new skill set to work in complex 21st