. This design made it easy for students to take the contentlearned in the module and immediately utilize a real-world application for it, exercising theirnew knowledge on their own research data. Since the document was shared with the twoinstructors via Google Drive we were able to check in on the students’ understandingperiodically throughout the course and provide feedback via the “Comment” feature. We chosethis form of assessment because it allowed us to gauge student understanding in an organic waythat would seem relevant to the students, rather than quiz-style assessment that we feared wouldbe viewed as busy work.The second prong of our assessment plan is to measure the long-term impact of the course via anonline survey that we will send
impact, firstproposed by Alexander Astin over thirty years ago5,6,7. Furthermore, the APS research questionsseek to explore the evolutionary nature of outcomes and environmental influences, tracing theirdevelopment and change over time. Inherent in the research questions is the anticipation that thestudy will generate recommendations for improving educational practices to enhance the studentexperience and persistence in engineering studies, as well as suggesting potential strategies forattracting more students to the discipline.This is certainly not the first study of the engineering student experience; there is solid priorwork to build on. A few of the studies that have influenced and informed the APS design deservenote.Seymour and Hewitt
into undergraduate writing-intensive courses. We conducted design-basedimplementation research (DBIR) during the 2023-24 academic year on the incorporation of AIwriting tools for scientific communication centered on teacher instruction, student learning, andproblems of teaching practice as identified by practitioners, students, and researchers [4].Through iterative cycles of DBIR, we explored best practices for teaching and learning the use ofAI writing tools in scientific communication; integrated these practices into the products;evaluated the impact on students’ development as writers; and improved the project's products.For this paper, we focus on two research questions: 1) What emerging best practices do we seeinstantiated for using
training in sound pedagogical practices, ashortage of training in the effective use of educational technology, short supply of requiredresources and time to produce completed and tested works, and a lack of emphasis on improvedteaching in the university faculty rewards systems are the major obstacles to materialsdevelopment. To remedy this situation, this project endeavors to create an active, engaged, andsustained virtual community of engineering educators who energetically contribute to and sharematerials from a common collection of courseware.The virtual community will take form as an incubator in which faculty are trained in soundpedagogical practices e.g., developing learning goals and assessment techniques. Next,participants will be schooled
). Page 22.900.13Another issue is that while some instruction is necessary if the students are to be successful,it needs to be done in a way that minimizes the impact on the time given to technical topicsand avoids repeating the same (nontechnical) instruction in multiple courses. The third issueis assessment, which we hope to address through the use of rubrics. While some rubrics areassignment specific, there are some generic ones that can be defined for common types ofassignments that can then be tailored as needed.The instructor supports are being designed and developed based on the experience ofpiloting the first set of communication-based assignments. Some supports have already beenrequested, suggested or employed: • Instructional
-specific fine-tuning and the long-term impact of AI-assisted grading on student learning and educator workload.1. IntroductionThe integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) into education offers transformativepotential, especially in crafting and applying grading rubrics for engineering courses. Thesecourses, with their complex assessment demands, ranging from technical proficiency to creativeproblem-solving, stand to gain from GenAI’s scalability, consistency, and efficiency. However,this potential comes with challenges, including preserving academic integrity and aligning withsound pedagogical principles. As educators adopt GenAI, they must balance its benefits withcareful attention to rubric quality and responsible
this paper, we present ourstudy of the performance of students in two partially flipped electrical and computer engineering (ECE)classes, where we compare students’ performance in the flipped modules to those in the non-flippedmodules. This comparison enabled us to evaluate the potential impact of flipped instruction on studentlearning within a single course offering. Also, we studied the students’ perspectives on flipped learning andthe activities conducted during class time.The elements of flipped classroom generally include (a) an exposure to the content prior to the classmeeting, (e.g., video lectures), (b) a motivator for students to prepare for class, (e.g., pre-class oraccountability quizzes), (c) a method to assess student
their preferences between online and in-personclasses pertaining to lectures, discussions, classroom engagement, assignments, quizzes, classactivities, course organization, guest speakers, building rapport and communication of courseexpectations. Included were also 12 questions that asked students to comparatively grade theironline versus in-person experience related to lectures, discussions, engagement, assignments,quizzes, in-class activities, course organization, guest speakers. building rapport, and coursecommunication. The survey was administered via Qualtrics Survey Software and the questionscan be seen in Appendix A [14].ResultsThe data in Tables 1 and 2 are presented on a 1 to 5 Likert rating scale and highlights the initialquantitative
can be “taught,” either deliberately or organically[5]. Sternberg and Williams recommend several approaches to promoting creativity throughpedagogy [6], among these being: 1. Building self-efficacy (self-perceived ability to successfully engage in a task) 2. Encouraging idea generation 3. Instructing and assessing creativity 4. Rewarding creative ideas and productsWe enacted in a design class the above four approaches to promoting the development ofcreative thinking. Students were enrolled in either a fall or a spring section of a BME designcourse based on development of software and fabrication skills. One of the sections includeddaily, brief creativity exercises with non-academic rewards. On the first day of class and
could represent any one (or more) of the seven individuals who participated inthe interviews [35], [36]. We used the singular form of “they/them” pronouns to represent theamalgamated participant.Author PositionaltyThe first author (they/them/theirs) was a Ph.D. student at the University of Colorado, Boulderwhile the study was being conducted. As a dis/abled, queer, nonbinary person, who at timespasses as an able body/minded, white, heterosexual, cisgender person they found themselvesdrawn to the models of disability that affirmed their experience. This likely impacted thetheoretical frameworks of disability they found and chose to explore. Their experience ofdisability influenced how they interpreted the participants’ statements even as they
increasing retention for first-yearengineering students.2 Other studies describe residential learning and living communities wherestudents are housed together and share common academic interests as an effective method forincreasing persistence, connection and satisfaction with the degree program.8,9,10Our evolving definition of a learning community is built around both students’ common GE+curricula and interests as well as the impacts on their academic program satisfaction, universityachievement and understanding of course material.Research HypothesisWith growing evidence that both formal and informal academic learning communities canimprove the undergraduate education experience, and a desire to impact community and groupidentity between
frequent low-stakesdeadlines to create a rhythm, rather than leaving everything to a midterm and final exam. While some studentsindependently used calendars and timers, others did not or could not. Thus, course-level scaffolding can ensureno student falls through the cracks due to self-regulation difficulties. The scarcity of peer engagement in online STEM courses also shaped learners’ experiences. In line withDillenbourg et al.’s emphasis on structured peer interaction for active learning [8], the participants found virtualclassrooms isolating and not conducive to teamwork or community. The lack of informal academic discoursehindered group project dynamics and the formation of an academic identity or sense of belonging. This isparticularly
learning,reflection, and peer-to-peer instruction. PLTL was originally developed to focus on teachingtechnical skills [2], but, in our initiative, it was modified to teach soft skills, such as teamwork,leadership, effective communication, among others. Peer leaders were selected among volunteerstudents.A program for LIATS was recently established in the College of Engineering to address thedifferences between the performance of low-income students when compared with the generalengineering population. A cohort of ninety-two (92) students, ranging from 1st. to 3rd. year ofstudy participate in the program. The purpose of this program is to increase retention andimprove graduation rates of students from economically disadvantaged communities as well
interests are in the development of information systems applications and the complementary nature of back-end developer and front-end developer skill sets. Her research interests are program and student assessment, the impact of instructional technology on student learning, and the improvement of e-learning environments and experiences.Dr. Barbara Louise Stewart Page 24.372.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Design of On-line Courses: Implications for Student Time ManagementThe Chronicle of Higher Education reported that - from a
the number of connectionswithin the class roster. Students report positive feedback at mid-semester check-ins and duringfinal class evaluations with requests for more interactions and to keep the assignment for futureclass iterations. Faculty have anecdotally observed increased class participation and engagementwith peers during in-class activities. Future studies may include an IRB approved longitudinalstudy tracking first-year students through the end of their academic careers to assess if theirsenses of loneliness and community differ from those students who did not participate in the10MTs assignment.IntroductionIn 2023, the US Surgeon General issued an advisory on the epidemic of loneliness and drewnational attention to the growing
Teach Design: Implementing Research ResultsAbstractWhile design has been increasingly taught in engineering courses over the last decade, there arestill many opportunities to improve the effectiveness of design learning. One opportunity is toleverage research on design processes in classrooms as design is taught. This paper presentsstudent work from two instances of a small seminar course in which empirically-based designprocess timelines were used as the basis of teaching undergraduate engineering students aboutdesign processes. Design process timelines are graphical representations that display how anindividual allocates time across a set of design activities as they engage in a design process.These
opportunities based on two hands-on activities from the e4usa™ curriculum to engage autistichigh school students in engineering. With the support of VR content being developed, the ECIIA projectaims to increase access to engineering education for autistic individuals and develop their engineeringidentity, engineering self-efficacy, engineering interest, and an understanding of the engineering designprocess. Another component of ECIIA is the commitment of Community Collaborators, whichemphasizes that everyone has a responsibility and unique ability to enact inclusive change for autisticindividuals in engineering. Community Collaborators will take on the dual role of informing all stages ofthe project based on their expertise and increasingly gain
explanations and designs for the underlying problem. 8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information: All students should have the opportunity to engage in this critical activity of science and engineering. They should have varied opportunities to perform it multiple ways, including, visualizations, orally, and in writing.2.2. Review on effective teaching practices in science educationMany scholars have identified and decomposed effective teaching practices; thus, the number ofscience teaching practices available to teachers is vast. This subsection, however, reviews corescience teaching practices that take into account the most recent goals identified by the NGSS.Teaching practices in science classrooms have
her community. April graduated from Oklahoma University’s Economic Development Institute and she is a Certified Eco- nomic Developer. April is married to Tim Eads and has two sons, Tyler 19 and Kodee 14. April is active in the community and serves on Bristol Morning Rotary Board; Chamber of Commerce Lead Bristol Advisory Committee; and the Northeast Tennessee Regional Industrial Association Advisory Committee. Page 26.297.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Building a Broadband Community with a Baldrige Based
Research Experience Uses Drawing and Art to Bolster Understanding, Communication, and Innovation in EngineeringAbstractThis paper highlights the impact that making art had on five cohorts of engineering studentsparticipating in a U.S. National Science Foundation funded Research Experience forUndergraduates program during the summers of 2019 to 2024 at the University of Kansas. Usinga weekly incubator format, students were challenged to practice drawing exercises and graphicdesign principles and then apply these lessons in the context of their individual research projectand laboratory environment. Evaluation of these experiences showed that the arts-basedapproach led many students to assimilate drawing as an observation and learning tool. Over 70
grade and their problemsolving, communication and logical thinking skills after engaging in PBL activities duringengineering modeling and design course.Our study employed a within-subjects design to assess the impact of PBL on students inengineering modeling and design courses with respect to their course grades, self-efficacy, andother essential skills. The participants were 95 undergraduate third year engineering studentsenrolled in Engineering Modeling and Design Course during 2017- 2019 academic years. This isthe first course focused on engineering modeling and design within the engineering curriculumand is offered in the first semester of the third year. This course is followed by a two-creditcourse on engineering design during the second
student population in each section. The resultsshowed that each instructor had failure rates that did not necessarily relate to teachingexperience. Significantly, one of the seasoned instructors had no identified failures versusanother seasoned instructor had a 12% failure rate. The new instructors had statisticallycomparable results for failure rates. The significant conclusion from Table 1 is that teachingexperience may not necessarily impact the rate of student failure. This is counterintuitive, but isimportant to consider that a well trained teacher is as effective as a seasoned professional. Table 1 - Results of the statistical analysis which identified student failures. Instructor Experience Course Cadet Grade
, 31]. Thus, the Appropriate Technology frameworkemphasizes the critical role of education in advancing science and engineering to addressfundamental needs, such as ensuring access to clean water for all communities, especially thosethat are marginalized [32].MethodsTo address the research question, we designed an exploratory single case study [33].ParticipantsFor this study, we selected a team of first-year engineering students. The team consisted of fivestudents, three men and two women. The students were enrolled in the course The Impact ofModern Technology on Society at a Hispanic Serving Institution in the Southwestern UnitedStates in a U.S. state that shares a border with Mexico.Ram Pump Model Eliciting ActivityFor this study, we
, inclusive, industry-specific, and increasingly visualEngineering Communication is necessary to enable technology adaptation throughdocumentation, visuals, and verbal interaction. This field produces content necessary forbusiness and engineering success. A redesigned EC course that is sensitive to the recenttechnological pivot toward remote work, VR, and AI-assisted tasking should accomplish anexpanded set of tasks, while providing students with novel tool exposure [34-36]:1. Focus on audience’s values and preferencesEC can add value to the organization by providing support through structured and high-qualitydocumentation. Think of the end – did the audience learn or take away what was expected? Anengineer’s solution or innovation has reduced impact
from the public and private sectors;and (4) investigate the impact of the ACCESS project activities on students’ success.The ACCESS project team carried out a wide range of recruitment activities to reach high schoolstudents and current WVU students at different academic stages, with specific focus onincreasing the diversity. To date, the project team selected Cohort 1, Cohort 2, and Cohort 3 ofscholarship recipients for the school years 2020/21, 2021/22, and 2022/23, respectively. A totalof 50 annual scholarships in amount of $5,000 were awarded to 32 unique students. TheACCESS program has achieved its goal to increase the annual enrollment of students in the B.S.and AoE in Cybersecurity at WVU, which has more than doubled in two years (from
implementing [design solution].Overview & Future WorkBuilding on our pilot observations and our model of appropriate Generative AI use in Figure 1,our Research Aim is to assess the strengths, limitations, and negative consequences of employingGenerative AI in design pedagogy. We aim to address three research questions (RQs):RQ1: What are the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of incorporating Generative AI into engineering design courses according to engineering design instructors?RQ2: How does Generative AI impact engineering students’ socially engaged divergent thinking during a design challenge?RQ3: What do engineering design content experts view as the pros and cons of using GenerativeAI to prompt socially engaged
division multiplexing. Eachmajor course topic is accompanied by a laboratory module designed to reinforce that topicthrough simulation and hands-on experimentation. Students use MATLAB and Simulinksoftware tools together with personal low-cost SDR hardware, allowing them to conductexperiments and investigations outside the traditional undergraduate laboratory setting. Througha balanced pedagogical approach involving in class experimentation and outside of classprojects, the laboratory modules are designed to ensure strong understanding of foundationaltopics while simultaneously engaging and motivating students through investigation of real-world wireless communication signals and systems.Details of the course approach, structure, and
; and the ASME C. D. Mote Jr., Early Career Award. In 2014 Dr. Rhoads was included in ASEE Prism Magazine’s 20 Under 40.Dr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for over 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country. His current research focuses on student problem-solving pro
of Waterloo (UW), largely due to the co-op program, where students alternatebetween four months of school and four months of co-op. On co-op terms, students typicallywork for an engineering company and can earn enough to fund their school terms. Despite this,students in first and second year engineering must usually attend classes, labs, and tutorials forthe majority of the day. This leaves little time for students to explore concepts learned in classoutside of lecture hours, and in larger classes it is increasingly difficult to actively engagestudents. We are proposing a pedagogy which uses an active learning method based on rapidquestion and answer class discussion in an attempt to increase student engagement,collaboration, and confidence
include the Engineering Success Program, established to provide academic support to first- generation underrepresented college students, and the Engineering Learning Community Introduction to Research Program, a high impact learning and research opportunity that offers freshmen underrepresented engineering students a chance to partake in a one-credit class and research project while gaining global experience with a research trip to Merida, Yucatan, Mexico. Garcia also leads efforts directing and coor- dinating the Engineering Summer Bridge Program, which gives first-generation students a head start on engineering and math courses before their first semester begins. Before joining the College of Engineering, Garcia