, data and science literacy skills that will allow them to succeed in a global economy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Graduate Research Data Management Course Content: Teaching the Data Management Plan (DMP)Introduction: The need for effective education of graduate students in the area of Research DataManagement (RDM) has been demonstrated through the number and types of recently developedcourses on this topic.[1-6] These courses tend to take one of two general forms: 1) a full-term,for-credit standalone course and 2) a workshop/seminar approach. However in both forms of theRDM course, one topic that is common to both approaches is the Data Management Plan (DMP).The
Engineering Education, 2018 0123453467819ÿ891ÿ81819ÿ8173ÿ7ÿ84764ÿ19814819ÿ 4482ÿÿ ÿ74627ÿÿ!"#ÿ!$ÿ%ÿ&!''!(ÿ$)*+%,-"*ÿ()(*)(ÿ.*!*"'ÿ"%ÿ!/*ÿ/()0*+)%-ÿ)+ÿ%!ÿ.*."*ÿ+%/1(%+ÿ%!ÿ+/&&1ÿ)(ÿ/..*ÿ#0#ÿ()(*)(ÿ&/**)&/#"2ÿÿ)+ÿ)+ÿ"&)01ÿ%*!/ÿ%ÿ.*!&++ÿ!$ÿ+!#0)(ÿ!.(,(11ÿ'/#%)1)+&).#)("*-ÿ()(*)(ÿ.*!3#'+ÿ)(ÿ"(ÿ"&%)04ÿ(")(4ÿ#"*()(ÿ(0)*!('(%4ÿ5)#ÿ")()(ÿ6.!+/*ÿ%!ÿ1)$$*(%ÿ()(*)(ÿ'"7!*+ÿ"(1ÿ&"**ÿ!.%)!(+2ÿÿ$!&/+ÿ)+ÿ%ÿ10#!.'(%ÿ!$ÿ.*!3#',+!#0)(4ÿ&!'./%"%)!("#4ÿ"(1ÿ&!''/()&"%)!(ÿ+8)##+2ÿ*!/ÿ"&%)04ÿ&!##"3!*"%)0ÿ%"'5!*84ÿ+%/1(%+ÿ"..#-ÿ()(*)(ÿ'%!1+ÿ%!ÿ9*"#ÿ5!*#1:ÿ.*!3#'+2ÿ;)#ÿ%*ÿ"*ÿ"ÿ(/'3*ÿ!$ÿ=@ÿ6.*)(&+ÿ"0")#"3#ÿ%!ÿ!/*ÿ$)*+%,-"*ÿ
to facilitate and supportHispanic, low-income, and/or first-generation STEM students to develop academic research andcareer preparation experience over summer break. The UGR Program is led by dedicated staffacross 3 colleges who organize and develop a comprehensive schedule of weekly workshops,seminars, and trainings across the summer session. The combination of direct research andprofessional development provide a first-hand exposure to emerging issues and real-worldtraining needed to advance in science, either as graduate students or bachelors-level workingscientists. To apply, undergraduate students must be a declared major within the Colleges ofAgriculture, Engineering, Construction Management and Computer Science or Natural
homeworks were assigned, in addition to a single Rankine CycleDesign project. Student reaction to the tool was measured using the website version of theSystem Usability Scale (SUS) [9], a survey instrument designed to measure website usability,and that has been validated in the literature [10]. The survey contained ten questions rated on a 1-5 Likert scale from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). The questions for the SUS arelisted here: 1. I think that I would like to use this website frequently 2. I found the website unnecessarily complex 3. I thought the website was easy to use 4. I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this website 5. I found the various functions in this website
reduces the workload on the faculty and teaching assistantfor the course. Overall, students have had a positive experience with the program and feel that ithas helped them improve their abilities in Excel.In the future, the program could be implemented across the campus in the Info SystemsEssentials course, a general technology education for the college The program has beendiscussed with a couple of professors who teach that course and they expressed interest inpotentially using the program in their course.References [1] T. G. Hill, "MEAGER: MICROSOFT EXCEL AUTOMATED GRADER*," Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges, vol. 18, pp. 151-164, 2003.[2] D. M. Kline and T. N. Janicki, "Enhancing Economics and Finance Learning through
MakerTruck.)Partnering with Educators and SchoolsThe SMU Maker Education Project has partnered with a large number of educators across avariety of public and independent schools in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. When we enterinto a partnership, we attempt to tailor our support based on the particular needs of the schooland its educators. While this means that each partnership is unique, they generally fall into threecategories: (1) brief encounters, (2) continued encounters, and (3) sustained encounters. Below,we report on the nature of each of these types of encounters. After describing the type ofencounter, we follow with an example, and end by reporting the lessons we have learned.Brief EncountersBrief encounters are partnerships in which we
project. The report also included a survey for students to assess the educational goals of the project.This paper contains a review of past exercises and outlines resources used, parameters of project,student deliverables, and a survey of learning outcomes.Introduction and literature review The idea of incorporating active learning in engineering coursework has been discussedfor over three decades, but instructors continue to seek the perfect balance between engagementof students through activities and traditional lecture-type delivery of concepts. Before expandingon the merits of active learning in engineering education, however, let us first define what ismeant by “active learning” in education in general. In 1991 Bonwell [1
generalized to aspects of the solution for the mainstreameducational practices. At a minimum it would make for a stronger multifaceted approach to problem-solvingAcknowledgment:The authors would like to acknowledge support from NSF, Grant number 1551233.References: [1] Burckhard, Suzette R. and Joanita M. Kant, Eds. (2016). The PEEC Experiment: Native Hawaiian and Native American Engineering Education. Brookings, SD: Jerome J. Lohr College of Engineering, South Dakota State University. Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty Books. 1. http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/cvlee_book/1/. [2] Pieri, R. V., & Legg, T. D., & Vallie, A. M., & Nelson, L., & Mattes, J. J., & Parker, M. M., & Padmanabhan
of the omitted features. In thispaper, three publicly accessible datasets are used to present subjective analyses of insignificantfeatures beyond the general recommendation of an AI algorithm.IntroductionPredictive modeling is one of the skills that industrial engineering graduates possess. Thepredictive relevance of an output/response depends on the quality of the input factors, commonlyknown as the features. Among many input factors, choosing significant features for businessoperational purposes is customary. There are many reasons why a portion of the features is usedfor decision-making purposes, such as computational cost and accuracy [1,2,3]. In addition, thepredictive algorithms are also tuned carefully to optimize for overfitting and
design of PB-Lab engages students with active learning and authentic learning; theysee how what they are learning in materials sciences can be applied as working engineers.Students experience the interdependent and integrated nature of the materials developmentprocess in the lab and generate their own concepts about addressing global challenges. Insummary, PB-Lab engages students in identifying problems, developing potential solutionsthrough materials characterization and analysis in the lab, and delivering effectivecommunication in the form of lab reports or presentations. 1. Introduction Materials science (MER 213/lab) at Union College is a sophomore-level course integralto understanding the properties and applications of
interdisciplinary public outreach training and events pairedwith the workload of junior faculty was noted as a difficulty, as was the lack of tangibledeliverables that could be referenced in a tenure review dossier.These emergent findings from this research left our research team with many questions andconsiderations. While the notable outcomes that emerged from participant interviewstangentially related to the development of teaching and research – two important aspects ofreceiving tenure – there still emerged a tension between participants’ engagement in thisprogram and how it related to what ‘counted’ toward earning tenure. We aim to report theseemergent findings in a more detailed manner and discuss 1) future directions for research on thewider
than “no specialization” if the general list contains sufficient courses that astudent would opt to take an EnvE course topic for every required elective space in thecurriculum. A CivE program that requires four engineering electives but only has twoenvironmental engineering elective courses would have been classified as “no EnvEspecialization”.Table 1: Among CivE PUI, the degree to which a CivE major could customize their coursework to specialize in EnvE. Fourcategories include: (1) PUI where both CivE and EnvE programs are present, (2) no customization or limited ability to specializein EnvE, (3) formal specialization pathway through declaration of a “concentration” or “specialty”, and (4) informalspecialization through student selection of
, chemistry, and mathematics. Each respondent alsomet the following requirements: 1) The student identified his/her race/ethnicity as Black/AfricanAmerican on his/her application to Tech College; 2) The student stated that s/he was educated ina high school either in the U.S. or in a sub-Saharan African country; 3) The student enrolled atEC prior to transferring to Tech College; 4) The student was at least 18 years of age at the timethat s/he participated in the research study. A roster of Black transfer students was generated by the Admissions office at LandingUniversity (Landing University is the main campus on which Tech College of Engineering andseveral other academic colleges is housed). After obtaining this roster, undergraduates who
graduate education, faculty hiring, and the pathway to an academic career. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Lessons Learned: Faculty Search Committees’ Attitudes Towards and Against Rubrics Gabriella Coloyan Fleming, Maura BorregoIntroduction Faculty search committees are the gatekeepers to the next generation of tenure-trackfaculty [1]. The tenure-track faculty search process typically follows similar steps: 1)development and marketing of the position, 2) narrowing the candidate pool from all applicantsto a “long list” for first-round interview (often, on the phone or a video call), 3) conducting first-round interviews, 4
Paper ID #36681Experiences Of Faculty Mentoring Engineering TransferStudentsDeniz Nikkhah BME Grad student at UCIDavid A. Copp (Assistant Professor of Teaching) David A. Copp received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Arizona and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of California, Irvine in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Prior to joining UCI, he was a Senior Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories and
, and theyhelp mentees prepare documents for tenure-track applications. Circles are encouraged to use thisstructure or develop their own. Between meetings, circles communicate via email or services likeSlack or Microsoft Teams. In general, circles that created a Slack or Teams group found theseplatforms helpful for sharing files, providing feedback, and sending links to articles of interest.Table 2. Recommended meeting topics. Meeting Recommended Topics Meeting 1 Life as a faculty member: facing imposter syndrome, failing gracefully, challenges of early faculty career, work-life balance, the tenure process Meeting 2 CVs: what to include and how to build yours up. Action: update CV Meeting 3 Faculty
(CGIW) wasadministered to measure students’ shift in: 1) Innovation Self-Efficacy, 2) Innovation Interests,and 3) Innovative Work. The results generated from this survey showed the students’ increase ininnovation self-efficacy as a result of the design of K-12 STEM projects. The findings will haveimplications for assisting engineering educators to adopt futuristic designs into their engineeringcurricula, understand how to encourage innovation self-efficacy in students for their futurecareers, and understand how student projects focused on teaching promote innovation self-efficacy.Keywords: Innovation Self-Efficacy, K-12 STEM projects, environmental engineering,augmented realityIntroductionEducation for innovation in engineering is a central
recruited to participate in Aim 1, this paper is focused on the firstresearch question of Aim 2: How might we verify that novices have baseline competency forconducting ethnographic design interviews? Aim 1 and the second research question of Aim 2will be addressed in the continued research.In the study, professionals experienced in ethnographic design interviewing reviewed and scoredpractice interviews conducted by the novice students during the training program. Those sameinterviews were evaluated using software to code and calculate scores derived fromliterature-supported interview metrics. The scores given by the experts were compared to thescores generated by the metrics and software calculations. The comparison of the two scoringtechniques
theconcept.The Multidisciplinary Design approach has proven to be both challenging and rewarding in bothindustry and academia. Bringing together bright minds to attack a design problem functionallyand systematically can test the boundaries of all team members. “For some professionally,vocationally, or technically oriented careers, curricula delivered in higher educationestablishments may focus on teaching material related to a single discipline. By contrast,multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary teaching (MITT) results in improvedaffective and cognitive learning and critical thinking, offering learners/students the opportunityto obtain a broad general knowledge base” Pooley, Alison and Wanigarathna, Nadeeshani(2016).KeywordsShipping
, gaining significant traction in the K-12 system is standards-based grading. With standards-based grading, grading is based upon “measuring students’proficiency on well-defined course objectives.” [1] Instead of arbitrary grading scales, studentsare assessed multiple times regarding their performance on course outcomes. By doing this,there is an increase in student engagement and a more thorough comprehension of coursematerials. [2] Standards Based grading focuses on the specific, relevant skills a student shouldlearn and helps instructors to assess how well students are learning and tailor their teaching tomeet areas of concern. [3] By measuring these goals, students continue to learn. By usingrubrics to articulate these goals, students can use
boysexclusively makes no sense, and a part of the diversification of an over- all population should bedifferent populations working together. Engineering outreach programs have been around for quite some time, with a casual survey indicating that the late 1990’s saw an uptick in the number of programs, perhaps due toincreased NSF funding. In the same time period, efforts to recruit more women to engineeringwere languishing. The nationwide percentage of women has hovered in the vicinity of 18% forover 20 years [1]. Coincident with these phenomena, research emerged providing good insightinto characteristics of educational programming that appeal to girls. SciGirls published theSciGirls Seven [2] strategies for engaging girls. They advise providing
issues.Despite these statistics and the national focus on diversity, work to improve diversity of facultyin institutions of higher learning, particularly in STEM, is questioned. Justifications for the needfor faculty diversity in STEM is usually justified by because (1) it is the right thing to do, (2)females represent at least 50% or more of the college population but the percentage is notreflected in STEM, (3) including females in the process of design adds dimensions to the design,improving the solutions ability to serve society, just to name a few. However, these reasons donot resonate with all members of an academic community and other theory based and evidencebased approaches need to be made to justify the need for diversity of faculty in STEM
eight undergraduate students, mostly ECE majors but including ascience major, and two faculty advisors from the ECE and Physics departments. All studentsparticipate in this project as an extracurricular activity and do not receive any course credit towardcompletion of the ECE or science curriculum.For the remainder of this paper, we 1) present a brief description of the baseline system, as well asdetailed descriptions of the MTS of our SE ballooning system, 2) identify key technical knowledgerequired for a successful design of the subsystems in reference to specific ECE course content, 3)present how the extracurricular research activities are administered to keep students motivated andengaged in the project, and 4) present and discuss
. Entering the 2015-2016 academic year,program faculty envisioned a capstone design experience that would engage student teams in ayear-long, professional level design project sponsored by an industry client. The first two yearsof the capstone design program have been inarguably successful, and in this paper we identifyand reflect on the keys to our success. The intention for writing this paper is to ensure thesuccess of the program is repeatable, and to assist other programs, especially those residing insmall liberal arts universities, in starting or revising their own senior design experience.Our key factors in assembling a successful industry-sponsored capstone design program havebeen: (1) faculty buy-in and involvement, (2) engaged industry
engineer with a passion for teaching the next generation of engineers to be well-rounded professionals who consider the broader impacts and effects of their work beyond the technical. Her cur- rent research interests include investigating pedagogical interventions in the classroom to build technical, professional, and lifelong learning skills.Dr. Linda A. Battalora, Colorado School of Mines Linda A. Battalora is a Teaching Professor in the Petroleum Engineering Department at the Colorado School of Mines (Mines) and a Shultz Humanitarian Engineering Fellow. She holds BS and MS degrees in Petroleum Engineering from Mines, a JD from Loyola University New Orleans School of Law, and a PhD in Environmental Science and
knowledge of their peers. Cross-disciplinary considerations,particularly those that may have inhibited this response, will be explored in the future.We anticipate that participation in the ESIP-Project will help students immensely in their day-to-day technical tasks once they graduate, as they will know how to organize their arguments in aneffective and persuasive manner. During the current semester, one student group who enrolled inCourse 1 is currently responding to USPTO office actions for their IP design. We anticipate thisrate of response to grow in subsequent iterations. Students will put their recently or concurrentlyacquired MPEP knowledge to good use by generating responses to those office actions. Whetherhypothetical or actual office
for the course text. It was not used Page 24.549.2again in PHYS 205 until the opportunity arose to change textbooks in 2012 to Physics forScientists and Engineers, 3rd edition by Knight. MasteringPhysics was more quickly adopted forthe algebra based General Physics I (PHYS 175) as the department was already using Giancoli’sPhysics: Principles with Applications 6th edition. It was used with Giancoli’s text from Fall 2010until Fall 2012 when the text for this course was changed to College Physics 2nd Edition byKnight, Jones, and Field.In all of these instances, students were assigned 8-12 End of Chapter problems AND 2-4 conceptquestions per
considerations into technological decision-making processes,engineering management is an ideal program of study (CSUN 2014), (Becker, 2007). Page 24.163.2The undergraduate engineering management degree program includes studies in basicmathematics and sciences, the engineering sciences, engineering management disciplinarystudies, and technical electives, as well as general education. The selection of technical electivescan be tailored to particular areas of student interest. The team project experiences in manycourses approximate the professional environment that graduates will encounter in their futurecareers. Program culminating experiences include
fromhaving to fund the ProSTAR organization.Given this model, and in accordance with general accounting practices, there are twocomplementary methods for reducing an overhead rate reflecting fixed expenses: (1) controllingfixed and variable expense growth and/or reducing expenses, and (2) increasing the activity base(gross revenue). Reducing expenses, while typical in mergers, acquisitions and restructurings, isusually perceived as a pessimistic view of future growth and a protectionist approach. Increasingthe activity base (gross revenue) is perceived more positively as a growth strategy and typicallyviewed as a methodology associated with a competitive spirit.While reducing overhead can work in some instances, it is widely held there exist a
% first generation, 51% white, the first-time freshman acceptance rate is 22%, and the entering class included15% transfer students. Although the universities are in the same system, the tuition and fees at Cal State LA are $6750/yrwhile at Cal Poly tuition and fees is $9950/yr. The higher fees provide Cal Poly with more resources that can be used inmany ways to support students. An indication of the resource imbalance can be seen in the tenure/tenure-track faculty tostudent ratio in the engineering colleges: Cal State LA is 59:1 and Cal Poly is 45:1. These differences allow us to comparethe responses of employees and students at the two universities with a diversity and equity lens. Cal State LA is classified asa Hispanic Serving Institutions