increasing the number of underrepresented engineering students is the lackof a sense of belonging those students may feel while enrolled as a student. Previous researchshows that a lack of strong sense of belonging in higher education is a common reason for theearly withdrawal of ethnic minority students [8]. In fact, students who find few peers in theirclass—often underrepresented ethnic groups and women—“tend to feel much more strongly thatthey don’t belong” [9] so a lack of community can deter underrepresented students frompursuing engineering in the first place.The CAR Strategy is one pedagogy that intends to contribute to eradicating underrepresentationof racial/ethnic minorities in engineering. It aims to provide a framework for driving outnon
field and advice on how to be successful in their early careers.ResultsIn the first iteration of this intervention, as part of Stage 3, students were only asked to completean informational interview with a working professional. Following their interviews, an in-classdiscussion was facilitated with PollEverywhere. Students were prompted to share advice thattheir interviewee provided. One major message students received was the power of having awell-developed professional network: • “make connections and always try to keep learning something new” • “go to as many career fairs as possible so you can build your network” • “Networking and communication is SUPER important, start building your tree of contacts early” • “build
ease accreditation metric creationAbstractBackground: Research has shown that students from underserved groups are more likely topersist when they see the link between their coursework and improving society [1], [2].Simultaneously, human welfare and social impacts have become a part of accreditation protocolsfor engineering programs [2], [3], [4]. These two factors result in a need for faculty tostrategically create inclusive classrooms where students 1) are engaged in the field of studythrough application to their personal, social, and global knowledge contexts and 2) aredemonstrating proficiency on subject matter sufficient to demonstrate accreditation andprogrammatic requirements. In prior work the authors have shown strategies that exist
professorand the students, who share a common learning goal and who collaborate to achieve that goal.32The role of the professor is to select and structure information for the students. The professoralso provides questions and tasks that promote critical thinking, facilitates on-line discussions,and coaches and mentors students as they work together to learn.23 An on-line community isoften considered to match the constructivist view of learning, where students construct personalmeaning of content by engaging with the content.24,33 The participation of the instructor is key tothe development of a feeling of connectivity within an on-line learning community.The number and quality of interaction events between and among learners and instructors isanother
mentionedhow this program has impacted their approach to student teaching. One pre-service teacher said,“Participating in this program will help me with my student teaching. It allowed me to get aheadon some of my lesson plans where I can incorporate active learning strategies for the students.”The RET program also helped the pre-service teachers connect with leaders in the localeducational community. Two of the pre-service participants connected with a local middleschool to offer weekly engineering design challenges for several classrooms.ConclusionsThe RET program is very impactful to both in-service and pre-service teachers in many ways.All participants are gaining personal knowledge and skills about the research process and how touse this process
115: Intro to STEM Teaching) and one designed as a service-learningcourse for engineering undergraduate students (EF 327: Engineering Design in K-12 Education),are taught together by a team of instructors from both the Engineering Fundamentals (EF)division and the department of theory and practice in teacher education (TPTE).In this combined course, students learn about the field of engineering and how it can beincorporated into K-12 STEM teaching, as well as learning about how to teach effectively andhow to create instructional materials. They complete a series of service-learning projects thatinclude working directly with K-12 students and families at community outreach events anddeveloping videos and lesson plans that can be used to teach
Paper ID #241732018 ASEE Zone IV Conference: Boulder, Colorado Mar 25Inspiring Community College Students in Electrical and Computer Engineer-ing Research through Live Digit Recognition using Nvidia’s Jetson Tx1Mr. Jayson Paul Mercurio, Canada College Jayson Mercurio studies computer science at UC Santa Barbara. He is a recent transfer student from Canada College in Redwood City and interned at SFSU over the summer of 2017, working on image recognition with neural networks.Kevin YamadaMr. Jose L. Guzman, Canada College Jose L. Guzman is currently an undergraduate at Canada College. He participated in a research program
administrative support in coordinating service-learning efforts on and off Purdue University’s campus with the goal to institutionalize service-learning into the academic fiber of the campus. In this position, she works to enhance and expand partnerships in engagement among faculty, staff, students, and community partners, and consults with faculty in matters related to service-learning. This year, along with PI Dr. Velasquez, she was awarded two service engagement grants from Indiana Campus Com- pact totally nearly $10,000. Payne has also co-coordinated CIE’s all-campus teaching assistant program, and organized the all-campus Scholarship of Engagement Conference in October of 2010. She also co- developed and presented
such benefits at the introductory level is to integrate primary literaturesources into the course [5]. Separately, external evaluations of developments in the informalscience education space have correlated integration of outreach into general engineering courseswith undergraduate student self-reported gains in communication skills including communicatingcomplex science ideas to non-scientific audiences, understanding of teaching practices, andincreased knowledge of the community [6-10]. Here we report on the results of a small scalestudy of the impact of introducing outreach elements and primary literature sources into anundergraduate level introduction to nanotechnology course.Course Design and RationaleA 3-credit course with lecture as well
high-impact scholarlyvenues. WIED should also continue to provide a voice for women engineering faculty and graduatestudents, and find new ways to recognize the contributions of women faculty and graduatestudents.R3 (2006-2008): Two of the challenges when I was Chair were communications and makingprogress between our annual physical meetings. We were working to advance our listserve andwebsite to help promote WIED but also figure out the best way to disseminate information todivision members. We also worked to get more involvement of non-tenure track and graduatestudents in the division.The second item related to making progress between annual meetings. I set up regular conferencecalls with WIED leaders so we could work on items between our
equipment [1, 9-11]. The outcomes of these capstoneprojects can lead to tangible enhancements in laboratory equipment, improving functionality,accuracy, and overall effectiveness. Consequently, this contributes to the continuousimprovement of educational resources within engineering programs, fostering a more robust andmodern teaching environment, and providing engineering students with cutting-edge resources.Through the integration of capstone projects centered on equipment improvements, and guidedby faculty teaching respective courses, students engage in a comprehensive learning experiencethat goes beyond theoretical understanding. They are required to conduct in-depth research of theexisting laboratory setup(s) identifying inefficiencies
Paper ID #12003Exploring Students’ Multimodal Mobile Use as Support for School Assign-mentsMrs. Tiina Leino Lindell, The School of Education and Communication in Engineering Science, KTH RoyalInstitute of Technology Tiina Leino Lindell is Ph.D student at The School of Education and Communication in Engineering Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, with specialization in mobile learning and multimodality. Her research focuses on how learning and communication occours in technology education, by using digital and multimodal resources. She also teaches students at high school level in a technology education.Dr. Stefan
international aspect of the community building effort, d) Steering Committeeformation involving robotics industry members and university faculty, e) several student projectson social aspects of the RICC, f) setting the format and schedule for the conference, g) refiningthe competition format and scoring rubric, h) holding the First Annual 2009 RICC, i) conductinga survey of RICC attendees and assessing the results.We report on the extent to which the competition and conference achieved four major goals: (1)stimulating students to imagine new robotics applications and encourage them to develop theirideas into working prototypes; (2) bringing student work to the attention of industry leaders whomay see opportunities to further develop the students’ ideas
progress describes a pilot to incorporate critical reflection activities, completed byindividuals and by teams, during the implementation of design activities in an early-career,project-based learning context. As described in full below, critical reflection has beendemonstrated as a high-impact practice that can deepen learning and cultivate a productivefuture-oriented mindset [1]–[3]. Thus, activities that incorporate reflection into projects havegrown in use and garnered increased attention in engineering education for their transformativepotential [4]–[6]. Further, consistently engaging in reflection on learning as a community has thepotential to develop environments and classroom cultures that value student growth andcommunity [7].Critical
Grand Challenges for Engineering,fourteen challenges facing modern society that reinforce the message that engineers use theircreative problem-solving skills to improve our world and shape the future. [17] [18] See Table 1for a list of the Grand Challenges. Each of these challenges impact people around the world andusing these challenges as framing for engineering projects and lessons can engage students whoare interested in having a career that helps others or solves problems they observe in theireveryday life.Most of the work evaluating the impact of the Grand Challenges has focused on undergraduateengineering majors and their perceptions of lessons based on Grand Challenges. [19] Forexample, Corneal found that students responded positively
AC 2011-2296: EXPLORING COLLABORATIONS WITH NON-METROPOLITANCOMMUNITY COLLEGES TO GRADUATE MORE ENGINEERING ANDCOMPUTER SCIENCE STUDENTS WITH BACHELOR’S AND GRADU-ATE DEGREESMary R. Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University MARY R.ANDERSON-ROWLAND is the PI of an NSF STEP grant to work with five non-metropolitan community colleges to produce more engineers, especially female and underrepresented minority engi- neers. She also directs three academic scholarship programs, including one for transfer students. An Associate Professor in Computing, Informatics, and Systems Design Engineering, she was the Associate Dean of Student affairs in the Ira a. Fulton School of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. She was named a
Paper ID #41797Appraising the Impact of Dialogical Pedagogy and Curriculum Co-Design: AConversation Between the Humanities and EngineeringDr. Brainerd Prince, Plaksha University Brainerd Prince is the Associate Professor and the Director of the Center for Thinking, Language and Communication at Plaksha University. He teaches courses such as Reimagining Technology and Society, Ethics of Technological Innovation, Technology and the Anthropocene, and Art of Thinking along with communication courses for undergraduate engineering students and Research Design for PhD scholars. He completed his PhD on Sri Aurobindo’s Integral
, there is a formal in-class exercise designed to actively engage the studentsthrough brainstorming or calculation. These exercises use 3-4 member groups based on wherethe students are sitting in lecture (not necessarily their project team). This group dynamic ischosen solely for the sake of organizational time. Each group is given one copy of the question.The worksheet details the role of each group member (typically a leader, recorder, andspokesperson). The exercise is designed to take about 10 minutes of class time. During thattime, the instructor circulates the room answering individual group’s questions. Uponcompletion of the activity, groups are called on to discuss their questions and solutions. Thesolutions are posted online after class
taken (1).Anyone who has been involved in a manufacturing process is well aware that qualityissues will surface periodically. Although we can all accept the natural variationsinvolved in manufacturing, one has to question the responses to these variations. One hasto question the authenticity, sincerity and validity of quality initiatives with the followingclaims. Six former employees of the Firestone plant in Decatur, IL, which manufacturedmany of the 6.5 million tires recalled, claim that workers used questionable tactics tospeed production in the mid 1990’s (6). This author goes on to report that these workersallege that (6): • Decatur workers engaged in practices such as puncturing bubbles on tires to cover up flaws on products that
attention on. It allowed for a narrowing of scope in the proposedsolutions into the specific areas of social and authority infrastructure, meaning that theintervention could focus on how people’s beliefs, attitudes, and past conversations impact theircurrent communication along with the authoritative powers that individuals are vested with whilecommunicating.Once these infrastructural foci were identified, they were then cross referenced with themalleability scores produced earlier. Cross-referencing these coded sets allowed us to comparethe moments that were having the greatest impact on the students with the moments that were themost malleable or able to be changed without heavy investment of time, money, or attention. Theintervention could use
to allow for work sharing and information management.While students used technology specific to their disciplines, information and decisions werecompiled to allow access by the team and client. The project guidelines mandated the inclusionof green technologies, including renewable energy. Net Zero Energy, which requires designersto balance a building’s energy consumption with its ability to generate power, required team’sdiligence in their IPD effort.Layering on top of the various discipline-specific and IPD priorities was a goal to explore thepedagogy of technology. Students matriculating in the current technological environment facesignificant impact on their productivity, communication and research activities as a result oftechnology
(MHOS) learning platforms (e.g., mobile personal instrumentation and control devices likemyRIO, myDAQ, Analog Discovery and ADALM1000 and processors/microcontrollers likeArduino, Raspberry Pi, PSoC, ARMmbed, LaunchPad … ) provide almost unlimitedopportunities to solve this remaining problem in engineering courses. Pedagogy based on thesetools has been implemented and studied in many institutions in the US and in other countries,impacting thousands of students each year. In all cases in which hands-on learning has beenstudied, the pedagogy has been successfully implemented. This has occurred even intraditionally theory-only courses, resulting in more engaged students and instructors. Althoughthe initial assessments of this new approach to STEM
past years, she has taught several thousands of students of diverse backgrounds. She has a strong passion for teaching innovations, in particular, active learning strategies, engagement pedagogies, and open education. Dr. Yan strives to make sustained contributions to support holistic student success and wellbeing through her teaching practices and scholarship of teaching and learning. She is an active contributor to UBC, professional societies, and the broader communities through her K-12 outreach program and committee work within and beyond UBC. Dr. Yan is a registered P.Eng. with EGBC (Engineers and Geoscientists BC), and a member of CEEA (Canadian Engineering Education Association) and ASEE (American Society for
of UND’s Center for Engineering Education Research. Her research explores strategies for broadening access and participation in STEM, focusing on culturally relevant pedagogy in science and engineering. She also investigates strategies for increasing access and participation in STEM through teacher professional learning opportunities and by exploring the impact of group gender composition on girls’ motivation and engagement. Dr. Robinson is a PI and Co-PI on several NSF sponsored grant projects which focus on teacher professional learning and self-efficacy with implementing culturally relevant engineering education, connecting to place and community, and centering culture and Indigeneity within STEM education
presentations - We use the Solidworks professor platform, that has a certification path from beginning to end.Additional Lessons LearnedThough there were convergent and divergent themes from interviews, there were also reflectivelessons from instructors.Two out of four instructors explained that they communicated their transition plan to the studentsand polled students to get their input on the plan. Both reported that the students responded wellto their suggestions and engaged in the proposed activities. One instructor reported that ‘almostone hundred percent of those students said: we wanted to
with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage- to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf 3. California Community Colleges Student Success Task Force (CCCSSTF). (2012). Advancing student success in California community colleges. Retrieved from http://www.californiacommunitycolleges.cccco.edu/Portals/0/StudentSuccessTaskForce/SSTF_FinalReport _Web_010312.pdf 4. Feisel, L., & Peterson, G. (2002). A colloquy on learning objectives for engineering education laboratories. Proc. 2010 Annu. Conf. ASEE.5. Feisel, L., & Rosa, A. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering
engineering job market. The second primary issue was that nearly 30% of thenon-retained students had been put on academic probation due to low grades.FORCES activities were designed to improve retention by bolstering academic performancebeginning with improved calculus readiness before the first semester. This involved two keycomponents - community building through cohorts and improved calculus readiness andperformance. The strategies and some of the impacts of those strategies are presented in thesections that follow. Additional details can be found in the article “Mathematics Performanceand First Year Retention of Students in Engineering Learning Communities.”23Improved Calculus Readiness and Performance. FORCES scholars that were not ready toenter
. in educational leadership and policy studies with a focus on higher education. She has over six years of research and professional experience in the field of higher education. With a dedication to diversity, equity, and inclusion, she is committed to using qualitative and quantitive research to inform impact-driven decisions.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as
bouncing ball using particle mechanics; Apply the use of the conservation of energy in the analysis of a bouncing ball; Apply the use of the conservation of linear momentum in the analysis of a bouncing ball; Apply central impact, inelastic impact, and the coefficient of restitution to a real problem; Design experiments; Carry out their experiments and collect data using new software found on the web; Interpret data and relate results to what analysis had led them to expect; Write reports; Present reports orally; and Work in group.Part 3. What students gained [24]. They: Engaged another dimension of learning by working on a hands-on project; Discovered that, even though the project required
providing non-loan based awards that are correlated withhigher persistence rates 5. Additionally, retention of engineering students is shown to improvewith programs that engage the students beginning with the first year 9-14. Characteristics ofsuccessful retention programs for under-represented minorities include elements that build asense of community and provide guidance via role models (mentors) for talented students.15BackgroundThe Louisiana State University (LSU) College of Engineering has supported an active MinorityEngineering Program (MEP) to recruit and help retain minority students in engineering since1977, with a large emphasis on attracting talented minority students to engineering whileproviding student support services and small