Paper ID #19780What does an In-Class Meeting Entail? A Characterization and Assessmentof Instructor Actions in an Active, Blended, and Collaborative ClassroomDavid Allen Evenhouse, Purdue University, West Lafayette David Evenhouse is a Graduate Student and Research Assistant in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. He graduated from Calvin College in the Spring of 2015 with a B.S.E. concentrating in Mechanical Engineering. Experiences during his undergraduate years included a semester in Spain, taking classes at the Universidad de Oviedo and the Escuela Polit´ecnica de Ingenieria de Gij´on, as well as multiple
, instill afeeling of value creation in students, and encourage teamwork, collaboration, and connection.”Hoffman [24] introduced how they applied an entrepreneurial approach to a senior design course.In order to simulate the workplace, the entire design class functions as a startup companyaddressing an instructor generated problem for development of a new product. The University ofFlorida College of Engineering offers an entrepreneurship course which mimics the real-worldexperiences of enterprise formation and growth in an academic environment [25].Universities outside US also noticed the importance of building an entrepreneurial mindset intheir higher education systems. In a paper from Romania, the author mentioned the worry aboutthe country’s
content to entire classrooms using picoprojectors. In 2008, he established Class on a Chip, Inc. to commercialize an array of micro-experimental devices for use in engineering, physics, and MEMS classes. In 2014, he established a new class in the Whitacre College of Engineering, Technology Start-up Lab, which takes students through a process to develop their own technology projects for commercialization. Each summer, he teaches a class entitled Solar Energy, which includes a hands-on solar energy design project. Dr. Dallas has served as the principal investigator for two National Science Foundation sponsored Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM) projects, a Research Experience for Undergraduates Site, a Course Curriculum and
department) and the mix of students. How is a department,program, or institution to quantify the multidisciplinarity of a class or student team? The number ofmajors is a simple metric, but it does not capture cognitive distance between majors. Beyond the numberof majors and cognitive distance, a measure should also account for the proportion of students in eachdiscipline. To describe the multidisciplinarity of educational programs, we propose the use of the Rao-Stirling diversity index, which has been used to quantify the multidisciplinarity of research papers,authors, research centers, departments, and institutions. The index requires a measure of distancesbetween categories, in this case students’ majors. In studies on university research
, I modified the syllabus to reflect how I had learned patent law in law school. Iincorporated the Socratic Method and taught from a law school casebook6. The class includedlively debates over the intricacies and nuances of the law, such as the Festo rule7 (the exceptionto the exception to the exception to the rule of infringement). One of my main goals for thecourse was to teach engineers how to determine whether their invention is patentable andwhether making and selling their invention infringes upon a competitor's patent. Despite thesolid attendance by the students and my detailed explanation, some of my students still confusedthe patentability and infringement tests on the exam. Some of the students applied the
2006-911: THE ONE-MINUTE ENGINEER: GETTING DESIGN CLASS OUT OFTHE STARTING BLOCKSBeverly Jaeger, Northeastern University BEVERLY K.JAEGER is a member of Northeastern University’s Gateway Team. The focus of this team is on providing a consistent, comprehensive, and constructive educational experience in engineering that endorses the student-centered and professionally-oriented mission of Northeastern University. She teaches Engineering Design and Engineering Problem Solving to first-year engineering students and has served as a coordinator for multiple sections of these courses as well.Sven Bilen, Pennsylvania State University SVEN G. BILÉN is an Associate Professor of Engineering
of engineering in society, drawing on a range of ethical paradigms and human rightsprinciples. Based on Chacon-Hurtado et al. (2022), we argue that a Human Rights frameworkprovides an encompassing language to advance ethical goals of public welfare by focusing on thedignity and development of human rights and following universal principles of interrelatedness,indivisibility, and equity. The class analyzed in this paper centers around the assumption thathuman rights-based lectures and case studies can equip engineering students to handle both extantchallenges and the potentially disruptive impact of emerging technologies because human rightsare focused on minimum standards that uphold human dignity. This paper draws on the experienceof
Paper ID #21339Incorporating Active Learning and Sustainable Engineering Concepts into aRequired Materials ClassDr. William M. Jordan, Baylor University William Jordan is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University. He has B.S. and M.S. degrees in metallurgical engineering from the Colorado School of Mines, an M.A. degree in theology from Denver Seminary, and a Ph.D. in mechanics and materials from Texas A & M University. He teaches materials-related courses and does research with natural fiber composite materials. He is also interested in entrepreneurship,sustainable engineering, and appropriate technology
Paper ID #33932Modeling Trajectories of Latent Classes to Understand the AcademicPerformance of Engineering StudentsHeather Lee Perkins, North Carolina State University Heather graduated from the Applied Social and Community Psychology program in the spring of 2021, after completing her Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the University of Cincinnati. She has par- ticipated in various research projects examining the interaction between stereotypes and science interest and confidence, their influence upon womens’ performance in school and the workplace, and their pres- ence in the media and consequences for viewers. Her
Paper ID #43817Cultivating Innovators—Unveiling the Hidden Potential of ”Innovation ThroughMaking” in Engineering EducationMitra Varun Anand, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Mitra Anand serves as the Associate Director of Makerspace, and Innovation and Entrepreneurship, in addition to being an Adjunct Faculty of Mechanical Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Anand’s research interests lie in combining hands-on Maker skills with an entrepreneurial mindset and value creation, aiming to develop practical solutions for real-world problems. He is enthusiastic about innovation in engineering education, design thinking
seven scale (seven being extremelyconfident, very high interest, and extremely important). These questions measured innovationself-efficacy (ISE) using the Very Brief Innovation Self-Efficacy scale, innovation interest (INI)using the Innovation Interests scale, and innovative work goals using the Career Goals:Innovative Work scale (IW) (adapted from [34-35]).Figure 1. Example Monster Drawings (left and right rated lower and higher on creative work,respectively)The specific survey items are shown in Appendix B. The survey concluded with demographicquestions on gender, race, and whether the student identifies as neurodivergent. The studentschose whether to receive in-class extra credit or compensation in a $10 gift card; students notparticipating
combining the humanities and social sciences with STEM education to create a unique learning experience for students.Jeffrey Stransky, Rowan University Jeff joined the field of engineering education after receiving his Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engi- neering from Rowan University in May 2019. He conducted research as part of his senior design course on the analysis of Process Safety Decision MakingDr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and
ensure every student gets access toreal-world learning.The outcome of incorporating an entrepreneurial mindset (EM), bio-inspired design (Bio), andSTEAM elements in a computer aided design and modeling class was evaluated in this study.According to Lau et al 2012 [5], integration is the ability to be involved in all aspects of anenterprise and being a strong systems thinker able to make sense of complexity. People who takean interdisciplinary approach can easily identify and evaluate opportunities, explore theseopportunities, and create solutions that provide value to the stakeholders. Hence the researchquestions addressed in this study are: What are the student-perceived learning outcomes associatedwith completing an engineering project
Paper ID #20992A Preliminary Investigation into the Use of Audience Video Recordings to As-sess Student Engagement During in Large Lecture ClassesDr. Matthew Jason Bilsky, Lehigh University Matthew holds a BS, MEng, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Lehigh University. He is currently a Post-Doc Research Associate working on a novel snake-like robot with construction, aerospace, and res- cue capabilities through his company Impossible Incorporated LLC. The project tied for second place in the 2016 Lemelson-MIT invention competition. As part of his duties he is the professor for the Technical Entrepreneurship Capstone and
on engineering education, EM, and related topics. Thecommunity members upload class materials, ideas, and stories to informal collections referred toas cards. The umbrella organization of partner institutions is the Kern EntrepreneurialEngineering Network (KEEN); partners include more than 50 colleges and universities across theUnited States.One challenge many engineering educators face when developing EM modules in classrooms ishow they might assess student mindset shifts. The Engineering Unleashed community hasworked on this topic for many years, and many useful tools have been developed or adaptedfrom the fields of education or psychology. This paper describes a long-term effort to categorizeand understand the types of assessment
. J. Hoff, W. J. Riffe, “Incorporating entrepreneurship into twomechanical engineering automotive courses: two case studies”, in Proceedings 2011 ASEEAnnual Conference.8. Gillespie, S. M., “Single-class Infusions to Integrate the Entrepreneurial Mindset intoFirst-year Experiences”, in Proceedings 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference.9. Z. Koupilová and P. Kácovský, “Active Learning in Advanced Undergraduate Course ofThermodynamic and Statistical Physics”, Science in Education, Vol.8, Iss.1, pp.65-80, 2017.10. H. Georgiou and M. D. Sharma, “Does using Active Learning in ThermodynamicsLectures Improve Students Conceptual Understanding and Learning Experiences?”, EuropeanJournal of Physics, vol.36, 2015.11. A. Gogineni, “Learning
University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI).Jeffrey Stransky, Rowan University Jeff joined the field of engineering education after receiving his Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engi- neering from Rowan University in May 2019. He conducted research as part of his senior design course on the analysis of Process Safety Decision MakingDr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as innovation and entrepreneurship. ©American Society for Engineering Education
would rather watch a video than read anarticle, and that by doing so their content retention increases by 35% [9].In a study at a large research university in the Southeastern United States, students weregenerally positive about using pre-class videos for their courses [10]. In this application, a 20-minute video was not considered unreasonably long. The students had definite suggestions forimprovement, such as that the videos needed to be professionally produced and thoroughly testedon the proper equipment before being released to the students. Videos should be kept short andaccompanied by some sort of pre-class learning activities, which also should not take too muchtime. The research also suggested that the videos cover the learning content
in agriculture, experience in programming, theability to break down a problem, being able to communicate well, and strong interpersonal skillsin their engineers or engineering interns. There are themes of communication, teamwork, andbreaking down problems, all of which are classified as meta-skill resources.When asked about what was missing in their undergraduate education, one participant mentionedthe lack of a class on entrepreneurship and communication. Others mentioned that there was anopportunity for them to take more technical classes that would have been helpful, but they werenot able to take them before entering the ag-tech industry. These ideas point to the need to sharewhat the ag-tech industry is looking for in their engineers and
Paper ID #37822Board 6: WIP: Development and Implementation of a Makerspace Class forBME Undergraduates to Enhance Skills in Senior DesignDr. Miiri Kotche, University of Illinois Chicago Miiri Kotche is the Richard and Loan Hill Clinical Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Illinois Chicago and currently serves as Associate Dean for Undergraduate Affairs in Engineering. Her research interests center on experiential learning, interdisciplinary collaboration, and promoting biomed- ical engineering through high school science teacher professional development.Dr. Anthony E. Felder, The University of Illinois at
conductentrepreneurially minded learning in Physics class taken as a requirement in a communitycollege for engineering-transfer majors (*student author).I. IntroductionThe Kern Family Foundation has initiated a university network called Kern EntrepreneurialEngineering Network (KEEN) to promote the idea of entrepreneurship learning. Multiple grantshave been awarded to curriculums across the country to teach the engineering students aboutEntrepreneurially Minded Learning and assess the learning outcomes. The contrast of Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 10-11, 2015 Villanova Universityentrepreneurially versus tradition engineering has been highlighted in a Kern EntrepreneurialEngineering Network (KEEN) video, which emphasizes the
characteristic is the inclusionof extra classes specially selected as aquiculture and business management and the effectivework in projects. The work in projects was developed in a fishing community or in fishingcaught industry, supervised by a professor.4.2 Computer Science Engineering - five years program, totally ministered in a traditional waywith the insertion of Digital Systems course taught at distance in a first moment and lately withthe introduction of Communication Systems course. They were available in punctual and non-punctual systems with tutors to help to solve doubts and intermediate the student – professorinteraction.4.3 Electrical Engineering – five years programs that had what was called “free period” thatwas a time when the students
has its roots in the XVI Century beginning with thecolonization. A Historical analysis shows visibly that it started with the military engineering,which military actions at that time in the country were basically the construction of fortificationsand the seek for solutions of defense and attack evolving to what is today the civil engineer.With the colonization of Brazil and the insurance Aspect of Portugal, the royal governmentrecognized the necessity of forming the national engineer and so becoming it of crucialimportance. It was made always attending the evolution of French Schools of Engineering and soin 1641 in Lisbon born the Artillery and Square Classes becoming in 1647 the Special Class ofFortification and Architecture. The Portuguese
Paper ID #15880An Innovative Approach to Offering a Global Supply Chain Class for Engi-neering Managers in an International ContextDr. S. Jimmy Gandhi, California State University, Northridge Dr. S. Jimmy Gandhi is an assistant professor at California State University, Northridge. His research interests and the courses he teaches includes Quality Management, Lean Manufacturing, Innovation & Entrepreneurship,Sustainability as well as research in the field of Engineering Education. He has over 30 conference and journal publications and has brought in over $500K in research grants to The California State University
when faced withcomplex problems they have to agentively solve, this shows that these students can successfullydo design work to frame and conceptualize large and difficult problems.There are several limitations to this work. The primary limitation lies in the differing number ofcredit hours between the two courses. This is reflected in students in the CCEE course havingmore accurate calculations when analyzing their data collected in the lab, and having moreprofessional presentation slides. However, these results show that even a 1-credit class allows fornuanced design work from first-year engineers. The sample size for this study is also relativelysmall, limiting universalizing due to small-scale statistics.AcknowledgmentsThis material is
Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s
Paper ID #28248Design of Instructional Tools to Facilitate Understanding of FluidViscous Dampers in A Vibration and Controls Class and Course AssessmentDr. Yucheng Liu P.E., Mississippi State University Dr. Yucheng Liu is the Jack Hatcher Chair Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering (ME) at Mississippi State University (MSU) and he currently serves as Graduate Coordinator in that depart- ment. Prior to joining MSU in 2014, Dr. Liu was the Assistant Professor of the ME Department at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette (UL Lafayette). Dr. Liu received his PhD degree from the University of Louisville in
Page 14.76.10they enjoyed the class and applied many of the skills that they had learned in the courseto their term project. Pre- and post-course assessments indicated that the students’confidence in their ability to create new products and services had significantly improvedin the case of several students as a result of taking the class. Most of the students whotook this class are now continuing in the engineering entrepreneurship minor program.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Kern Family Foundation. Theauthors are also grateful to Mr. Gerry Mayer for hosting the tour to Lockheed MartinCorporation’s Advanced Technology Laboratory.References[1] P.Singh, E.J. Dougherty, W. Hurley, and J. Klingler, “A Novel
Leadership Skills and Incorporation of a New Leadership CourseAbstractAs one part of a larger required leadership curriculum, a new course covering leadership modelsand practices was developed and administered. The course addresses many of the aspects of theentrepreneurial mindset including communication, teamwork, leadership, ethics and ethicaldecision-making, opportunity recognition, persistence, creativity, innovation, creative problemsolving, and critical thinking. Through in-class activities and games, as well as assignedcollaborative work, the course explores the various theories on leadership including relational,shared, global, and organizational models. Along with these models, integrity, character,diversity
and the topics that were covered in class. They included smaller in-class ACL activities withindividual or group homework assignments. Additional learning opportunities came from invitedentrepreneurs who gave seminars that were attended by students from multiple classes. At leasttwo of the modules covered each of the entrepreneurship skills that were targeted (Table 2).Highlights of modules in each of the four course are described below: BME 1002 Introduction to Biomedical Engineering Examples of QS products Opportunity Recognition through “Painstorming” Investigation of QS devices