AC 2011-599: APPROACHES TO ENGAGING STUDENTS IN ENGINEER-ING DESIGN AND PROBLEM SOLVINGAnn F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Ann McKenna is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering in the College of Technology and Innovation at Arizona State University (ASU). Prior to joining ASU she served as a program officer at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education and was on the faculty of the Segal Design Institute and Department of Mechanical Engineering at Northwestern University. Dr. McKenna’s research focuses on understanding the cognitive and social processes of design and innova- tion, design teaching and learning, the role of adaptive expertise in
and theirprofessionalism. I was able to answer many questions and clarify many concerns I had about myson coming to the “Colegio”. I will recommend this activity to my friends for next year.”Other outreach programs that have been established are the School Visits and the Tutoring inScience and Mathematics (TISAM). The School Visits program focuses on giving high schoolstudents, from different levels and social status, orientations to help them gather a concrete visionof each one of the engineering fields offered at UPRM. The program promotes students’ interestand engagement in their field of study but also fosters their creativity and sense of belonging thatwill result in a successful career. Since the approval of the program, it has impacted
in engineering. McCord [30] has studied metacognitiveengagement in self-directed study groups in order to develop a qualitative approach that usesobservations to study students’ actual engagement in metacognition. Litzinger, Meter, Firetto,Passmore, Masters, Turns, Gray, Costanzo and Zappe [16] found that students who engagedmore frequently in metacognitive monitoring performed better on statics problems using a thinkaloud protocol. Cunningham, Matusovich, Hunter and McCord [31] continue to investigate theimpact of targeted instruction of metacognition on engineering learning and performance. Whilesome researchers are beginning to investigate the impact of metacognitive engagement onengineering learning and problem solving, research outcomes
class.Figs 8(b) and 8(c) show that students have indeed gained an appreciation for what electricalengineering is, both in the classroom and in the broader context of general impact. This goesnicely with Secs 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 as it shows that there is true learning happening that allows thestudents to grow throughout the course. It is fascinating that zero students indicated that theyunderstood what electrical engineering was prior to the course. Just this finding alone is evidenceenough for why such classes are so greatly important.3.2 Course evaluationsUniversity-administered course evaluations contain both numerical and qualitative responses. Forboth of these, the focus will be on recent offerings of the course, comparing the three times
Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Iowa. He earned his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, in 1983, 1984, and 1989. He holds two patents, has received numerous teaching awards, and was a Hewlett Packard Faculty Development Fellow. His research interests include network communication, decentralized control, and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Impact of Active Learning Classrooms on Feedback Supported Student LearningIntroductionAs student-centered active learning has gained popularity among educators, and evidence
mentoring programs hold great promise, but that setting expectations forboth student protégés and mentors is critical for overall program success and individualparticipant impact. Eller et al. report results from a study of mentoring across multipleinstitutions showing that key components of an effective mentoring relationship (regardless ofthe discipline) include open communication, accessibility, mutual trust and respect, setting goalsand challenges, both independence and collaboration, and an exchange of knowledge12.The remainder of this paper describes the implementation of a program that integrates skillssessions focused on transversal competencies with mentoring by engineering and appliedsciences alumni to improve students’ knowledge
Carolina A & T State University (NCAT) Rookie Re- search Excellence Award. Under her mentorship, Dr. Ofori-Boadu’s students have presented research posters at various NCAT Undergraduate Research Symposia resulting in her receiving a 2017 Certificate of Recognition for Undergraduate Research Mentoring. In 2016, her publication was recognized by the Built Environment Project and Asset Management Journal as the 2016 Highly Commended Paper. Andrea has served as a reviewer for the National Science Foundation (NSF), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and several journals and conferences. Dr. Ofori-Boadu engages in professional communities to include the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the
Paper ID #38860Analysis of Covid-19 Impact on Minority Students in Higher Education.Dr. Awatif Amin, Johnson C. Smith University Awatif Amin is an Assistant professor at Johnson C. Smith University in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering since 2001. She primarily focuses on programming and data analytics. She completed her Doctorate of Management in organizational Leadership and Information System Technol- ogySuryadip Chakraborty ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Analysis of Covid-19 impact on Minority Students in Higher Education.AbstractThe Covid-19 pandemic has
University of California, Berkeley in 2013. She has a B.S. in Materials Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Dr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Amelink is Director of Graduate Programs and Assessment in the College of Engineering, Virginia Tech. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of Engineering Education and Educa- tional Leadership and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Follow Up Study on the Impact of Summer Research Experiences on Community College Students Career PathsThe Transfer-to-Excellence Research Experience for Undergraduates program (TTE REU
with consistent reminders of the underrepresentation ofindividuals with similar social identities. As a woman who identifies as Black with mixed-racedculture from Indigenous decent, I “fit” within the stereotypes of many deficit narrative of womanof color who choose to leave the an unsupportive culture. So, I often wondered how I not onlysurvived but achieved success. This questioning has motivated my journey and lead me to focuson the influence of cultural factors on students’ professional identity development in engineeringand the impact for students from diverse backgrounds. .So, I found it fitting that during my REEFE experience, I was actively engaging in my ownprofessional identity formation while conducting research on the professional
they moved learning modules and resources todistance learning platforms within a short period of time to ensure that students still receivedquality education. Isolation from educational and social communities were also new norms asadvised by the CDC, and students had to get used to virtual platforms being their primary meansof connecting to educational communities [3],[4]. Institutions implemented strategies to copewith the sudden changes in teaching and learning environments that that had suddenly becamethe new normal. Researchers continue to investigate the impacts of these transitions on studentlearning and academic performance across the globe [5],[6]. Some studies are focused onunderstanding the effects of online transition on
to providing hands-on learning experiences that enhance engineering education. As a student leader, I actively promote collaborative initiatives that empower my peers to engage in meaningful projects, fostering a deeper understanding of engineering principles and their impact on society.Dr. Redahegn Sileshi, University of North Georgia, Gainesville Dr. Redahegn Sileshi, University of North Georgia, Gainesville, GA. Dr. Redahegn Sileshi is an associate professor of engineering at University of North Georgia, Gainesville. His research experiences and interests are in the areas of water quality analysis and stormwater management, largely focusing on small and large-scale infiltration studies. He has done extensive
Leadership Program supported by the grant united both pilot leadershipprograms into a single, experiential platform grounded in the Social Change Model forLeadership Development (SCM) theoretical framework. This framework develops leadersthrough a process that results in social change through values-based reflection and action at threelevels: 1) individual (consciousness of self, congruence, commitment); 2) group (collaboration,common purpose, controversy with civility); 3) and community (citizenship) (Komives et al.2017). Students voluntarily engage in the Hornet Leadership Program from their freshman tosenior year by participating in one or more of the four different leadership experiences shown inFigure 1. The leadership learning experiences
and education majorscollaborated to develop and teach five lessons across eleven fourth grade classrooms, reachingmore than 230 fourth grade students. The project culminated with a day-long celebration on ouruniversity’s campus in which fourth graders tested their model-scale wind turbines in a windtunnel and completed various engineering design activities. This work focuses on the outcomesof the engineering students (primarily juniors and seniors specializing in mechanical and/orelectrical engineering). In particular, the efficacy of this community engagement project as apedagogical tool for meeting ABET outcomes is examined through survey results and teamreflection papers. The impacts on the education majors, fourth grade students/teachers
the desired tolerance. This project had a multi-faceted impact on the students involved. First, they gainedknowledge and experience in an area completely new to them. More significantly, however, theylearned how to independently research a new topic and develop a detailed understanding of theproblem that they were asked to solve. Leveraging this understanding, they went beyond mereimplementation of a stock procedure and instead developed a procedure tailored to the specificequipment and requirements of our observatory. In addition to performing research andsynthesis in problem solving, these students gained valuable experience distilling andcommunicating the results of their research in the form of a written document. Finally, they
experience that offersstudents an opportunity to work collaboratively on real world engineering projects in collaboration withinternational institutions and communities. The overarching aim of the course sequence is to preparestudents for the multidisciplinary, multicultural environment that they will experience upon entering theworkforce.The swiftly changing world has inspired a review of how engineering courses are preparing students forthe globalizing workforce (1-4). Engineers will engage with others with diverse backgrounds involvingeducation, culture, language, and experiences (3). This will require skills beyond the technicalcompetencies students gain from their traditional coursework and include intercultural and social skills(2).The Global
an aluminum loop is included on the front for pulling. Thecommunication system mounts at 45 degrees for ease of viewing. Figure 10.0: Mobile Comm StandThe Thomas the Tank Engine Mount has provided the child with a significant way to gainmore independence as he communicates and moves around. The IED students’ creativedesign helped to make using the communication system much more appealing andmotivating!Learning Outcomes of the ProjectsTable 1 provides a summary of the number of UTC students and clients affected by the TDBprojects since the Fall of 2005 as well the student reported project expense (each project had afinancial resources of $700.00 to $900.00).Table 1: IED TDB Project Designer and Client Impact
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Aspirations: Overcoming barriers to success and developing character through pre- and post-secondary school partnershipsAbstractThe goal of this study is to improve understanding of how participation in learning and teachingpartnerships between elementary classrooms facing high barriers to success and collegeclassrooms can: 1) influence the knowledge of, interest in, and aspirations toward post-secondaryeducation in populations less likely to explore college; 2) impact college students’ sense of civicknowledge, civic learning, civic reflection, and civic efficacy. Qualitative evaluation methodsdesigned by Lafayette College’s Landis Center for Community Engagement in
inaugural chapter, many universities, as well as a fewcommunity colleges, have followed by forming their own ASEE student chapters. To date, thereare a total of 19 active chapters and 15 dormant chapters [1]. ASEE chapters are generallyfocused on providing students with an avenue into the engineering education community andencouraging students to become more active and engaged at all levels of engineering education.Based on the ASEE website [1], the national mission statement and goals for student chaptersfall into three overarching areas: (1) supporting teaching practices and outreach at the collegeand pre-college level, (2) support and encourage undergraduate and graduate students in theireducational endeavors, scholarship and advancement in
at Qatar. The branchcampus offers four different engineering undergraduate degrees, and the curriculum is exactlythe same as the main campus in the U.S. The student body is small (approximately 450students), and very diverse. Around 50% of the students are citizens of the nation, and the other50% are international, meaning that they are from nearby countries in the Middle East and NorthAfrica (MENA) region. The only American students are a small population of study abroadstudents (around 10-15 per semester) or those who carry an American passport, but often belongto various Arab or South Asian ethnic groups.At the time of this study, our institution began a renewed emphasis on PBL, and we wanted toknow more about the potential impacts of the
-based models impact the validation and recognition of students and communities of color as holders and creators of knowledge. His current work seeks to analyze and describe the tensions, contradictions, and cultural collisions many Latino/a/x students expe- rience in engineering through testimonios. He is particularly interested in approaches that contribute to a more expansive understanding of engineering in sociocultural contexts, the impact of critical conscious- ness in engineering practice, and development and implementation of culturally responsive pedagogies in engineering education.Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University in Materials Science and
-face so that we can ask questions when wedo not understand something.” Responses that specifically mentioned GLAs or TAs indicatedthat a higher level of interaction with their GLA was desired than was received in thehybrid/online lab course. From undergraduate responses, it appears that an intervention on how students can betterengage themselves in online classes might be beneficial to both the students and their GLAs, asstudent attendance and engagement has been shown to have a strong impact on studentsatisfaction with a course’s learning environment and satisfaction with their GTA [15]. Anintervention to encourage undergraduates to be an active participant in their online courseswould also be beneficial in increasing learning gains
material thatthey learn to real-world problems (among other things). As I engaged with my service-learningoffice and with my community over time, I learned that there were more components to aservice-learning program than students. Students are really important, but there’s also theinstructor, the university, the community partner, and the broader community to consider.Students are one important player in a team of players needed to truly create positive impact inthe community. Thus, my focus has shifted from a myopic view of students only to a moreholistic view involving my entire community and the incredible impacts we have when we doordinary things together.For years, I used the project model of service-learning in which the students’ service
Engineering Education, 2025 Impact of an Interdisciplinary Engineering Design Project on First Year StudentsAbstractIncreasing student interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)continues to be of significant importance in order to satisfy the increasing demand forprofessionals in these fields. The First Year Scholars program at Kennesaw State University(KSU) aims to introduce first-year students to the undergraduate research experience. Studentsare encouraged to apply for projects they find interesting, regardless of whether the projects arein their majors. This program helps students gain early research experience, which sets them on apath for future success. In this study, an
Paper ID #38895Board 400: The impact of Oral Exams on Engineering Students’ LearningDr. Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego Dr.Huihui Qi is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engi- neering at the University of California, San Diego.Dr. Minju Kim, University of California, San Diego Minju Kim is a postdoctoral scholar at the Engaged Teaching Hub at the UCSD Teaching+Learning Com- mons. Minju received her Ph.D in Experimental Psychology at UC San Diego. With Engaged Teaching Hub, Minju has designed TA training materials for oral exams and have conducted quantitative
proposesustainable solutions to different problematics using systemic thinking. The use of systemicthinking is aimed so that students have the capacity to design solutions considering acomprehensive number of stakeholders, variables and relations within a system [5]. To accomplish this objective, the following structure is proposed: (1) Describe the Valueproposition of the Program (2) Detail the process of piloting and implementation of the Program,(3) Present an experience of community impact; and finally, (4) Conclude on the results obtained. 1. Universidad Sergio Arboleda contextThe Industrial Engineering program of Universidad Sergio Arboleda, found the need of offeringits students the possibility to developing capacities for designing engineering
facilitating courses that already includeactive learning techniques, and students who hope to pursue a career in teaching and may need todesign their own courses in the future.Defining Course GoalsGoals are the foundation of course reform. Although TAs are typically not responsible fordefining the course goals (this is normally the instructor’s responsibility), an important aspectemphasized in the “SAIL TA Training” was to ask the TAs to 1) reflect on why it is important toknow the goals of the course, 2) articulate what these goals are, and 3) understand why/how theinstructor plans to use active learning methods to achieve these goals. This step ensures thatinstructors and TAs communicate the same goals and expectations to the students.To model these
Paper ID #39219Board 311: Impacts of the ProQual Institute: Building Communities ofTechnical Stem Faculty for Long-Term Engagement in Educational ResearchDr. John Ray Morelock, University of Georgia Dr. Morelock is an Assistant Professor of Practice with an emphasis on engineering education research, and the Associate Director of Educational Innovation and Impact for UGA’s Engineering Education Trans- formations Institute (EETI). In addition to coordinating EETI’s faculty development programming, Dr. Morelock conducts research on institutional change via faculty development, with an emphasis on innova- tive ways to
as education, waterpurification, electricity supply, and agricultural improvements. The biggest challenge in theseprojects has been to understand how to design and incorporate them into the communities in away that will be beneficial for the community, and thus have a lasting impact. Thinking abouthow to implement projects in a sustainable way in which the community takes ownership overthe projects encourages the students to spend time developing not only the technical solution tothe problem, as is often the case in traditional engineering projects, but also to consider all thestakeholders in the project and how it will impact the recipients.Effect of the Pavlis Leadership Program on Student Growth and DevelopmentMany programs and
responseand research papers, and a final reflection.Lesson Plans: The first assignment is a draft lesson plan that guides their on-site lesson. Thesecond assignment is a revision based on things learned through outreach experience, in-classdiscussions, and the other assignments.Response and Research Papers: Students read articles, watch videos, perform research, and reflecton a number of topics, including: equity in the educational system, inequity and civic engagement,and impact of social injustice on the educational opportunities of students in certain communities.While many of the learning objectives are organically covered through the outreach, theseassignments are tailored to meet the reflection requirement and aligns with ELSJ LO3.Final