Paper ID #281012018 Best PIC II Paper: Systems Engineering Division: Development of aSurvey Instrument to Evaluate Student Systems Engineering AbilityMrs. Diane Constance Aloisio, Indiana-Purdue University Diane Aloisio is a PhD candidate in the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University. Her research concentrates on taking a systems approach to finding the common causes of systems engineering accidents and project failures. Diane received a dual BS degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from University at Buffalo in New York. c American Society for Engineering Education
determine if therewas evidence of the students using the design thinking process. These documents were selectedfrom 4 different semesters: Spring 2018 (n = 56), Fall 2019 (n = 32), Fall 2020 (n = 25) andSpring 2021 (n = 41). The SD design documents covered a range of topics related to theengineering disciplines taught in the College of Engineering. The student teams, which aretypically made of 3-4 students, could have members from any of the engineering disciplines,although students tended to select SD projects that best matched their major. The SD projecttopics tended to have a focus in one engineering discipline, for example Bioengineering, butcould have elements of other disciplines, such as Mechanical or Electrical engineering. Thestudents in
development.IntroductionWork-integrated learning experiences (WILs) have become a core aspect in the earlysocialization of engineers into the profession. As a result, students who engage in WILs enhancetheir understanding of the cultures, norms, and skills essential to support their success in theworkplace environment [1]-[5]. In addition, these experiences tend to strengthen their technicaland interpersonal skills, which in turn have the potential to translate into improved academicperformance [6] and a broadened network [7]-[8]. As students work alongside engineers in thefield, they can take ownership of important projects that can influence their communities anddrive innovation and growth in a company [1],[7]. The recognition of their impact fuels
, student protestors at Rutgers interrupted (on June20, 2012) a board meeting to make their voices heard [36] . Adding fuel to the fire, results from arecent study by Gillen et al. [31] indicate that undergraduate student tuition is used to subsidize re-search. As a result, the natural question being asked by both students and educational institutions Page 23.1200.3is exactly what students are getting for their money. This is applying a certain pressure on phys-ical academic institutions to improve and enhance the in-person educational experience of theirstudents.Students are not the only ones demanding higher outcomes from educational
justifiable corecurriculum content. If the core curriculum is ubiquitous in the flat world, what are theunique elements which might distinguish American-trained engineers? We propose thatby inventorying the skills related to the global design and manufacturing of automotiveparts, useful new curriculum content might be identified.The Project Setting: From Shanghai/Pudong to DetroitUntil very recently, the Chinese government required foreign manufacturers to locate inChina only through joint ventures. These joint ventures imply a certain level ofgovernment oversight including location. Parts destined for export may requiremanufacturing plants to be located in special, regulated industrial parks. Foreignmanufacturers of automotive parts tend to locate
authors examined datafrom student Longitudinal Assessment of Engineering Self-Efficacy (LAESE)surveys. Despitethe shrinking number of women engineering students at San José State University , the self-efficacy levels of the women engineering students were high. The authors can surmise thatwomen who choose to study engineering at SJSU feel confident in their abilities to succeed inengineering and or project such confidence given the male-dominated terrain of Engineering.A. Theoretical basis for the researchThere is little empirical research on the specific impact of cultural attitudes about gender roles ongirls’ interest and career choice in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)fields, particularly about STEM interest and career
Non-formal education: Engineers, nutritionist,Bortz et al. Engineering: Socio-technical Capstone design R community, and Solving social and environmental problems(2018) Food systems projects in engineering government
Paper ID #14866Engineering Major Selection: An Examination of Initial Choice and Switch-ing Throughout the First YearAndrew Theiss, The Ohio State University Andrew Theiss is a Ph.D. student in the biomedical engineering graduate program at The Ohio State University. Andrew received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering at The Ohio State University in 2009. He currently works as a graduate research associate in the Wexner Medical Center and is in his third year as a graduate teaching associate in the Engineering Education Innovation Center (EEIC). His engineering research interests are focused on the development of
associated with developing an outdoor lab for environmental monitoring will belisted. In the following section, the design of LEWAS to overcome these challenges will bereviewed. In the following section, ongoing challenges associated with implementing LEWASwill be listed. Finally attitudinal data collected from students on LEWAS in the freshmanengineering course will be reflected upon and its educational applications in energy andenvironmental sustainability will be discussed.Educational Context of LEWAS and Prior Programming InitiativesA few years before implementation of LEWAS, a number of program-wide hands-on activitieswere developed and implemented in the freshman engineering program of Virginia Tech as aresult of an NSF funded curriculum
effectivedesign of engineering projects [49, 50].In this current iteration, five of the design teams had unrelated design projects, while theremaining four teams performed projects that were a subset of their larger research project. Thischoice was at the discretion of each team’s project advisor. The teams are formed from 37senior-level engineering students. Most teams have a majority of mechanical engineeringstudents with a minority of systems engineering or electrical engineering students. In this work,we sought to discover if varying the depth of instruction in the design process steps would havean effect on the students’ execution of the designette project, as well as their execution of theirlonger-term, real world project. It is with this in mind
of U.S. citizens who are training tobecome scientists and engineers, whereas the number of jobs requiring science and engineering(S&E) training continues to grow” (p.1). “If trends continue the United States will lose its abilityto fill the growing demand for science and engineering jobs, yielding [its] global standing tonations such as China and India who are training thousands more engineers and scientists than isthe U.S.” (O’Brien50, 2004, p. 1).The U.S. Department of Commerce62 (1999) projects that by 2010, 50 percent of all U.S. Page 11.1454.2workers will be women. This projection, plus the growth in the science and engineering
and epistemic curiosity, engineering identity, and self-efficacy will be used to gauge student progress [2]. As a result, the Industrial Engineering (IE)department adopted the ECP idea with a focus on implementing home-based hands-on activitiesfor two courses. Learning a specific idea can start at any point, but the ECP concept starts withthe presentation of an experiment to teach the students a theory. This greatly improves thestudent's ability to retain the taught theoretical topic. The ECP concept is based on the MobileStudio project designed by the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute to boost students' interest andsuccess in electrical engineering [3]. Since then, many colleges, including 13 HBCUs in the USA[4], have adopted it as a
Humanitarian Technology.Prof. Cecilia KY Chan, University of Hong Kong Dr. Cecilia Chan is the Head of Professional Development and Associate Professor in the Centre for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning at the University of Hong Kong. She has conducted research on topics such as the development and assessment of generic competencies, assessment and engineering education. Cecilia holds a PhD in Engineering from Trinity College, a postgraduate diploma and a MA in Higher Education. She also held a Fellowship from King’s College London. Dr. Chan has involved in over 40 research/project grants worldwide. Please see Teaching and Learning Enhancement and Research Group (TLERG): http://tlerg.cetl.hku.hk/Mr. Mehrdad Tahernia
the ABET definition of engineering design tostudents, emphasizing open-ended problem-solving. The laboratory curriculum included twodissection labs, three Design-Build-Test (DBT) labs and a semester-long BeetleBot project, toprovide practical exposure to mechanical engineering concepts. We sought to understand howengineering students drew connections between the lab content and engineering design. Thecourse was assessed in Fall 2022 at the end of the semester through a voluntary, anonymousGoogle form survey that included questions about student impressions of the lab course. Thesurvey recorded which labs were perceived by students as being most integrated with engineeringdesign and which key aspects of engineering design (derived from the
Incorporating Complexity into Undergraduate Engineering Development through the Research Communications Studio Nadia Craig, Nancy Thompson, Loralee Donath, Michael Matthews Department of Mechanical Engineering/ Department of English/ Linguistics Program/ Department of Chemical Engineering University of South CarolinaIntroductionThe National Academy of Engineering’s Engineer of 2020 project addressed the growing need topursue collaborations with multidisciplinary teams of experts, because of the increasingcomplexity and scale of systems-based engineering problems15. These teams must be able tocommunicate effectively with technical and non-technical
. William B. Miller and Vicki L. Schenk, All I Need to Know About Manufacturing I Learned in Joe’s Garage:World Class Manufacturing Made Simple (Boise, Idaho: Bayrock Press, 2000).3. Dogan Comez et al. "Graduate Student-University-School (GraSUS) Collaborative for Science, Mathematics,Engineering, & Technology, National Science Foundation Project DGE-0086445," (North Dakota State University Center for Science and Math, August 2001). Page 7.1026.13 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering
Program: Students’ PerspectivesAbstractEffective advising ensures students take the proper classes to stay on track for their graduation.For example, in an engineering curriculum, it is crucial that students maintain the propersequence of courses that results in the culmination of the program's required capstone designcourse(s). Any human error during the advising process can risk the disruption of the smoothprogression through the program for a student. Thus, a computerized web-based advising toolcan be highly useful to eliminate such human errors in identifying the most needed coursesduring an advising session. Currently, many advising tools are available through commercialbusinesses or developed by those working in the field of education. In
collecting quantitative and qualitative data. In a broadest context, our project is an exploration in institutional change necessary forsustaining [our] curricular innovations after the funding ends. A central consideration of thisproject is the implementation of an effective change strategy that allows the successful adoptionof the reform beyond classroom, individual faculty and ideally beyond institutions. Thisdimension of the project will be discussed in a forthcoming publication.Bibliography[1] Vergara, C. E., Urban-Lurain, M., Dresen, C., Coxen, T., MacFarlane, T., Frazier, K., et al. (2009). Leveragingworkforce needs to inform curricular change in computing education for engineering: The CPACE project.Computers in Education Journal, Vol
and Medicine. He currently holds a postdoc appointment with two institutions at Penn State University—the Rock Ethics Institute and the Leonhard Center for Enhancement of Engineering Education—to facilitate exchange and collaboration between philosophers and engineers. Prior to joining Penn State, he was a postdoctoral research fellow at the Science History Institute working on the history of engineering ethics education. Shih earned his PhD and MS in science and technology studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. He also has a graduate certificate in engineering education (ENGE) from Virginia Tech and a Bachelor of Science in electrical engineering from National Taiwan University.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State
).[2] “NAE Website - Activities, Projects & Initiatives.” https://www.nae.edu/default.aspx?id=20676&areas-of- interest=6_21&listsortby=Object.Name&listsortdir=ascending (accessed Feb. 03, 2022).[3] “About the American Nuclear Society -- ANS.” https://www.ans.org/about/ (accessed Feb. 03, 2022).[4] J. Krupczak et al., “A Framework for Developing Courses on Engineering and Technology for Non-Engineers,” 2008.[5] “Majority Supports Use of Atomic Bomb on Japan in WWII.” https://news.gallup.com/poll/17677/majority-supports-use-atomic-bomb-japan-wwii.aspx (accessed Feb. 03, 2022).[6] F. Kertesz, “The Language of Nuclear Science,” 1968.[7] A. S. Bisconti, “Changing public attitudes
engineering student project teams. Additionally, she has co-developed a framework for measuring and in- terpreting an array of team dynamics. An online assessment tool has been created based on this framework which allows teams to diagnose and improve the ”health” of their team. She is passionate about her area of research and plans to continue conducting research on factors that contribute to effective teamwork.Ms. Amanda Deacon, University of Calgary I am currently in my second year masters in Industrial Organizational Psychology at the University of Calgary under the supervision of Dr. Tom O’Neill. My area of focus is teams within organizational contexts and that results in a plethora of research conducted with engineering
importance for the future of industry, especially as implemented by regional industrypartners. A substantial component of this effort at MTC involves developing curriculum andhands-on experiences designed to familiarize Engineering Technologies students with Industry4.0 concepts such as monitoring, collecting data from, and interacting with both real andsimulated manufacturing processes remotely, through a cloud computing infrastructure. MTCfaculty have started working on the development and outfitting of a dedicated classroom wherestudents can learn about smart manufacturing principles of connectivity, virtualization, and datautilization [1]. In this paper, we present the work done to accomplish the objective of creating thededicated classroom and
process, with a one-semester design project 5. Introduction to engineering problem solving with an introduction to principles from circuits, statics, and thermodynamics (Eide et.al. 4) 6. Introduction to engineering thinking and engineering skills (Stephan et. al.-Thinking Like an Engineer 5 )Our goal became to combine the best of each approach while focusing throughout the course onthe question, “What do engineers actually do?” Previous studies by Trevelyan and others haveserved to define what an engineer does in the course of executing their professional duties6. Acomposite list of tasks that engineers tackle became central to the goal of introducing as many“real engineering tasks” as possible into the course. These tasks were
in an engineering career than they do to their technical and engineeringskills [2,10-11]. Professional engineers rate communication skills as almost twice as necessaryfor working in an engineering job as engineering undergraduates do [2].Researchers have explored different explanations for engineering students’ low self-efficacy andlow perceived importance related to communication skills as a result. For example, Direito,Pereira, and Duarteb [9] pointed out the lack of active and visual learning opportunities forengineering undergraduate students to foster communication skills. Donnell et al. [5] questionedwhether technical communication courses and curriculum were adequately simulating thecommunication practices that students would
the device, its applications, anddemonstration of fluid mechanics concepts through carefully designed experiments.I. IntroductionOur institute is supported by a consortium of five major oil companies. The prime sponsor hasdiverse interests in the oil and gas industry, including various subsidiaries and operatingcompanies in the major business areas of exploration, drilling, production, refining, and gasprocessing operations, as well as transportation and marketing. Our institute offers undergraduate(and soon graduate studies) in the five major engineering fields of chemical, electrical,mechanical, petroleum, and petroleum geosciences engineering. Additional engineeringdisciplines are expected to be added in the future, in-line with the needs
Informatics and Engineering Systems (IES) for supportingAlexis De La Cruz, who conducted the Cloud Computing and Security Labs for the class.References1. Quweider, MK, et al., (2022, August), Crafting a Degree, Empowering Students, Securing a Nation: The Creation of a Modern Cyber Security Degree for the 21st Century. Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, Minnesota. https://peer.asee.org/412922. Quweider, MK, et al., (2023, July), Early Integrating of Industry Certification Domains and Objectives into a Modern Cybersecurity Degree Curriculum. Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. https://nemo.asee.org/public/conferences/327/papers/37056/view3
newtools and education that could be incorporated in the engineering and mathematics courses thatthey normally teach. During the summer of 2004, ETS personnel provided a 2-day workshop onDiscourse, and the education faculty member conducted assessment and pedagogy workshops,all which occurred over a two-week period. The remainder of the summer was used forperformance tasks development, and the education faculty continued to provide guidance.Engineering Performance Tasks and their Development Prior to the creation of the performance tasks, a reexamination of the desired coursecontent was performed. Since a multidisciplinary team of engineering faculty was involved inthe project, a review ensured that each Department had input on the
://multicorelca.wordpress.com - accessed on June 21, 2013. 11. Zhu, Y. “Supercomputing Undergraduate Program in Maine (SuperMe),” NSF RUE Award 0754951, 2008. 12. Zhang, W. “Collaborative Proposal: Problem-Based Learning of Multithreaded Programming,” NSF CCLI Award1063644, 2011.Proceedings of the 2013 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 13. Brown, R. “A strategy for injecting parallel computing education throughout the computer science curriculum,” NSF CCLI Award 0942190, 2010. 14. Ernst, D.J., et al, “Concurrent CS: Preparing Students for a Multicore World,” ITiCSE’08, 2008. 15. Adams, J., Nevison, C. and Schaller, N.C. “Parallel computing to start the millennium,” in Proceedings of the
and was assessed on a 47 point scale. Though the assessment is not used to determine scholars’ grades, the program reviewed scores and used these scores as a guide to determine physics placement. Scholars were placed in the Engineering Explorations through Physics course if they earned a score below 25;students who earned a score of 25 or above was placed into Physics 1, the first physicscourse in the engineering curriculum. Information about the design and analysis of thisEngineering Explorations through Physics course was described by Sullivan et al.[9].Scholars also took a chemistry assessment at the beginning of summer bridge todetermine their placement in the Introduction to Chemistry course or the GeneralChemistry for
\program was designed to integrate algebra and engineering activities in Spanish for a group of middleschool students. The intervention curriculum was assembled, professional development was providedto the support team in Honduras, and it was deployed as a pilot program. A research case studypresented in this paper explores the following questions:a) What elements of a hybrid program are most valued by students and teachers, b) To what extent dostudents report changes in their perceptions of mathematics and engineering and c) What is the impactof instructors and family involvement in this community-based pre-engineering program? IntroductionThe Honduras project was designed to provide early motivating