: Integrating a National Airport Design Competition into the CurriculumAbstractThis research paper examines the integration of the Airport Cooperative Research Program(ACRP) University Airport Design Competition into a junior/senior level undergraduate coursewithin the Aviation Administration Program at California State University, Los Angeles (CalState LA), a Minority Serving Institution characterized by a predominantly Hispanic/Latinostudent enrollment. Many of these students arrive with varying levels of academic preparednessaccording to conventional standards.The study explores the approach of using the ACRP University Airport Design Competition asthe focal point of the curriculum, fostering a dynamic learning environment
Paper ID #5828The Perpetual Challenge: Finding a Complementary Balance of Depth andBreadth in an Engineering Curriculum – Approach of the Electrical Engi-neering FacultyDr. Robert J. Albright P.E., University of Portland Robert J. Albright received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Oregon State Uni- versity, Corvallis, in 1963 and 1965, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington, Seattle, in 1971. He is a Professor and Chair of Electrical Engineering at the University of Portland, Portland, OR. A member of the faculty of the University of Portland
, self-identified race/ethnicity) of participants and compares the models with each other. The findingsreflect a range of emotions as identified by four models and the need for an intersectionalapproach in developing inclusive strategies with a cultural and emotional awareness to empowerindividuals in navigating academic and professional settings. There are several implications ofthe study including how the participants’ awareness of hidden curriculum affects their emotionswhich in turn affects their self-efficacy and self-advocacy, and their demographic correlations. Itgives us insights to utilize NLP techniques for qualitative data within a mixed-methods survey toextract meaningful information for educational research in engineering
merely a discussion of an idea presented in 1956 by Benjamin Bloom in hisTaxonomy.1 Bloom identified three types of learning, one of which is the cognitive domain.Within his cognitive domain he identified six levels that most educators think of when referringto Bloom’s Taxonomy. As a quick review, the six levels of Bloom’s cognitive domain arepresented in Figure 1.0 below. Figure 1.0, Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognitive LearningEducators are very familiar with the concept presented in Bloom’s Taxonomy. The idea thatstudents can learn at different levels is a driving force in how educators develop and constructtheir lessons. We know that students can learn at a lower level where all they are able to do isrecognize the material; at a higher level
Paper ID #12073Towards a T Shaped Electrical and Computer Engineering Curriculum: aVertical and Horizontally Integrated Laboratory/Lecture ApproachDr. Harry Courtney Powell, University of Virginia Harry Powell is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the Charles L. Brown Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Virginia. After receiving a Bach- elor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering in1978 he was an active research and design engineer, focusing on automation, embedded systems, remote control, and electronic/mechanical co-design techniques, holding 16 patents in these
(2010).(2) O’Brien S. (2010), Characterization of a unique undergraduate STEM K-5 teacher preparation program,Journal of Technology Education, 21 (2), 35-51 (2010).(3) Sullivan, D., O’Brien S. and Karsnitz, J., Development of a Teacher Education Curriculum Based onEngineering Principles and Concepts, ASEE Annual Conference, June (2007)(4) Steen, L. A. (2001), Mathematics and democracy: the case for quantitative literacy, National Council onEducation and the Disciplines (2001), 1–22. Princeton, NJ: Ed.(5) Rise above the Gathering Storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching Category 5 (2010), National AcademicPress. (Washington, D.C.)(6) Unfinished solution(7) Cron of Higher Ed.(8) Achieving the Dream(9) Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G
prevention, health and safety of communities and consumers. Many industries aredirecting their resources to reduce the environmental impact of their produced products andservices. To remain competitive in the global economy, these industries need to train engineeringand technology professionals to understand the impact of their decisions on the environment andsociety. It is important for universities to prepare these future engineering technologists to meetthis need. Many technology programs do not offer this type of information to their undergraduatestudents. The goal of this paper is to assess the current undergraduate mechanical engineeringtechnology program curriculum at Metropolitan State College of Denver (MSCD) with regard tosustainable green
(IDEA) integrated multi-disciplinary designmethodologies throughout the engineering curriculum, and created a design community to supporttechnology innovations [5]. A multidisciplinary freshmen and sophomore levels design approachcalled “2D design challenge” was developed at Singapore University of Technology and Design[6]. During a designated term, all courses simultaneously attacked a common multidisciplinarydesign problem. Students’ perception of their ability to solve such problems was evaluated andassessed statistically. Connecting several Mechanical Engineering core courses, Thermodynamics,System Dynamics and Control, Fluid Mechanics with a common design project was attempted atRowan University [7]. Each course was divided into multiple
. Example projects and implementation experiences of the projects into therelevant courses are also summarized. The goal of the proposed projects is to highlight forstudents the relevance of each course and the applicability to future industrial applications. Inaddition, the project aims to convey the interrelated nature of courses in the curriculum. As such,pre and post intervention survey data related to student perceptions of overall course relevanceand course interconnectedness are presented. Improved ratings are seen in some aspects ofcourse relevance and integration. Suggestions for implementation in other programs and possiblefuture work are also presented.IntroductionIn today’s global and competitive environment, development of new products
societally relevant engineering technologies intoscience and health curriculum requires the full involvement and understanding of teachers fortrue impact on students to occur.6 Accordingly, teacher training/professional development, andmentoring assistance have been demonstrated to be critical prerequisites for the effectiveapplication of research in secondary classrooms.7, 8 We have chosen to focus on teacher trainingin STEM education rather than solely on students’ STEM education because several studiesindicate that when teachers are directly involved in the planned integration of research into K-12curriculum, they are consistently able to engage students in meaningful educational experiencesand to allow more time for high level individualized
multiplepositions (e.g. professor and chair).Prior to the forum, the participants were provided with position papers describing the rationalefor the curriculum models as well as supporting materials. These materials were primarily relatedto participants through a website developed specifically for the forum6. Page 22.655.3During the forum, participants engaged in small group discussions around particular issues thatwere then shared with the larger audience. In addition, industry representatives and specificfaculty held periodic panel sessions where they would focus on a particular issue and then openthe floor for questions and feedback.Central to forum
funds toadd three more stations and complete the system.Amatrol’s unmatched multimedia31 utilizes text, audio, and stunning 3D animations that engagelearners in both theoretical knowledge and hands on skills. This thorough, exceptionally detailedcurriculum31 is built to begin with the basics and steadily advance to more complex concepts andskills. Through partnerships with key industry leaders and leading edge educators, Amatroldeveloped the right balance of knowledge and applied skills needed to train learners to work intheir chosen field.Faculty Training at Amatrol FacilityThe two-week training was offered by Amatrol Inc31 to the faculty members involved in thelaboratory and curriculum development, and consisted of one week (36 hours) of
electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, etc. A systems engineering based concept curriculum, that provides foundation for a broadbased major discipline such as electrical engineering, is presented. This is proposed as a domain centric systems engineering program under the Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering program. The motivation to develop such a program stems from the growing industry demand for systems engineers who are equipped with skills related to development, evolution and verification of lifecycle based system solutions for a variety of applications in the areas of power and energy, telecommunications and information technology, robotics and control systems, and hardware and
program structure andoverhauling the late freshman- and sophomore-level curriculum to better address today’s studentneeds. Over the past 18 months of the grant-based work, the grant PI and department facultyteams have collaborated to develop this vision through a base set of eight courses for all studentsto complete by the end of their second year. Consequently, the base courses must providestudents with a broad enough view of the field that they can make a satisfactory choice for theirpathway to a degree, while also providing them with basic knowledge that will be required ofany of those pathways.The program goals for the base courses are to 1) strengthen the integration of both electrical andcomputer engineering and ethics topics across the
design and teaches in a Masters of Arts program designed for second career STEM professionals. He also teaches a variety of courses to as- sist classroom teachers with curriculum development, analyzing their instruction and conducting action research. Dr. Marlette was awarded his Ph.D. from Kansas State University in 2002. During his pro- fessional career he has taught both middle and high school science, worked in professional development schools, and provided teacher professional development at all grade levels (K-12). He regularly collabo- rates with STEM faculty on various projects and grants to improve K-12 STEM learning. He currently is serving as a faculty fellow in the SIUE Center for STEM Research, Education
Instructional and Curriculum Leadership from Northcentral University. Burr-Alexander has nearly three decades of experience in management, curriculum development, and im- plementation of projects for educators, students, and their parents in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (STEM) education.Dr. Howard S. Kimmel, New Jersey Institute of TechnologyDr. John D. Carpinelli, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. John D. Carpinelli is a professor of electrical and computer engineering and executive director of the Center for Pre-college programs at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He has served as coordinator of activities at NJIT for the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition and as a member of the
Paper ID #6184Professional Development System Design for Grades 6-12 Technology, Engi-neering, and Design EducatorsDr. Jeremy V Ernst, Virginia Tech Dr. Jeremy V. Ernst is an assistant professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning at Virginia Tech. He currently teaches graduate courses in STEM education foundations and contemporary issues in Integrative STEM Education. Dr. Ernst specializes in research focused on dynamic intervention means for STEM education students categorized as at-risk of dropping out of school. He also has curriculum research and development experiences in technology, engineering, and design
of the professional development program did not involve the community collegedirectly, but was very dependent on recruiting participants. This recruitment proved to be moredifficult than the project team expected. The targeting of the professional development programand the development of the curriculum will be discussed. The authors will also highlight thedelivery changes they implemented over the two years of the offerings based on participantfeedback.The final aspect of the project is the teacher experience with advanced manufacturing. Hostingteachings and determining what content and activities they experience is a somewhat dauntingtask. The use of an existing University Program and the selection of collaborating faculty will bediscussed
-sustainable in the long run. Some of theproject materials are used in several courses to enhance the current curriculum. Through theproduct development process, PID Initiative provides the students with entrepreneurialexperiences. Examples are provided to illustrate the PID Initiative process. To further increasethe impact, future plans include organizing student seminars and offering a certificate in newproduct development. Page 23.661.21. IntroductionEngineering students in different majors spend most of their time taking courses within their ownprogram/department in addition to common body of knowledge (CBK) courses such as Math,Physics, and
programentitled Course, Curriculum and Laboratories Improvement (CCLI-EMD). Thetitle of the grant is “PROJECT EMD-MLR: Educational Materials Developmentthrough the Integration of Machine Learning Research into Senior DesignProjects”. The project partners are two major universities in Central Florida,Florida Institute of Technology (FIT) in Melbourne and the University of CentralFlorida (UCF) in Orlando. In addition to the two universities, there are two 2-yearCentral Florida colleges, Seminole Community College (SCC) in Oviedo andBrevard Community College (BCC) in Palm Bay.Project EMD-MLR is a “proof-of-concept” project focused on Machine Learning(ML), whose immediate objectives are i) the development of educational materialin the form of software
(US Army) is an Academy Professor in the Department of Systems Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He has a B.S. degree from USMA in Organizational Leadership and an M.E. degree in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. He also holds a PhD in Management Science (System Dynamics) from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His research interests include systems design, new product development, system dynamics, decision support systems, project management and curriculum development. He has taught and served as the course director for numerous engineering courses in Systems Design, System Dynamics and Production Operations Management. He
assumptions about different parts of the analysis. The experientiallearning acquired through integrating real-life projects appears to compensate for somepedagogical weakness of classroom instruction. Some problems arising in coordinating betweenclassroom concepts and community interests have been discussed. The major challenge faced isto select a suitable project that can fit into the curriculum and also student schedules. Thefaculty’s long-term commitment to service learning is another crucially important element. Inaddition, it is critical that the needs and concerns of the stakeholders are heard and incorporatedduring the development of the program
Session 3448 DEVELOPMENT OF A COURSE IN FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS FOR MECHANICAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIST Slade Gellin, Ph.D. Department of Technology Buffalo State College Buffalo, NY 14222AbstractAn elective, senior level course in finite element analysis is developed for incorporation into amechanical engineering technology program. The curriculum for the course is developed withthe varied roles of the mechanical engineering technologist in
highschool students.I. IntroductionSensors are ubiquitous in everyday life in the modern world. From motion-sensing light switchesto environmental observatories, we are always connected to our physical world in real time. Thesensor revolution is, in effect, giving the world its first electronic nervous system [1]. Theclassroom integration of sensor development is topical and offers highly interdisciplinary subjectmatter, providing motivating scenarios for teaching a multitude of science, technology,engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects and skill sets.This paper describes the development and implementation of a carefully scaffolded set of highschool curriculum modules, tied to the state and national standards in science, math, andtechnology
developing metacognitive skills in engineering students who,as part of their curriculum, solve ill-structured, real-world problems. In this paper, we report on the results of interviews with recent IRE graduates who are nowworking as engineers. We interviewed these graduates to ascertain: • How their IRE preparation in metacognition helped them (or not) to transition to the engineering workforce. • How and to what extent are graduates using the lifelong learning and metacognition skills developed at IRE in their current positions.The general question that guided our analysis is: How do metacognitive skills developed in anundergraduate engineering program translate into lifelong learning in
are better prepared to assume an ethical and technical role in the business environment. Prior to her academic position, Dr. Milonas worked as a database administrator where she realized that technical expertise is only part of the skill set needed to succeed in a business setting. Her research focuses on the mechanisms used to organize big data in search result pages of major search engines. In addition, she is conducting research related to techniques for incorporating ethics in computer curriculum specifically in data science curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 How Do We “Raise” Ethically Minded Computer Students?Abstract Intelligent technology
departments – and still be granted a degree at the end of theireducational path as a graduate student.In 1998 a position was created using a combination of National Science Foundation (NSF) andUniversity funds to hire a technical manager from industry to establish and promote aninterdisciplinary graduate program in support of the research faculty in this area. Ken Vickerswas hired into this position after twenty years at Texas Instruments in integrated circuit processand equipment engineering. The charge was to incorporate industrial management methods intoboth the program’s internal management, and into the student curriculum using both formal andinformal methods.The stated goal of this experimental approach to graduate education was to create a MS
University (BGSU). (1) The traditional approach ofteaching data communications from a well known topics as signal standards, message syntax,time-based and frequency-based transmission techniques, must now share the undergraduate'sattention with newer topics. (2) These topics include administration of servers, workstations andnetwork devices. For the educator, the problem posed by these new topics is the unwantedpresence of a potentially large amount of vendor specific and proprietary information within thebody of work. The curriculum under development at BGSU attempts to (1) minimize transient,or unnecessary, vendor-specific details, while presenting a strong core of new communicationfundamentals that enable students to understand and exercise the
. Page 12.329.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Building a Modern Power Electronics and Electric Machines LaboratoryAbstractThis paper presents the development of the state of the art Power Electronics and ElectricMachines Laboratory at Cleveland State University. This laboratory was designed as a part ofnewly developed power program that consists of three required courses in the undergraduateelectrical engineering curriculum. Typically, Electromechanical Energy Conversion is the onlyone required power course in electrical engineering curriculum. To support the need of localindustry in North East Ohio, two power courses, Power Electronics I and Electric Machines andPower Electronics Laboratory, have been added as required
as: • DFT topics that would be used in much larger projects in industry • Automated testing techniques used in industry • failure analysis techniques used in industryOther industry-oriented topics include: • The formal prototype development process such as that used by a contract PCB design house • SMT automated assembly and test issues • Secondary source considerations for parts • Timing of semiconductor manufacturing • Professional ethics • International nature of industryWhile this course results from the faculty’s desire to improve the ECET curriculum at Purdue’smain campus, the author feels it would serve equally well as a capstone course for an AS