Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at Vir- ginia Tech. He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS), Master of Business Administration (MBA) and in Engineering Education (PhD). His research focuses on contemporary and inclusive ped- agogical practices, environmental, ethics and humanitarian engineering, and non-traditional knowledge transfer. Homero has been recognized as a Fulbright scholar and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Natasha Smith, Virginia Tech Natasha is the Director of Enrollment Management for the College of Engineering as well as an under- graduate academic and career advisor for General Engineering students. These dual roles allow Natasha the unique opportunity to
-ended problems, and promoted an active learning environment bydiffusing interdisciplinary knowledge and engaging collaborations amongstgraduate/undergraduate study groups. Page 23.92.31. Introduction1.1 The overall purpose of the studyThe overall purpose of this study is to develop a new learning method to enhance studentlearning and to generate synergistic knowledge through integrated project studies on the subjectof Smart Monitoring of Accelerated Construction (SMAC) from undergraduate studentsattending the ETCE4251- Highway Construction Technology course and graduate students in theCEGR 6090 – Nondestructive Testing course. The ultimate
in soft skills such as interdisciplinary understanding,communication, and collaboration skills throughout participating in the interdisciplinary NRTprogram.1. IntroductionIn the rapidly evolving landscape of technology and innovation, the conventional boundaries thatonce confined individual fields of study are becoming increasingly blurred. Moreover, acceleratedby the COVID-19 pandemic, the world of work is undergoing momentous change. Nearly half ofall occupations (including those in production, transportation, extraction, agriculture, andmaintenance/repair) are at risk of being automated within the next two decades [1]. At the sametime, labor shortages within the U.S. have plagued post-pandemic recovery efforts and areparticularly dire for
Paper ID #41285Board 325: IUSE/PFE:RED Innovation: Breaking the BinaryDr. Lynne A Slivovsky, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Lynne Slivovsky is the Inaugural Chair of Computer Engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California, USA.Dr. Lizabeth L Thompson P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Lizabeth Thompson is the Director of General Engineering and a professor in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She has been at Cal Poly for nearly 30 years and has held various positions on campus including Co-Director of Liberal Arts and
. In response to feedback from undergraduate and graduate programs, industry andgovernment employers of engineers, and professional societies, ABET incorporated leadership inits student outcomes required for accreditation for the first time in 2019 [1]. The new language,shared below, is a move in the right direction, but leaves institutions to figure out how best toteach their students to work together to provide leadership and create a collaborative andinclusive environment. ABET Criterion 3, Student Outcome 5: An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives. Empathy is a skill
specifications, and facilitymanagement strategy.Keywords: Facility engineering, Facility condition assessment, engineering management,engineering educationIntroductionOrigins of the facilities engineering profession can be traced to organizations supporting the builtenvironment. The industrial revolution in the early 1900’s brought to creation a diverse array ofbuildings, factories, and equipment to support the evolution of the United States of America. Toaddress the challenges associated with a rapidly growing industry, in 1915 thought leaders in plantengineering assembled a forum in Boston, Massachusetts of mechanical engineers, mastermechanics, and chief engineers in plants. This forum discussed common problems and facilitatedthe exchange of ideas in
on technical standards education in undergraduate engineering curriculumscontinues to capture the attention of academia, government, and industry. However, manyengineering educators engaged in undergraduate engineering instruction lack either the resourcesto create technical standards educational material for insertion into their courses or access to suchpre-developed material which they could customize for their courses. As a result, students’ first,primary, and only exposure to technical standards often comes through opportunities external touniversities. Examples include internships, volunteer opportunities, conferences, and part- orfull-time employment. While industry and government are instrumental in the educationalrefinement of
competitive pressures for U.S. industry, generating the need for an ever-increasing level of broadly-educated engineering students entering the workplace. This notionhas been communicated through the NAE [1] and more recently by ASEE's "TransformingUndergraduate Engineering Education [2] (TUEE)" workshop where industry and academicparticipants “seek a T-shaped engineering graduate who brings broad knowledge across domainsand the ability to collaborate within a diverse workforce as well as deep expertise within a singledomain”. These and other industry feedback encourage us to rethink the way we deliverengineering education. Recent engineering graduates continually find themselves learning on-the-job business acumen, struggling with open-ended problem
system is on a gradual and continuous move towards sustainability.Industry Level Vision – An industry level vision of BES calls for the implementation of mechanismsto turn the A/E/C industry into a collaborative pull/push business environment among three distinct Page 11.49.4groups of stakeholders: those involved within the total life cycle of the delivery and use of facilities;those involved within the total life cycle of the delivery and use of civil infrastructure systems; andthose involved within the total life cycle of the delivery and use of technologies, systems, products,materials, and equipment, have a collaborative interaction
feedback and selects the best three presenters to receive awards. Finally, students attend a mock interview that is conducted by experts from SLB company, which boosts their confidence and provides them with invaluable experience in real job interviews before graduation. Thus, the enrichment program helps the PETE students develop their technical writing, presentation, communication, and teamwork skills by the time of their graduation, which smooths their transition from students to industry professionals and distinguishes them from other fresh graduates. Table 1 shows the enrichment program that has been developed in collaboration with the Office of Advancement and the Writing Center at TAMUQ. The table shows the workshops, whether they are
, build, and deploy a device to launch astuffed school mascot (Duke Dog) toward a specified target, we called the event “The Fling”.Points were distributed based on performance, cost, environmental impact, and teamcollaboration. Students proceeded through judging stations for the cost, environmental impact,and team collaboration portions of the competition. Each judging station was staffed by a Schoolof Engineering faculty member and a volunteer judge from industry. Performance was measuredon the “Field of Play” which consisted of a 10’ x 10’ launch zone called the “batter’s box”, and atarget that was positioned 50’ from the batter’s box. Teams were given a limited amount of timeto set up their device and make five launches; performance scoring
of the National Academyof Engineering (NAE), and George M.C. Fisher, former chair and CEO of the NAE council, callfor a “major shift in engineering education’s center of gravity” toward creative design and cross-disciplinary teaching practices.4 In addition, the ABET 2000 "a-k" criteria confirm theseconclusions and require an increasingly design-based and interdisciplinary approach toengineering education.5 Current trends in engineering design education in academia and industry over the pastdecade have continually stressed the importance of innovation, writing and communication skills(especially for team-based projects), and interdisciplinary collaboration skills. The topographyof progressive engineering programs varies dramatically
Wen-an Guo, Columbia University Tiffany Guo is a MD-PhD candidate at Columbia University. Her PhD is in biomedical engineering on the development and testing of point-of-care diagnostic devices for resource limited settings. She TAed for both a senior undergraduate and masters design course. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Re-designing Design: A Technology-Enhanced Graduate-Level Biomedical Design CourseA. IntroductionBiomedical engineering (BME) is an evolving discipline that involves collaboration amongengineers, physicians, scientists and entrepreneurs, in academia and industry to provideinterdisciplinary solutions to
engineering challenges that require both technicalproficiency and collaborative expertise. 1.2 The Necessity for Entrepreneurial Integration in ET CurriculaTo address this, a shift in the educational paradigm is necessary, moving beyond traditionalproblem-solving to nurturing value creators skilled at navigating modern societal complexities.In accordance with ABET's criteria, ET students require a balanced mix of technical acumenand interpersonal abilities (Fosmire 2020). Although practical, hands-on learning is a focalpoint, the curriculum often lacks practical activities that prepare graduates to identify real-world challenges and transform technical designs into viable solutions (Bendanillo et al. 2023).Today's industry seeks graduates who
team whose members provide leadership, create a collaborative andinclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives” [1]. These requirementsare reflected in engineering capstone courses, where undergraduates apply their conceptualknowledge to real-world industry design challenges [5, 6]. Many engineering students firstencounter group work at the end of their undergraduate studies through these capstone programs[5]. However, recent research indicates that students who participate in collaborative courseworkbefore capstone demonstrate “detectable, specific, and stronger teaming skills in capstonedesign” relative to students without prior teamwork experience, motivating institutions toincorporate additional collaborative
education in Science, Technology, Engineering and MathematicsAbstractAt Central Michigan University (CMU), the College of Science and Engineering (CSE) started in2023 a new undergraduate program called InSciTE (Integration of Science, Technology andEngineering) to provide diverse students with an interdisciplinary, equitable space to exploreScience, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) challenges and solutions. Designedas a 15-credit certificate that complements existing STEM majors, InSciTE consists of five skill-based courses taken over a four-year period as a cohort. Each course is centered aroundtransferable skills (including collaboration, communication, data and time management) withstudents
components without requiring new financial sources. 2. Institutional Collaboration: Cross-departmental and external partnerships create a robust support system for students. 3. Alumni and Industry Involvement: Engaging alumni and industry partners enhances career readiness and professional exposure. 4. Administrative Efficiency: Understanding institutional processes allows for better resource management, especially in handling research funding and sub-awards. 5. Long-Term Impact: Initiatives such as graduate associations and professional development programs ensure the lasting success of student support efforts.By strategically leveraging available resources, universities can enhance the impact, reach, andsustainability
Integrated Livelihoods (SOIL) which promotes ecological sanitation in Haiti.Dr. Andrew Mark Herbert, Rochester Institute of TechnologyDr. Matthew Marshall, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Matthew Marshall is Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies and Professor in the Kate Gleason College of Engineering at Rochester Institute of Technology. He received a Ph.D. in Industrial and Operations Engineering from the University of Michigan in 2002.Prof. Karen Kashmanian Oates, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Karen Kashmanian Oates A nationally recognized consultant, scientist, science educator, and higher edu- cation leader, Dr. Oates joined WPI from the National Science Foundation, where she had been serving as deputy
whichnetwork collaborations and communications relate to team outcomes, and understand hownetwork differences both before and after joining Pathways contribute to successful changeefforts. This research aligns with the extensive literature review that informed the design ofPathways, which emphasized the importance of a peer network in the design of an effectivefaculty development program2. Drawing upon research on community networks within acollective impact framework3,4, the authors hypothesize that the Pathways initiative, which“…involv[es] a centralized infrastructure, a dedicated staff, and a structured process that leads toa common agenda, shared measurement, continuous communication, and mutually reinforcingactivities among all participants” (p
interdepartmental. Some departments have influential external forcessuch as accreditation or industry needs which can drive many of the changes in the curriculumand deter collaboration with departments that have different forces acting on them [21].Departments may also be less inclined to support faculty-driven courses that take them awayfrom research and departmental teaching responsibilities.Faculty-Driven Courses in EngineeringOne example of a faculty-driven course is a design studio taught by an Arts Education andEnvironmental Engineering professor [6]. The authors maintain that the integration of the Artsinto the STEM (STEAM) course “provided a space… to dig deeper and make personally relevantconnections between materials, design, society, and the
University. His scholarly interests span computing education research, information technology for teaching and learning, and software engineering. Prior to coming to Drexel, Dr. Hislop spent eighteen years working in government and industry where his efforts included software development and support, technology planning and evaluation, and development and delivery of technical education.Dr. Sarah Monisha Pulimood, The College of New Jersey S. Monisha Pulimood is on the faculty of the Department of Computer Science at The College of New Jersey. She has been successfully incorporating immersive learning experiences and multidisciplinary collaborative projects into her courses for several years; has published on undergraduate
Unlock Regional Excellence(CAPTURE) program sponsored by the Florida Board of Governor (BOG) and addressescurriculum mapping and articulation to support student degree completion in computer scienceand engineering programs. Specifically highlighted as part of the transfer model are curriculumalignment and mapping, degree-specific “flight” plans, and program-geared advising. Thecollected data validates the effectiveness of the proposed model in increasing both the studentpipeline, and graduation rates. The process has also deepened our understanding of the needs ofstudents to better align student careers aspirations with industry workforce needs. Theeffectiveness of the collaborative model could be replicated among other institutions interested
stakeholders, and how shared vision influences the teams’ activities and goalattainment. Major results include that some teams found success in developing shared visionwith creative incentives (e.g., from a focus group: “teaching will be fun”), culturally-relevantevidence (e.g., interviews with industrial board members helped shape curriculum changes), andintentionally inviting naysayers to contribute. Teams that created high levels of shared visionintentionally used collective work, collaboration on problems, and formative communication(rather than informational communication) [47]. Research relating to successful change isongoing, now examining the partnerships that teams are creating and how their work follows ordoes not follow models of academic
for teams’ soft skills (problem-solving, interpersonal competence, cultural intelligence),perspective-taking (perspective-taking and empathy), and openness to failure (mindset, agency,and curiosity)?’The risk of silo-ing challenges carrying forward into industry environments concerns highereducation today [2]. How does higher education develop ways of ‘standing in the gap’? Aneducational model that brings together college students from different disciplines to think aboutproblems and explore solutions in collaboration might help close silo-created gaps.The Rich Normality Design Collaborative (RNDC) is a multidisciplinary initiative encompassingteams made up of interior design, mechanical engineering, entrepreneurial studies, and
Digital Design), Communications, Controls, andAdvanced Microscale and Nanoscale Fabrication. The current paper will outline the experiencesand lessons learned from the perspective of the two authors who, either collaboratively orindependently, have supervised over 20 capstone projects in the last eight years. The methodsemployed to lead these teams to a successful conclusion of their projects are consistent withgood design practices as well as robust team management principles.The projectsDepending on the origin of the project, capstone projects fall under three general categories.They can be defined (1) through an external agency – a non-profit or an industry partner, (2) bythe faculty advisor or (3) by the students themselves. Partnering with
-and-tech[21] https://www.ncwit.org/resources/interrupting-bias-industry-settings-0[22] https://www.ncwit.org/resources/interrupting-bias-academic-settings-0[23] https://coach.uoregon.edu/domestic-workshops/[24] G. L. Richmond, “COAChing women to succeed in academic careers in the chemical sciences,” J. Chem. Ed., vol. 82, pp. 351-353, 2005. [25] National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI) https://www.asee.org/conferences-and- events/conferences/neti[26] LEVERAGE: Extending the ASSIST Collaborative to Illuminate Engineering Faculty Pathways http://www.greatmindsinstem.org/college/nsf-assist-leverage
elements of the Engineering GoldShirt Summer Bridge Programwere redesigned to transition students to college and to transform their levels of expertisethrough engineering skill-development workshops, spatial visualization and engineering designproject integration, and mathematics and physics curriculum collaboration. Developing earlypartnerships with skilled professionals and faculty fostered a collaborative approach toimplementing an integrated summer bridge program.In addition to classes, introducing these scholars to industry professionals and researchopportunities during summer bridge supported an increase in their engineering expertise.Industry tours and research presentations were expanded to multiple companies and multiplefaculty
that I have about 15 hours in completing HW#1 and about 12 hours incompleting HW#2. Though I received a grade of 100 on HW#1, I do not feel confident becausea significant amount of collaboration with classmates was involved.4) As a result of the above three issues, I am extremely concerned that I would not pass the up-coming mid-term exam.”As one can see from the above quotes there are many challenges that graduate students from thenuclear industry face while trying to also work and balance other personal demands. In ourcourse re-design we attempted to address most of the identified issues in the redesign of theNuclear Engineering Fundamentals course as well as the subsequent nuclear engineeringcertificate courses. Data collected from student
(STEPS).Erin Cortus (University of Minnesota - Twin Cities)Jacek Koziel (Professor) (Iowa State University of Science and Technology) Jacek Koziel is serving as a Professor at Iowa State University, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering. He leads and collaborates on multidisciplinary projects on the nexus of agriculture and the environment. His team develops and tests strategies to enhance the efficiency of livestock production systems and reduce the environmental impacts of animal production. Dr. Koziel received M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Warsaw University of Technology in 1989 and M.S. in Environmental Quality Engineering from the University of Alaska in Anchorage. He earned a Ph.D. in Civil
chapter or theComputer Engineering Club were an impactful activity of the LEAP program. LEAP studentsserved in positions of President, Vice President, Social Media Chair, VP of Publications, and VPfor University Relations. LEAP enrichment and professional development activities weredelivered largely through these organizations, which gave other students in the departments anopportunity to benefit as well. Under faculty supervision, student leaders took responsibility forplanning LEAP activities, inviting and introducing guest speakers, arranging for field trips tolocal industries and employers, hosting or conducting workshops, and organizing LEAP design(collaborative) projects. For example, workshops have included MATLAB (a multi