. MethodologyThe study will utilize a bibliometric analysis to determine the current temporal and spatialtendencies of diversity and inclusion within systems engineering education publishing.Bibliometric analysis is an established and assiduous technique for scrutinizing vast quantities oftechnical data to realize emerging patterns for a particular topic. A bibliometric analysis mayuncover emerging article trends, publication performance, collaboration patterns, researchelements, and explore the intellectual structure of a specific realm within the existing literature[4]. This study hypothesizes that both diversity and inclusion research within systems engineeringeducation is increasing. The bibliometric approach consists of querying academic databases
=/about_the_program/ (accessed February 1, 2017)[10] Violante, M.G., & Vezzetti, E. (2012). Implementing a New Approach for the Design of an E-Learning Platform in Engineering Education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 22(4), 708–727.[11] Wright, W.A., Knight, P.T. & Pomerleau, N. (1999). Portfolio People: Teaching and Learning Dossiers and Innovation in Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 24(2), 89-103.[12] Parsons, M. & Stephenson, M. (2005). Developing reflective practice in student teachers: collaboration and critical partnerships. Teachers and Teaching, 11(1), 95-116.
, ASME and VDI (Germany). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020ASEE Annual Convention in Montreal, Canada: (Paper for Presentation in International Division)Cultural Relativism and Global Technology Transfer in EngineeringJayanta Banerjee (ASEE Life Member)Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez (UPRM)“Culture manages us far more than we ever manage it; and it happens largely outside our awareness.” Schein (Anthropologist)AbstractWhile we cannot govern our education only by our culture, culture still plays a very significant role in ouracademic and professional career. In engineering education, in particular
Engineers department head listserv, the nationalNSF ADVANCE program listserv, and the engineering education PEER Collaborative listserv.Flyers were also given out and posted at conferences including American Sociological Associationnational conference and a philosophy conference at University of Massachusetts Lowell.Additionally, the survey was advertised on the website of the lead researcher’s research group andResearchGate.com page, and a representative from ASA tweeted about it from his personal Twitteraccount. The survey was online for approximately 1 year and in total received over 300 responses,the majority of which were from engineering faculty members. Not all surveys were complete.Chi-Square analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS. Complete
Paper ID #11309Exploring Military Veteran Students’ Pathways in Engineering EducationDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and
India.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as co-Director of the VT Engineering Communication Center (VTECC). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and re- flective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 On Epistemic Diversity of Engineering and Engineering EducationAbstractThe philosophy of science and the philosophy of technology are now both established academicdisciplines, but can either be a surrogate for the philosophy of engineering? How can we justifythe philosophy of engineering? In an attempt to answer these questions, we use the termepistemic diversity to represent the multi-dimensional nature of engineering knowledge, which ischaracteristically distinct from other sciences. The role of design in engineering and itssocio-historical “situatedness” are also discussed to shed light on the knowledge of engineeringand what engineers do
- ble for failure analysis of thin film materials. She also managed collaborations with national laboratories, Air Force and Navy research groups, and universities. She invented new quality control tools and super- vised interns from local universities and community colleges as part of a $5.0 million technical workforce development initiative funded by New York State. She has published diverse articles on topics ranging from engineering education to high temperature superconductors and has spoken at many national and international conferences. Her doctorate in materials science and engineering are from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and she has four patents issued and one patent pending.Dr. Larysa Nadolny, Iowa
Paper ID #5948Growing Assessment Capacity of Engineering Educators through ASSESSDr. Denny C. Davis P.E., Washington State University Dr. Davis is emeritus professor of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering at Washington State Uni- versity. He is project leader for the National Science Foundation grant supporting the development, implementation, and testing of ASSESS. He has led numerous projects focused on the development of assessment instruments for engineering design learning. He is a Fellow of ASEE.Dr. Jennifer E LeBeau, Washington State University Dr. Jennifer E. LeBeau is a research associate in the Learning and
Affairs in the College of Engineering in addition to being an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Page 15.6.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A 21st Century Undergraduate Engineering Education ProgramAbstractEngineering in the 20th Century was marked by a significant number of inventions thatresulted in sweeping societal changes. The National Academy of Engineering proposesthat the current century’s major global engineering efforts will be focused on a number ofsocietal benefits that need large scale systems approaches to resolve. The question thispaper addresses is whether or not current
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright @ 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationreferences as they document details of the survey and findings with profound implications inengineering education. Two important conclusions of the study are quoted below.(1) “Students were found to have considerable difficulty making estimates for common engineering quantities, such as force and energy.”(2) “Students were also found to have difficulty applying basic engineering concepts in rough estimation situations even at the senior level.”After reading the MIT study, the author became curious about how well University of the Pacific(UOP) engineering students would perform E2. He conducted
Session 2793 Multi-media technology --- an opportunity for modern engineering education G. Kohli, S. P. Maj, and D. Veal Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia.AbstractThe last few years have seen an exponential growth of multi-media applicationson the Internet. Video and audio data, is now in high demand as it can bedelivered in a cost-effective manner via the Internet and CD-ROMs. Multi-media has its roots in network and computer technology but represents theconvergence of a wide range of disciplines. There are considerable jobopportunities in this field within Australia however the requirements aretypically
Session 2230 Suggestions for Establishing Centers for Engineering Education Trevor S. Harding and Cynthia J. Finelli Kettering UniversityIntroductionAt the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, a group of individuals gathered for a session entitled “ARoundtable Discussion of Best Practices for Developing Centers for Engineering Education,Teaching, and Learning”. The event was part of the Breakfast of Champions session, regularlysponsored by the Educational Research Methods division of ASEE. Eleven people directlyinvolved in existing centers for engineering education were invited to
Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education“The Program in Integrated Science and Technology (ISAT) educates students forpositions that are often filled by graduates of the traditional sciences, engineering, andbusiness programs. The ISAT graduate, however, is professionally prepared in a broadersense. ISAT students are educated to be technological problem solvers, communicators,and life-long learners. They are unique in having • breadth of knowledge and skills across a variety of scientific and technological disciplines; • formal training in collaborative and leadership methods, problem-solving techniques from many disciplines, and use of the computer as a problem-solving tool; • the ability to
Session 3630 The Role of Undergraduate Research in Engineering Education W. D. Jemison, W. A. Hornfeck, J. P. Schaffer Division of Engineering Lafayette College Easton, PA 18042AbstractThe establishment of formal research programs for undergraduate engineering students isone way to encourage critical thinking, life-long learning, and the pursuit of graduateeducation. This paper discusses issues associated with the participation ofundergraduates in engineering research, and describes the highly successful and firmlyestablished
– Not Business As Usual, ASCE Journal of Management inEngineering, 16(6), 29-33 (2000).6 Russell, Jeffrey S., Stouffer, Brewer, and Walesh, Stuart G., The First Professional Degree: A HistoricOpportunity, ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 126(2), 54-63 (2000).PAUL S. CHINOWSKYPaul S. Chinowsky is an Associate Professor in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at GeorgiaTech. Professor Chinowsky is currently conducting research in two areas; the management of organizations in theAEC industry and the role of virtual teams in engineering collaboration. In the management area, Dr. Chinowskyhas published the book entitled, “Strategic Corporate Management in Engineering,” that introduces
Session 1315 Enhancing Construction Engineering Education Using Internet based Tools Anil Sawhney, Prawit Rotsawatsuk, and André Mund Western Michigan UniversityAbstractThis paper describes the work being performed as part of a three-year project that has beenfunded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and Western Michigan University (WMU).The goal of the project is to enhance the undergraduate construction engineering education.Enhancements will be accomplished by developing: 1) an Internet-based Interactive ConstructionManagement Learning System (ICMLS) and 2
AC 2010-2158: IMPROVING FUTURE FACULTY WITH GRADUATEENGINEERING EDUCATIONAndrea Burrows, The University of CincinnatiAnant Kukreti, The University of CincinnatiMike Borowczak, The University of CincinnatiAmr Safwat, The University of Cincinnati Page 15.696.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Improving Future Faculty with Graduate Engineering EducationAbstractOne of the major missing links in today’s graduate engineering curriculum is the lack ofeffective preparation of students who plan on entering into academia upon graduation. Whileclasses exist to prepare future engineering faculty, these classes are often taught by currentfaculty members with limited breadth
quality. These include: Revenge Advanced Composites (a specialty boat manufacturer), Lockheed Martin (F-22, JSF, Space Systems, Missiles and Fire Control: PAC-3), NASA, Visteon Automotive, Robert Bosch Corp., Ford Motor Company, Dell Computer, SAP, HP and Kinetic Systems. Page 15.287.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Collective System Design in Systems Engineering Education David S. Cochran Yong Suk KimAbstractCollective System Design
Infusion of international issues into curriculum at participants’ home institutions Increased collaborative teaching, research, and service activities between Page 7.945.3 US and European engineering educators Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationThe electronic conferenceGearold Johnson, Academic Vice President of the National Technological University andRussel C. Jones, managing partner in World Expertise LLC, designed an electronicconference that took the form of a
Session 2793 Process Teaching and Learning in Engineering Education Sheryl Duggins, Ph.D. Associate Professor School of Computing and Software Engineering Southern Polytechnic State University Marietta, GA 30060 sduggins@spsu.eduAbstractThis paper explores the process-oriented constructivist theory of teaching and learning which hasits roots in cognitive psychology, philosophy, learning theory, and education theory. A processmodel
devices.AcknowledgmentThe authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the National ScienceFoundation, Award #9950794 and Cartwright's National Science Foundation CAREERAward #9733720.References 1. Alexander N. Cartwright, "Design and Collaborative-learning in Lasers and Photonic Courses", American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Session 2632, 1999. 2. David R. Wallace, Philip Mutooni, "A Comparative Evaluation of World Wide Web-based and Classroom Teaching", Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 3, 1997, pp. 211-219. 3. URL: http://www.abet.org/images/Criteria/2002-03EACCriteria.pdf 4. Pratibha Gopalam, Alexander N. Cartwright and Bina Ramamurthy, "Java Enabled Opto
Session 1526 Event-Driven Computing Projects for Software Engineering Education Marjorie Skubic and James LaffeyComputer Engineering and Computer Science Department / School of Information Science and Learning Technologies University of Missouri-Columbia skubicm@missouri.edu / laffeyj@missouri.eduAbstract There is a growing need in the software industry for the development of systems with adynamic, event-driven behavior, such as interactive human-computer interfaces, client-serverarchitectures
Session 2342 SUCCESS STORIES IN PARTNERING FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION Howard Eisner The George Washington University Washington, DC 20052Abstract: The George Washington University, with an Engineering ManagementDepartment that dates back to the fifties, and now one of the largest in the country,has developed and implemented new collaborative programs in engineeringmanagement and related areas. These programs have involved partnering with bothIndustry and Government in the fields of systems engineering and engineeringmanagement. The former
Session 2360 "CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES" THE NEW FRONTIER IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Robert T. Balmer Division of Engineering and Computer Science Union College Schenectady, NY 12308Abstract In recent years a wide variety of industries and technologies have been intersecting to createnew products and solve new problems. Since these new technologies typically occur at theinterfaces of science and engineering (producing new fields such as “nanotechnology”), we callthis phenomenon
Construction Engineering Technology at Penn State Harrisburg. She received her Ph.D., Masters, and Bachelors in Civil Engineering from the University of F ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Artificial Intelligence Tools that Enhance Engineering Education Rajarajan Subramanian, Associate Teaching Professor and Sofia M. Vidalis, Associate Professor, Pennsylvania State University at HarrisburgAbstractPersonalized and electronic learning has been on the rise in recent years and is expected tocontinue growing. This approach to education has revolutionized the way engineering conceptsare taught by making it more immersive and interactive for students. In engineering
Applying home schooling lessons to engineering education F. Edwards, T. Daniel, W. Hale, A. Hanson, E. Richardson University of Arkansas/University of Arkansas/University of Arkansas/New Mexico State University/New Mexico State UniversityAbstractThere is mounting evidence that homeschooling provides a better education than traditionalclassroom education. A comparison of standardized tests results showed that on average 5,402homeschooled students outperformed public schooled students by 30 to 37 percentile in allsubjects. The Tennessee Dept of Education found that 2nd grade homeschooled children scoredin the 93rd percentile as compared to public school students who scored in the
1 Enhancing Engineering Educational Using Virtual Lab Technology Ketul B Shah Aritra Ghosh Electrical Engineering Computer Science Department Texas A&M University - Kingsville Texas A&M University - Kingsville Kingsville, TX-78363. USA Kingsville, TX-78363. USA ketul.shah@students.tamuk.edu aritra.ghosh
2015 ASEE Northeast Section Conference Integration of Software in Structural Engineering Education Michael J. Davidson1, P.E Wentworth Institute of TechnologyAbstractIn the work place today, software is typically used by the structural engineer to analyze anddesign most elements of a structure. There is a wide variety of software available to thestructural engineer, allowing the engineer to analyze and design micro, macro and even allelements of a structure. In fact, it is common today for consulting firms and contractors to usemulti-discipline software that inputs the project, including
Department of Industrial and Engineering Technology of Murray State University. His teaching and research interests are in the field of design and manufacturing. Page 14.1020.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Remote Laboratory CollaborationAbstractThis current NSF DUE Project titled --The development of a Remotely Accessible RapidPrototyping Laboratory-- is promoting an awareness of rapid prototyping technology through thedevelopment of a remotely accessible rapid prototyping laboratory. This project is: (a)introducing cutting-edge rapid prototyping technology to four-year engineering