, and respect for diversity. In this paper, we present the lessons learned fromour first four years, including assessment of our partnership model, impact on our communitypartner, and contributions to Stanford’s research.IntroductionCommunity engaged learning (used here interchangeably with the term service-learning)improves student learning by connecting theory with practice and classrooms with communities[1], [2]. Actively engaging students is essential because students learn more when they areintensely involved in their educational experience [3], [4]. Taking the further step of engagingstudents with community partners in joint projects can contextualize engineering and exposestudents to a broader view of who can become an engineer and who
outcomes and improve student engagement. The integration of AI tools has the potential to significantly impact student learning, bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. This paper explores the impact of AI tools on student learning in engineering education, particularly in civil engineering. AI tools offer numerous benefits in engineering education, providing students with interactive and immersive learning experiences. These tools enable students to apply their theoretical knowledge in real-world scenarios, enhancing their understanding and problem-solving skills. A survey was distributed to engineering students in civil engineering courses to gather feedback on the effectiveness of using AI tools, allowing for
engineers can sometimes run counter to the needs ofcommunities they serve and reinforce structures of power that maintain inequality. Civil Engineering in particular is inextricably linked up with societal change, and responsible engineering is about understanding wider environmental and social impacts ofdesign and construction. Patricia teaches creative design modules that give students tools and techniques (Human-centered design, VR collaborative design tools) to find their own brand of creativity, while prompting students to consider how their individualprivilege and biases impact on their design decisions. American c Society for Engineering Education
helping students with their education6. We are currently engaged inexploring the expansion of our engineering portfolio to support a larger community of studentsand interest areas. The next generation of our portfolio is planned to add flexibility allowingcustomized applications beyond engineering education aimed to have a broader impact at ourinstitution.Summary and ConclusionsThis paper reports on a new initiative by the Armour College of Engineering at IIT in trackingand recording student participation and performance in curricular and non-curricular activitiesthat are relevant to their engineering education. The collection of a student’s accomplishments isachieved through an electronic online engineering portfolio system. The IIT
tools in educational research.Farzad Shafiei Dizaji (Lecturer Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Impact of COVID-19 on Applied Mathematics Courses for Engineering Students Gianluca Guadagni Deepyaman Maiti Farzad Shafiei DizajiThis is a Work in ProgressIntroductionThis study investigates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Applied Mathematics (APMA) coursesin the Engineering School at our institution. We investigate which subset of students may have beenimpacted more by the change/disruption in our instruction methods due to the pandemic, and then
for employee selection and development, and working with clients to better leverage organizational talent.Lauren Q DiBianca Frye, Forsyth Country Day School Lauren Frye is a licensed architect and educator practicing in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. She holds a bachelor of arts in architecture degree from Princeton University and an MArch degree from the Uni- versity of Virginia. After practicing architecture for ten years, Lauren followed her long time passion for education and began teaching design thinking to high school students, prototyping courses at Forsyth Country Day School. She co-founded the Community Design Studio of Winston-Salem, a nonprofit col- laborative bringing design thinking to bear on
Paper ID #43378Board 299: Impact of Socialization on Graduate Student EducationDr. Arvin Farid, Boise State University Dr. Arvin Farid is a Professor of the Civil Engineering Department and the Director of the SEnS-GPS Program, sponsored by the U.S. National Science Foundation, at Boise State University. He is also the chair of the Geoenvironmental Engineering Technical Committee of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Geo-Institute (GI) and an editor of the Environmental Geotechnics Journal of the Institute of Civil Engineers (ICE). He also serves on several national and international committees. He
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Impact of COVID-19 on Faculty Teaching and Student LearningAbstractThe year 2020 started with the corona virus outbreak which had life-changing consequences for nearly allaspects of human life, including businesses, academics, office work, and personal interactions. Almost allactivities that are deemed non-essential have become remote, relying heavily on online interfaces, and thisvirtual lifestyle has now been referred to as a “New Normal” for people everywhere. Academic institutionshave been particularly impacted, with the pandemic disrupting the way colleges and universities holdclasses and interact with students. Most institutions have cancelled in-person classes and switched toonline-only
] Selbach-Allen, M.E., Greenwald, S.J., Ksir, A.E. and Thomley, J.E., 2020. Raising the barwith standards-based grading. Primus, 30(8-10), pp.1110-1126.[5] Carlisle, S., 2020. Simple specifications grading. Primus, 30(8-10), pp.926-951.[6] Kohn, A. and Blum, S.D., 2020. Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (andwhat to do instead). West Virginia University Press.[7] Clark, D. and Talbert, R., 2023. Grading for growth: A guide to alternative grading practicesthat promote authentic learning and student engagement in higher education. Taylor & Francis.[8] Lewis, D., 2022. Impacts of Standards-Based Grading on Students' Mindset and TestAnxiety. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 22(2), pp.67-77.[9] Katzman, S.D
Paper ID #25880Cross-Cultural Training and Engineering: An Illustration Using VietnameseEngineering Faculties’ Responses to Nature of Engineering Instrument (Workin Progress)Amanda Vazquez, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Amanda Vazquez is a fourth-year mechanical engineering undergraduate student at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She is working as a research mentee under the R.A.M.P. (Research and Mentorship Program) at UNLV. This research is focused on Nature of Engineering View’s of Professional Engineers. Prior to the R.A.M.P. program she worked on NSF EPSCoR STEM K-12 outreach programs, including: a STEM career
department. After finishing seminary I will go on to graduate studies in physics so as to teach in the college. Two years ago some monks and students came together to make maple syrup by tapping local maple trees. In the second year we constructed our own evaporator and this year we are working with an engineering course to design a sap preheater system to improve the evaporator’s efficiency. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Engagement in Practice: Engineering at a monastery - Integrating course content with community engagement by building a better maple sap evaporatorMonasteries have long been associated with the notion of communal self
program at Bowling Green State University (Bowling Green, Ohio, USA). • Three years of experience working as Biomedical instructor at Owens Community College.Mr. Mikhail Shilov, Bowling Green State University Mikhail Shilov is the instructor of Engineering Technology at Bowling Green State University who is interested in improving teaching techniques as well as mentoring and motivating students for higher achievements. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Impact of pre-lab videos on improving students’ learning outcomesAbstract:In Engineering Technology courses that involve lab activities, we observed a knowledge gapamong 10-30% of students that increases as the semester
Schools of Public Health and the development of innovative service learning curricula.Dr. Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University Dr. Malini Natarajarathinam is an Associate professor with Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution. She teaches classes on strategic relationships for industrial distribution and distri- bution logistics. She is interested in researching on the impact of high impact practices on the learning and engagement of students in Industrial Distribution and other STEM disciplines. She is also interested in creating awareness about Industrial Distribution and related STEM fields among the public.Ms. Lauren Neala Holder, Texas A&M UniversityMary Kathryn McDougal
143 On Exploring the Connection between Hispanic Engineering Students’ Educational Goals and Communal Obligations: for Project-Based Learning through Community Engagement Lily Gossage, College of Engineering California State University, Long BeachAbstractThe goal of this research was to acquire a deeper understanding of the perceptions held byLatino/Hispanic engineering students, specifically what factors students associate theireducational efforts with and the extent to which their communal goals impact their academicgoals. Blending the concurrent nested and
learning due to the pandemic required significant changes in both thedelivery and assessment of course materials.Before the pandemic, we gave surveys twice during the semester to obtain detailed feedback onthe course, including suggestions for potential changes. For the last two years, due to thepandemic, we gave three surveys. The surveys were enlightening and helped us to adjust ourexpectations. The data in Table 1 demonstrate the impact of the pandemic on learning for 2020(n=124) and 2021 (n=122). Most students were living at home during the fall 2020 semester andwere in their school dorms/apartments during the fall 2021 semester. Table 1 – Survey results on impact of pandemic
- prepared for instructing computer science. - Outreach camps can have a positive influence on students learning about computer science. Instruction TechniquesT hese outreach events were focused on maintaining engagement while progressing through a series of computer science and cybersecurity lessons. Researchers favored student-centered, hands-on activities. Togauge the success of the events, learning artifacts were collected from the participants that showed both the The volunteers met the objectives for the camps. The activities engaged the participants seen both in the 17.5
electrical energy from the reaction of hydrogenand oxygen. Each of the experiments lasts for two weeks.In Engineering Foundations, students are also introduced to a number of professional skills, suchas technical writing, communication, engineering ethics, and the engineering design process.Technical writing is covered by requiring the students to prepare laboratory reports for each ofthe four hands-on experiments. Communication is emphasized through a group presentation thatrequires the students to research one of the fourteen Grand Challenges9 identified by the NationalAcademy of Engineers and to present their findings to the class. Ethics is covered during alecture that uses practical examples and role playing to emphasize the challenges in
organize all workerswithin a particular industry. Following the passage of the 1947 Taft-Hartley act, some US laborunions have formed as business unions, unions oriented around a belief that labor unions shouldbe run like businesses while posing no threat to the state or corporations employing theirmembers. These business unions tend to be less democratic and engage in an advocacy model ofchange that does not center its base of power on the workers and their communities [10]. Part ofthe power labor unions have comes from labor strikes and other forms of direct action, actsindividuals or groups take to bring about social change rather than relying on intermediaries orrepresentatives to act on their behalf. As Valle, Bowen, and Riley have described
Paper ID #33822Turning Office Hours into Study Sessions: Impacts on Students’ Homeworkand Exam GradesProf. Liza Boyle, Humboldt State University Dr. Boyle is an Assistant Professor of Environmental Resources Engineering at Humboldt State Uni- versity (HSU), where they have been since 2016. Dr. Boyle received their PhD from the University of Colorado Boulder in 2016 studying dust accumulation on solar panels, and especially the links between airborne particulate concentrations and the impact on solar power output. Since starting at HSU Dr. Boyle has taught a variety of classes across the engineering curriculum, but
, tours, architectural embellishments that highlight structural design Page 23.1010.9elements, and other community engagement strategies can serve as a memorable pedagogicaltools. Recognizing the educational opportunities of the outdoor exhibit, project managers invitedPrinceton University students to contribute to the development of exhibit components thatillustrate aspects of the bridges’ engineering design.Dr. Maria Garlock from Princeton University’s Department of Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering teaches a Studio for Engineers course every two years. The theme of the coursechanges each year, and when asked to participate as one of
team may include students from chemical engineering, electrical engineering, and industrialdesign. The course is designed to give the students real-world design capabilities and aninternational service experience on a scale commensurate with the 3-credit hour course. Becauseof this, one project may be redesigned for several years in a row. Subsequent years are oftendedicated to system and product improvements. Projects have been implemented in Tonga,Ghana, and Peru with over 200 students participating over the years. Communities within Peruhave been the focus since 2009.The GEO course, with an emphasis on the design of small-scale projects, typically involves fourteams of five members each. Students in the course, many of whom speak Spanish
museums. The projectgoal is to help combat engineering pipeline challenges by providing K-12 students with activitiesto educate them about engineering so the students can see how their involvement in STEMcareers could positively impact their communities. This paper focuses on the university-museum partnership model and its uniqueness in that all levels of the program implementationand evaluation involved direct input from the museum partners to ensure the educational kitsare community-informed and socially-driven. There are several goals associated with this project. For the purposes of this paper, wewill focus on how this project model creates synergies within an interdisciplinary team offaculty, graduate students, and museum educators
certainaspects of the filter, especially the reservoir, assisted the teams in discerning what should beretained from previous iterations. Additionally, the contact provided information on what life islike on Lake Titicaca- first-hand experience that is hard to find elsewhere. The most difficult partof communicating with the contact was poor reception which led to ineffective understanding onsome occasions. Nevertheless, the communication has been effective enough to provide feedbackon the designs each year and to facilitate a relationship between students and the contact thathave bridged across successive classes.As part of documenting community engagement, students were required to develop an interviewguide that involved a continual update of questions
- Chico. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engagement in Practice: The Do’s and Don’ts in Partnership Development for a Successful Humanitarian Engineering Project.IntroductionHumanitarian engineering projects are increasingly being used in engineering education as a wayto teach sustainable development, involve students in a hands-on project, raise student socialawareness and engage underrepresented groups in engineering. Advocates of these projects laudthe experience and engineering growth gained by participating engineering students [1]. Butthese programs face criticism when student experience is placed above project effectiveness andcommunity impact [2]. The literature is full of
population of study. The partnership also allowsfor sustained dissemination of the findings, as the partners are consistent in the population ofinterest [3]. Furthermore, this sustained implementation by partners invested in the communityenables the research to have a long-term impact on the community of interest and an influence onfuture work.Motivation for ProjectPellecchia et al. [2] emphasized the importance of “building a coalition”. This partnershipenables active participation from all members of the group and supports the use of theirexpertise. This is especially important for underserved and underrepresented communities.Specifically, there is a persistent need for research focusing on the retention of Black students inengineering. While
communitycollege voices and perspectives while promoting the mission of the AG, the importance ofSociety membership for community college students and institutions, and the impact of CCASEfunding on broadening engagement and participation in the community college space. Two- tothree-minute videos were submitted by community college faculty, students, and alumni andjudged by a panel of judges. The CCASE Program funded prize money for winners.At SWE’s annual conference in 2023, the AG hosted an interactive presentation called “BuildingCommunity Around the Community Colleges AG”. This presentation celebrated communitycolleges and community college women in engineering while brainstorming ways in which theAG could promote them within SWE. The CCASE Program
students to work on a “fun” project increased theone-year retention at Penn State University up to 98% [3]. Though there are many examples offirst-year projects, there are notably fewer instances of second-year projects found in theliterature.Another tactic that can increase retention is the development of learning communities of studentsthat continue from the freshman year to graduation [4]. The development of community amongstudents aids in their ability to complete their degrees. Furthermore, career mentoring by facultyduring the second year has been shown to increase retention in the sciences as well [5]. Taking ita step further, connecting students to their future is also very important during the second year[6]. These aspects are also
and the central identity of his faith, the community engagement experienceswithin the course were less impactful than the narratives about engineering that he heard fromothers who were affiliated with his chosen profession.In another counterexample, students did follow the same pattern of finding an increasinglyconnected identity between their core faith or values and their profession. But finding such aconnection ultimately led them away from engineering. For example, Heath reflected,“[Engineering] attracted me because I feel there is a certain prestige that comes with being anengineer that was really appealing to me. . . . However, this semester[,] I realized thatengineering wasn’t for me . . . [I] need to focus on careers that will
institutions increase the adoption of essentialtransfer practices [1]. These include re-prioritization of transfer student recruitment and successat Cal Poly so that Cal Poly can better serve neighboring communities. One aspect of this is toencourage deep connections for student engagement across the campuses. The PrincipalInvestigator (PI) of the grant at Cuesta identified the potential to connect through establishing achapter of Engineers Without Borders (EWB) at the community college. The PI was confidentthis would attract non-traditional students to engineering by creating opportunities for positivesocial and equity work [2]. As we began to investigate this possibility, we found that even inEWB, there are structures in place that make engagement
panelists who share their experience and insights. Other metrics ofsuccess include national and statewide recognition, strong community support, and attendeesatisfaction. Professional Ethics LIVE! promotes learning not only among those designprofessionals who attend, but also the multiple generations of Tech TSPE students who host theevent. Another important impact is that Professional Ethics LIVE! tangibly expresses how TexasTech University values the local design professional community, and vice versa. As a university-community partnership, Professional Ethics LIVE! exists at the intersection of learning,application and collaboration and is an excellent expression of the community engagementmodel.Introduction The community engagement