as more conventional measures (the final reflective essay and the letterhome) to evaluate student achievements. The class discussion notes and post-discussion reviewwas very helpful in solidifying evaluations of students for their participation in class.Discussion and ConclusionsThis paper is intended to provide a lens on several issues related to short-term engineering studyabroad through examining two such courses in Latin America. The authors realize that theemergent themes resulting from analyzing these two case studies may not be generalizable to allsuch programs. The objective, however, is not generalizability. Instead, the objective is toprovide a rich description of themes that could later be studied across a broader set of
thatthey more easily accommodate these approaches. Ten years after the Seven Principles werepublished Chickering and Ehrmann14 noted that we could use “technology as a lever” to helpimplement these principles. The large-scale technology of the learning space itself can be onesuch lever.Examples of Alternative Learning SpacesDifferent groups are starting to transform some learning spaces to accommodate morecooperative and active learning approaches.15A prime example of using redesigned space to enhance learning is the SCALE-UP project(Student Centered Activities for Large Enrolment Undergraduate Programs).16 While thisproject has broader interests, its initial focus has been introductory physics. It is a joint projectof a number of universities
testing facility, mechanical instrumentation, and industrial applications of aircraft engines. Also, in the past 10 years she gained experience in teaching ME and ET courses in both quality control and quality assurance areas as well as in thermal-fluid, energy conversion and mechanical areas from various levels of instruction and addressed to a broad spectrum of students, from freshmen to seniors, from high school graduates to adult learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development. Dr Husanu developed laboratory activities for Measurement and Instrumentation course as well as for quality control undergraduate and graduate courses in ET Masters program. Also, she introduced the first experiential
the fall of 2014. This class was co-taught by professors from the MechanicalEngineering Technology (MET), Electrical Engineering Technology (EET) and the Computerand Information Technology (CIT) programs at Purdue University.The goal of this paper is to document the activities carried out during the semester the coursewas taught and present the lessons learned from teaching multidisciplinary students with thebackgrounds in MET, EET and CIT.The objective of the course was to provide a Project Based Learning (PBL) experience for thestudents. Students were tasked to specify, design, and develop prototype sub-systems for existingrobots. During the semester, the students attended lectures and participated in laboratories thatwere heavily focused
the National Science Foundation.The authors would like to thank the participants who volunteered their time in completing thesurveys described herein, along with the ASEE LEES division reviewers for their insights andhelpful comments on the initial draft. Page 26.740.11References1. Genco, N., Hölttä-Otto, K., & Seepersad, C. C. (2012). An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 60-81.2. Duderstadt, J. J. (2010). Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of American Engineering Practice, Research, and
live conversations exploring the nature of technology and itsimpact on our planet and society. For example, on the one hand, the humanities professortalked about definitions of the Anthropocene, the historical debate on its emergence as well asthe relationship between the Anthropocene and capitalism. On the other hand, the STEMprofessor took forward this conversation by discussing the role of technology in the makingof the Anthropocene, the transformation of technology from the Pre-Industrial to Post-Industrial age and highlighting its impact on the planet.The students were not merely passive recipients of information but were also co-participantsin their learning experience. They actively participated in the course by responding to
programs, nor are there studies showing any effect onincreased retention in engineering undergraduate programs for students who have participated inthese K-12 programs.Boettcher and colleagues [17] also reported increased comfort level and knowledge by teachersas a result of summer training programs. Hirsch and colleagues [19] developed and implementeda “Preparedness to Teach” survey for teachers, which was administered prior to the workshop, atthe end of the workshop, and one-year later. Results showed that teachers felt better prepared toteach specific concepts after the summer program, and teachers reported a greater comfort levelone year later after having integrated engineering concepts into their instruction
constraints such as desirability,affordability, language, safety etc. pose as major barriers for most students to participate in suchprograms.International student groups bring significant cultural diversity on a university campus. In2012/13, an estimated 819,644 international students studied in US with 19% (2nd highest)enrolled in various engineering and technology programs17. International students andassociations promote awareness of cultural diversity and global understanding within theuniversity and the broader community. Engaging local students with these diverse groups ofinternational students through activities, group projects, and discussions can be an effective wayof exposing students to learn cultural diversity, practices, ethics, and
consultant with many years of industrial experience and a “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ® 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”true leader in university governance and community service. Clearly, not all faculty can excelin all the areas describe here. In fact, fewer than 30% of the extant full time faculty at publicand private institutions excel, even marginally, in all four areas. However, as Wankat says[5], “Itis perfectly reasonable and possible to expect all professors to be good enough teachers inaddition to excelling in at least one other area.” Gosick and Streveler[6] contend that nearly 40%of undergraduate engineering
learning community, and using design studiotechniques and real-world problem solving. New curricula projects involve industry asparticipants in projects and courses, to provide program proficiencies, and to provide stories ofsuccessful practitioners. Learning communities interface with non-profit organizations in theiractivities.e. Faculty Development Projects – Faculty development has been cited as the most criticalneed for engineering education reform, especially in the area of design education.120 We believethat the inclusion of faculty from other disciplines and external partners to combine engineeringeducation research results with the broader academic, industrial and non-profit best practiceshelps to develop new attitudes, approaches, and
industry and the civil engineering profession, overall. Myexperiences as an undergraduate civil engineering student inform my interests and the areas Iexplore as an engineering education researcher. As a woman who didn’t excel academically incollege and struggled to fit in with her mostly male peers, I was unaware that other students werehaving the same experiences as me. Inspired by other students’ stories and the realization that myexperiences were not unique, I became interested in exploring engineering identity and the keyevents, relationships, and identity dimensions that shape it. Because my significant experienceshave shaped who I am and how I perceive myself as an engineer, I want to know how otherstudents experience, manage, and navigate
. These applications are PC based, and have been Basic or C++ programs, withinterfaces to Excel® in some cases. We have recently joined the Wonderware® educationalprogram, and are beginning to use the Factory Suite® software for our data acquisition andcontrol applications. This provides the students with an interface and software developmentenvironment that will be found in an industrial setting. Students will be able to configure controlloops, perform sophisticated data analysis in real time, and construct graphical interfaces. Sincethis software interfaces easily with Excel®, Mathcad®, and Matlab®; the students will be able touse familiar software tools to work with data acquired from the Factory Suite® software.The Powerpoint® package is
curriculum design, rather than be confined by rigidcriteria. This paper offers preliminary evidence that the regular assessment of the ABET-designated outcomes has opened the eyes of our faculty to issues in student learning thatmay not have been considered before. While initial assessment was conducted at thedisciplinary course level, improvement actions have been more far-reaching includingnon-trivial course and program improvements, interdepartmental faculty collaboration,redesign of course content, and renewal of faculty interest in improved classroompedagogy. This paper reports on the assessment-based approaches used to implementcurricular change and the benefits that have resulted to date. In a broader sense, this paperproposes a model process
thefreshman-level engineering design and communications courses, principally about 2/3 through thefirst semester at the University.2. Our Adaptation and Use of Manufacturing SimulationsIn the fall semester of 1996, three of the authors (RJ, MAS, JPO’C), became interested in usingclassroom simulations as one experience in the UVa Professional Development Program 4 forbeginning students in Engineering Design. We approached Aviat, a subsidiary of ORIONInternational in Ann Arbor, MI, about trying their manufacturing simulation, Paper Planes, Inc.,which was created by W.C. Musselwhite for business use. We were attracted to it because itcould involve as many as 30 participants simultaneously (about the size of our classes), requiredthe production of a
Cultures of Pedagogy: Teaching and Learning in the Natural Sciences and the Humanities,” UT Publications Center, 107 Communications Building, Knoxville, TN 37996-4001., 1996. Accessed: Mar. 26, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED395556[16] A. Biglan, “The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas.,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 195–203, Jun. 1973, doi: 10.1037/h0034701.[17] B. Lucas and J. Hanson, “Thinking Like an Engineer: Using Engineering Habits of Mind and Signature Pedagogies to Redesign Engineering Education,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 4–13, May 2016.[18] “SciELO - Brazil - Application of Project-Based Learning in the first year of an Industrial Engineering Program
Foundation established the Engineering Education Coalitionsprogram to “stimulate bold, innovative, and comprehensive models for systemic reform ofundergraduate engineering education.” Sixty colleges have participated in eight such groups,receiving nearly $100 million in grants from NSF and other federal agencies. Butundergraduate enrollment in engineering has dropped by 20 percent since 1985, and programsreport growing difficulties in recruiting women and minorities and retaining students. At thesame time that employers’ demand for engineering graduates is growing, the interest ofstudents in the topic is shrinking. Thus, any innovations in engineering education will occur ina context of self-examination and other reform initiatives.Sustainability
, ABET, ASME, and IEEE. He is also the Associate Editor of IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology and International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing.Dr. Mel Cossette, Edmonds Community College Mel Cosette is the executive director and principal investigator for the National Science Foundation- funded National Resource Center for Material Technology Education (MatEd) housed at Edmonds Com- munity College in Lynnwood, Wash. Mel has over 20 years of experience in manufacturing education and has developed technician-training programs for industry and educational institutions. She serves on nu- merous committees and national boards, and worked in various industries prior to holding
/Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstractPenn State University has hosted a NSF sponsored GK-12 Outreach project for the pastfive years, and has just begun the second phase of the project. The Penn State projectutilizes the talents of many science and engineering graduate students as teachers,mentors and role models for the K-12 classrooms. The project focuses on developingskills of students in the areas of science, technology, engineering and mathematicsthrough the use of Advanced Transportation Technologies. The GK-12 students areinvited to participate in research in various ways in support of Advanced TransportationTechnology such as undergraduate/graduate student competitions like Future Truck andChallenge X. The quantitative assessment planned at the
than $9M. In addition, her STEM outreach programs and curricula have impacted hundreds of thousands of K-12 students nationwide. She is the co- founder and director of Georgia Tech’s K-12 InVenture Prize, a statewide invention competition, open to all students and teachers in Georgia. She earned her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign in 2007, and her Masters and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2009 and 2012. Dr. Moore received the Georgia Tech Teaching Effectiveness Award in 2018.Leslie Flynn Professor of STEM Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the University of IowaStephanie CouchNisha Detchprohm (Research Engineer I)W. Ethan Eagle (Lecturer)Joanna K
technologies inengineering, and design for extreme (and extraterrestrial) habitats. Innovative activities includeusing drones for aerial photography and mapping, identifying tension and compression loads bybuilding a 3D bridge model, tours to Purdue’s innovative research facilities, reviewing theinfrastructure around them and proposing novel improvements, and participating in activities inthe classroom like debates about autonomous vehicle and jigsaw activities. The authorsanticipate similar programs could be instituted at universities and not-for-profits across thecountry to expose diverse students to civil engineering as a career and to the complex, multi-dimensional problems civil engineers get to solve every day. In addition to the means
courses and lectures. In undergraduate and basic computer science courses, programming exercises andassessments are widely used. These courses usually have a large number of participants, leadingto several problems when the submitted exercises have to be graded by tutors. The main reasonfor this is that programming exercises, no matter which programming language is used, tend tohave a large degree of freedom for learners. Thus, simply comparing the provided solutions witha sample solution does not produce a reasonable result that can be used for grading, sincedifferent, yet still correct, solutions for the same exercise exist. It is possible that the submittedsolution still fulfills the required aspects of the exercise, but follows a
Friday, April 1, 2011 (Afternoon) 02:30 – 03:45 PM Concurrent Session Presentations Experiential Learning Michael Jenkins, A Truss by Any Other Name May Still Not Be a Truss: A ‘Do-Say’ 64 Pedagogical Laboratory Exercise Satbir Sekhon, et al., Embedded System Data Logging 74 Collin Heller, et al., Accident Reconstruction: A Model-Eliciting Activity in 82 Dynamics Educational Technique Bradley Hyatt, Effectively Utilizing Industry Members to Assess Student Learning 104 Outcomes in a Senior Project Course Fariborz Tehrani, Implementation
Arlington, March 21 – 23, 2013. Copyright © 2013, American Society for Engineering Educationinternational scholars striving with hope in this challenging time. We do more than hope for abetter, safer, and more accessible world for our global citizens because, as agents of change, weput that hope into action with the work and research that we conduct. Margaret Mead oncewisely advised, "Never doubt that a small group of people can change the world. Indeed, it is theonly thing that ever has." Commensurate with her notion we face the 21st Century EngineeringGrand Challenges locally with student-facilitated projects and globally as a network of activists.Teachers, students, community members, policy makers, and industry are working
. Interested students completed a survey to provide demographic and schedulinginformation. Participants were chosen from six engineering majors - civil, chemical, computer,electrical, industrial, and mechanical - and were diverse with respect to gender and ethnicity.Selected students were interviewed in Fall 2011, Spring 2012, and Fall 2012. We used a semi-structured interview protocol to learn more about student experiences with the transfer process.The protocol covered a variety of topics including why students selected the engineering major,why they chose to pursue the transfer pathway, experiences with the transfer process, andchallenges in making the academic and social transitions to the new institution. Just prior to theinterview and after
Vision Engineering program teacher for a secondary experiential college preparatory program that uses a holistic and transdisciplinary pedagogy. He has also taught at the John Hopkins University Center for Talented Youth. With thirty years of engineering design and production experience in industry, Dr. Povinelli also brings a wealth of practical knowledge to his teaching and research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #37345A Longitudinal Engineering Education Study of a Holistic EngineeringPedagogy and Holistic Design Thinking Methodology on PostsecondaryStudent Academic Success and
Overview: The program included: keynote speeches from engineering educational leaders, papersessions, workshops, a poster showcase, a forum with industry and educational leaders, and an operationaltour of Boeing's famous C17 military transport aircraft. The highlight of the conference includes an awardsbanquet aboard the historic Queen Mary luxury liner.We are at a critical crossroads in engineering education within the United States. With decline of Americanadvantages in the engineering/technology marketplace, the national need for engineers is more critical thanever. Such a need has been widely articulated in numerous publications including, “Rising Above theGathering Storm” (a report by the National Academies). We encourage participation of
following research questions: ● What role does uncertainty avoidance play in developing creative practice especially in interdisciplinary teams? ● What strategies can be used to overcome that uncertainty?MethodsParticipantsThe participants (n=15) were students enrolled in an undergraduate honors course titledCREATE!. The undergraduate students represented freshman through fifth year seniors from avariety of disciplines, including 4 students enrolled in engineering majors, 3 design/architecturemajors, 2 art majors, 3 science majors, 1 math major, and 2 business majors. The course waselectively taken to fulfill three hours of 21 credits required to receive an honors degree. Each ofthe 15 students enrolled in the course signed Institutional
Learning Impact Evalulation in the Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness at the University of Central Florida (UCF). Since 1996, she has served as the li- aison for faculty research of distributed learning and teaching effectiveness at UCF. Patsy specializes in statistics, graphics, program evaluation, and applied data analysis. She has extensive experience in re- search methods including survey development, interviewing, and conducting focus groups and frequently serves as an evaluation consultant to school districts, and industry and government organizations. She has also received funding from several government and industrial agencies including the National Science Foundation and the Alfred P. Sloan
research over past 10 years has resulted in national and international recognition, industry collaborations, 5 patents/patent appli- cations and over 75 scholarly publications in highly regarded discipline specific journals, peer-reviewed conference proceedings and invited book chapters. He is a scientific and technical reviewer for over 50 in- ternational journals, book publishers, and several funding agencies. He is a licensed professional engineer in the state of New Mexico and a board certified environmental engineer. His research interests include water and wastewater treatment, bioelectrochemical systems, desalination, algae, biofuels, and sustain- ability. He enjoys teaching and mentoring undergraduate and
in the learning process: active student engagement (ASE) and project-basedlearning (PBL). Both approaches assume active student participation in learning practices whereexchange of ideas, extensive collaboration, and interdisciplinary synergies are essential. We willalso leverage two pedagogies: scaffolding students in their metacognition process to becomeself-directed learners; and creation of a teaching program based on case discussion pedagogy.We expect to offer our courses during and after spring 2018. We will use pre and post surveys tomeasure improvements, if any, in students’ team skills, social awareness, and the metacognitionprocess. Other formative, summative, and longitudinal studies are also planned.Rationale:STEM Pipeline