information to potential participants and the public.Sarah Zappe, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Sarah Zappe is the Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Pennsylvania State University. Her background is in educational psychology with an emphasis on educational testing and assessment. Page 14.1197.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Development of a National Workshop to Teach Norwegian Ph.D. Students in Engineering and Science How to Communicate ResearchKey Words: graduate
of these students serving on the faculty at ITU, one of whom has served asthe Department Head and Dean of Engineering!3e. The Value to Your CountryIt might seem a bit melodramatic to include the potential value of SALs to your country. Yet, theauthor sincerely believes that world understanding is the prelude to securing world peace. Inparticular, the scholars of our country must make an effort to better understand other cultures and Page 14.1041.7to share our culture. International SALs are an excellent forum for achieving this. The author hasto believe that the many bi-directional visits of well-educated peoples between the U.S. andSoviet
input and ideas. I thinkthat built a lot of their self-confidence because the other kids were listening to them- becausethat doesn’t happen very often in the classroom.Joe: They went from thinking an engineer was somebody that drove a train to that actually was aperson that usually has a higher level education and is involved in so many different things, Imean, by the end of the year, they realized that….Some of them even started talking about videogames, that an engineer would be involved in that process, so yea, I think that they made somepretty good connections and leaps as far as what they thought in the beginning to the end of the Page
- based approach to increasing participation of women in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(3).Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of engineering education, 96(4), 359-379.Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-dux, H. A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304-328.Chiu, J.C., McElhaney, K.W., Zhang, N., Biswas, G., Fried, R., Basu, S., & Alozie, N. (2019, April). A Principled Approach to
design and optimization. His current research interests are the modeling of supply chains and production planning systems, and their applications in different industries.Agnes Galambosi, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Agnes Galambosi has a PhD in Systems and Industrial Engineering from the University of Arizona in Tucson, AZ. She is currently employed at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte teaching several engineering courses. Page 22.1151.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Perception and Preferences of Faculty for Online
AC 2009-460: INTEGRATING STUDENT EXPERIENCE INTO THE CLASSROOMTerri Lynch-Caris, Kettering UniversityDaniel Ludwigsen, Kettering University Page 14.769.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Integrating Student Experience into the ClassroomAbstractEngineering educators seek to inspire their students to integrate classroom theories with theirown experience. This paper describes the development of an activity integrating co-opexperiences and/or research interests with classroom learning. The resulting instrument, CITIES– Beyond the Classroom, will be useful for STEM educators to create a participative classroomenvironment. The instrument may be
, AIChE, ASME, NAE, and NSPE.3. Chau, K.W. 2007. Incorporation of sustainability concepts into a civil engineering curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 133(3):188-191.4. Fenner, R.A., C.M. Ainger, H.J. Cruickshank, and P.M. Guthrie. 2005. Embedding sustainable development at Cambridge University Engineering Department. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 6(3): 229-241.5. Vanasupa, L. and F.G. Splitt. 2004. Curricula for a Sustainable Future: A proposal for integrating environmental concepts into our curricula. In Proceedings of 2004 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting.6. Schokker, A.J. 2010. The Sustainable Concrete Guide: Strategies and Examples
Paper ID #16574Petroleum Engineering Students’ Views of Corporate Social ResponsibilityDr. Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines Jessica M. Smith is Assistant Professor in Liberal Arts and International Studies at the Colorado School of Mines. Trained as anthropologist, her research engages two major areas: the sociocultural dynamics of extractive and energy industries, with a focus on corporate social responsibility, social justice, labor, and gender; and engineering education, with a focus on socioeconomic class and social responsibility. She is the author of Mining Coal and Undermining Gender: Rhythms of Work
Engineering Education, 2021 What do Mechanical Engineers Do? A Content Analysis of Mechanical Engineer Job DescriptionsAbstract:The engineering curriculum is intended to prepare students for their careers; however, academic literaturelacks information regarding the specific activities engineers typically undertake once they enter the workforce.The field of mechanical engineering is often referred to as a “general concentration” of engineering. This canbe seen within the typical mechanical engineering curriculum, which covers topics such as fluids, heattransfer, solid mechanics, dynamics, electronics, and design. Students are taught general theory andapplication throughout their undergraduate education in preparation for a career in mechanical
Engineering at the University of Limerick. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium for Engineering Education, 2010, University College Cork, Ireland. < http://www.ucc.ie/ucc/depts/foodeng/ isee2010/pdfs/Papers/Cosgrove%20et%20al.pdf> (accessed 09.15.2013)8. Neto, P., Williams, B., Carvalho, I. S. “Cultivating Active Learning during and outside class”. Proceedings of 37th annual SEFI conference, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2009, 1 - 4 de July. < http://www.sefi.be/wp- content/abstracts2009/Neto.pdf> (accessed 09.15.2013) Page 26.219.139. Incorporating Active Learning Strategies. (accessed
Paper ID #21096How Theater Can Promote Inclusive Engineering CampusesDr. David DiBiasio, Worcester Polytechnic Institute David DiBiasio is Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering and Department Head of ChE at WPI. He received his ChE degrees from Purdue University, worked for the DuPont Co, and has been at WPI since 1980. His current interests are in educational research: the process of student learning, international engineering education, and educational assessment. Collaboration with two colleagues resulted in being awarded the 2001 William Corcoran Award from Chemical Engineering Education. He served as 2004
Paper ID #13682Integration of Gamification and Creativity in Engineering DesignMs. Emily Ann Marasco, University of Calgary Emily Marasco is a Ph.D. student at the University of Calgary. Her research focuses on cross-disciplinary curriculum development for engineering students as well as for K-12 and community outreach programs.Prof. Laleh BehjatDr. William Rosehart, University of Calgary Page 26.997.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Integration of Gamification and
Conference 2008, Austin, Texas, USA, June 2009. 2. T. E. Doyle, B. W. Baetz, and B. Lopes “First-Year Engineering Bicycle Dissection as anIntroduction to Sustainable Design”, Conference Record of the 2009 The Sixth International Conference on Innovation and Practices in Engineering Design and Engineering Education (CDEN/C2E2 2009), Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, July 2009. 3. C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, L. J. Leifer, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning”, Journal of Engineering Education, January 2005, pp.103-120. 4. D. Dudley, Practical Gear Design, McGraw Hill, 1960. Page
Paper ID #23464Innovative Approach to Online Argumentation in Computing and Engineer-ing CoursesDr. Swaroop Joshi, Ohio State University Swaroop Joshi is a Senior Lecturer in Computer Science and Engineering at Ohio State University. He is interested in a range of topics in Education Technology and Software Engineering, including but not limited to Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Game-Based Learning, Programming Languages, Compiler Construction and Optimization.Dr. Neelam Soundarajan, Ohio State University Dr. Neelam Soundarajan is an Associate Professor in the Computer Science and Engineering Department
Education, 2016 Manipulatives in Enginering Statics: Supplementing Analytical Techiques with Physical ModelsAbstractIn order to assist students, gain conceptual understanding of internal forces, a physicalmanipulative of a truss was developed in order to help students visualize, feel, and analyze thebehavior of the material being manipulated. The purpose of this qualitative study was tounderstand how a physical manipulative of a truss contributed to the conceptual understanding oftruss analysis in statics. In this study, six students were presented with a simple problem of atruss, where no measurements or numerical quantities were provided, and asked to determinewhich members where in tension or compression
, October, 20015. Varma, R. “Permanent Tenure and Academic Freedom in Engineering”. In Bulletin of Science, Technology& Society, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp 193-201 June 2001.6. Felder, R.M. and Brent, B. “Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABETEngineering Criteria, J. Engineering Education, pp. 7-25, January, 20037. Froyd, J.E. and Ohland, M.T. “Integrated Engineering Curricula”, J. Engineering Education, pp. 147-164,January, 20058. Nair, I., Jones S. and White, J. “A Curriculum to Enhance Environmental Literacy”, pp. 57-67, January2002 Page 12.1153.8
emergency management and disaster assistance. He has authored numerous papers and presentations focusing on the use of decision support systems for risk assessment, threat analysis, and emergency management. During his tenure at JSU, Skelton has mentored more than 70 students at his research center, focusing on problem solving, software development, and GIS utiliza- tion. Skelton’s primary areas of interest are STEM education, risk assessment, decision support, and cyber security.Dr. Pao-Chiang Yuan, Jackson State University Pao-Chiang Yuan received his Ph.D in civil engineering (environmental/water resources engineering) from Oklahoma State University. Yuan serves as Peer Reviewer for state, private grant programs, and
to make,but also the most constrained, as there is a limit to what one individual can achieve viachanges within a single course. At this level, the five processes look like this:• Logistics (mobilising) – teaching spaces, field trips, assessment tools, laboratories, Page 12.654.9 teaching assistants, teaching materials• Peers – other course leaders, the program team, staff developers• Alliances – industry/companies, lecturers at other universities, engineering education society• Public representation – internal and external publications about the changes, award applications• Links and Knots – pedagogical strategy, technical
- tivities. He earned a B.S. in Engineering Sciences from Yale University, with a double major in East Asian Studies. He also holds a Graduate Certificate in Chinese and American Studies, jointly awarded by Johns Hopkins University and Nanjing University in China. In addition to his doctoral work, Robert is also a Graduate Facilitator with the Center for Socially Engaged Design and an Engineering Teaching Consultant with the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education
experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning(j) a knowledge of contemporary
transportation.Dr. Salman Ahsan, San Jose State University Currently Salman Ahsan is an educator and mentor to young people he teaches part-time at San Jose State and Seattle University. He is also working on a services company that specializes in the artificial intelli- gence and machine learning space. In the past he worked in the semiconductor industry, in companies like Linear Technology (now Analog Devices Inc) and Maxim Integrated. Salman studied at the University of Pennsylvania (B.S.E), Princeton University (Ph.D) and University of California at Berkeley (M.B.A).Mr. Eric Wertz, self/EduShields Eric Wertz is a software engineer most recently involved in embedded systems and education. He has been a volunteer educator
, September 2007.16. Neeley, WL, Adaptive Design Expertise. Thesis (Ph.D.) Stanford University. 2007.17. Todd, RH, Magleby, SP, Sorensen, CD, Swan, BR, Anthony, DK, “A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America,” Journal of Engineering Education, 165-174, April 1995.18. Dutson, AJ, Todd, RH, Magleby, SP, Sorensen, CD, Todd, RH, “A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, 17- 28, January 1997.19. Skogstad, PJ, Currano, RM and Leifer, LJ, “An Experiment in Design Pedagogy Transfer Across Cultures and Disciplines,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 367-376, 24(2) 2008
in the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College, where she coordinates and teaches the capstone engineering design course. Her current research focuses on innovations in engineering design education, particularly at the capstone level. She is invested in Page 25.789.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 building the international capstone design community and served as Co-chair for both the 2010 and 2012 Capstone Design Conferences. She is also involved with efforts to foster design learning in middle school students and to support entrepreneurship at primarily
this course concluded in his post-interview: “I just don’t think I have the brain for programming.”Thus, ours and others’ prior empirical work suggests that smartness is a salient and complexaspect of the student experience of engineering education. In spite of this promise and initialcontribution, the terrain of smartness remains contested and taboo, with strong traditions andcamps on either side of a disciplinary divide. In the next sections we explore psychological andanthropological approaches to investigating smartness.2. Background (Disciplinary Divide)While smartness is a phenomenon and a construct that is embedded in everyday experience, theextant approaches to studying smartness demonstrate a stark disciplinary
Paper ID #37867Evaluating Spatial Visualization Learning Through DigitizedSketches: A Case Study of Engineering Students'Orthographic Projection ErrorsLelli Van Den Einde (Dr.) Lelli Van Den Einde is a Teaching Professor in Structural Engineering at UCSD. She incorporates education innovations into courses (Peer Instruction, Project-based learning), prepares next generation faculty through TA Training, serves as advisor to student organizations, and is committed to fostering a supportive environment for diverse students. Her research focuses on engagement strategies for large classrooms and developing K-16
. Zunkel earned a B.S.in Industrial Engineering from Iowa State University, a M.S. in Industrial Engineer- ing from the University of Oklahoma, and a Ph.D. in Higher Education from Iowa State University.Dr. Jason Pontius Jason Pontius, Ph.D. is the Coordinator of Continuous Academic Program Improvement within the Office of the Senior Vice President and Provost at Iowa State University. Jason helped with the statistical analysis for early credit task force. Jason has a Ph.D. in Higher Education Administration from Iowa State Uni- versity, an M.S. in Higher Education Administration from Indiana University and a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Virginia.Dr. Thomas J Brumm, Iowa State University Dr. Tom Brumm is
, 1994.8. Dombach, M., Knight, M., Rogers, C., “Teaching Seniors Through Developing Multidisciplinary Academies”, Proceedings of CCLI Conference, The Power of Interdisciplinary/Multidisciplinary Courses and Curricula, 2007.9. Hyman, B. L., “From Capstone to Cornerstone: A New Paradigm for Design Education”, International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 17, pp. 416-420, 2001.10. Todd, R.H., Sorensen, C.D., Magleby, S.B., “Designing a Senior Capstone Course to Satisfy Industrial Customers”, Journal of Engineering Education, 1993.11. Paulik M. J., Krishnan M., “A Competition-Motivated Capstone Design Course: The Result of a Fifteen-Year Evolution”, IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 44, 2001.12. Lumpp J
engineers and industrial designers. 4th International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition (DCC'10). Stuttgart, Germany.31. Yilmaz, S. and C.M. Seifert. (2009). Cognitive heuristics employed by design experts: A case study. 3rd Conference of International Association of Society of Design Research, IASDR '09. Seoul, Korea.32. Yilmaz, S. and C.M. Seifert. (2010). Cognitive heuristics in design ideation. International Design Conference. Cavtat, Croatia.33. Daly, S.R., et al. (2011). Teaching design ideation. American Society of Engineering Education. Vancouver.34. Daly, S.R., et al. (2012). Assessing design heuristics for idea generation in an introductory engineering course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28
Paper ID #11437Measuring the Complexity of Simulated Engineering Design ProblemsMs. Golnaz Arastoopour, University of Wisconsin, Madison Before becoming interested in education, Golnaz studied Mechanical Engineering at the University of Illi- nois at Urbana-Champaign with a minor in Spanish. While earning her Bachelor’s degree in engineering, she worked as a computer science instructor at Campus Middle School for Girls in Urbana, IL. Along with a team of undergraduates, she headlined a project to develop a unique computer science curriculum for middle school students. She then earned her M.A. in mathematics education at
. Also, the authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers.References [1] J. L. G. Alcaraz, F. A. M. Hern´andez, J. E. O. Tiznado, A. R. Vargas, E. J. Mac´ıas, and C. J. Lardies, “Effect of quality lean manufacturing tools on commercial benefits gained by mexican maquiladoras,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1–15, 2021. [2] D. F. Galindo and R. G. Herrera, “The journey from lean manufacturing to industry 4.0: The rail manufacturing process in mexico,” International Journal of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 294–299, 2021. [3] M. Leijon, P. Gudmundsson, P. Staaf, and C. Christersson, “Challenge based learning in higher education– A systematic literature review,” Innovations in Education and