Session 3413 An Improved Distance Learning Environment for the Material and Energy Balances Course David L. Silverstein G. T. Lineberry University of KentuckyAbstractThe Kentucky Council on Post-Secondary Education has mandated goals of substantiallyincreased enrollments in Engineering for Kentucky state-funded institutions over the nextdecade. As part of the process designed to meet this goal, the University of Kentucky hascollaborated with other state institutions providing (or soon to provide
spring or fall semester. Overall, we are excited about this new curriculumchange and hope it continues to increase student learning in the future to create expert 3Dmodelers.AcknowledgementsWe would like to acknowledge Cameron Beard and Matthew Marandola for course redesign help.References[1] A. Majchrzak, “Effect of CAD on the jobs of drafters and engineers: a quantitative case study,” Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 32, pp. 245-262, Feb, 1988. Accessed: Jan, 24, 2023.[2] M. Sadat-Hossieny, M. Torres, “Modifying CAD Courses to Improve Proficiency in Interpretation of EngineeringDrawings Using Modified Constructivism Approach” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio,2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2—28682[3] B.F. Robertson, D.F
2015 ASEE Zone III Conference (Gulf Southwest – Midwest – North Midwest Sections) Tests Given Throughout a Course as Formative Assessment Can Improve Student Learning Robert M. O’Connell Electrical and Computer Engineering Department University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211AbstractResearch has shown that formative assessment can have a significant positive impact on studentlearning. Furthermore, tests administered throughout a course can be used effectively forformative assessment. However, such tests
be perceived negatively [17]. Team members are the ones who can best assess thedynamics of their teamwork and the degree to which each member contributes to their work.Consequently, peer evaluation can be an effective tool to provide information on theparticipation of each team member and their skills and weaknesses regarding teamwork [18].Peer assessment can be formative, giving feedback to students, helping them improve their work,or a summative assessment, which allows them to adjust individual grades into group work [19].Millis and Cottell [20] propose the following components to be assessed by peers: meetingattendance, task completion, contribution to the work, and/or support among team members.This course measures students’ performance
assessment and continuous improvement tool for a redesigned first year courseAbstractThis paper demonstrates evidence-based practice for evaluating the effectiveness of andcontinuing to improve a first year course on engineering fundamentals and decision-making. InSpring 2015, five instructors in the Department of Engineering at James Madison Universitytaught six sections of an introductory engineering course. The course is a curricular element ofthe department's first-year experience and is intended to introduce new engineering students toengineering fundamentals, analytical and creative problem solving, systems thinking,engineering and society, sustainable development, and professionalism. As part of courseassessment, students
for Engineering Education, 2016 Using Student-Developed Narratives to Improve Learning and Engagement in Computer Problem-Solving CoursesAbstractIn our Computer Systems major, we require all students to take a problem-solving course (PS) toprepare them for subsequent courses in computer programming. As part of the PS course,students use flowchart interpreters to learn basic procedural programming concepts. Studentsoften have difficulty translating word problems into flowcharts because they do not have a goodunderstanding of the problem’s domain. To write an effective computer program to solve aproblem, programmers must first understand the problem. 1,6,14,15 Thus, the student’s inability toconceive of the problem
Engineering Education, 2024 Improved Student Learning in a Circuits Course With a Novel Web-Based SystemIntroductionA multiyear (unfunded) development effort has led to the creation of a web-based teaching andlearning system for circuit analysis. A key feature of the ''Circuit Analysis Tool for Education''(CATE) system is the ability to automatically generate topologically distinct circuits with step-by-step solutions. These problems are used for examples, practice, and for out-of-classassignments. Circuit problems can be readily refreshed for each new section of a course. Thecourse associated with this study was one for non-majors and covers DC analysis, AC phasorsand AC power, as well as transient analysis
Page 11.731.8answered questions in the area of Electricity and Magnetism, the performance of our studentswill be compared against the peer performance to gauge the effectiveness of ECE3183. 7IV. ConclusionTo improve the teaching and learning effectiveness of the service course, ECE 3183 at MSU,initial efforts have been made to coordinate the lectures offered by the ECE department with thelaboratory offered by the ME department. We believe that this collaboration will inject vigorinto what has historically been perceived as a “boring” classroom in the ECE3183 course, whileenhancing the ME curriculum.If the proposed integration is proved to be successful, a similar approach will be applied to
Paper ID #16487Preliminary Analysis of Spatial Ability Improvement within an EngineeringMechanics Course: StaticsSteven David Wood, Utah State University - Engineering Education Steven Wood is a junior in the Civil Engineering program. After finishing his BS he plans on completing a MS in Civil Engineering. In addition to studies, he is a teacher’s assistant and he teaches a recitation class for the Statics course. His Interests in the field of engineering are public transportation, specifically in rapid and heavy rail systems. His research interests include spatial ability, learning styles, and gender differences in
AC 2010-161: DESIGN IMPROVEMENT AND ANALYSIS ON 3DHAPTIC-AUGMENTED LEARNING TOOLS FOR DYNAMICS COURSEWeihang Zhu, Lamar UniversityKendrick Aung, Lamar UniversityJiang Zhou, Lamar University Page 15.354.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Design Improvement and Analysis on 3D Haptic-augmented Learning Tools for Dynamics CourseAbstractThe paper presents the recent improvement and analysis of 3D haptic-augmented learning toolsfor Dynamics course, which is a fundamental course offered in most engineering disciplines.Dynamics is considered to be one of the most difficult and non-intuitive courses that engineeringstudents encounter during their
1 Session 10 Improve Learning Efficiency by Using Computers For Junior Level Electrical Engineering Courses George G Karady, Fellow member IEEE K. A. Nigim*, Senior member IEEE Arizona State University Birzeit University, Birzeit, Palestine Tempe AZ 85287 Knigim@imap3.asu.edu Karady@asu.edu *Fullbright Fellowship leave at Arizona State
educational effort to improve student retention in introductoryelectronics and network analysis course offered at a university in northeastern United States. Ituses a new media-based tutorial and mini project intended to engage students in their studies.The paper, also seeks to study the effects of technology mode of instruction that complementsconventional mode of instruction. This development, as well as lessons learned in the first threeyears of technology mode of instruction in introductory engineering courses (namely Electronicsand Network Analysis) is evaluated numerically. A concluding section is offered that discussesthe benefit of balancing conventional mode of instruction with technology mode of instruction.INTRODUCTIONThis paper examines
Paper ID #10044Transforming a Freshman Electrical Engineering Lab Course to Improve Ac-cess to Place Bound StudentsDr. Denise Thorsen, University of Alaska, Fairbanks Denise Thorsen received her B.S. (1985), M.S. (1991) and Ph.D. (1996) degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She is currently an Associate Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Alaska FairbanksLori Sowa P.E., University of Alaska, Southeast Page 24.1278.1
Paper ID #14436An Engineering Mathematics Course to Improve Success of Students in Al-gebra IIDr. Edmund Tsang, Western Michigan University Edmund Tsang received a B.S. with distinction in Mechanical Engineering from University of Nebraska and a Ph.D. in Metallurgy from Iowa State University. Dr. Tsang’s current professional interests include integrating service-learning into engineering, social entrepreneurship, and student success and retention.Kenneth David Domingue, Western Michigan University Kenneth Domingue is currently a graduate student in Aerospace Engineering at Western Michigan Uni- versity. As a graduate
them in a course. Similarly,Felder and Stice [2] state that students are better prepared to improve their learning environmentwhen they understand and can articulate what is effective for them. Further, Anson et al. [3]observe that “[with a] diversity of approaches [to engineering education], the potential formismatches between students’ learning styles, preferences and practices on the one hand, andteaches pedagogies on the other, is considerable”. They go onto state, “… to understand andsolve such mismatches requires seeing education as a … symbiosis involving complexrelationships between students’ and teachers’ beliefs and practices.” While we acknowledge that students are not adequately equipped to address broader
issues are apparent from apreliminary review of student comments. In response to a question asking in what waysthe course is or is not meeting their expectations, most students gave non-specificcomments to the effect that it was meeting their expectations. Some, however, werecritical: I expected both parts of the clinic to be related more. It seems we have two completely separate classes at times. I expected better coordination between this (writing section class) and the lab part. Thought it would be more connected to lab portion--more of an engineering thing than a writing thing.Similar opinions were expressed, even more forcefully, in response to the question, Whatwould you do to improve the course (50 words or less)? In this case
Paper ID #36968A sustainable model to structurally improve outcomes inMath courses for Engineering students.Gianluca Guadagni (Assistant Professor Applied Mathematics) Assistant Professor - Applied Mathematics - School of Engineering - University of VirginiaHui Ma (Assistant Professor) Dr. Hui Ma is an assistant professor of applied math at the University of Virginia. She holds a Ph.D. in applied mathematics from the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Her current research interest focuses on mathematics education and STEM education, in particular student-focused instruction, and learning-based grading
. The paper reports the application of stage gate for a course, aimed at courserefinement and attempts to present evidence to assess the effectiveness and achievement ofthe desired outcomes. Improvements in the course contents, delivery methods, assessments,and student performance are reported for the selected freshmen course titled “Introduction toEngineering”. The paper explains activities, working team and deliverables that are part ofthe stages, with samples. The decision-making methodology in gate reviews using criteriaand rubrics are also explained with samples. Samples of course design outputs, coursematerial, checklists with rubrics that were used during the gate reviews also are included inthe paper.1. IntroductionThe Fourth United
AC 2009-902: IMPROVING AN ABET COURSE ASSESSMENT PROCESS THATINVOLVES MARKER PROBLEMS AND PROJECTSBruce Murray, State University of New York, Binghamton Bruce T. Murray is a professor of mechanical engineering at the State University of New York at Binghamton and is the Director of Undergraduate Studies in the ME Department. He received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in ME from Rutgers University in 1978 and 1980, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in ME from the University of Arizona in 1986. Earlier in his career he was a Member of Technical Staff at Bell Laboratories where he was involved in system thermal management and reliability. He also was a research engineer at the National Institute of
Not (%) (p≤ 0.05) Enrolled Enrolled Yes/No <2.5 27 72 15.3 Yes 2.5 to 3.0 62 120 2.6 No 3.0 to 3.5 81 149 10.1 Yes 3.5 to 4.0 58 166 - 5.6 NoThe consistency of a level of retention at or close to 100% for the three lower grade intervals isindicative of an effective course in improving retention. This data supports that the Engineering110 course is a positive force in retaining students in engineering, especially for students withlow college GPAs.Interestingly, the
Paper ID #29479A Curriculum-Spanning Review Video Library to Improve Retention ofPrerequisite Course MaterialDr. Hope Leigh Weiss, California State University, Fullerton Dr. Hope L. Weiss is currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at California State University, Fullerton. She earned her B.S. in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from Cornell Uni- versity, and her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Weiss’ research focuses in the areas of nonlinear dynamics and chaos and engineering education. Her current research includes biomedical acoustics
Reality can contributesignificantly to a better understanding of improvement project implementation.Two limitations of this study should be acknowledged. On one hand, the generalizability of thefindings may be constrained due to the single-case design focused on Tecnologico de Monterrey.While the results showcase the efficacy of Virtual Reality (VR) in Lean Manufacturingeducation within this specific context, variations in institutional settings, student demographics,and course structures could impact the applicability of the proposed methodology elsewhere. Onthe other hand, the relatively short duration of the study, spanning only a week, may not capturethe long-term effects of VR integration on students' retention and practical application of
expert level in problem solving is of paramount importance for engineering students. Thetraditional Skinnerian guided-practice through drill homework and “cookbook” laboratoryactivities, usually leads to superficial gains of algorithmic knowledge in problem solving.Interactive Engagement methods in learning help students develop higher cognitive functions,and arguably, will lead to transferable knowledge from physics to engineering. In thispresentation I will explore the effect of employing the Socratic Dialogue method -in conjunctionwith Interactive Engagement physics curricula- in improving student’s problem solving skills.Introduction Many students in introductory calculus-based physics college courses perform poorly inproblem solving
individualdiscussions. However, there is also a concerning decrease in perceived effectiveness andfrequency of interactions during synchronous sessions and forum use. It emphasizes the need toimprove synchronous session quality and to investigate possible issues limiting forum utilizationas tools for addressing student questions and uncertainties.The open-ended question responses highlight student diversity in expectations for learningdynamics and course content focus. Although this emphasizes the importance of adaptableteaching methodologies, providing varying formats for interactions and assessments [16], itreveals students' unawareness that this course consisted of a self-instructional format. Flexibilityto offer individual learning styles improves student
competentgeotechnical engineers and who will practice in the real world after their graduation should takeat least one engineering geology course. For instance, the father of soil mechanics, ProfessorTerzaghi, when he was teaching at Harvard University, MIT, and University of Illinois, legendsaid that he taught one and only one course that was not soil mechanics engineering, but it wasactually the engineering geology course[16]. This effectively shows why all civil engineeringprograms should offer an engineering geology course or a required prerequisite geology course.During the ice age, nature sometimes geologically engineered a phenomenon similar to “quicksand” condition by creating a large kettle lake that works like a “quick sand” barrel, at the righttime
AC 2009-2334: DESIGNING A SEQUENCE OF DESIGN COURSES TO IMPROVESTUDENT PERFORMANCE AND RETENTION AT A MINORITY INSTITUTIONNhut Ho, California State University, NorthridgeRobert Ryan, California State University, Northridge Page 14.426.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Designing a Sequence of Design Courses to Improve Student Performance and Retention at a Minority InstitutionAbstractThis paper describes the process of creating a sequence of design courses in theDepartment of Mechanical Engineering at California State University, Northridge. Theoverarching goals of the course sequence are to address and
Improving A Fluid and Thermal Sciences Course for Electrical Engineering Technology Students Robert Edwards Pennsylvania State University at ErieAbstract:At Penn State Erie, Electrical Engineering Technology (EET) seniors are required to take acourse in fluid and thermal sciences. The course consists of two hours of lecture and two hoursof lab per week. This course has traditionally been taught by a Mechanical EngineeringTechnology (MET) faculty member who would teach it from a mechanical standpoint, withelectronic examples brought in where possible. The labs were designed around existingequipment in the mechanical fluid and thermal sciences lab and held little significance for
developed linking student development focused first-year coursesand a project called “Design Your Process of Becoming a World-Class Engineering Student”.The project is set within first-year engineering orientation courses that pair academic successstrategies with engineering college knowledge. Through the project students are challenged todesign their individually tailored learning process to have a significant impact on their academicsuccess by improving the students’ skills, confidence, and motivation to succeed in engineering.The approach is currently implemented in over 30 institutions nationwideError! Reference source notfound. . The results from two four year institutions— Oregon State University and University ofAlaska Anchorage—one
in thisquarter. In particular, we hope to answer several important questions with surveys and gradesfrom the following two quarters: 1. Are these students more likely to continue as CS majors, and 2. How does their performance compare to others who did not take the class?ConclusionWe suggest that collaboration and life-long learning are key ingredients to a successful freshmanexperience and can help improve retention rates, performance, and make the major moreappealing to a wider, diverse set of students. Without a doubt, teaching cornerstone coursesrequires a substantial time investment. We believe that the constructivist course design model wepresent here can substantially reduce the effort required to effectively conduct such
2006-1882: ABET OUTCOME ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT THROUGHTHE CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSE IN AN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMShantha Daniel, Iowa State University SHANTHA DANIEL is pursuing her doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering at Iowa State University. She has served as a graduate assistant in teaching as well as research including objective evaluation and outcome assessment.Devna Popejoy-Sheriff, Iowa State University DEVNA POPEJOY-SHERIFF is pursuing her master degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies with an emphasis in Student Affairs. She currently serves as the Academic Advisor for IE undergraduate students in IMSE Department.K. Jo Min, Iowa State University K. JO