Paper ID #12469Impact of interventions on students’ conceptual understanding of dynamicsprinciples and self-efficacyDr. Shaobo Huang, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Shaobo Huang is an Assistant Professor and the Stensaas Endowed STEM Chair in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. Her research interests in- clude student retention and academic performance in engineering, student achievement evaluation and assessment, and K-12 STEM curriculum design.Dr. John M Mativo, University of Georgia Dr. John Mativo is Associate Professor at the University of Georgia
study was to use the author’s MOOC to: 1) develop high qualityassessment questions that examine a student’s understanding of combined static loading,2) determine what fundamental concepts student’s struggle with in combined staticloading, and 3) analyze which fundamental concepts in combined static loading arecritical for students to grasp in order for continued success in machine design and solidmechanics. The MOOC covers both static and fatigue failure theories, which arecommonly taught in mechanical engineering machine design courses. Results from thisstudy can be utilized to improve student understanding in solid mechanics and machinedesign courses by highlighting essential fundamental concepts as well as providing testedassessment
service and engineering. He has written texts in design, general engineering and digital electronics, including the text used by Project Lead the Way.Rachel Rosenbaum, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Rachel Rosenbaum is a junior in Industrial and Systems Engineering with passions in project management and engineering education. She was in the Galipatia LLC freshman year, a CEED Peer Mentor sophomore year, and has recently started research with the ECLIPS team. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 First-year engineering program evaluation: Understanding senior students’ perceptions about their first-year experienceAbstractThis Complete Research paper
misconceptions (calleddistractors) are listed next to the correct answer for each question. Concept inventories areusually brief, require minimal or no computations and ideally, produce reliable results acrossbroad and diverse student populations.16 Many cycles of design, testing and redesign arenecessary to develop calibrated inventories that lead to repeatable results.12,16 Conceptinventories lend themselves nicely to statistical analysis and are easy to score. Inventories havebeen very popular in probing students’ conceptual understanding in engineering education.They have been effective in identifying trouble areas in engineering courses and in assessing theeffectiveness of new instructional methods and educational reforms.In thermodynamics, concept
Paper ID #33176Student Recognition, Use, and Understanding of Engineering for OnePlanet Competencies and Outcomes in Project-based LearningJames Larson, Arizona State University James Larson is a graduate of Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus. The general engineer- ing program in The Polytechnic School takes a project-based pedagogical approach when designing the curriculum. James has previously researched influences for this program design in examinations of the Maker Movement. Previous contributions to ASEE on this subject include conference papers, ”Sup- porting K-12 Student Self-Direction with a Maker Family
Paper ID #18635Toward Understanding the Impacts, Whys, and Whats Behind Mechatronic-based Projects and Student MotivationMr. John R. Haughery, Iowa State University Mr. John Haughery is currently a PhD graduate and lecturer in the department of Agriculture and Biosys- tems Engineering at Iowa State University pursuing a degree in Industrial and Agricultural Technology. His technical experience and interests include electrical power systems, industrial controls, and mecha- tronics. His research focuses on the integration of mechatronic-based projects into freshman engineering and technology curricula with the intent of
Paper ID #34467WIP: Enhancing Student Understanding of Impact Dynamics Using aJupyter-Based Simulation Tool for Injury AnalysisMr. Nicholas J. Caccese, CBE Consultants, Inc. Mr. Nicholas Caccese is a Technical Associate at CBE Consultants, Inc. Mr. Caccese is gaining expe- rience applying biomechanics to a variety of real-world problems, including: automotive collisions; falls from various heights and in various orientations; impacts from falling objects; injuries resulting from the misuse of a variety of devices; and amusement ride verification. After completing an M.S. and B.S. pro- gram in Biomedical Engineering at
Paper ID #9053Understanding the Benefits of the Flipped Classroom in the Context of Sus-tainable EngineeringJayne Marks, University of PittsburghKevin J. Ketchman, University of PittsburghDr. David R Riley II, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. David Riley is a faculty member in the Penn State Department of Architectural Engineering. His fields of expertise include education for sustainability, sustainable building methods, renewable energy deployment, and sustainable housing design. Dr Riley directed Penn State’s Center for Sustainability (now Sustainability Institute) from 2005 to 2013. He currently serves as
solutions to society’s infrastructure challenges,they must possess a deep understanding of engineering fundamentals so that they can tailordesign solutions to meet growingly-complex constraints. Since research suggests that studentconceptual development is enhanced through employment of engaging classroom practices, avariety of active pedagogies are being implemented in engineering education. Consequently,there is a need for assessment tools to monitor the learning outcomes of these educationalinterventions. Concept inventories have emerged as quick tools for examining conceptualunderstanding in a variety of engineering domains. While a concept inventory has beendeveloped for fluid mechanics, it was designed for application in mechanical
(almost three) engineering degrees, I wholeheartedly attribute my su ccess and persistencein engineering to my HBCU experience and unparalleled mentorship.How does your positionality impact how you relate to your participants?Unless a participant inquires or makes assumptions about my background, I often only explicitlydisclose my position as a graduate student in engineering education. I understand that my positionas a graduate student (outsider) may influence how the participants interact with me throughoutobservations and interviews. However, over the past few years, I have worked toward developinga relationship with the interdisciplinary engineering program by designing and delivering a guestlecture on diversity, equity, and inclusion in the
, tables, formulas) to solve problems. For instance, when a civilengineer designs a network of pipes to convey water to a city, they will use software based onformulas learned in college engineering courses, pipe manufacturer specifications provided astables, graphs, and figures, and other codes and specifications often presented in multiple ways.Similar contextual representations (CRs) are used in engineering courses to teach studentsfundamental engineering concepts. Research has shown that CRs can influence students’understanding of important engineering concepts, but less work has addressed how engineeringpractitioners interact with CRs as they use these concepts to solve problems. If educators are ableto better understand how engineering
Paper ID #22460Mechatronics and Academic Success: Towards Understanding the Impactsof Age, Major, and Technical ExperienceDr. John R. Haughery, Iowa State University Dr. John Haughery is currently a lecturer in the department of Agriculture and Biosystems Engineering at Iowa State University. His technical experience and interests include electrical power systems, industrial controls, and mechatronics. His research focuses on the integration of mechatronic-based projects into freshman engineering and technology curricula with the intent of increasing student engagement and motivation. John received his BS in Industrial
Supply Anal- ysis as well as Design and Analysis of Sprinkler Systems. Her research interests include fire protection systems, codes and standards, as well as educational effectiveness and women in STEM. She serves as the advisor to the OSU SFPE Student Chapter and is an active member in the Oklahoma Chapter of SFPE. She is a licensed Fire Protection Engineer in Nevada, California and Oklahoma. Prior to returning to OSU, Ms. Charter was a Senior Consultant for the Las Vegas office of Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc. Ms. Charter has been heavily involved in large mixed-use properties egress design. She has developed performance specifications and conceptual drawings for fire alarm and automatic sprinkler systems
, PA 17837Dr. Suresh Immanuel Selvaraj, University of Evansville Dr. Suresh Immanuel Selvaraj is an associate professor of civil engineering at the University of Evansville, IN. He holds a PhD degree from Auburn University and a licensed professional engineer. His research in- terests are in engineering education, pavement design and analysis, pavement management, and pavement instrumentation. At the University of Evansville, he teaches courses such as transportation engineering, soil mechanics, geotechnical engineering, advanced pavement design and management, and surveying.Dr. David A. Saftner, University of Minnesota, Duluth David Saftner is an Associate Professor at the University of Minnesota Duluth. He received a
Conference proceedings found 9 other papers mentioning its use (all since 2012).Study designThis paper focuses on the use of virtual interactives to increase conceptual understating in a 2ndyear Engineering Mechanics: Statics (hereafter ‘Statics’) course at Colorado State University.This paper is designed as a demonstration of developing virtual interactives in the GeoGebraplatform and using these interactives as the basis of learning exercises completed out of classwithin the Canvas Learning Management System (LMS) platform.Class descriptionTo better understand the use of the virtual interactives, it may be valuable to understand theformat of the course where they are being used. Statics is typically taken by students in their 3rdsemester of their
multiple institutions was analyzed. The ConceptInventory for Engineering Thermodynamics (CIET) and its Reversibility Sub-Test were used tomeasure conceptual understanding and change. Some classrooms used a series of inquiry-basedactivities in each key concept area as part of their instruction and some did not. Data was alsocollected on whether students had previously taken fluid dynamics and heat transfer courses.Finally, instructors were asked to indicate how they had implemented a packet of inquiry-basedactivities specifically designed to teach reversibility. Results showed that conceptualunderstanding of thermodynamics (five concept areas) as measured on the CIET wassignificantly higher for the inquiry-based activities group than the no
Paper ID #33185Five-minute Demo: Developing an Intuitive Understanding of SupportReactions Using an Interactive Teaching ActivityDr. Tonya Lynn Nilsson P.E., Santa Clara University Tonya Nilsson is a Senior Lecturer in Civil Engineering at Santa Clara University (SCU), where she regu- larly facilitates pedagogical training for other faculty. In 2020, Tonya received the School of Engineering Teaching Excellence Award and the SCU Brutocao Award for Teaching Excellence. Prior to joining SCU, Tonya was an Associate Professor at CSU - Chico. American c Society for
time at Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Understanding the gap between communication in the classroom and communication during an industrial internshipAbstractWhile it
else islacking in the controversy, careful review highlights some commonly held misunderstandings about thenature of intentional design and the engineering process. Understanding these misconceptions canprovide a guide for changes in engineering curricula. By exploring some of the assumptions about thedesign process that are implicit in these arguments we may gain insight into the learning aims and neededgoals for engineering design education.Introduction and BackgroundThree key components of the mechanisms described by evolutionary theory are random mutation, naturalselection, and time. Random mutation provides a basis for the variability within a population and its slowchange or drift with time. Natural selection provides the pressure that
AC 2009-714: DON’T PANIC! HOW TO INCREASE STUDENT INVOLVEMENTAND UNDERSTANDING IN AN INTRODUCTORY THERMO-FLUIDS COURSEKathryn Marlor, Michigan Technological University Ms. Kathryn Marlor is currently a Peace Corps Masters International student in Civil and Environmental Engineering. She will be starting her international work experience in March, 2009.Nathan Manser, Michigan Technological University Mr. Nathan Manser is currently a Peace Corps Masters International student in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Hewill be starting his international work experience in March, 2009.Gretchen Hein, Michigan Technological UniversityBrett Hamlin, Michigan Technological University
Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS), Master of Business Administration (MBA) and in Engineering Education (PhD). Homero has 15 years of international experience working in industry and academia. His research focuses on contemporary and inclusive pedagogical practices, industry-driven competency development in engineering, and understanding the experiences of Latinx and Native Amer- icans in engineering from an asset-based perspective. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society. American
understanding in STEM concepts. Some of the current interest in using comics in STEM education stems from the desiredprogression to STEAM (science, technology, engineering, art, mathematics). The United States wasranked first in innovation until 2008, and was ranked fourth by the 2015 World Economic Forum.36STEAM has become a prevalent acronym in secondary and higher education as a result of working toaddress the innovation gap. A joint resolution from the US House of Representatives in 2012 stated that,“adding art and design into Federal programs that target the STEM fields encourages innovation andeconomic growth in the United States”.37,38 An alternative approach to simply balancing the arts withSTEM is to enhance and promote STEM learning by
Paper ID #32340Using Quizzes Effectively: Understanding the Effects of Quiz Timing onStudent Motivation and Knowledge RetentionMajor John Case, United States Military Academy JOHN CASE is a U.S. Army Officer in his 12th year of active duty service and is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Systems Engineering at the United States Military Academy. He holds master’s degrees in Operations Research from Virginia Tech and Engineering Management from the Missouri University of Science and Technology. He is in the Operations Research functional area of the Army and has research interests in operations research, data
of design thinking to education contexts is not surprising. Scholars have notedsimilarities between design thinking and the models and practices used by expert instructionaldesigners3. For example, learner and context analysis are often important features of expertmodels and practices3–6 and connect to the empathic and user-oriented aspects of design7.However, scholars also recognize that differences between settings, even within instructionaldesign, may favor different practices4. Literature on the role design thinking can play ineducation settings is emerging, but more work is needed to understand how design thinking canbe applied to the design of engineering courses and curricula, and how the unique features ofthese settings may affect
) Program. His research and teaching interests include K-12 STEM education impact on post-secondary success, assessment and evaluation, DBER, and embedded systems software design. Professor Zion received his B.S. and M.S. from Rochester Institute of Technology and his Ph.D. in Cur- riculum and Instruction from the University at Buffalo. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Assessment of discrete concept knowledge and integrated understanding in introductory networking coursesAbstractTraditionally, the instructional approach to introductory courses in networking and networkingtechnologies has been to start with an explanation of each of the layers in either the
better, or that their commitment to changesociety for the better had grown while in college.9” Although these results are for collegestudents at large, they very likely included engineering students within the sample.Clearly, engineering students must be taught the basics related to their social responsibility asengineers. ABET student outcomes h (understand the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal, economic, environmental, and societal context), f (understanding of professional andethical responsibility), and c (design to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as …social, political, ethical, health and safety,.. and sustainability) all touch on these elements.Frequently, engineering’s impact on society and ethics are taught
Encyclopedia of Philosophy’s Ethics and Information Technology section. His research interests include engineering ethics, robot ethics, research ethics, and ethics assessment. His work has appeared in various journals including Science and Engineering Ethics, AI & Society, Communications of the ACM, the Journal of Academic Ethics, Ethics and Information Technology, IEEE Technology & Society, and Accountability in Research. Page 25.300.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Changing Engineering Ethics Education: Understanding ill-structured problems
Paper ID #27290Pushing and Shoving: Improving Student Understanding of Support Reac-tions with Hands-on DemonstrationsDr. Tonya Lynn Nilsson P.E., Santa Clara University Tonya Nilsson is a Senior Lecturer in Civil Engineering at Santa Clara University (SCU), where she regularly facilitates pedagogical training for other faculty. Prior to joining SCU, Tonya was an Associate Professor at CSU - Chico.Dr. Laura Doyle, Santa Clara University Dr. Laura Doyle is a lecturer in the Civil Engineering Department at Santa Clara University where she teaches undergraduate courses in civil engineers. Before coming to SCU, Laura was a
develop deeper understanding so that they could explain and communicate theconcepts better.Students were generally positive with respect to the projects as determined through post-semestersurveys for which they were encouraged to describe their feelings and supply feedback. Ageneral summary of the student responses to two main survey questions is presented in Table 4.Table 4. Summarized student feedback on the use of the projects (n= 92). Did you find that the projects were Did you find that the projects helped helpful in terms of your understanding you to better communicate chemical the concepts you addressed? engineering concepts?Yes 90
Engineering Education, 2021 Understanding eLearning Acceptance of Generation Z Students: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted instructional practices at educational institutions.Countermeasures included transitioning the majority of classes from primarily in-class learningto primarily eLearning. This shift has been met with varied levels of resistance and acceptance,while one study showed that 85% of higher education students prefer in-class learning [1].Models developed years ago don’t account for the dynamic nature of the education world and thestudents within it. As a result, there is demand for an understanding of the unique set of needspresented by Generation Z, the