who came from underrepresented groupsin engineering. Results indicate students increased their skills in several engineering tasks, theirconfidence and sense of belonging in engineering increased slightly, and students had fewerhesitations to declare an engineering major at the conclusion of the course than prior to thecourse.BackgroundInstitutions of higher learning, including the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA), areactively seeking to broaden participation in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) education and have systemic efforts in place to accomplish this goal. However, thestrategies of STEM programs that prioritize expanding access and inclusion of students fromunderrepresented groups into the classroom have
result, theyend up with a higher level of design skills because they can implement their higher levelelectronics designs. Lastly, the setup, use and curriculum for this facility has been disseminatedamong a wide group of educators. With a new educational emphasis towards concurrentengineering that combines an understanding of design and production, other institutions will beable to use this prototyping facility as a model in developing their own approach.Based on my discussions with industry employers and my own experience, I believe it isimportant for students to graduate with the knowledge on how to make their designs become areality. Without sacrificing other aspects of their education, we are able to improve our studentslearning experience
delivered.Team E had planned a Power Point presentation but suffered a disc failure the morning ofthe presentation; they had prepared overhead slides as a backup just in case, so no delaysresulted.Other professors usually attend the presentations and participate actively in the questionand answer period that follows each one. These other professors are from the technicalspecialties, so they probe for technical feasibility, covering the ground that I, with mydegrees in literature and English education, cannot. I take extensive notes during thepresentation so I can include their comments on the grade sheet.The presentations might pose a problem insofar as patenting any of these projectinventions is concerned. Included in our patent laws is a provision
subjects. It wasinteresting to note that almost all the participants cited a teacher’s attitude in middle and highschool as “very important” in determining an aptitude and/or interest in science or math. Inaddition, parental attitudes and expectations were of high importance. The remainder of the day Page 7.475.3 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright (c) 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationwas spent in mapping out the math/science curriculum strands by grade level, and tying socialstudies areas of concentration to these.Throughout the
Professional Aeronautics from Embry-Riddle University of Daytona Beach Florida. I am currently enrolled in the Technology Management PhD program at Indiana State University and expect to graduate in the fall of 2014.Dr. Leslie Pagliari, East Carolina University Dr. Leslie Pagliari serves as Associate Professor of Technology Systems and Associate Dean for Aca- demic Affairs in the College of Technology and Computer Science. Her research interests center on STEM initiatives, global supply chain issues, and new technologies in the distribution and logistics sec- tor. She was one of three professors in the United States recognized in an Inbound Logistics Article featuring leading professors in today’s supply chain curriculum
Professional Interest Council I, a position that gives her a seat on the ASEE Board of Directors. She is also the ASEE Pacific Northwest (PNW) Section Chair (2015 - 2017). Dr. Miguel has held several other officer positions across the ASEE including: Division Chair and Program Chair of the ECE and New Engineering Educators Divisions, and ASEE Campus Representa- tive. Dr. Miguel is also a member-at-large of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Heads Association (ECEDHA) Board of Directors. She has been a member of the ECEDHA Annual Conference Program Committee since 2013 and is serving on the Editorial Board for the ECEDHA Source monthly newsletter. c American Society for
citizens globally. This paper describes the role that HP University Relations is playing in theLatin America region in building engineering/science human capacity and infrastructure; fromengineering education activities, sponsored research, and infrastructure projects; to student andfaculty internships and the development of new technology communities. The paper willdescribe specific examples and the role of academia, government; non-governmentalorganizations as well as HP and other partners are playing. I. Introduction – on capacity building, technology infrastructure and innovationRecent research by ECLAC (UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean)[1] on the contribution of investment and other sources of funding to Latin
Learning in Acquisition of Knowledge, Soft Skills During Basic and Preclinical Sciences: Medical Students’ Points of View. Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 26(2), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2018.26.119-124.[3] Vaz, R., & Quinn, P. (2015, June). Benefits of a project-based curriculum: Engineering employers’ perspectives. In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 26-278).[4] Vasiliene-Vasiliauskiene, V., Vasiliauskas-Vasilis, A., Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I. & Sabaityte, J. (2020). Peculiarities of educational challenges implementing project-based learning. World Journal on
Pacific Southwest Regional ASEE ConferenceTransforming Engineering Education through Community Engagement, Entrepreneurship and Service Learning California State University, Fresno Fresno, CA 93740 March 31 – April 2, 2011 California State University ◊ Fresno Henry Madden Library ii The Conference Organizing Committee wishes to express its warmest gratitude to thefollowing
and strongly agreeing with this recommendation. The satisfaction ofCaterpillar with their participation and the project results is expressed in the following quotefrom Paul Watts in an email exchange following the program. “ . . . I am equally as glad the project was a success. We are actually building on one ofthe design ideas to implement as a cost reduction and I will keep you posted on developments.”Near the end of last year Paul informed me that design and manufacturing specifications hadbeen completed for the Team 1 redesign concept and production has resulted in a cost reductionof 28%. This program structure and implementation plan represents a model that can be adoptedby others to provide greater numbers of US and Chinese
Paper ID #42854WIP: Rewriting Capstone: The Unexpected Solution to Our Assessment ProblemDr. Janice Mej´ıa, Northwestern University Dr. Mej´ıa is an Associate Professor of Instruction in the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences. She also teaches in the Design Thinking and Communication (DTC), Masters in Engineering Management (MEM), and College Prep programs. Her research interests focus on mixed methods research in engineering education, curriculum assessment and development, and engineering identity. Prior to teaching at Northwestern, she worked in for-profit and non-profit sectors to optimize
Department of Education data.1 Design iscommonly thought of as the creation of a widget, such as a speaker system or an airplane engine,using certain design constraints. However, design can also encompass a process to achieve adesirable end result. Process engineering is widely utilized in manufacturing and chemicalengineering.2,3 In many instances designing how to make something is more challenging thanthe original design of the component. For example, in the pharmaceutical industry attainingstability in synthesized molecules is an immense challenge.4 A more common example, inmanufacturing, is how to make a machine component economically, since in most cases severalprocesses are possible (machining, casting, etc.). Manufacturing education commits
effectiveness in engineering education, energy management and thermal / fluid systems.Craig Sanders, East Caroilina University Dr. Sanders is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology Systems at East Carolina University. Page 11.87.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A New Undergraduate Course in Electromechanical Systems for Industrial Engineering TechnologyAbstractThere is an increasing need in engineering and technology educational practices toinclude interdisciplinary components. This paper describes key curriculum activities in anew electromechanical systems
Foundation (NSF), IUCEE Young Leader Award for the year 2015, and IGIP SPEED Young Scientist Award for the year 2014.He previously served as the President of the Student Platform for Engineering Education Development (SPEED) and the Vice- President for Student Engagement of the International Federation for Engineering Education Societies (IFEES) where he has led many student-based initiatives to help solve engineering education issues at the local and global level.Prof. Gopalkrishna H. Joshi, KLE Technological University I hold a PhD in Computer Science and Engineering. Areas of research: 1. Data Engineering 2. Engineering Education Research Current position: Professor and Head of Computer Science and Engineering
Paper ID #33514Fostering Entrepreneurial Mindset through a Hands-on Design Project in aMechanism Design CourseDr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Dr. Haolin Zhu earned her BEng in Engineering Mechanics from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and her Ph.D. in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from Cornell University, with a focus on computational solid mechanics. Dr. Zhu is a Senior Lecturer of the freshman engineering education team in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University (ASU) and the recipient of the Fulton Outstanding Lecturer Award. In this role, she focuses on designing the curriculum
with their freshman year inintroductory courses of specific engineering specialties. Subsequently, they are exposed tosystems engineering quantitative modeling and analysis techniques in several core courses at thejunior and senior levels. This approach builds up a promising systems engineering education thatreaches its highest point with the required systems engineering capstone design project. At thesame time, the current UALR Systems Engineering curriculum gives the graduates a solidengineering education in one of the following four option areas: electrical, computer,telecommunications, and mechanical engineering. This unique approach prepares graduates tobecome high-quality professionals in one of the above four areas, with the key benefit
field.The developed learning module has been implemented in a six-week curriculum and the projecteffectiveness is evaluated for enhanced faculty-student experiences during transferring researchknowledge to a two-year college educational curriculum. Page 25.60.2Learning Module Development: The learning module activities took place during the Summer-Fall 2011 period and included the legacy cycle and engineering design process concepts, theresearch experience and associated technical knowledge from the RETainUS program at TexasA&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK) laboratory, and the module implementation in afreshman level robotics course at Del-Mar
Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University Dr. Vimal Viswanathan is an associate professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at San Jose State University. His research interests include design innovation, creativity, design theory, additive manufacturing, and engineering education. He joined San Jose State University in 2016. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Sketching Instruction in Engineering Design with an Intelligent Tutoring Software AbstractEngineers who learn to sketch develop many essential skills, such as spatial visualization, designidea representation and fluency, and communication. However, most engineering programs
Session Number: A Comprehensive Energy Model Development for Off-Highway Vehicles Ayhan Zora*, Mohammed F. Fahmy, Recayi Pecen, Faruk Taban** Department of Industrial Technology, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa/ (*) Technology Center, Deere & Company, Moline, Illinois/ (**) Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NevadaAbstractUtilizing machine and thermal system simulations (vehicle energy models) can be very helpfulfor vehicle manufacturing companies to develop a machine with acceptable componenttemperatures, less heat loads to the vehicle cooling
graduation, Sanati-Mehrizy plans to attend medical school.Dr. Reza Sanati-Mehrizy, Utah Valley University Reza Sanati-Mehrizy is a professor of the Computing Sciences Department at Utah Valley University, Orem, Utah. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Oklahoma, Norman, Okla. His research focuses on diverse areas, such as database design, data structures, artificial intelligence, robotics, computer integrated manufacturing, data mining, data warehousing, and machine learning. Page 25.338.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012
Engineering Department at the University of Southern Indiana. He serves as the Director for the MS Industrial Management Program. He earned his BSIE and MSIE degrees in Industrial Engineering from Clemson University and his PhD in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech. His research and teaching interests primarily include lean manufacturing, discrete event simulation and modeling, and engineering economy. Tom has been involved in lean manufacturing and modeling of production lines since 1999. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Design and Implementation of a Course in Experimental Design and Technical WritingAbstractThis paper describes
paradigm? What is the current engineering paradigm? What arethe founding principles of our current paradigm? What’s the new paradigm look like and whatdoes it mean for education?The answer to the first question is clearly yes, as I will show through a description of this newworld view that more correctly models the modern world. The new world view I present appliesto all engineers, even though it is certainly not accepted yet by most engineers. This paper, then,presents an alternative lens through which to understand the world and see the route that we musttake.Engineers’ Current World ViewWe see our role as problem solvers and believe that nearly all problems can be solved, typicallyby breaking the problem down into smaller pieces. We also tend
the IACand discusses how the curriculum is enabling the PEOs. The MET Program used DirectAssessment (DA) and Indirect Assessment (IDA) methods to evaluate the student outcomes(SOs) of ETAC of ABET Criterion 3 (a) through (i) for the A.S. degree. The same process is alsoused to evaluate the student outcomes (SOs) of ETAC of ABET Criterion 3 (a) through (k), andalso the Department's MET specific Criteria (l) through (o) for the B.S. program. The specificcriteria (l to o) developed by the MET faculty reflect the characteristic essence of the coursesoffered through the MET curriculum which emphasizes design, materials, manufacturing, andfluid and thermal equipment areas. This focus in the MET curriculum is shown to have met thelocal industry
: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h)the broad education necessary to understand the
associatedwith the University entity that administrates summer programs, the income from the payingparticipants‟ off-set the awarded scholarships and did not impact the budget for the programactivities. Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2010, American Society for Engineering Education 10ActivitiesHands on activities performed in the camp were 3 hours long which included a 20 to 30 minuteintroductory lecture prior to commencement. Exceptions to this schedule included the roboticsactivity and the “I measure for treasure” activity. The “I measure for treasure
toxicity, can be made if investigations into the early stages (Phase I or II) of drugdevelopment are performed. It is important to work with drugs in Phase I or II of development,since these changes can be incorporated into the final manufacturing steps that are approved bythe FDA. By Phase III, “synthesis lock” and “process lock” prevent innovations from beingeasily implemented. The team is working on developing a heuristic that pharmaceuticalcompanies can follow in the development of new drugs. The specific objectives of this project are to identify reductions in the use of hazardouschemicals in a drug synthesis. The Rowan team first met with the Bristol-Myers Squibb staffand discussed several possible drugs at various stages of development
when they are integrated into the vehicle or systemto meet the requirements of the customer. Success as a systems integrator requires a goodunderstanding about customer needs, design constraints, manufacturability, and operator life-cyclecost issues to name just a few examples. Successful systems engineers must therefore be able tocommunicate with and understand the issues that are dealt with by a multitude of different peoplesuch as marketing, design engineers, manufacturing technicians, and maintenance personnel. Thissuggests a need for introducing more multi-disciplinary concepts using a team-based approach todesign problems in the Aerospace curriculum. The third and final lesson learned was the new emphasis on reducing cost. This need
educators, numerous universities have recast their curricula offering “cornerstonedesign” courses, some of which bear up to 3 credit hours for both semesters of the freshmanyear14-17. While it is undeniable that these courses have a positive effect on students, it must alsobe recognized that the implementation of cornerstone projects in the curriculum is costly in termsof faculty time, and departmental resources, making full blown adaptation of this approachunattractive for many engineering schools11-12. In a 2005 survey of first year programs Wankatand Brannan reported that Introduction to Engineering courses averaged 1.6 credits, and thatonly 21.9% of the engineering schools surveyed had 2-semester intro to engineering courses18.These statistics
, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues”3As evaluation of Student Outcomes now requires direct evaluation (for example, citing andtracking student performance in a particular course which demonstrates competence in a learningobjective), it is all the more important to design and evaluate learning tools (such as courses
Education and Human Resources, was that '….. all students learn[Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology] subjects by direct experience with themethods and processes of inquiry.'2 The inquiry-based method of learning by students in theCDW addresses these concerns. The approach, which incorporates both active and cooperativelearning models, arouses the students' natural curiosity, nurtures their sense of wonder andencourages wide-eyed exploration that can last a lifetime.A schematic of the CDW structure is illustrated in Figure 1. Modules I-IV refer to the four-course sequence which embodies the CDW's activities. Each semester, CDW students enroll inthe course that corresponds to their length of service. All students can only join the CDW in