creation,selection, and use of infographics, educators can provide students with a richer, more engaginglearning experience. Moreover, by teaching students to create their own infographics, educatorsare equipping them with essential skills for effective communication and critical thinking in theirfuture professional endeavors.Methodology for Evaluating the Effectiveness of InfographicsEvaluating the impact of infographics on learning outcomes, engagement, and retention involvesadopting a multi-faceted approach that encompasses both quantitative and qualitative metrics: 1. Learning Outcomes: Pre- and post-tests can be utilized to quantitatively measure the knowledge gained before and after the integration of infographics into teaching
Paper ID #46493Instructional Benefits of a Web-Based Students’ Concurrent Course RegistrationToolDr. Ke Tang, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Ke Tang is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Tang’s research focuses on engineering education, particularly on student-centered pedagogies, data-driven instruction, and interdisciplinary education.Dr. Thomas Golecki, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign I spent 10+ years in industry as an engineer in structural mechanics and structural health monitoring projects
sustainability remains more abstract. Tailoring thecurriculum to provide stronger examples and applications for social sustainability might helpaddress this discrepancy. Additionally, demonstrating through specific examples the relationshipbetween the three sustainability aspects, environmental, social, and economic, could also improvestudents’ understanding of how one aspect can quickly impact the other.The significant increase in students' interest in learning more about sustainability principlesindicates that the course was able to engage and inspire curiosity. This outcome is favorable, as itindicates that students are motivated to pursue further education or explore sustainability topics,which may translate into lifelong learning. This finding
information based on the analysis of college student data. Educationalchange has been shown to improve the wellbeing of society by provoking discussions aboutissues and events that had major impacts on society54. As indicated by the data analysis, there ismuch that still needs to be done to reducing the perceived barriers for women to enter careers inapplied physical science. Future changes to curriculum will generate new topics of debatedepending on how those changes manifest. Surveys of the perceptions of BC high school physicsstudents today may reveal new information about how these perceived barriers to careers in the Page 26.1734.11applied
-TEC Project Goal and ObjectivesThe goal of the BE-TEC project is to build on the success of a previous S-STEM program toincrease the graduation and retention rates for students in Engineering and Computing at UVUand develop their potential for success in the STEM workforce by providing scholarships toacademically talented students with financial need and by providing evidenced-based supportand activities to include intentional faculty mentoring, engagement in high-impact practices,professional preparation, and leadership opportunities [7].The Process objectives of the BE-TEC project are to: 1. “Scholarship Awards - Increase support of financially needy, but academically talented students (including students from underrepresented groups
, but relatively little has been done to address this particulartopic within engineering education. This paper discusses a new study abroad program developedand implemented at the University of Alabama at Birmingham which aims to increase globalcompetency in engineering students by focusing on world history from a technical perspectiveand by using experiential learning to engage students with the connection between historicalcontext and modern cultural and social differences. The three weeks of faculty-led travelthrough Germany gave the students first-hand exposure to historical and cultural sites, inaddition to university and industry visits and introductory language lessons. Work is underwayto create a complimentary semester-long, on-campus
due to a gap in skills such as communication and problem-solving [1]. Newlygraduated and employed engineers must be ready to engage in workplace learning as self-directed learners. This preparation must come from engineering learning experiences designed tohelp students transition from instructor-led learning (as is typical of pedagogy) to more self-directed learning (as is typical of adult learning or andragogy) across the curriculum [2].However, there is much fixation on pedagogical approaches and engineering science learning,wherein students work to solve predominately close-ended problems [3]. Andragogicalapproaches focus on students becoming self-directed individuals who rely on their bank ofknowledge and apply their skills to perform
students[38], [40], [41]. Ehlinger & Ropers [33] used narrative methods within a transformativeparadigm to look at the ways instructors can use their classroom cultures to make disabledstudents feel more welcome in their courses. They talked with instructors who said they caredabout students, created a community in the course, validated identities, and cultivated diverseviewpoints that facilitated disabled student learning. On the opposite end of the spectrum,Ehlinger & Ropers [33] found that instructors who expected students to fail, were difficult tocontact, or made it seem like certain types of people would not be enrolled in the course inhibiteddisabled student learning. For example, one student had an instructor tell their class that
very few Black students on campus and stick their face on the cover of arecruitment pamphlet to show the “diversity” of the university. I have not been asked to be onthe cover of a recruitment flyer, but I can speak on times where I felt like I had to be the solerepresentative of my community (Asian American/African American), especially when it comes todiscussions about diversity and equity in professional and/or academic environments. When I aminvolved in such discussions, there are times when I feel uncomfortable speaking on behalf of myrace because I am what is considered a “model minority.”Being a model minority is more common amongst the Asian American community where theperson is considered naturally smart, wealthy, hard-working
forthe purposes of data collection, but rather have the opportunity to build collective understandingand empathy across their experiences through these data collection methods. Collaboration offersan avenue for participants to further develop their understanding of the breadth of structuralsystems of oppression and the tangible impacts on their everyday lives as engineeringundergraduate students. We also engaged these methods to assist participants in developingfamiliarity with community organizing practices for systemic change through collective action.Data AnalysisThe data collection event resulted in approximately 45 pages of multimodal data. Memberchecking of the data was employed at various stages in the research, including live
AC 2011-1767: THE EFFECTS OF WORKED EXAMPLES ON CAD PER-FORMANCE: AN APPLICATION OF THE FOUR-COMPONENT INSTRUC-TIONAL DESIGN MODEL TO CAD INSTRUCTIONSpencer Barnes, North Carolina State University Spencer Barnes is an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Industrial Design at North Carolina State University (NCSU) and he teaches automotive design, parametric modeling, and surface modeling to undergraduate and graduate Industrial Design students. Spencer is a Technology Education doctoral candidate in the NCSU Department of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education as well. His re- search primarily focuses on engineering education and CAD. In particular, he is interested in the effective presentation and
to develop sample curricula the supported the BOK1. One of the majorcontributions of the Curriculum Committee was a review of the educational developmentliterature to find an appropriate framework that could link body of knowledge outcomes to actuallearning and achievement. The committee’s recommendation, as presented in the “Levels ofAchievement Report” was to adopt Bloom’s Taxonomy5, which is widely known and understoodwithin the educational and engineering education communities. This was a significantdevelopment in the “Raise the Bar” initiative as expected levels of achievement could be tied todemonstrable student achievement.Bloom’s taxonomy employs three distinct domains—the cognitive, the affective, and thepsychomotor. The cognitive
Scaffolding is often used to facilitate learning by providing supports that allow studentsto complete tasks that they would not otherwise be able to complete successfully. The researchliterature on the types and efficacy of scaffolding in the context of teaching and learning isextensive. Although there are numerous examples of scaffolding in large scale assessment, thereis relatively little research related to the impact of scaffolding in this context. With the need tocreate large-scale assessments aligned to the Next Generation Science Standards, which requiresassessing the integration of science and engineering core ideas with practices, knowledge aboutthe impact of scaffolding in assessment tasks on the measurement of students’ knowledge
Statistics Mean Effect n=75 Mean SD Difference T P Size Pre-Assessment 30.67 16.12 17.33 8.75 < .001 1.13 Post-Assessment 48 14.57Statistical analysis shows a statistically significant difference between the means for the pre- andpost-assessments; t(74) =8.75, p < .01. Students had not previously engaged in the topicsassociated with this unit and as a result they experienced high levels of learning. The resultsindicate that the technologically centered, hands-on learning experiences had a statisticallysignificant impact on average student
Jacob Marszalek Kathleen O’Shea University of Missouri-Kansas City Dan Justice Metropolitan Community College-Penn ValleyAbstractIn this paper, we explore the lived pandemic experiences of civil and mechanical engineeringstudents participating in a S-STEM scholarship program during the 2020-2021 academic year.The program, launched in 2020, is designed to facilitate the transfer of students from acommunity college to an urban-serving research university co-located in a Midwestern city.Findings reveal how the pandemic both challenged students and illuminated resiliency andsources of on- and off-campus support. A description of how findings have informed programgoals and implementation is
stakeholder engagement, more pivoting is observed. Exploringthe data and the in-class circumstances further, the following observations were made:● In F17, several in-class guests were invited to comment on student work during mid-semester presentations, resulting in student teams incorporating more suggestions, more significantly, than average.● Conversely, in F16, although ITD students had ample opportunity to understand the problem from the perspective of the users, the lessons failed to make an impact, possibly due to: ○ Variable depth of engagement and willingness to engage amongst students, ○ The quality of feedback provided to teams regarding their need to pivot, as program discussions on the benefits of pivoting
to other institutions and research areas, given the availability of relevant datasets and computational tools. • Skill Development: Engaging students in hands-on AI and data science projects fosters lifelong learning skills, such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and effective communication. • Collaboration: Partnerships with organizations like CT DOT provide students with practical exposure and demonstrate the societal impact of their work.Challenges encountered included limited computational resources and the steep learning curveassociated with advanced AI techniques. Addressing these barriers through targeted training andresource allocation will be crucial for broader adoption.CONCLUSIONThis paper
year, interacting with more than one mentor,continued interaction with mentor past the first year of activities, and the quotes shown below areall corroborating evidence of the beneficial impact of the mentoring activity. The approach usedfor mentoring, excluding the stipend as a ‘carrot’ can easily be adapted at other institutions.Informal feedback from Fellows that used the mentoring activity the most often forgot about thesecond half of the stipend. “We frequently communicated. With regular scheduled meetings, we also texted/emailed each other with any issues and concerns, shared progress and messages. My mentor gave me a lot of encouragement and guidelines for my future career.” (2017 Fellow
: Learners, contexts, and cultures. She is a fellow of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychologists (SIOP) and a fellow of the Association for Psychological Science (APS).Brittany Bradford Research Analyst, OpenStax, Rice University © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The development of collegiate STEM self-efficacy: A longitudinal study of first-year studentsAbstractThis NSF S-STEM Grantee poster examines the longitudinal impact the Rice Emerging ScholarsProgram (RESP), Rice University’s comprehensive science, technology, engineering, and math(STEM) summer bridge program, has on student
responsibility.g. An ability to communicate effectively.h. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context.i. A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning.j. A knowledge of contemporary issues.k. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.In addition, the following Program Outcomes specific to Mechanical Engineering programs arerequired:l. Knowledge of chemistry and calculus-based physics with depth in at least one.m. The ability to apply advanced mathematics through multivariate calculus and differential equations; familiarity with statistics and linear algebra.n. The ability to work
newcomers toget involved on many levels as an avenue for establishing a necessary supporting network. Thus,many of our actor/directors recognize that surrounding themselves with a great supporting cast isone key to developing and sustaining an academic and professional career.Networking, described as a strategy for building relationships providing benefit to the individual,is offered by 30 of the 62 respondents as the motivation behind getting involved. Ninety percentof these 30 students are upper division students (15% UD, 8% LD). That twice as many of thesemore experienced students recognize the value of engaging in relationships and activities thatpositively impact their academic performance is not surprising. As others have noted,10, 19
any area [21]. The Gallup-Purdue index went on to find how satisfied alumni were with their alma maters.It was found that if the alumni felt that their college prepared them for life, their engagement atwork was tripled. The important ways that the university environment prepared them for lifeincluded six elements. The student needed a professor that supported them, got them excitedabout learning, and encouraged their dreams. The more engaged employees also had meaningfulinternships, worked on a project that took a year or more, and were actively engaged inextracurriculars during their college career. Others continued the research to determine whattypes of interactions created the most impactful faculty-student interactions. They agreed
in 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic [5].In a very ad-hoc reflection, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and CulturalOrganization (UNESCO) stated that “the world was not prepared for an educationaldisruption on such an unprecedented scale, where schools and universities had to closetheir doors overnight, hastening to deploy distance education solutions to ensurepedagogical continuity” [6].Despite the above, Fada et al. [7] state that the educational community made considerableefforts to continue educational processes, aligning themselves with new scenarios anddeploying the best possible solutions for students. As presented in [8], research findingsmay identify resources or support that instructors may take advantage of in adapting
©Introduction and Objective Most engineering programs expect that their students will develop intellectually inaddition to acquiring knowledge and skills in a specific engineering discipline. However, nearlyall measures of student achievement are focused on content knowledge, process ability (e.g.design), or communication skills; students are assumed to be developing intellectually, especiallyin their ability to think critically, but rarely are meaningful data collected and reported whichsupport such an assumption. However, the recent movement towards outcomes assessm ent nowrequires reliable measures of students’ abilities to make reasoned decisions as they solvecomplex problems. For example, in the U. S. the Accreditation Board for Engineering
academicsuccess. It can be used with any student who is in the process of making decisions about his/heracademic future. It also encourages open dialogue between the student and professional thatmay promote a better understanding of student motivations.Model FocusFor minority engineering students there are a variety of factors that impact their academicperformance on college campuses. These factors might include the following variables:academic preparation, support systems, classmates, faculty, staff, peer group, family,community, historical orientation, and worldview. Page 7.4.7 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education
research focuses on student engagement and equity considerations in Computer-Aided Design (CAD) software education. She previously worked as Project Coordinator for the Engineering Collaboration for Online and Remote Education (E-CORE/CIEL Project), a national Canadian initiative to support instructors in shifting to remote instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic.Dr. Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto Alison Olechowski is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering and the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice. She completed her PhD at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). ©American Society for
researchfindings into video has advanced into creation of peer reviewed scientific journals, such asJournal of Visualized Experiments (JOVE). Other, more traditional journals include acomplementary short video summaries of published papers either on the journal website or ontheir YouTube channel. These short summary videos are outside of the subscription paywall andtry to entice purchase of an article for non-subscribers. The multimodal feature possessed byonline videos allows for more effective engagement and communication of complex concepts tothe general public [11].While our previous work started by utilizing videos to engage students in classroom, thispedagogy evolved into students reverse-engineering YouTube videos to create course relatedproblems
laser-focus their work on thetechnical aspects of technology. The reality is that technology is deeply intertwined with thesocial, economic, governmental, and environmental spheres. I used this research project tointervene in their laser focus. The novelty is the student-generated themes below, indicating thatthey have broadened their view.MethodologyThe students perform an independent research project to explore globalization’s impact on aproduct, company, industry, or community. Table 1 presents a taxonomized list of topics tohighlight the types of student interests. It is sometimes hard to distinguish between a product andan industry, so I organized it based on scale or specificity. For example, products are generally 1)specific, named, and
learned via the internship program, the graduate student developed aseries of PLC based laboratory exercises. He developed laboratory exercises to concentrate onthe knowledge and design skills needed on the job. The focus of these laboratories includedteaching ladder logic through binary logic, timers, counters, binary comparisons, and subroutinebasics. Using these techniques, the students learned how to establish communication with anAllen Bradley SLC 500, control a stepper motor, use binary masks to control outputs connectedto light emitting diodes (LEDs), and simulate a PLC with graphical monitoring of inputs,outputs, and variables. The laboratories helped expose the students to basic skills that are neededin industrial applications. In
summarized the problem, analysis, and proposedsolution in a one-page poster (about 30”x 40” in size), with the identification of team membersand foreign partners. We added this required deliverable for the second edition of the project toprovide students with training on visual communication and technical presentations. These postersalso serve as an archive for future students and a promotion for outreach programs for futureaudiences.The fifth deliverable was a final presentation (6-min, pre-recorded) highlighting the main findingsand a proposed solution. Presentations needed to consider the impact of the proposed solution inglobal, social, environmental, economic contexts and ethical impact, as requested by ABET inoutcomes two and four for