, and othernon-research institutions). Although NSF provides examples of such activities, there is currentlyno method by which to gauge grantee attention to the Broader Impacts Criterion or the success ofsuch efforts when they are asserted. To provide suggestions of possible metrics, The Center forthe Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) at the National Academyof Engineering (NAE), with NSF support, convened a workshop consisting of individualsbroadly representative of NSF’s grantee communities. The group suggested that, at a minimum,grantee institutions should provide both their existing affirmative action plans as well as specificinformation on collaborations with underrepresented institutions. In addition, the working
these high impact experiences, intentional marketing and participant recruitment wasused. Strategies included engaging students already a part of other URM in STEM programssuch as the Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP), as well as participants inan on-campus program for men of color called BRIDGE. These communities not only acted asready populations to recruit from but were also asked to share the experience with their peers,further enlarging the recruitment efforts. Additionally, a review of all STEM and/or racial/ethnicminority-centered student organizations was conducted, and information was shared with thoseofficer groups to share with their respective students. This snowball method of recruitment wassuccessful in
, Integrated Defense Systems Homeland Security and Services and has led a number of service and support-related programs such as Space and Communication Services, Reusable Space Systems, Naval Systems and Tactical Systems, Space Shuttle and submarine combat systems. Stephens serves on a number of non-profit and business focused boards and has been recognized for his long-standing leadership to local and national organizations. He is an advocate for aligning and integrating community leaders' actions to develop a future workforce capable of the complex critical thinking and skills necessary for success in aerospace and other innovative industries. Stephens was appointed to the
, distance or compressed (Feldhaus & Fox, 2004).5 Andfinally, based on a study by Davies & Graff (2005) students who failed their online coursesinteracted less frequently than their counterparts.6MethodWith all of this in mind, researchers desired to explore student engagement in one ethicaldecision-making engineering and technology course in the School of Engineering andTechnology at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) during a two yearperiod. Of particular interest was how the students’ final course grades were impacted by theiroverall site usage, chat and message activity. Researchers were also curious to learn both thestudents’ and instructors’ perspectives on communication, tools, chats and activity within
Paper ID #43745Report on a Student Community of Practice Program’s Impact on CareerPreparedness and Sense of Belonging Among Underserved UndergraduateStudents in the Electrical & Computer Engineering MajorDr. Rachael E Cate, Oregon State University Rachael Cate received her M.A.in rhetoric and composition from Oregon State University in 2011 and her Ph.D. in higher education leadership and research from Oregon State University in 2016. She joined the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Oregon State University as a member of the professional faculty in 2016. In this role, she provides engineering
National Science Foundation Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (NSF IUSE) program.REFERENCES[1] D. Wood, H. Marie, F. Aqlan, J. Brockman, K. L. Meyers, and D. Lapsley, "Replicating a Community-Engaged Educational Ecosystem: First Year Findings," presented at the American Society of Engineering Education, Baltimore, MD, June 25-28, 2023, 2023.[2] "The state of American jobs," ed: Pew Research Center, Washington, District of Columbia, 2016.[3] L. Cancado, J. Reisel, and C. Walker, "Impacts of a Summer Bridge Program in Engineering on Student Retention and Graduation," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 19, no. 2, 2018.[4] D. Wood, A. Gura, and J. Brockman, "Critical Findings in the Development of the Community
into conversation with NASA engineers, scientists, and managers, to discussthe long term ethical and societal implications of NASA’s human space exploration efforts fromthe Moon to Mars. Whereas some ASEE ethics division research focuses on the impact ofeducational discussions on students, ours involved practicing engineers as well as managers andpolicy analysts who shape the future of major engineering endeavors. While we will describe thiscase study in subsequent sections, we will point out some specific points of content in the reportnow, that may best serve as bridges for engaging in the engineering education literature.This paper seeks to further explore the concepts described in the workshop report, particularly asthey relate to
concept known as multi-dimensionaldiversity, extending diversity into race, gender, and socio-economic status, including adiversity of student ages, education, and cultural backgrounds. The fundamental aim ofBCe2 is to develop a system for STEM learning across different types of institutions thatis woven into the cultural fabric of the region - creating a ‘sticky environment’ forSTEM. As such, this effort seeks to impact attraction and retention across the STEMpipeline, but also attraction and retention of STEM professionals to the geographic regionin which the students and institutions are making contributions. The National ScienceFoundation recognized the potential for BCe2 to engage underrepresented groups inSTEM by funding research on the
) program, developed new assessments grounded in social science andeducation research10. We have revised our assessment instruments to study the impact of service-learning on our participants multiple times throughout the course of each project and willcollaborate with other programs on gathering data around the impacts of service-learning onengineering students and the community. We hope to also address the shortcomings of lowresponse rate within our current members.From our lessons learned, we have generated recommendations (outlined in Appendix B) to helpother student organizations.ConclusionAs an engaging part of students‟ education, the EFAC organization creates an opportunity forstudents from all engineering disciplines to participate in
recruitment and retention. Community engaged researchprojects have also been shown to strengthen institutional partnerships with surroundingcommunities through collaboration and action. [5] The objective of this work is to share a Fellowship program that provides early-stageundergraduate students an opportunity to participate in community-engaged research in aninformal, ad-hoc manner. Herein, we discuss goals, logistics, and outcomes of the first year ofthe fellowship program. Additionally, we introduce a survey instrument that will be utilizedduring the second year of the program to understand the impact of the fellowship on students’research identity and self-efficacy.1.2. The University of New Mexico Grand Challenges Program Grand
STEM Share Quality of presentations for students’ interest in graduate school Quality of presentation for students’ interest in science Ability of researchers to fully answer student questions Engagement of researcher with students during presentation Communication from Rice Office of STEM EngagementThere was close agreement for the following two components with nine out of ten selecting“Excellent” and one teacher indicating “Good.” Promptness and first impression of researchers for presentation date Communication from your pair or researchers The teachers also had an opportunity to provide open-ended feedback to three questions,similar to those asked of the participants. When asked what was most valuable
to serve in the community, engage in a hands-on project, and learn about one way that engineering can be used to serve globally. Theengineering students were assessed on their ability to communicate about engineering withnovices. It was evident that the engineering students initially struggled to explain the complexconcepts related to the project to the novice audience, but dramatically improved over time.ChallengesA number of first-year engineering students had bewildered looks on their faces when theoutreach project based on Design Squad was introduced. Many were nervous about working withyoung people and fearful that they were glorified babysitters. Since then, this has been addressedin part by inviting the students’ teacher to campus to
the lab after receiving a corporate donation, or sizable funding through a variety of waysincluding alumni, internal grants, and direct donation solicitation. All interviewees describedfilling a gap that existed at their institution because they had lacked a space or opportunity toprovide students with EGD-related experiences. Communicating the value of EGD research andlearning opportunities to industry partners was therefore highly recommended.Implementation and Research CapabilitiesThe aspirations of the space were to: • Provide students appropriate space, resources and tools to develop hands-on skills and act as a piloting ground for service-learning and community engaged learning projects that have a global impact
. He has additional appoint- ments in the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life and the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts. His current engineering education research interests focus on community engagement, service-based projects and examining whether an entrepreneurial mindset can be used to further engi- neering education innovations. He also does research on the development of reuse strategies for waste materials.Dr. Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc. Dr. Canney conducts research focused on engineering education, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sus- tainability
environments where they feel a solid connectionto their field [8]. One way to foster students’ motivation in the programming classroom is todeliver tailored courses that engage students in activities relevant to their own disciplines andfavor authentic tasks [9]. Forte and Guzdial [10] reported that engineering students enrolled inan introductory programming course with programming language and skills tailored toengineering needs had lower D -grade, withdrawal and failure rates compared to those enrolledin a traditional course. The students who took the tailored course also commented that theylearned useful content. Pullu and Gomleksiz [11] investigated the impact of authentic task-oriented applications on undergraduate students’ attitudes and success
collaboration skills among students. The students learn the theories while simultaneously applying them using hands-on projects. This approach has been very effective across the borders of different STEM and engineering disciplines [3, 4]. • Flipped Classrooms Learning: This approach reverses the traditional teaching and learning processes by having students watch videos and complete readings before class using class time to complete hands-on activities, problem-solving, and discussions [5]. 1 • Project-Based Service Learning: This approach has also been referred to as Community Engaged Learning. Through this learning approach, the students work alongside organizations
management. Penn State Greater Allegheny waschosen as an ambassador team for the 2014-2015 grant cycle. Following a seminar given byGTECH Strategies about the project, students were surveyed regarding their interest in theproject and the perceived impact on the community of rehabilitation of a site in the local area. Asite was chosen from a pool of vacant land owned by the city.Site design was based on a student survey in partnership with landscape architects from GTECHStrategies. For the students a common theme was recreation and gathering space. Duringstakeholder engagement discussions with GTECH Strategies and the student group, it waschosen to build a community garden/gateway for students to utilize on campus. Elements of thespace include a
has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Dr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene
Template for Engineering Design CoursePurpose of the StudyThe purpose of this study is threefold. First, we seek to contribute work that casts a positive,opportunities-driven light on engineering opportunities for rural students, teachers, and communitypartners. Second, this paper and the DeSIRE project will serve as a case study for othercommunity-engaged engineering education researchers to use for their ownschool-university-community collaborations. Third, through qualitative methods, we aimed to answerthe following research questions: 1. How and to what degree does the engineering design-focused program impact teacher STEM content and pedagogical knowledge and awareness of STEM educational pathways and occupations? 2. How
stakeholder engagement,end-user testing, mass-manufacturing, and assembly. More importantly, GOAL presents anopportunity for UMD students to actively work toward equitable educational access, a complexproblem providing impact experienced directly within the students’ own local communities, bothgeographic and professional. This involvement grants our engineering undergraduates directagency toward solving a local “grand challenge”, empowering them to utilize their skills toconnect with their communities and engage with social challenges.In addition to the teacher involvement during implementation, fifteen (15) teacher partners weredirectly involved in the design process of the version two kit. Undergraduate student classesworked closely with teacher
-solving have also shown benefits for the achievement and attitudes ofurban minority students, particularly African-American boys [45]. With open-ended activities,students can more readily make connections with their interests and prior experiences, and theyhave more reason to listen to and respect the views of others [46].In the real world, engineering problems rarely have one unique solution—much depends oncontext and constraints. To communicate this feature of engineering to children; to fostercreativity, problem solving, and innovative thinking; and to engage children who may havechecked-out of rigid school activities that must result in one answer, EiE creates designchallenges that afford a myriad of solutions. The challenges identify a set
, sustainable transportation, travel demand modeling, , land use-transportation interaction modeling, and transportation safety. Dr. Mitra’s current research focuses on how technological advancement in transportation can best serve the disadvantaged population through the integration of transportation systems, economic activities, and land uses. He was a recipient of the Environmental Excellence Award from the Federal Highway Administration and his research on carless households was awarded the Public Impact Fellowship in 2016. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 20241 Work in Progress: Designing a Community-led Bike Share Program for a2 Small US City - Evidence from
this coordination and meet our student engagement goals, we hosted several planningmeetings with members of the demonstration communities prior to the launch of BuiltEnvironment Team efforts. During these meetings we prioritized the needs of the communities,identified faculty and staff across campus with related expertise, defined undergraduate andgraduate student projects, and developed a plan with well-defined deliverables.Built Environment Team Case StudiesThe Built Environment Team holds biweekly meetings where the students have an opportunity toreport on their research and obtain input and guidance from the team members. In addition tothese biweekly meetings, faculty and staff from the Civil Engineering Department and SSCRCmeet regularly
Engineering in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She also serves as Director of the Craig and Galen Brown Engineering Honors Program. She received her BS, MS, and PhD from the College of Engineering at Texas A&M. Kristi works to improve the undergraduate engineering experience through evaluating preparation in areas, such as mathematics and physics, evaluating engineering identity and its impact on retention, incorporating non-traditional teaching methods into the classroom, and engaging her students with interactive methods. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Impact of Satellite campuses on undergraduate student experience in comparison
-- from tinkering with their own teaching innovationsand practices to evaluating their impact on learning and engagement to then sharing the resultswith the community-- CEE could offer more support for faculty related to DEI. With adevelopmental trajectory in mind, we suggest the following DEI supports, though also anticipatethat additional feedback and evaluation will expand and refine this list: ● A curated set of papers that provides accessible frameworks about power and explanations for currently preferred terms, whether published in CEE or elsewhere [6, 13, 15]. ● Exemplar papers that are not about DEI, but that treat DEI as omnirelevant, such as by explaining the limitations of a study sample that does not include students
and 5 representing Strongly Agree.We expect that the closer the averages are to “5,” the more likely the program is demonstratingstrength in relation to the goal.ConclusionsThese LLPs illustrate the meaningful impact that well-structured, community-centeredliving-learning programs can have on undergraduate engineering students. Through theirintegrated model, which combines community, support, and inclusion, these programs supportstudents holistically during a critical period of their educational journey. As evidenced byretention outcomes, positive student feedback, and deep engagement in co-curricularopportunities, the programs foster belonging, confidence, and persistence.Students benefit from close peer relationships formed through shared
differentfrom his/her home country will not be same as that of the students working in their homecountry. This transcript describes how an NSF funded international research experiences inMexico impacted the Industrial Engineering (IE) students who participated in this project. Thestudents worked with companies that had operations in Queretaro, Mexico, over the summer,including several multi- national firms. The students were required to take Spanish, a researchmethods course at Monterrey Tech, Queretaro, and perform research as part of their program.The impacts of learning, communicating and presenting final results in Spanish are evaluated. This research describes the results two cohorts of students and their experiences over the lastcouple of
support from their familyand may be required to hold a job outside of their college class load [28]. While there is somedebate about the correlation of academic performance and working while enrolled in bothpositive [51, 52] and negative [27] manners, the findings that first-generation students are lessinvolved on campus and less connected with peers can be further impacted by heavyemployment workloads and associated time commitment [28].Nationally, attention has been drawn to first-generation students through a variety of avenues,including centers, conferences, and dedicated recognition events [53]. The SD-FIRST programwill be the first concerted effort aimed at the success of first-generation students on the SDMines campus. The program will
. This programall teams are up to speed and ready to participate. Our proactive encourages participants to engage in trial and error, allowingapproach focuses on encouraging teams to engage deeply with them to fail early and often with the objective of refining theirthe training materials, consistently reminding them of their skills to achieve practical outcomes, thereby gaining valuablecapability to successfully compete with adequate preparation. experience, success, and confidence. Over three intense weekly During the event, teams are expected to utilize the skills training sessions, one hundred participants are introducedthey have honed in
increased.”Research by Eyler and Giles on service learning, the experiential education method that utilizes acycle of action and reflection focused on the application of learning to community problems, showsthat more rigorous reflection leads to better learning outcomes [28]. Students who engaged indeeper reflection had a deeper understanding of the subject matter, found it easier to apply theirknowledge, and were more able to tackle related problems. They were also more open to new ideasand showed superior problem-solving and critical thinking skills.However, Welsh pointed out that “instructors…merely telling students ‘it is now time to reflect’is a clumsy approach for them and students alike” [29]. In other words, simply instructing studentsto