AC 2007-735: SPEAKING TECH TO POWERDavid Bodde, Clemson University Dr. David L. Bodde Dr. Bodde is a professor of engineering and business at Clemson University and a Senior Fellow at Clemson’s Spiro Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership. Dr. Bodde serves on the Board of Directors of a variety of companies: Great Plains Energy (a diversified energy company and electric utility), the Commerce Funds (a mutual fund), and several privately held ventures. His past experience includes Vice President of the Midwest Research Institute, Assistant Director of the U. S. Congressional Budget Office, and Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Department of Energy. He recently
], p. 14]. Although research ethics has beengradually incorporated in graduate education, particularly on sites that receive NIH funding,education on the ethical dimensions of applying S&E research to societal needs exists only in ahandful of programs now funded by NSF’s Ethics Education in Science and Engineering (EESE)(e.g., Penn State, University of Texas, and University of Virginia). Our HEE project seeks toadopt the best practices of such reform efforts and to bring ethical education in the application ofresearch to societal needs by developing and implementing new curricula in humanitarianengineering ethics.Methods and procedures
inform otherresearchers and instructors how to help students develop mathematical and computationalmodeling skills, especially in a programming course. This work is part of a larger NSF studyabout the impact of varying levels of modeling interventions related to different types of modelson students’ awareness of different types of models and their applications, as well as their abilityto apply and develop different types of models.IntroductionEngineers must understand how to build, apply, and adapt various types of models, includingmathematical and computational models, to be successful. Modeling is fundamental for manycore undergraduate engineering courses, though it is rarely explicitly taught [1]. There are manybenefits to teaching modeling
instructional media had a strong effect on student achievement, while the effectof instructor differences was negligible. Selection bias, novelty factor, differences in instructionaldesign and social threats to the internal validity of the study were also rejected as a possibleexplanation for the observed differences in achievement.I. IntroductionBackgroundThe study was situated in the sixth semester Control Systems course (ELE639) in anundergraduate program in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Ryerson University in Toronto,Canada. Hypermedia (text, graphics, video and sounds, linked in a non-linear, associative manner)have been introduced into the course to support experiential learning 1, 2 . A pilot project 3 withclassroom hypermedia
Paper ID #26878Exploring K-12 Teachers’ and School Counselors’ Beliefs about Engineeringin High School: A Case Site in Virginia (Fundamental)Kai Jun Chew, Virginia Tech Kai Jun (KJ) Chew is a PhD student in the Virginia Tech Engineering Education department. In the past, he has been involved in the engineering education field by working with Dr. Sheri Sheppard, engaging in multiple projects, such as ABET accreditation, curriculum redesign and others.Dr. Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech Cheryl Carrico is a part-time faculty Research Scientist for Virginia Tech and owner of Cheryl Carrico Consulting, LLC. Her current
number of items was aggressivelyminimized by primarily focusing on the motivational constructs. The motivational subscales onthe MSLQ were deemed more important than learning strategies for supporting the goals of thebroader curriculum development project. Only two learning strategy subscales were used.Peer-learning was chosen because of its potential importance to planned curricular interventionsinvolving team projects and small-group work. Metacognitive self-regulation was chosen becauseof the relatively high correlation with final grade reported by Pintrich, et. al. [19] and theimportance of metacognition in active-learning settings. The metacognitive self-regulationsubscale was further shortened from the original twelve questions to six, as
). The scaling was adapted from Seymour et al, Student Assessment of Learning Gains Survey[18]. There was also a not applicable category for students to select if a strategy was notemployed in their specific learning environment. The items for this section of the SES involvedinstructor and TA specific activities, technologies employed (e.g. Zoom/WebEx chat),discussions, and questioning, to name a few. The second section of this survey had studentspecific activities that were rooted within the chosen theoretical framework and theconceptualization of engagement (affective, behavioral and cognitive) adapted from themotivation and engagement survey [19] and the learning propensity survey [20]. This section had21-items with the student-centered
explore engineeringconcepts, to investigate solutions to problems too complex for hand solutions, to analyze andpresent data effectively, and to develop an appreciation of the power and limitations of computertools. Students are introduced to such ideas as interpolation, curve-fitting, and numericdifferentiation and integration, through applications areas such as data analysis, imageprocessing, communications, position tracking, basic mechanics, and system modeling.The Engineering Models sequence was required for all incoming first-year engineering andengineering technology students starting with the 2012-2013 academic year. Lectures, recitationactivities, homework assignments, exams, and projects were common across all sections, thoughsome
Science, Lab on a Chip, and had an AIChE Journal cover. She is an active mentor of un- dergraduate researchers and co-directed an NSF REU site. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activities in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne has been an active member of ASEE’s WIED, ChED, and NEE leader- ship teams since 2003 and during this time has contributed to 36 ASEE conference proceedings articles and 6 educational journal publications.Dr. Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University Roger Green received the B.S. degree in electrical and
Paper ID #42897Getting Started Teaching an Undergraduate Engineering LaboratoryDr. Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Rebecca M. Reck is a Teaching Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research includes alternative grading, entrepreneurial mindset, instructional laboratories, and equity-focused teaching. She teaches biomedical instrumentation, signal processing, and control systems. She earned a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State University, and a B.S
Paper ID #7904Work-in-Progress: Design of an Online Learning CoachDr. Fred W DePiero, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Fred DePiero received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Michigan State Uni- versity in 1985 and 1987. He then worked as a Development Associate at Oak Ridge National Laboratory until 1993. While there he was involved in a variety of real-time image processing projects and several laser-based ranging systems. Dr. DePiero began working on his Ph.D. at the University of Tennessee while still at ORNL, and completed it in May 1996. His research interests include
Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests include graduate education, curriculum development, faculty development, global engineering education, and education policy.Ms. Michelle Soledad, Virginia Tech, Ateneo de Davao University Michelle Soledad is a doctoral student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests include faculty development and data-informed reflective practice. Ms. Soledad has degrees in Electrical Engineering (BS, ME) from the Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU) in Davao City, Philippines, where she continues to be a faculty member of the Electrical Engineering Department. She also served as Department Chair and was a
courses. Dr. Kim and his collaborators attracted close to $1M in research grants to study writ- ing transfer of engineering undergraduates. For technical research, he has a long-standing involvement in research concerned with the manufacturing of advanced composite materials (CFRP/titanium stack, GFRP, nanocomposites, etc.) for marine and aerospace applications. His recent research efforts have also included the fatigue behavior of manufactured products, with a focus on fatigue strength improvement of aerospace, automotive, and rail structures. He has been the author or co-author of over 180 peer-reviewed papers in these areas.Dr. Franny Howes, Oregon Institute of Technology Franny Howes is chair of the Department of
: Designing Program Educational ObjectivesAbstractIndustrial Engineering programs prepare graduates for a wide range of jobs in a wide range ofindustries. Having faculty members choose a focus for a program, design a new program, orredesign an existing Industrial Engineering program can be contentious. This paper presents amethod, using descriptions of real jobs, to help faculty members talk about the types of jobs forwhich the program is preparing graduates and to talk about how well the program is preparinggraduates for those jobs. The method allows agreements and disagreements to emerge andprovides a way to talk about them. This method has obvious applications in designing programeducational objectives and in reviewing and updating program
AC 2009-2132: LEARNING STYLE, STUDENT MOTIVATION, AND ACTIVELEARNINGWilliam Birmingham, Grove City College Professor of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Chair of Computer Science Department, Grove City CollegeVincent DiStasi, Grove City College Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, Professor of Chemistry,Grove City CollegeGary Welton, Grove City College Professor of Psychology, Assistant Dean of Institutional Assessment,Grove City College Page 14.841.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Learning Style, Student Motivation, and Active LearningAbstractFor the past two
on managing creativity and innovation in the area of nano-enabled technologies.Prof. Bryan Douglas Huey, University of Connecticut ˜20 year scholar working with nanotechnology, especially the characterization of materials properties at the nanoscale by applying and advancing variations of Scanning Probe Microscopy.Dr. Leslie M Shor, University of Connecticut Leslie Shor is an Associate Professor of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Connecticut. She mentors an interdisciplinary research team working at the interface of chemical engi- neering, microbiology, and advanced manufacturing. Current projects in her lab are focused on gradient bioengineering for next-generation biofuel production
on projects utilizing neural networks for predicting fatigue life and implementing Six Sigma for the development of torque standards. Her teaching interests include robotics, engineering statistics, quality assurance, and Six Sigma.Dr. Garth V Crosby, Southern Illinois University Carbondale Dr. Garth V. Crosby is an assistant professor in the Technology Department at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. He obtained his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Florida International University in Computer Engineering and Electrical Engineering, respectively. Dr. Crosby’s primary interests of research are wire- less networks, wireless sensor networks, network security and active learning strategies for STEM. He has served as
AC 2012-3937: COMPARING FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING TECHNOL-OGY PERSISTERS AND NON-PERSISTERSMr. Martin John Wagner, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Martin J. Wagner is a graduate student in the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. He is working on his master’s of science in technology. He is an IT Project Leader for Indiana University. He is also Adjunct Faculty for the IUPUI Kelley School of Business.Prof. Barbara Christe, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Barbara Christe is an Associate Professor and Program Director for biomedical engineering technology at Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis. Prior to teaching, Christe was a Clinical Engineer at the
applications, where students highlight prior motivatingexperiences and their degree of engineering intent, and individual entrance interviews. The curricularfoundation of the program, the Capabilities of Effective Engineering Leaders [10], was developedthrough a series of workshops spanning several months at the program's inception attended byfaculty and scholars in engineering and leadership, successful practitioners from industry, andmilitary leaders. The program's core structure is described in more detail by de Weck et al. [14],and can be summarized as consisting of three "legs": 1) an Engineering Leadership Lab (ELL)where students meet weekly in small teams to face leadership challenges keyed to the Capabilities,2) an Engineering Leadership class
Professorships, two national ASEE teaching awards, and is internationally recognized in his primary research field.Ms. Kristen Strominger, University of Cincinnati - School of Energy, Environmental, Biological and MedicalEngineering Kristen Strominger is the STEM Program Coordinator working under Anant Kukreti on the NSF Type 1 STEP Project in the School of Energy, Environmental, Biological and Medical Engineering at the Uni- versity of Cincinnati (UC). Kristen completed her master’s degree in Higher Education, Student Affairs at Florida State University in Tallahassee, Florida previous to beginning her position at UC in July 2012. She plans, designs, evaluates and modifies programs supported by the NSF Type 1 STEP Grant in the
-M in 2003, she was the Richard L. Terrell Professor of Excellence in Teaching, founding director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, and associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. In her current role, she coordinates faculty and TA professional development in the College of Engineering, conducts rigorous engineering education research, and promotes the growth of engineering education both locally at UM and nationally. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include evaluating methods to improve teaching, studying faculty motivation to change classroom practices, and exploring ethical decision-making in engineering students. She also has established a national
/slcehighered/38.13- Astin, A. W., Vogelgesang, L. J., Ikeda, E. K., & Yee, J. A. (2000). How service learning affects students. Higher Education. 144. http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slcehighered/144.14- Rodriguez, M. C. G. M., Soto, M. G., Dzwonczyk, R. R., Merrill, J. A., Greene, H. L., & Cater, M. (2014, January). Application of Sustainable Solutions in International Service- Learning Engi-neering Projects. In American Society for Engineering Education.15- Kokkelenberg, E.C. & Sinha, E. Who succeeds in STEM studies? An analysis of Binghamton University undergraduate students. Economics of Education Review, 29, 147-164.16- Geisinger, B.N. & Raman, D.R. (2013). Why they leave: Understanding student attrition
are part of theProfessional Development series described in this paper. Her research focuses on simulating fineparticulate matter at the local scale and analyzing indoor air quality health impact assessments.Antigoni C. Konstantinou, University of ConnecticutAntigoni Konstantinou is a doctoral student in Materials Science at the University of Connecticut.Her research focuses on materials development for electric motor insulation. She is a graduateteaching assistant for the Professional Development Course Series and a core undergraduate coursefor first-year undergraduate students.Ayah Abdallah, University of ConnecticutAyah Abdallah is a doctoral student in Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at theUniversity of Connecticut. Her research
AC 2011-2096: EXPLORING CURRICULUM FLEXIBILITY AND COM-PLIANCE THROUGH THE USE OF A METRIC FOR CURRICULAR PRO-GRESSIONGeorge D Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette George D. Ricco is a doctoral student in Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education. He previ- ously received an MS in Earth and Planetary Sciences studying geospatial imaging and an MS in Physics studying high-pressure, high-temperature FT-IR spectroscopy in heavy water, both from the University of California at Santa Cruz. He has a BSE in Engineering Physics with a concentration in Electrical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University. His academic interests include longitudinal analysis, visualization, semantics, team formation
Paper ID #38387Mentor Perspectives of Apprenticeships for Community College STEM Ca-reersMs. Sara E. Rodriguez, University of Texas, El PasoDr. Benjamin C. Flores, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Benjamin C. Flores joined the faculty of the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) in 1990 after receiving his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Arizona State University. He is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering.Dr. Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Chandra Turpen is a Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics at the University of Maryland. She has expertise in physics
Asia, Europe and the US. The exposure to different countries and cultures gives her a unique perspective on intercultural personal and professional relationships. She strives to leverage her own international experiences as an engineer to encourage engineering students to study abroad. She is passionate about the need to encourage more globally-minded engineers to keep up with the increasingly connected environment. Through her initiative and direction, the International Engineering Programs at UF has gain great exposure and led to many more engineering students pursuing an international experience, whether through study, research, intern, or service learning.Randy Collins Randy Collins is a Professor of Electrical
study in engineering and computer science. SMU islocated in a smaller town situated within a large urban area. SMU’s student population isapproximately 11,000 of which approximately 6,000 are undergraduate students. The LyleSchool of Engineering undergraduate population is approximately 1,000. Undergraduate degreeprograms in the Lyle School of Engineering include: civil engineering, environmentalengineering, electrical engineering, engineering management, computer engineering, computerscience and mechanical engineering.BackgroundOne of the overarching goals of the program was to increase retention of undergraduateengineering students, particularly throughout the pivotal first two years of study. The impact onthe persistence/retention of
groups at Northwestern 13, 14-16, NorthCarolina at Chapel Hill , University of Louisville 17, 18, 19, and Michigan State University20, 21 . These groups have published a set of conference papers, journal publications, andbooks that highlight the fundamental topics related to nanoscale science and engineering.For example, Stevens, Sutherland and Krajcik 21, identified the Big Ideas of Nanoscienceat the 7-12 levels. However, these “Big Ideas” may not be applicable to post-secondarynano-education.A few research studies have recently commenced to identify the core concepts ofnanotechnology in the undergraduate curriculum. For instance, Wansom et al.,16informed by academic course/degree program analyses and university research faculty
" Fellowship award for the years 2003-2004 and 2007-2008. He has also been cited in multiple publications of the "Who's Who" series. His research interests include Similitude and Scaling Theory, System Dynamics, Non-Linear Dimensional Analysis and Rapid Prototyping with specific emphasis in Selective Laser Sintering and applications in Product Design.Cameron Booth, University of Texas, Austin Cameron is a PhD student in the Mechanical Engineering department specializing in Dynamic Systems and Controls, and a recepient of the Thrust Fellowship. Cameron received his undergraduate education from Georgetown University and has worked for about 2 years as a Teaching Assistant for the Computers and
AC 2012-5064: ART FOR THE SAKE OF IMPROVING ATTITUDES TO-WARD ENGINEERINGProf. Jean Hertzberg, University of Colorado, Boulder Jean Hertzberg is currently Associate Professor of mechanical engineering at CU, Boulder. Her research centers around pulsatile, vortex dominated flows with applications in both combustion, and bio-fluid dy- namics. She is also interested in a variety of flow field measurement techniques, and has recently begun work in engineering education research. Hertzberg teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in mea- surement techniques, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer, design, and computer tools. She has pioneered a spectacular new course on flow visualization, co-taught to