engagement in engineering education systemically through a greater understanding ofschool environments that support engineering experiences for students. This work explores theexperiences of high school administrators as participants in e4usa, a national project aimed atbroadening participation in engineering at the high school level. High school administrators serve an important role in establishing school climate andgoals and can have a positive influence on student outcomes [4]. Prior work has also exploredthe influence of administrators in teacher decision making with regard to their classroom andadoption of curriculum [5,6]. While few studies have explored adoption of engineering initiativesexplicitly from administrator’s perspectives
problemsolving and research activities that are not provided by most course-only MS degrees. Thedirected project is less formal than a thesis with the objective to engage the student in an industrybased study culminating in a report. The topic is generally more practical than a thesis and isexpected to be completed in one semester7. A total of three credit hours are included in thestudent’s plan of study for a directed project as opposed to the six credit hours for a thesis. Thedirected project was intended as an applied research project that was more extensive than agraduate-level independent study but less rigorous than a Master’s thesis. Because of the regularstudent contact made available by the synchronous delivery platform, the use of a
students to have improved technical communication skills hasbeen well documented, perhaps most clearly in the ABET criteria3. Teaching communication aspart of engineering curricula has been tried in many ways, a good overview of which is presentedin Ford and Riley4. Adding technical communication to the freshman curriculum was one of thecentral reasons for reforming the courses at ONU. Some of this work has resulted in previouspublications5,6. The first of these courses, Freshman Engineering 1, includes objectives related totechnical communication and exposing students to the engineering profession.As the model of a Scholar/Teacher was being discussed at the 2006 ASEE National ConferencePlenary Session2, Dr. Sheri Sheppard stated that the
abilityto perform a particular task or to succeed in a particular domain [10]. Self-efficacy is known todevelop through repeated successes, where the negative impact of failures is diminished by thesesuccesses [18], [28] - [30]. Studies comparing the self-efficacy of females and males found that,females are more likely to derive self-efficacy from verbal reinforcement, strong social networks,mentors, and other positive social influences, whereas males have been shown to derive self-efficacy through the mastery of a task [14]. Research that focused on self-efficacy of female andmale students revealed that female students had higher self-efficacy than males in areas wherethere was support and mentorship [10], [18]. Social influences that include
learning skills,5 promoting collaborative learning5 and personalized learning,6 andincreasing classroom engagement.6 Investigating one specific benefit, Stickel et al.7 surveyedstudents and found that the level of faculty student interaction increased with the invertedclassroom model compared to a traditional classroom, which is to be expected since that is aprimary goal of the inverted approach. Lifelong learning is a goal of higher education and thepotential of the inverted classroom approach to improve lifelong learning makes it desirable. AsTalbert says, in a traditional classroom students are unable to gain lifelong learning skills like:“… the ability to identify when one’s personal knowledge runs short and when to seek out moreinformation
summary of the process to arrive at a final dataset of 13 papers, thechallenges in the process, and the refinements made at each step are outlined.Conclusion – There are several preliminary conclusions to be drawn, many of which will not besurprising to the engineering librarian community. The dataset came down to just 13 itemsbecause much of the EIL literature is based on student self-report data on how the class went, orwas it enjoyable, rather than on actual student learning gains. As such, these papers did not meetthe criteria for demonstrated learning gains as a measure of effectiveness. In addition, somepapers were excluded for lack of clarity about methods. In these studies it is not evident howeither the intervention and/or the assessment
University’s NSF S-STEM award #1458735 ”Enhanc- ing Engineering Talent in Tennessee.” He has been an external evaluator on a USDA award focused on precision agriculture. He is the Director of Community and Research Development at the School of Ap- plied Computational Sciences at Meharry Medical College. He was a community college transfer student then went on to receive a PhD from Vanderbilt University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Path from Community College to Engineering Bachelor’s Degree Through Partnerships and NSF S-STEM Funded ScholarshipsAbstractIn the spring of 2014, Governor Bill Haslam signed Tennessee Promise
attract these students, the program engages in pre- and post-admission efforts.The specific focus of this report is on the annual post-admission graduate student recruitmentevent. Admitted students are invited to the event in spring to meet with faculty and currentstudents, learn about research labs, and explore Austin. Each year the event is improved toaddress feedback from faculty, staff, current students, and the visiting recruits.What follows is an initial analysis of the influence of changes to the event made between 2012and 2015 on the yield of enrollees, with a focus on students from top-ranked undergraduateengineering programs, URMs, and those from low SES backgrounds. Descriptive analysis ofdata from applications received from 2009 to
leadershipopportunities, engaged learning activities, and mentoring. Sixty-three students meeting theselection criteria have been recruited and awarded scholarships. This paper presents the finalreport of this scholarship program and its impact on the students, the institution, the ComputerScience and Engineering Programs, and workforce development in the region.This NSF Scholarship program has increased student retention, success, and graduation inrelation to a comparison group by helping students overcome some of the factors that often limittheir educational ambitions. These successes were especially notable for women and first-generation students. The program’s requirement that LEAP students participate in thedepartments’ professional organizations (IEEE
fit all institutions, a set of rubrics thatidentify both areas to measure and ways of articulating performance levels could provide a usefulstarting point for developing a community of practice and a shared discussion around theseissues.These two issues – the relative lack of consensus on learning outcomes beyond retention (andpotentially design) and the lack of instruments that can be used across contexts – point to keyareas for further research and discussion among first-year educators. The sheer number ofarticles written about first-year programs indicates both the importance of these course and thepassion that faculty have for effectively engaging and supporting students at this criticaljunctions. Building a strong community of practice
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Coming Unglued: Restricting Adhesives in Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Design-and-Build Projects (Marble Machine Edition)AbstractCollege-level sophomore and junior mechanical design-and-build laboratory courses are criticalin helping engineering students develop practical skills for mechanical systems. However, manystudents struggle with basic mechanical components and fasteners, often failing to identifystandard parts on sight. This lack of foundational knowledge, in conjunction with suboptimalproject management habits, often results in over-reliance on adhesives. This is particularlyproblematic in situations where adhesives are used inappropriately—such as gluing gears toround shafts
Paper ID #16629Perception of Academic Integrity among Students and Faculty: A Compari-son of the Ethical Gray AreaDr. Teresa J. Ryan, East Carolina University Dr. Teresa Ryan teaches mechanical engineering fundamentals such as Dynamics, Mechanics of Materi- als, Acoustics and Vibrations. She also focuses on technical communication skills within an engineering context. Her research interests include acoustics and the dynamics of complex structures. She uses op- tical measurement systems (laser Doppler vibrometry) for characterization of a wide variety of targets including percussion instruments, landmines/IED, and coupled
that allthe participants who had selected ‘Other’ on the survey were referring to part-time constructionemployment, mostly related to family business. Students in these categories enter the constructionprogram with a specific preferred role that matches with their family business. In future self-reported surveys, researchers will include an option for students engaged in part-time constructionwork. Notably though, most of the students who indicated no experience in the constructionindustry were freshmen. Considering that the construction education program places emphasis ongaining construction experiences, the number of students with no construction experiencedecreases with classification. Gaining construction experience is very important for
Paper ID #45190Evaluating the five pillars of a Summer Bridge Program and their influenceon participants’ intentions to complete an engineering degree.Lorena Benavides-Riano, Mississippi State University Lorena Benavides-Riano, originally from Colombia, is a second-year Engineering Ph.D. student at Mississippi State University. In July 2020, she completed her bachelor’s degree in Environmental Engineering at the National University of Colombia. After graduation, Lorena worked as a research assistant investigating the effects of development projects on environmental parameters and rural communities in Colombia, South
likely this student will end up choosingengineering (Astin & Astin, 1992; Shuman, et. al., 1999). High school peers’ influence is also found to be agood predictor for successfully graduating with a STEM degree (Leslie, et. al., 1998). Friend’s encouragementplays an important role not only in a student’s college enrollment decision, but also in the retention decision(Bean, 1983). After entering into university, positive peer influence leads to successful education outcomecomes from opportunities like participating in honors program, tutoring other students, living on campus (Leslie,et. al., 1998). On the contrary, lack of student community on campus is found to have negative impact onstudents’ retention (Buyer & Connolly, 2006).Adult
acquisition of power, (c) ‘historical’ view of information where truth and order are balanced in service of society.A healthy democracy relies on checks and balances as well as an informed and engagedcitizenry. As we consider TELPhE’s (and also ASEE’s) strategic planning efforts, a fewfundamental questions stand out: 1) is the primary function of divisions to support an annualconference and publish articles? 2) Is the divisions’ purpose to promote research in engineeringeducation for broader societal impact? 3) For TELPhE specifically, are we an internal forum fordiscussion, or should we actively promote technological citizenship and engage in publicdiscourse? If the latter, what concrete steps can the division take to move beyond annualconference
strategies.The ongoing development and research will continue to be guided by educational theories onfeedback and learning, with an emphasis on creating inclusive, supportive, and engaging learningenvironments for all students. The ultimate goal is to contribute to the broader discourse on edu-cational technology and programming education, providing insights and tools that can be adoptedand adapted by educators worldwide.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2142309. Theauthors wish to thank the following students for their work on this project: Pradnya Pendse, and Katie Ulinski.References [1] L. C. Ureel II, “Integrating a colony of code critiquers into webta,” in Seventh SPLICE
were weak inleadership skills, but they stated that they preferred the role of employee. However to a fewstudents they felt that this project introduced them to a career avenue that they would have neverthought to pursue after graduation.Key themes noted in all the students‟ Lessons Learned documents were communication,performance of group members, and managing the client. All students indicated that maintainingactive communication was important among all group members. The students all noted how theclient‟s business requirements had a serious impact on their approach and implementation to thesite‟s development. They felt they no longer had free creative range in the design anddevelopment process. That the emphasis went from making something
on questions of mutual interest, rather than addressedin isolation. When problems are pigeon-holed into disciplinary boxes, answers may be easier,but without context, those answers may not be correct or complete. Forcing students to relateideas from different disciplines is intended to force them to think at higher levels in Bloom’staxonomy, and engage in synthesis and evaluation.39 In 1959, C.P. Snow lamented thebreakdown in communication between the Two Cultures: humanities and science/ technology.67The course described is also intended to provide a model of the type of social discourse desirablefor managing the future directions of technology.2. Course content Advances in artificial intelligence, as exemplified by the success of the
fundamental technical skills (29% SA; 67% A), inspiredthem to learn more than if it had been a theoretical problem (38% SA; 62% A), and believed thatit was a better learning experience than a typical classroom activity (45% SA; 50% A). Workingwith a team made students more effective collaborators (14% SA; 71% A), contributed to theirlearning in the course (19% SA; 48% A), and enhanced their leadership skills (19% SA; 62% A).The international aspect of the project enhanced student learning (19% SA; 62% A), encouragedthem to think about social impacts while creating engineering solutions (38% SA; 52% A), andinspired them to deliver a quality design for the community (33% SA; 62% A).This work is significant because it is one of the first international
], [2], [4]. There are also cultural constraints on rural students that may impact theirdecision to pursue and their transition into higher education. Education is not identified as a toppriority for most adults in rural communities, resulting in a lack of mentorship and role modelsfor students. Many parents in rural areas have not attended college themselves, and thereforethey are less likely to encourage their children to attend college. It has also been noted, manyrural Americans tend to be committed to their communities and have little desire to leave theirhometowns. There is also evidence that rural students have lower expectations and confidence intheir ability to succeed in an engineering course of study [5]. Finally, rural students are
requirements [2].Our university, like many other universities across the U.S., extended the spring break by one weekin order to prepare the required platforms for online teaching, and to assist instructors and staff tobecome ready for this prompt transition. In this research, we have investigated the impacts ofCOVID-19 outbreak on our students. The objective of this work is to study how different aspectsof college students’ lives affected by the outbreak. To achieve this goal, a survey has beenconducted to evaluate the students’ engagement and satisfaction while they experience newlearning environment. Moreover, we included an additional survey to compare the impacts of thepandemic on different categories of students.Literature reviewMany faculty
to understand and recognize our dependence on technology, its origin, evolution, and itsinvasive nature into our lives.Theoretical or Conceptual SupportA survey of 256 students that completed a freshman level general studies technological literacycourse, designed to expose students to different technologies, was recently conducted. It revealedthat for 64% of the students it was the first time that they had actually studied technology (Ritz16,2011). In addition, “the first-year statistics for this study indicated that this number was as highas 70%. Students found that technology does have an impact on the world in which they live”(Ritz16, 2011). It also was noted that “students gained improved understandings of the effects oftechnology, a
on how to help racially diverse students in their adjustment to college by listingnumerous support services that the students in their study or previous research found to be successfulin such circumstances. Trautvetter et al. study programs that are successful at recruiting and retainingwomen engineering students [12]. According to the authors, factors that are essential for retentioninclude campus climate, support services administered during early undergraduate years, personalconnection to faculty and other students, institutional support for student organizations and activities,and learning and living communities. Reid at al. discuss institutional student engagement strategies thathave been proven to facilitate success of students of
Paper ID #16199A Laboratory Study of Student Usage of Worked-example Videos to SupportProblem SolvingDr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for nearly 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country.Prof. Michael Wilson
publicaffairs? If Barber and Battistoni are correct about expression, how do we “educate” current andfuture generations to be engaged citizens? Service learning has been advocated widely as a method for advancing civic awareness andcitizen responsibility among college students (Hepburn et al. 2000; Hunter and Brisbin 2000;Ehrlich 1999; Neimi et al. 1999; Battistoni 1997; Campus Compact 1994; Schumer 1994).Hunter and Brisbin (2000) define service learning as “a form of experimental education thatcombines structured opportunities for learning academic skills, reflection on the normativedimensions of civic life, and experimental activity that addresses community needs or assists
and towards a focus on student learning. Evidenceshows this shift has affected faculty culture 37. Another call for change was issued by theNational Academy of Engineering38, which encourages the engineering community to shift awayfrom the quantitative, mathematical, and scientific identifiers associated with the discipline, andis rooted in the need of engineering to offer a more diverse face to students35. Departments thathave embraced the idea of cultural change, and new departments created during the movement,may have broken the traditional engineering stereotype; various engineering departments mayhave non-traditional cultures.Ahn39 briefly addresses the issue of ePortfolios and culture by concluding that reflective practicemust be part
will also engage in a cadence of“continuous improvement” conversations to add additional targeting courses, add additionalcourses that are already taught as part of other degree plans, and iterate on the materials and thedegree plan as we better understand the needs of our students. In this way, we hope to continueour focus on interdisciplinarity and stakeholder engagement as the bedrock of continuousimprovement for this degree plan.We also believe that this program will add to the preparation of our students. As shown above,many of the suggested skills and dispositions align with the literature, but it was a strength tohave a community stakeholder group that could amplify the need for specific skills anddispositions. It was also helpful to
1 Use of Student Surveys to Improve Efficacy of Lab Experience and Guide Lab Development Robert W. Williams, Salam F. Rahmatalla Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of IowaAbstract One way to refocus the importance of hands-on education is to allow students to haveownership of their lab experience so that, in time, the lab curriculum is tailored to their needs andwants. This paper discusses the use of student surveys to help improve the efficacy of labexperience for undergraduate Civil &
scheduled to be offered to students in their secondsemester. It will be focused on satisfying Diversity: Equity, Inclusion, and Social Justice generaleducation requirements required by our governing body. This course will utilize scientificanalysis to review how different communities have been impacted by engineering decisions. Thiscourse will be co-taught by professors within both the Humanities and Science departments. TheScience faculty will show data describing how human-driven decisions have led to effects likesea level rise, more intense heat waves, and childhood lead exposure that disproportionatelyimpacted marginalized communities. The Humanities faculty will then work with students toread, analyze, and discuss texts written by members of