Using A Modular Framework for Assessing Professional Skills Sadan Kulturel-Konak, Abdullah Konak, Gül E. Okudan Kremer, and Ivan E. Esparragoza increasingly crucial due to global competition and intensifying Abstract— More and more executives are now listing pressures on companies (i.e., companies have fewer resourcesprofessional skills along with technical ones among their and less time to train employees on these skills), the absence ofexpectations from information Sciences and Technology and a robust assessment framework inhibits the propagation
Assessment and Evaluation Process for Engineering Technology Program William Danley and Vladimir Genis danleywj@drexel.edu, genisv@drexel.edu One Drexel Plaza, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A. Abstract: The Applied Engineering Technology (AET) Program at Drexel University recognizes the need for periodic assessment and evaluation to make sure that the AET is achieving its mission. This paper describes how the assessment and evaluation of Program Educational Objectives and Program Outcomes leads to a “Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) of the Program Report
Innovative Tools For the Assessment of Instruction Philip L. Brach and Ahmet Zeytinci plbrach@att.net az@alfam.com The University of the District of Columbia Washington, DCAbstractCurrent ABET Evaluation places a strong emphasis on outcomes and assessment. At the ASEE2009 Annual Conference in Austin, Texas, the authors presented a paper on the value of teachingCivil Engineering Courses using individualized student assignments. To validate thatindividualized instruction was more successful than the traditional group methods of instructionand assignments the authors developed an innovative means of measuring student
Assessing Critical Thinking in Mechanics in Engineering Education Chris Papadopoulos1, Adeeb Rahman2, and Josh Bostwick3 Typically, mechanics education in engineering schools focuses on communicating explicit content to students, but deemphasizes the critical thought that underlies the discipline of mechanics. We give examples of the failure of students to apply basic principles of mechanics in solving problems. We develop assessment tools to measure critical thinking in student work, and how well mechanics textbooks engage students in critical analysis. Both tools focus on the treatment of three criteria that we judge to be fundamental, but which are commonly overlooked or
Paper ID #45426Comparison of Teamwork Assessment Methods in Engineering ClassesMr. Adam Barnes, University of Virginia Adam Barnes graduated with a BS and MS in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Tech. He worked in small business and industry for 18 years before returning to Virginia Tech to teach engineering as a professor of practice. He then moved to Charlottesville and began teaching at the University of Virginia in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, where he has now been for 5 years. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Comparison of Teamwork Assessment Methods
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 1 Session XXXX LLM-Assisted Performance Indicators for Student Outcome Assessment Rahul Sharan Renu Department of Physics and Engineering Austin College AbstractThe objective of this research is to evaluate the usefulness of using Large Language Models (LLM)to assist in the development of Performance Indicators (PI) to assess Student Outcomes (SO). TheLLM is primed with information regarding best practices
Materials Engineering at the University of Oklahoma. His research and teaching interests include transport phenom- ena, biomedical engineering, surfactants, and modification of surfaces by admicellar polymerization with over 130 archival publication and patents. He has served in a variety of administrative positions including NSF Program Director, Associate Dean for Research, and Director of the Bioengineering Program.Gary Robert Brown, Office of Assessment and Innovation Dr. Brown has been in higher education for more than 30 years. He has an interdisciplinary PhD and been working with colleagues in almost every discipline. His expertise is in educational assessment with a strong background in technology and innovations
Paper ID #33333Information Fluency Instruction as a Continuous Improvement ActivityDr. William W. Tsai, California State University Maritime Academy Dr. William W. Tsai is an associate professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at California State University, Maritime Academy (Cal Maritime). His research background is fluid mechanics and heat transfer. In engineering education, he is involved in the incorporation of information literacy into the engineering curriculum. He is also involved in his program’s assessment, ABET accreditation activities, and the Institution-Wide Assessment Council. Before Cal Maritime
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WIP: Student-Guided Project for Measurement System Development with ABET and EM AssessmentAbstractA team-based student project in a new Measurement Systems course is presented withassessment for both ABET Student Outcome 6 and demonstration of behaviors associated withan entrepreneurial mindset. The technical assessment aligns with ABET Student Outcome 6 bysplitting the outcome into six sub-outcomes and assessing each on a rubric for student projectreports. This method allows each sub-outcome to be measured, evaluated, and reported. Afterthree semesters, all student teams were performing at or above minimal level, but more study
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Assessing ABET Student Outcome 5 (Teamwork) in BSME Capstone Design ProjectsAbstractABET’s Student Outcome 5 concerning teamwork is much more elaborate than the previousStudent Outcome d, containing many sub-outcomes. While Student Outcome d focused more onindividual student performance on a team and could be suitably assessed with peer evaluation,Student Outcome 5 focuses on the performance of the team as a whole as well as individualperformance. As a result, an assessment tool that addresses each of the sub-outcomes has beencreated and implemented, allowing for greater distinction of strengths and weaknesses within ateam. The tool includes both a
Paper ID #34209Development and Assessment of a Polymer Processing Learning ModuleDr. Michele Miller, Campbell University Dr. Michele Miller is a Professor and Associate Dean at Campbell University. Prior to joining Campbell in 2017, she was a professor of mechanical engineering at Michigan Tech. She received undergraduate and graduate degrees in mechanical engineering from Duke and NC State, respectively. Her research interests include engineering education and precision manufacturing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Development and Assessment of
Paper ID #31682Using Qualitative Data to Further Examine Flagged Items from theEngineering Ethics Reasoning Instrument (EERI)Peter Wesley Odom, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Wesley is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His primary research interests surround assessment technologies, the psychology of student learning of STEM subjects, and international community development. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Using Qualitative Data to Further Examine Flagged Items from the
Paper ID #31238Variations in Reflections as a Method for Teaching and Assessment ofEngineering EthicsDr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning
learned useful techniques that helped them in their careersor in communicating with entrepreneurs. With this information, an assessment can be made ofthe impact that this course, and the study of entrepreneurship, had on their careers. The studentsare also asked to describe their entrepreneurial activities since graduating.The course was the most often cited of the many choices that were given which influenced themto become involved with entrepreneurship. The conclusion of the study is that this course had asignificant impact on them. Even though it did not have a major impact on the career pathconsidered and chosen initially by the students, the result of this study suggests that theseengineering students perceive they have become more
, Research for innovation New products New companies Models for assessing innovative cabability Innovation Innovation Business PIE-p EDU Management Rotation programs PIE-p Trainee Implementation and evaluation of innovation models Creative sessions
AssessmentAbstractCapstone engineering design courses play pivotal roles in development of engineering students’professional skills needed for innovation in a globally-competitive technological world. Thispaper describes a two-semester course sequence, jointly taught by faculty in engineering andentrepreneurial studies, that integrates engineering design and business development. Courseoutcomes are defined based on research that established four performance areas addressingstudent and solution development in capstone design courses: personal capacity, team processes,solution requirements, and solution assets. Performance criteria for each area establishdefinitions of desired student achievement in each area and form the basis for assessment ofoutcomes for the
Engineering Faculty to Educators of Entrepreneurs” to be presented at the2007 ASEE Annual Conference. Page 12.917.42 MSOE uses 11-week quarters rather than the typical 16-week semesters in all its academic programs. There are 3quarters in the academic year from September through May, and an optional summer quarter.developed to teach topics including: business planning, intellectual property, venture capital andangel investing, marketing, finance and business law. Each module contains a presentation ofcontent and an assessment of how well the material was received. Modules can be developed byboth engineering and business school
] Shor, I. (19800. Critical Teaching and Every Day Life. Boston: South End Press.[11] Van Rensberg, B. W. J., (2003). Structural Engineering Education: Effective Teaching and Learning. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE/WFEO International Colloquium.[12] Anwar, S., Ford, P. (2001). Use of a Case Study Approach to Teach Engineering. Technology Students. Internal Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. Vol. 38. pp.1-10.[13] http://aiche.confex.com/aiche/2005/techprogram/P3326.htm. (2005). Using Teamwork and Case Studies in-Class to Teach Chemical Engineering Safety.[14] Stuart, J. A. (1997). A Method for Teaching Problem Assessment. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, 1997. Teaching and Learning in an
2006-63: AN ASSESSMENT AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MODEL FORENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMSAlok Verma, Old Dominion University Alok K. Verma is Ray Ferrari Professor and, Director of the Automated Manufacturing Laboratory at Old Dominion University. He also serves as the Chief Technologist of the Lean Institute and MET Program Director at ODU. Alok received his B.S. in Aeronautical Engineering, MS in Engineering Mechanics and PhD in Mechanical Engineering. Alok is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Virginia, a certified manufacturing engineer and has certification in Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma. His publications are in the areas of Lean Manufacturing, Process Automation and
2006-1249: LESSONS LEARNED IN ASSESSING SENIOR ENGINEERINGCAPSTONE DESIGN COURSE LEARNING WITH A VARIATION ON THE TIDEEDESIGN TEAM READINESS ASSESSMENT (DTRA) I AND IIMartha Green, Texas A&M University Martha Green is an Educational Psychology PhD student at Texas A&M University,with an M.Ed. in Educational Technology and BA/BS degrees in History and Business/Accounting. Formerly a K-12 teacher, she is a Graduate Assistant in the Educational Assessment Resources unit in the College of Engineering at TAMU, was assessment consultant to the NASA Reduced Gravity Student Flight Opportunities Program and is managing assessment of the BOEING ProjectParag Ravindran, Texas A&M University
2006-851: DEVELOPING A SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT FORABET CERTIFICATION: HOW CAPSTONE DESIGN CLASSES CAN HELPJennifer Miskimins, Colorado School of Mines Jennifer L. Miskimins is an Assistant Professor in Petroleum Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. Jennifer received her B.S. degree in Petroleum Engineering from the Montana College of Mineral Science and Technology and her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Petroleum Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines.Ramona Graves, Colorado School of Mines Ramona M. Graves is a Professor of Petroleum Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. Ramona received her B.S. degree from Kearney State College in Nebraska and her Ph.D. in
into multiplecourses from the first year in engineering to the capstone design course in the fourth year. Thecase studies were also included in multiple elective courses of various subdisciplines such ashydraulics, structural, geotechnical, and transportation offered in the second, third, and fourthyears. This was able to provide continuity in ethics education across the curriculum. The resultsfrom the assessment showed that ethics was incorporated successfully into the CE curriculum atthe University of Portland (UP) and the students were able to learn about ethics in at least onecourse every year.A study by Carpenter [4] has discussed a case study that considers the pollution of a river byindustrial discharge from a company manufacturing a
Paper ID #16508Promoting Consistent Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes over Mul-tiple Courses and Multiple Instructors in Continuous Program ImprovementDr. Randall D. Manteufel, University of Texas, San Antonio Randall Manteufel is Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at San Antonio. He teaches thermal-fluid courses.Dr. Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio Amir Karimi, University of Texas, San Antonio Amir Karimi is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University
Paper ID #15915E-Assessment and Direct Competency Modelling in a Chemistry for Mechan-ical Engineering CourseDr. Rebecca Jo Pinkelman, Technische Universit¨at Darmstadt Rebecca J. Pinkelman graduated from Chadron State College with a B.S. in Chemistry and Biology in 2008. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in 2010 and 2014, respectively. She is currently a post-doctoral research scientist in the Mechanical and Process Engineering Department at the Technische Universit¨at Darmstadt. ¨ Technische Universit¨at DarmstadtIng. Frank Guido Kuhl
Paper ID #16991Video-Based Concept Tutors with Assessment in Game Format for Engineer-ing CoursesEliza A. Banu, Auburn University Dr. Eliza Banu has a Bachelors degree in Electrical Engineering from Polytechnic University of Bucharest and completed her Ph.D. program in Mechanical Engineering at Auburn University in 2014. Dr. Banu’s research interests are in the dynamics of impact of rigid bodies and human with granular matter as well as developing innovative instructional materials. She has been working with LITEE (Laboratory for Innovative Technology and Engineering Education) at Auburn University since 2010.Dr. P.K
: a. The student will be able to articulate the impact of ethics on society and the professions. b. The student will be able to apply an ethical decision-making process.3. Faculty will identify and develop one written assignment in the selected course that studentswill upload into their E-Leadership portfolios to be evaluated by the QEP assessment team usingthe national Association of American Colleges and Universities VALUE rubric on EthicalReasoning [6].Freshman students take LDRS 101 and LDRS 111. LDRS 101 is a two lecture hour, one creditcourse which includes an ethical analysis of their summer reading assignment “A Few GoodMen”. LDRS 111 is a Freshman Ethical Fitness Seminar which is taken in the second semesterof the
2006-2029: CAN ASSESSMENT BE A MARKETING TOOL FOR YOURPROGRAM? THE ROLES OF ASSESSMENT, STUDENT SUCCESS ANDFACULTY IN PROGRAM SUCCESSKim Nankivell, Purdue University-CalumetJana Whittington, Purdue University-CalumetJoy Colwell, Purdue University-Calumet Page 11.303.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Can Assessment be a Marketing Tool for Your Program? The Roles of Assessment, Student Success and Faculty in Program SuccessAbstractThe growth of technology in the last fifteen years has not only restructured existing degreeoptions but has also created new avenues for a quality education. Institutions have recognized theneed for marketing and promoting, but
course emphasis on learningoutcomes for design skills, teamwork skills, and communication skills. Their evaluation involvesstudents’ performance in learning design conceptualization in a much general manner than thementioned previous work. Their survey contains seven contracts: teamwork, informationgathering, problem definition, idea generation, evaluation and decision making, implementation,and communication.Another overall student designer learning assessment was proposed by Safoutin et al8. In theirstudy, a design attribute framework for course planning and learning assessment was introduced.In this study, the intention is to transform the Accreditation Board of Engineering andTechnology (ABET) learning outcomes into a standard and
2006-2369: USE OF RUBRICS FOR ASSESSMENT OF A SENIOR PROJECTDESIGN COURSEAhmed Khan, DeVry University-Addison Ahmed S. Khan, Ph.D. is a senior Professor in the EET dept. at DeVry University, Addison, Illinois. He received his M.Sc (applied physics) from University of Karachi, an MSEE from Michigan Technological University, and an MBA from Keller Graduate School of Management. He received his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of Fiber Optics Communications, faculty development, and outcomes assessment, and, Internet and distance education. He is author of “The Telecommunications Fact Book” and co-author of “Technology and Society: Crossroads to the 21st