; A projectile motion machine for launching a tennis ball 15 feet; A two-foot span wooden truss bridge that holds 50 pounds.Each design project had a five week duration culminating in a demonstration, a design report,and a presentation from each team. This emphasis on technical communication was guided bytwo class periods focused on verbal technical communications and two on written technicalcommunication. It was intended that these class periods, combined with three significantopportunities for detailed feedback, provided the tools to foster the desire for continuousimprovement in technical communication skills (towards ABET Criterion 3, outcome g.)Three faculty members co-taught three sections of this course, rotating sections every
needs of the technical workforce requireengineering students to gain both disciplinary depth and interdisciplinary and interpersonal skillsto ready themselves for the evolving career landscape. Specifically, engineering students areexpected to build relevant skills through experiential learning opportunities [1]. However, formost high school students considering engineering in college, their preparation is typicallyadvanced placement courses in science and mathematics. Courses alone don’t meet theincreasing national demand to better prepare high school students for careers in technology andmanufacturing [2]. To bridge this gap, high school students may pursue the skills and qualitiesexpected of them in a university setting, which will enable
representatives fromindustry, faculty, students, engineering societies, and the Division of Student Affairs staff. Basedon feedback received from the advisory board, changes may be made to the tracks and topicswithin each track. Additionally, there is flexibility built within the PLI that allows for theaddition or subtraction of tracks or topics, as appropriate.The ethics curriculum is taught by the Conflict Resolution team on campus, and by engineersworking in both the public and private sectors. Ethics is also incorporated into many of theworkshops within the other four tracks and some of the technical curriculum. The ethics contentconsists of sessions such as Academic integrity, which covers ethical issues that students mayencounter in the university
effective pitch. 3. Developing Elevator Pitches: Outline a process for developing elevator pitches. 4. Persisting through Failure: Implement strategies for recovering from an unsuccessful pitch experience.The lessons provide an introduction to terminology and concepts associated with elevatorpitches. The lessons include opportunities to read about case studies, watch videos, and performguided reflection on both successful and unsuccessful elevator pitches. The topics in the lessonsinclude: identifying stakeholders, talking to a non-technical audience, creating a value proposition, advocating for exigence, constructing a pitch, critiquing a pitch, and recovering from a bad pitch experience.A short online
Alvarado, and Leo Porter. 2021. Un- derstanding sources of student struggle in early computer science courses. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Virtual Event USA). ACM, New York, NY, USA.[5] Duane F Shell, Leen-Kiat Soh, Abraham E Flanigan, and Markeya S Peteranetz. 2016. Students’ initial course motivation and their achievement and retention in college CS1 courses. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education - SIGCSE ’16 (Memphis, Tennessee, USA). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA.[6] Christopher Watson and Frederick W B Li. 2014. Failure rates in introductory pro- gramming revisited. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on
approach. Working in small teams over Zoom, participating engineering,education, and fifth grade students designed, built, and coded bio-inspired COVID companionrobots. The goal for the engineering students was to build new interprofessional skills, whilereinforcing technical skills. The collaborative activities included: (1) training with HummingbirdBitTM hardware (e.g. sensors, servo motors) and coding platform, (2) preparing robotics lessonsfor fifth graders that explained the engineering design process (EDP), and (3) guiding the fifthgraders in the design of their robots. Additionally, each undergraduate engineering studentdesigned a robot following the theme developed with their preservice teacher and fifth gradepartners. The intervention
traditional exclusively technical emphasis ofengineering education may make it particularly susceptible to this kind of disengagement [5].Cech [12] identifies three ideological pillars associated with engineering culture that contributeto a behavior of disengagement to social concerns. These are 1. Technical/social dualism, definedas engineers' cognitive division of social and technical skills and their undervaluation of socialskills, including those related to public welfare, 2. Meritocratic ideology, where success isbelieved to be a result of individual talent and where the way things are done is not usuallyquestioned and 3. Depoliticization, the idea that social and political issues can and should beseparated from engineering work because they may
this tailored framework, we developed a codebook incorporating these constructsand Social Learning Theory to examine how students internalize cognitive and affective insightsfrom collaborative experiences in studios and apply them to enhance their own learning [16]. Thisintegration of frameworks provides a platform for evaluating student cognitive and affectivereflections in BME studio learning (Figure 1).Course Context. We analyzed the reflections of students in BME 3010: Cellular Principles ofBiomedical Engineering, a core upper-level course in the BME curriculum that is taught annuallyduring the fall semester. Across the semester, five studios provided students with hands-onopportunities to apply quantitative and analytical principles
accessed from asmart phone and the tools that are used in the seminar are freely available. The students use the knowledge they acquired (e.g., algorithms, technical presentation) fromthe bi-weekly seminar to develop an algorithm to solve the puzzles in the game. The algorithmsconsist of a series of written steps to solve the puzzle without knowing the layout of the puzzle inadvance. The students compete to create the best algorithm based on the following criteria: (1) thehighest number of puzzles solved, (2) the fewest number of steps in the algorithm, and (3) the bestpresentation of the algorithm. The team with the best overall algorithm will received a $25 giftcertificate for each team member.5.1.1 Interactive ExercisesIn order to teach
widely-used technology. He has several projects that aim to improve the security of the Web public-key infrastructure (PKI) by building on existing technology, and he is currently studying and improving the economic incentives underlying cryptocurrency. He is also interested in computer science education, particularly in the field of security, and focuses on designing courses that build students’ (1) competence in technical fields, (2) confidence to tackle important and interesting problems, and (3) context in non-STEM fields. Before coming to Olin, Steve was a postdoctoral researcher in the Cybercrime group in the Institute for Software Research at Carnegie Mellon University, supervised by Nicolas Christin. He earned
leader respondents in aCanadian context). Second, the general literature emphasized that leadership is a process,requires collaboration, entails problems solving, and is transformative. Next, the engineeringliterature emphasized that engineering leadership is about influencing others or directing a group,and producing a deliverable based on constraints. Additionally, the engineering identity studyconcluded that engineers display leadership through their technical mastery, collaborativeoptimization, and organizational innovation [30]. A summary categorizing the results into thewhat, who, how and why of leadership can be found in Table 3.Table 3. Summary of key engineering leadership elements from literature & survey results
, construction, testing, and evaluation.” Simply, engineering design isthe use of theoretical knowledge to bring useful systems to reality.The structure of senior design experience varies from one university to another. Someuniversities offer this course as a one semester course and others offer it as a year-long course. Page 15.155.2ONU requires students to take a year-long (three quarters) senior design sequence. The sequenceconsists of three courses; senior design seminar (2-credit hours), senior design (3-credit hours),and engineering technical communication (1-credit hour). The list of senior design projects isgiven to students in the last week of
Network and Protocols of IEEE AINA 2015, and so on. He served as a program chair, general chair, and session chair for numerous international conferences and workshops, and served as a technical program committee (TPC) member for several international conferences including IEEE INFOCOM, IEEE GLOBECOM, IEEE CCNC, IEEE GreenCom, IEEE AINA, IEEE ICC, IEEE WCNC and IEEE VTC conferences. He has received the Best Paper Awards at the International Conferences. Dr. Rawat is the recipient Outstanding Research Faculty Award (Award for Excellence in Scholarly Activity) by the Allen E. Paulson College of Engineering and Technology at Georgia Southern University in 2015. He is the recipient of the Best Paper Award at the
innovate through their creativity built on the foundation of a thoroughunderstanding of the design process and an integration of technical knowledge and socialawareness. The importance of teaching design in engineering education has been highlyrecognised by Professional Engineering Associations; for example, the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) and the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board(CEAB) have recognized facility with design as one of the most important learning outcomes ofan engineering education. However, design is difficult to teach because (1) design is a complexcognitive process [2], which requires what are classified in the Bloom’s taxonomy [3] as higher-level thinking skills: analysis, evaluation and
) Kurt Becker, Ph.D., Professor, Department of Engineering Education, College of Engineering, Utah State University Kurt Becker is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. His research includes engineering design thinking, systems engineering, engineering education professional development, technical training, and adult learning cognition. He is currently working on National Science Foundation funded projects exploring engineering design thinking and systems thinking, a USAID funded project in Egypt, “Center of Excellence in Water”, and Department of Education funded GEARUP projects in the area of STEM education related to engineering education. He has extensive international
3). The order of virtual disassembly is authentic. For example, a user can takeout the battery only after the tablet has been opened up, and the sub-assembly of circuit boardand battery has first been isolated. Each sub-assembly can be magnified or rotated around oneaxis to see the back and front.Figure 3. In the Disassembly/Reassembly mode, the electronics tablet can be disassembled intosix sub-assemblies: front case, LCD screen, internal scaffold, circuit board with speaker, battery,and back case. (Sub-assembly labels added for reference and pen included for scale.)iii) Inspection mode: to facilitate closer inspection, the user can isolate each sub-assembly forfurther examination by selecting the sub-assembly and entering the Inspection
from additional scaffolding in office hours.References [1] M. Ball, J. Hsia, H. Pon-Barry, A. DeOrio, and A. Blank, “Teaching TAs To Teach: Strategies for TA Training,” in Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, (Portland OR USA), pp. 477–478, ACM, Feb. 2020. [2] E. McDonald, G. Arevalo, S. Ahmed, I. Akhmetov, and C. Demmans Epp, “Managing TAs at Scale: Investigating the Experiences of Teaching Assistants in Introductory Computer Science,” in Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, (Copenhagen Denmark), pp. 120–131, ACM, July 2023. [3] S.-H. Ko and K. Stephens-Martinez, “What Drives Students to Office Hours: Individual Differences and Similarities,” in Proceedings
, E. R., Philip, J., Geoffrey, E., & Herman, L. (2010). Identifying student misconceptions of programming. In In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 107–111).3. Shinners-Kennedy, D., & Fincher, S. A. (2013). Identifying threshold concepts: from dead end to a new direction (pp. 9–18). Presented at the Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research, ACM.4. Loo, C. W., & Choy, J. L. F. (2013). Sources of Self-Efficacy Influencing Academic Performance of Engineering Students. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 86– 92. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-1-3-45. Purzer, Şe. (2011
scopelimitations in this study, fostering international collaborations across continents.REFERENCES[1] S. Iddrisu, E. Alhassan, and T. Kinder, “Educational Reforms and the role of Polytechnic Education in the Socio-economic Development of Ghana Tamale Polytechnic, Box 3 E / R , Tamale . University of Edinburgh Business School,” AFRICA Dev. Resour. Res. Inst. J., vol. 11, no. August, pp. 29–52, 2014, Accessed: Sep. 05, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://ir.ucc.edu.gh/jspui/handle/123456789/9326.[2] A. A. Afonja, K. Sraku-Lartey, and S. A. Oni, “Engineering Education for Industrial Development : Case Studies of Nigeria , Ghana and Zimbabwe,” Jan. 2005. Accessed: Jan. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https
Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education. He has worked in both industry and education. Dr. Clark’s teaching specialties are in visual theory, 3-D modeling, technical animation, and STEM-based pedagogy. Research areas include graphics education, game art and design, scientific/technical visualization and professional development for technology and engineering education. He is a Principle Investigator on a variety of grants related to visualization and education and has focused his research in areas related to STEM curricula integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Active Learning Module Development for At-Risk Learners in
project-based learning developed around the National Academy of Engineering’s GrandChallenges for Engineering [1]. The Grand Challenges for Engineering, which span a broadrange of societal, real-world problems in need of technical solutions, effectively demonstrate tofirst-year engineering students how they can make an impact in the world by studyingengineering [2]. While many of the fundamental courses students study in their first year mayseem abstract and disconnected from real-world applications, the Grand Challenges forEngineering connect fundamental coursework to actual careers, industries, and broader societalproblems [3]. Consequently, working within the framework of the Grand Challenges may helpstudents envision which engineering fields
toderive solutions, (3) offer timely assistance, without providing the answer, (4) set an atmospherethat fosters respect for all points of view, and (5) ensure that all students are activelyparticipating.A typical Calculus I or Calculus II course consists of roughly 60 students. Four ES Leaders areassigned to each class. For each session, students are divided into groups of 4 or 5 and areinstructed to proceed to various parts of the large classroom. Group members turn their desksaround so they are all facing each other. Each student is provided a worksheet with a mix ofconceptual and computational problems which are carefully drafted to reinforce skills and todeepen and expand conceptual understanding of lecture materials. Problems for each
there is no mention of distinctions between written, oralor visual communication skills [2]. In contrast, outcome (f) for engineering technology programsrequires “an ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical andnon-technical environments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature”[2]. This trend is also evident in the literature for general higher education standards. The 2002report published by the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) stated theneed for learners to “effectively communicate orally, visually, in writing, and in a secondlanguage” [3]. However, in the AAC&U’s follow-up report in 2005 omitted the direct referenceto visual literacy and instead
is considered important because it: 1)reinforces the idea that multiple solutions are possible to one problem; 2) utilizes scientific,mathematical and technical concepts from other classes; 3) can be repeated many times whilesolving; and 4) promotes systems analysis and modeling [1]. Additionally, while working on thedesign, students engage in engineering habits of the mind such as creativity, collaboration,communication, enjoying challenges and systems thinking.In practice, educators have successfully implemented EDP in the teaching of science, mathematics,engineering and technical courses in middle and high schools [3-7]. To evaluate studentunderstanding of the EDP, an engineering design rubric can be used as an assessment instrumentto
interests are in international engineering education and teaching conceptually deDr. Sonia J Garcia, University of Georgia Dr. Sonia Garcia is the Assistant Dean for Undergraduate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. In this role, Garcia is responsible for the initiation, development, management, evaluation of various DEI Programs. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Language-based Dual Degree Engineering Program: Increasing Women in Engineering?AbstractIt has been well documented that females are generally underrepresented in many engineeringacademic programs as well as the profession. This paper suggests one way to lessen femaleunderrepresentation in engineering
training, and adult learning cognition. He is currently working on National Science Foundation funded projects exploring engineering design thinking and systems thinking, a USAID funded project in Egypt, “Center of Excellence in Water”, and Department of Education funded GEARUP projects in the area of STEM education related to engineering education. He has extensive international experience working on technical training and engineering projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Countries where he has worked include Armenia, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, China, Egypt, Indonesia, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, and Thailand. In addition, he has taught
□ □ □References[1] A.-W. Harzing and A. J. Feely, "The language barrier and its implications for HQ-subsidiary relationships," Cross-Cultural Management, vol. 15, pp. 49-61, 2008.[2] K. Hwang, "Effects of the language barrier on processes and performance of international scientific collaboration, collaborators' participation, organizational integrity, and interorganizational relationships," Science Communication, vol. 35, pp. 3-31, 2013.[3] H. Tenzer, M. Pudelko, and A.-W. Harzing, "The impact of language barriers on trust formation in multinational teams," Journal of International Business Studies, pp. 1-28, 2013.[4] V. Popov, D. Brinkman, H. J. A. Biemans, M. Mulder, A. Kuznetsov, and O. Noroozi, "Multicultural
Empower Students’ Path to Success Through Tailored Mentor-Mentee PairingsAbstractLimited access to resources for students' technical and personal development poses challenges.Existing universities’ mentorship resources do not fulfill students’ goals and interests.MentorMate proposes a matching algorithm that allows students to automatically match withmentors who have similar backgrounds and interests. The matching algorithm is a MERN webapplication that serves as an interface to register users as mentor or mentee. The backend,utilizing K-means clustering, facilitates and automates an effective grouping. After rigoroustesting, matching execution response time is 4.08 seconds for a database of 1500 users.Performance analysis
, et al. "Engineering education and the development of expertise." Journal of EngineeringEducation, 100.1 (2011): 123-150.4 Hundley, S.P. “The Attributes of a Global Engineer Project: Results and Recommendations from a Multi-YearProject.” ASEE 2015 International Forum. Seattle, WA June 2015 (2015): 19 37 1-7.https://peer.asee.org/collections/19.5 ABET. Proposed revisions to criteria for accrediting engineering programs definitions, generalcriterion 3 student outcomes, and general criterion 5 curriculum (2015). www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Proposed-Revisions-to-EAC-Criteria-3-and-5.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2016.6 Rogers, K.J. “A Work in Progress.” Inside Higher Ed, Sept.1, 2015.www.insidehighered.com/views/2015/09/01/essay-responds
, adesign situation calling for an engineering solution requires engineers to recognize not onlytechnical also non-technical goals and constraints and the interactions between the variables witha broad range of perspectives. However, examining P-12 engineering design cognitive processes,multiple studies have indicated a lack of students’ cognitive effort to analyze a given designscenario and to structure and formulate a design problem in any effective or efficient ways. Also,students tend to fail in identifying multiple, conflicting goals and constraints in a given designscenario. In the meantime, the characteristics of entrepreneurial engineers’ thinking and actions(Kriewall & Mekemson, 2010) imply the possibility of improving P-12 students