gratefullyacknowledged: 1) Sarah Oerther (PhD in nursing, candidate); 2) Laura Brown (EdD,candidate); 3) Lee Smith (professor of nursing).References 1. Bloom, B., 1968, “Learning for Mastery: Instruction and Curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1.” Evaluation Comment, 1(2). 2. Masi, B., & Watson, D. M., & Bodek, A., & Khaitan, D. A., & Garcell, E. (2015, June), Comparison of Mastery Learning and Traditional Lecture–Exam Models in a Large Enrollment Physics Course Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23719 3. Oerther, D.B. (2017, June), Reducing Costs While Maintaining
Paper ID #37288Investigating the Transferability of the Productive Beginningsof Engineering Judgment Framework from Statics toDynamicsJessica Swenson Jessica Swenson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She was awarded her doctorate and masters from Tufts University in mechanical engineering and STEM education respectively, and completed postdoctoral work at the University of Michigan Her current research involves examining different types of homework problems in undergraduate engineering science courses, flexible classroom spaces, active learning
. Sellnow, “Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 5–20, Feb. 2005.[20] C. E. Hmelo-Silver, “Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 235–266, Sep. 2004.[21] A. Otieno, K. Urbanowicz, and C. Mirman, “A Laboratory Based Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Course for a Manufacturing Curriculum,” 2002.[22] R. B. Mindek, “Development of a Programmable Logic Controller Experiential Learning Platform,” in Proc. ASEE Northeast Section Conference, 2008, pp. 1–10.[23] K. T. Peerless, J. M
a technologist engineer in mechatronics at the Airforce Aerospace Science and Technology Department (DCTA), being part of the Research Council at the Manufacturing Competence Center (CCM) and teaching at the Mechatronics Department of the Mechanical Engineering Division of the Aeronautical Technological Institute (ITA). Research interests on (i) modeling and simulation of systems applied to the development of mechatronic systems and (ii) automation and control of industrial systems, with an emphasis on digital signal processing, industrial robotics and computational intelligence applications.Flávio Luiz Cardoso-Ribeiro Dr. Flávio Luiz Cardoso-Ribeiro is a Professor in the Aeronautics and Aerospace Department at
Page 2.192.1grasp a soda can. At the other end of the curriculum, senior-level capstone design projectsare being piloted with interdepartmental cooperation. For example, students frommechanical and electrical engineering recently teamed up to design a powered manipulatormounted to an electric wheelchair, and a sip and puff actuated gear shift for a paraplegic’shand-powered bicycle. Dedicated studio spaces in the ITL Laboratory support andshowcase these hands-on design project courses. The heart of engineering education lies in the middle two years, when thefundamental concepts that define disciplinary specialization are introduced. Many of theseconcepts are taught in multiple departments. For example, fluid mechanics is taughtseparately
University (M.S. in 1985 and Ph.D. in 1988). She can be contacted at LPauley@psu.edu . Page 22.469.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Development and Implementation of an Intermediate Design Course Using Active LearningAbstractSix years ago, the Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering Department at Penn State, after manyheated debates, approved a major curriculum change that included adding a required course inDesign Methodology. This action was taken to better align with ABET curriculum objectives,particularly in the area of Design. The course was designed from a
. (2007). An Evaluative Study of Teacher Creativity, Use of the Heuristic Diagnostic Teaching Process and Student Mathematics Performance, Drexel University School of Education, Philadelphia, PA.6. Belski I, Baglin J, Harlim J. (2013) Teaching TRIZ at university: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29:346-354.7. Belski I, Adunka R, Mayer O (2016) Educating a creative engineer: Learning from engineering professionals, Procedia CIRP, 39: 79-84.8. Baillie C (2006). Enhancing student’s creativity through creative-thinking techniques. In N. Jackson, M. Oliver, M. Shae, & J. Wisdom (Eds.), Developing Creativity in Higher Education: An Imaginative Curriculum (pp. 1-15). Routledge.9. Felder RM (1988
AC 2011-315: MODAL ENGAGEMENTS IN PRECOLLEGE ENGINEER-ING: TRACKING MATH AND SCIENCE CONCEPTS ACROSS SYMBOLS,SKETCHES, SOFTWARE, SILICONE AND WOODMitchell J. Nathan, University of Wisconsin-Madison Mitchell J. Nathan, BSEE, PhD, is professor of Educational Psychology, with affiliate appointments in Curriculum & Instruction and Psychology at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, and a faculty fel- low at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research (WCER) and the Center on Education and Work. Dr. Nathan studies the cognitive, embodied, and social processes involved in STEM reasoning, learn- ing and teaching, especially in mathematics and engineering classrooms and in laboratory settings, using both quantitative
internationalization of higher education, faculty engagement, and global curriculum development.Elizabeth M. Tront, Virginia TechProf. Joseph G. Tront, Virginia Tech Page 25.597.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Examining the Development of Global Competencies Among Engineering Undergraduates Social, political, and economic factors are making it necessary for engineeringundergraduates to be proficient in content knowledge but also acquire a set of skills that willenable them function seamlessly in a work environment that has both national and
of Texas at Austin in Structural Engineering. Her undergraduate degrees in History and in Construction Engineering and Management are from North Carolina State University. Dr. Talley teaches courses in the Construction Science and Management and Civil Engineering Technology Programs, and her research focus is in student engagement and retention in engineering and engineering technology education. Contact: talley@txstate.eduDr. Austin Talley, Texas State University Dr. Austin Talley is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Ingram School of Engineering at Texas State University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas State University, Dr. Austin Talley worked as a manufacturing quality engineer for a test and m
over our presentations beforehand and that was helpful.”No negative feedback regarding the peer mentor was received in the interviews. Students whocould not make it to the workshops expressed a desire to come to these workshops if they did nothave time conflicts.Peer Mentor Reflections. After the conclusion of the program, the peer mentor reflected on howtheir learning experiences directed the approach of their teaching experience as a peer mentor. “A lot of it came from my reflection on what I was missing when I was a student, which was the speaker resources what I wanted to give to students in the office hours. So, being very proactive and kind of developing your own, like pseudo-curriculum to supplement what is going on
Manufacturing Engineering programs and Tooker Professor for Effective STEM Education at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Pedagogical Ninjas: Using an Additive Innovation Cycle for Faculty Development of Teaching-Focused FacultyAbstractThis evidence-based, practice paper describes a semester-long, faculty development programdesigned by an “additive innovation” [1] framework to promote the sharing, scaling,sustainability, and implementation of a pedagogical risk-taking culture across a school ofengineering. This intervention has been developed as part of a research
Tech X Ploration: A Summer Institute for High School Girls or What We Did on Our Summer Vacation Josephine Lamela Professor, Physics Middlesex County College Prof. James Finne Assistant Professor, Engineering Technology Middlesex County College Karen Ford New Jersey Center for Advanced Technological Education Deborah Iacontino Teacher, Technology and Mathematics
education [4], [6], [7], [8] as society continuesto demand increasingly complex, interrelated and global systems.For instance, the organization that accredit engineering programs in the U.S., ABET, has approvedchanges toward systemic and globally relevant student outcomes effective 2019-2020 reviewcycle. This need is also evident in its new definition of engineering design [8].Integrating ST in Engineering ProgramsThe International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) envisions that systems engineeringbecomes “a part of every engineer’s curriculum and systems engineering at the university level[be] grounded in the theoretical foundations that spans the hard sciences, engineering,mathematics, and human and social sciences” [9]. There has been
available: “We argue that capstone projects can enculturate students in both disciplinary and industry communities of practice. Educators must identify the differences in the shared repertoire of these communities and frame curricular content and activities accordingly.” Wherever possible, curriculum developers and instructors should employ an integrative approach where students can connect their use of professional skills directly to their technical work and the engineering objectives they pursue [5].At this stage, we may clearly observe that when it comes to: a) integration of the professionalcomponent into the design and innovation process as well as b) strong consideration andincorporation of
involved in project analysisand justifications since graduating with a BIE degree in 1970. Since 1993, the author has beenteaching engineering economy on a regular basis in a variety of programs and for a variety ofaudiences at both the undergraduate and graduate level. During this time the author of this paperlist 58 different courses on his cv in programs as diverse as industrial engineering, engineeringmanagement, manufacturing engineering, industrial management, and technology management.During the past thirteen years, the author has regularly attended the annual ASEE conferencesand attended countless sessions. These sessions have been eye-opening and thought provokingand well worth the time to attend. At the same time it has educated this
Worcester Polytechnic Institute is proactivelyaddressing industry demands and enrollment challenges by enhancing its program and expandingaccessibility to a more diverse student population. A key component of this effort is theintroduction of an experimentation and data science course, designed to meet ABET accreditationrequirements while also enriching the student experience, aligning skill development with industryneeds, and strengthening our curriculum. To achieve these goals, I developed and implementedthis course as a means to improve learning outcomes for all students, with a particular focus onsupporting women and BIPOC students. Additionally, the course provides valuable data to validatethe SALG (Student Assessment of Learning Gains) tool
descriptivenarrative often including sound engineering judgement or justifications, outstandingcontributions and key conclusions. Some critical findings and contributions may not berecognized unless they are presented through a formal writing narrative. On the other hand, theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has stipulated the engineeringeducation outcomes as (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; (g) anability to communicate effectively; (h) The broad education necessary to understand the impactof engineering solutions in a global and societal context; (i) A recognition of the need for and anability to engage in life-long learning, and (j) Knowledge of contemporary issues. Theseoutcomes are hard to achieve in
of Educational Psychology 88(1), 144-161.6. Hogan, K. & Pressley, M. (Ed.) (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.7. Ryan, A. M. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). Should I ask for help?" The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents' help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology 89, 329-341.8. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 4, 167-207.9. Grabowski, B. L. & Harkness, W. L. (1996). Enhancing statistics education with expert systems: More than an advisory system. Journal of Statistics Education, online at
helps in understanding the principles. ● I feel like students in freshman year should have some sort of involvement in capstone to learn the projects and what they like for when they actually get to work on the project. ● Capstone is very challenging and the Machine Design project, junior year course, along with the multiple labs performed in other classes somewhat help with knowing what to expect going into Capstone. ● I think that without my background in different types of manufacturing it would have been much more difficult. ● Not much experience in the machine shop. ● I did not expect any design/fabrication projects during my freshman year. I was focused on passing Physics. ● The Mechanical
, no. 2, pp. 143–149, 2020.[9] L. D. Camblin and J. A. Steger, “Rethinking faculty development,” Higher Education, vol. 39,no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2000.[10] A. Saroyan and C. Amundsen, Rethinking teaching in higher education: From a course designworkshop to a faculty development framework. Stylus Publishing, LLC., 2004.[11] R. F. DeMara, B. Chen, R. Hartshorne, and R. Zand, “Digitizing and remediating engineeringassessments: An immersive and transportable faculty development workshop,” in 2017 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, 2017.[12] A. C. Strong, M. R. Kendall, G. Henderson, and I. Basalo, “Impact of faculty developmentworkshops on instructional faculty at hispanic-serving institutions,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
familiarizedstudents with the use of RF benchtop sources, measurement tools and simulation softwarethrough the construction of a discrete FM broadcast receiver1. Incoming students have beenimmersed in a curriculum of structured laboratory experiments which typically provide a detailedlist of specifications, deliverables and instructions for both the construction and testing of acircuit.The open-ended nature of this course project represents a significant paradigm shift fromprevious course and laboratory experiences in the curricula. Students nearing the completion oftheir undergraduate education are poised to shortly face work or graduate school environmentswhere the ability to self-start and perform with minimal instruction is desired, if not
design in a multidisciplinary capstone design course," Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 99, pp. 2173-2185, 2021.[11] D. A. Schon, "The architectural studio as an exemplar of education for relection-in-action," Journal of Architectural Education, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 2-9, 1984.[12] P. Little and M. Cardenas, "Use of "Studio" Methods in the Introductory Engineering Design Curriculum," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. July, pp. 309-318, 2001.[13] G. Goldschmidt, H. Hochman and I. Dafni, "The design studio "crit": Teacher-student communication," Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, vol. 24, pp. 285-302, 2010.[14] T. A. Dutton, "Design and Studio Pedagogy," Journal of
about technology andengineering demands new thinking about engineering undergraduate education and a willingnessto consider novel approaches to address this crisis.Higher education has evolved significant barriers to discourage non-engineers from attempting todevelop any depth of understanding about engineering and technology. The engineering majorhas a lengthy and high-sequenced curriculum, it is surrounded by a moat of prerequisite coursesand its demands on student’s time strangle efforts to pursue another field of study along with anengineering major. At the same time most science fields emphasize knowledge of the natural Page 25.939.2world
disciplines. He is a senior member of IEEE and he served in IEEE/Industry Application Society for 15 years at various capacities. He served as chair of Manufacturing Systems Development Applications Department (MSDAD) of IEEE/IAS. Currently, he is serving a two-year term as the chair of the Instrumentation of ASEE (American Society of Engineering Education). He authored over 32 refereed journal and conference publications. In 2009 he as PI received NSF-CCLI grant entitled A Mechatronics Curriculum and Packaging Automation Laboratory Facility. In 2010 he as Co-PI received NSF-ATE grant entitled Meeting Workforce Needs for Mechatronics Tech- nicians. From 2003 through 2006, he was involved with Argonne National Laboratory
developing some animation for an EE course [4]. Multimedia projects founded by theNSF and the Department of Education suggest that visualization, animation and interactive simulationeffectively help learners understand abstract concepts. However, there has been no major instances ofa multimedia approach to EET electric machine courses.In 1998, the Division of Engineering Technology (DET) at Wayne State University (WSU) hadconducted a project to develop computer based instruction (CBI) materials for an Electric Machinescourse for the NSF-funded Greenfield Coalition (NSF-GC) for Manufacturing Education [5-8]. Thiscourse introduce industrial electric power source and industrial applications of motors, generators, andtransformers to associate level
changes. Source: wtrg.comI. IntroductionMotor oil and filters have been changed by do-it-yourselfers for decades. Many family memberschange their oil on their own for a fraction of what it costs to get it done at the local garage orquick lube. Though cost effective for families, some home mechanics overlook the details andhazards created when changing their own oil.Approximately 400 million oil filters are manufactured annually in the United States. Current Page 7.520.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
. He hopes to contribute to the transformation of engineering education so that students are well- equipped to face the challenges of the future in engineering, and can build core engineering competencies in a more self-motivated and confident manner in a diverse and inclusive learning environment. Dr Yu’s academic research interests and expertise focus on using an integrated design approach that in- volves the synthesis of material selection, finite element methods, rapid prototyping/additive manufactur- ing, and machine learning to improve the mechanical properties of hybrids materials (fibre composites, metal/metal hybrids, and cellular lattices) and biomedical materials (surgical implants, head protection, and
very active in pedagogical research and undergraduate research projects, and his research interests include manufacturing laboratory pedagogy and writing pedagogy.Dr. Charles Riley P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Riley has been teaching mechanics concepts for over 10 years and has been honored with both the ASCE ExCEEd New Faculty Excellence in Civil Engineering Education Award (2012) and the Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award (2013). While he teaches freshman to graduate- level courses across the civil engineering curriculum, his focus is on engineering mechanics. He has served in leadership positions in the ASEE Civil Engineering Division.Dr. Ken Lulay P.E., University of Portland
complete details.3. A sophomore industrial engineering class that has student teams do a human-centered technology-relatedproject This project focuses on the development and implementation of a cross-disciplinary, project-drivencourse on the product development process. A Clemson sophomore-level course (Industrial Engineering 201:System Design I) was offered for the first time in the fall semester of 1992 and has since been offered duringthe spring and fall semesters of each year. The course is required of all students in the industrial engineeringmajor and is designed to be taken as the first course in the industrial engineering curriculum. The courseprerequisites (Computers in Engineering and Physics I) are a part of the college-wide