(or ignore) theculture of engineering within academic makerspaces.IntroductionFunded through the National Science Foundation Research Initiation in Engineering Formation(REIF) program, WWU university created a peer mentoring program focused on supportingstudents socially within an academic makerspace. The goal of the program is to increasing senseof belonging in undergraduate engineering students by engaging them in non-technical workwhile supporting social connection and developing community. This study is the first of its kindto explore how peer mentors develop and support makerspace activities explicitly focused oninclusive engagement and how those experiences impact their development as mentors. Thepurpose of this study was to better
inimproving college readiness for black men. Although this work is not engineering-specific, manyof the findings echo those of studies that focus on identity development. Their thematic analysisyielded three themes that linked pre-college experiences to the early undergraduate experiencesof their participants: external influences of college expectations, precollege primers, andeducational and social empowerment. This study suggests that external factors are important tohelping students embark on a trajectory towards the engineering community, but McGee’s(2015; 2014) work indicates that even a positive trajectory motivated by such external factorsmust at some point be converted into a primarily internal motivation. In summary, black malesuccess in
, psychology and communication. Her recent work examines perceived differences in on-line and off-line lives; and ways to generate creative work environments. She also bridges the intersection of Silicon Valley and Hollywood in a leadership initiative.Mr. Srinath Sibi, Stanford University I am a 1st year PhD student in the Automotive Interaction Design Group, interested in driver state and physiological responses in autonomous and partially autonomous cars.Matthew T. IkelerLeigh Hagestad, Stanford University B.S. M.S. Computer Science 2016Dr. Wendy G. Ju, Stanford University Dr. Wendy Ju is Executive Director for Interaction Design Research at the Center for Design Research at Stanford University, and Associate Professor of
exposure at earlier stages in theCS pipeline are minimal.This survey-based article will also discuss potential opportunities to enhance the overall impactand awareness of the technical interview process in academic settings. One example ofopportunity being the provision of systematic studies to assess the overall impacts of technicalinterview preparation initiatives in academic settings. Another example reflects the employmentof longitudinal studies on CS majors as they matriculate through a curriculum to gauge theimpacts of such initiatives as they approach graduation. Moreover, infusing initiatives to increasefaculty awareness and engagement with the technical interview process so they can effectivelyassist in the students’ interview preparation
, which effectivelyintegrates structured projects, guided mentorship, and industry collaboration to maximize internproductivity and growth. The NASA internship program began with an overview of theorganization’s mission, goals, and departmental structure, ensuring that interns gained a clearunderstanding of the broader framework. Interns were also provided with key contactinformation, facilitating seamless communication throughout the program.To enhance the internship experience, NASA offered various professional developmentopportunities, including presentation workshops, mentorship and personal development classes,and public engagement events. For example, one such event that the student participated in wasNASA in the Park, an annual initiative
and Cognitive and Learning Sciences.Dr. Mark Bradley Kinney, West Shore Community College Dr. Mark Kinney is the Vice President of Academics and Student Services at West Shore Community College in Scottville, MI. He has a passion for rural higher education, leading him to conduct his dissertation on the various social roles these institutions play within their community. His career has been spent conducting both qualitative and quantitative research and evaluating the efficacy of a wide variety of organizational initiatives. This ultimately led Dr. Kinney to found All-Star Assessment, LLC, where he applies these research-based principles to the practice of thoroughly evaluating candidates for high-level leadership
2.75 775 Difference in outcome 0.76 0.56Students in the first semester general engineering course Fall 2012 who engaged in the bonusoption and attended one or more workshops did significantly better than students who did notparticipate. When examining the number of workshops that were most significant for improvedperformance, students attending more than 2 workshops had the best outcome for the coursegrade, and students attending 8 workshops had the best outcome for semester GPRs. The resultsare shown in Table 3 below.Table 3. Comparison of number of workshops attended and impact on course grade in firstsemester general engineering course grade and semester GPR for Fall 2012. # Workshops
.5Retention of highly qualified K-12 science and math teachers is essential to successfully preparefuture generations of engineering students. Quality professional development, such as theSummer Institute, provides methods for engagement in experimental and activity design, andsuccessful instruction of ELL students which positively impacts teacher retention. 10, 11The Science Partnership Program (UASPP)To address the issues discussed above, in 2006, the University of Arkansas Science PartnershipProgram was created as a consortium of 18 middle schools by the collaboration of the Universityof Arkansas’ College of Engineering, College of Education & Health Professions and the publicschools. The mission of this partnership was to engage students in
results from the in-videoquizzes. This study will provide evidence on the impact that short-length videos have on learningoutcomes based on whether students engage with the videos on-schedule or if they wait untilreviewing for the final exam. Table 1 shows the video lengths for all videos in the study. Theinstructors worked to make sure the sum of the short-length videos in a given section was similarto the video lengths of the medium-length videos from the semester before. A few timediscrepancies exist due to variance in re-recording the lectures. Videos containing a quiz have a Qin the label (e.g. 7.2Q).Table 1: Number of videos, video length, and defined label for each video chapter (Q next to the videos’ label show
: (1) designteachers across contexts share a common repertoire of design teaching techniques and design thinking processknowledge and (2) insights into what design teachers may be most concerned about regarding their students’development as designers. One contribution of this study is a language for making visible teachers’ designthinking knowledge, the teaching techniques they use to convey this knowledge, and the kinds of designthinking they want to observe in their students. Teachers can use this to make sense of their own experiencesand use it as a tool to discuss their experiences within a larger community of practice. Sharing results withstudents may help them make sense of the ways their teachers help them learn to design – both their
ofcognitive engagement such as apply, analyze, and evaluate. A reflection activity or surveycomposed of specific questions may reveal a more representative picture of how thisAR-enhanced activity impacts learning engineering analysis.5.1.5 OtherAccessibility was represented by 2% of the tags; while this is a small fraction, this topic isimportant to be addressed. Concerns were focused on the technology accessibility; some learnersdid not have a printer to print out the target or a device capable of running the AR app. Theseissues of accessibility may be economic in nature and could remain an issue for a portion of theMOOC population whereas in a residential course it is easier to distribute needed equipment tolearners. Therefore, in MOOCs alternative
” Page 25.441.6Authenticity of assessment:Assessment is authentic (real, genuine, applied or authoritative) when student performance isdirectly examined on worthy intellectual tasks 29, 30. Engaging teaching methods andassessments that emphasize conceptual knowledge rather than rote skills and recall have beenreported to promote deeper learning 31. According to Lauren Resnick 30 “What you assess is whatyou get; if you don't test it you won't get it. To improve student performance we must recognizethat essential intellectual abilities are falling through the cracks of conventional testing”. In otherwords, if assignments and assessment are not designed to adequately capture learnercompetencies, important formative insights may be lost. For
Paper ID #22249Comparative Study of the Intersection of Engineering Identify and BlackIdentity of African-American Engineering Students at a PWI and an HBCUDr. Lesley M. Berhan, University of Toledo Lesley Berhan is currently the Interim Assistant Dean of Diversity, Inclusion, and Community Engage- ment for the College of Engineering and an Associate Professor in the department of Mechanical, In- dustrial, and Manufacturing Engineering at The University of Toledo. Her research interests are in the areas of composites and fibrous materials and engineering education. She received her B.Sc. in Civil Engineering from the
, Student Outcomes Graduates of the program will have an ability to: 1. Analyze a broadly-defined security problem and apply principles of cybersecurity to the design and implementation of solutions. 2. Apply security principles and practices to maintain operations in the presence of risks and threats. 3. Communicate effectively in a variety of professional contexts. 4. Recognize professional responsibilities and make informed judgments in cybersecurity practice based on legal and ethical principles. 5. Function effectively as a member of a team engaged in cybersecurity activities.Criteria 1, 2, 4, 7 and 8 are ”harmonized” across all four ABET commissions, meaning the sameunderstanding applies to all programs accredited by ABET regardless
in [7].Although the programs presented there share some common features, they have generally risenindependently in the absence of a cohesive community in MRE.Our Vision is that MRE will become one of the most impactful disciplines of engineering;attracting diverse and innovative students, graduating professional engineers who will design,develop, and implement transformative autonomous technologies, and improving human healthand welfare. Indeed, mechatronics was identified by Technology Review as one of the top 10emerging technologies with potential to change the world [7]. Therefore, the authors’ long-termgoals are to: • Develop a diverse, inclusive community of MRE educators, students, and practitioners • Collaboratively define the
provide motivation to future cohorts and to otherdepartments in these institutions.Since URM doctoral students spend most of their time exposed to the culture of their academicdepartment as they take classes, conduct research, and interact with department faculty, staff, andother graduate students, the climate they experience and the support they receive at thedepartmental level has a major impact on their success. Preliminary results from the department-level change model being developed and tested in this project are promising. Our biggestchallenges have been: (1) What to do if a Fellow falls behind in their obligations; (2) Low surveyresponse rates by students and faculty; (3) Communicating what the Fellows are learning to theirfaculty
ofaccreditation paradigm. It provided an opportunity for ABET to put forward the newaccreditation criteria-EC2000, which brought a profound impact on engineering educationwithin colleges and universities. In order to cope with the transformation paradigm ofprogram accreditation, colleges and universities carried out various engineering educationreform which included the exploration of a variety of learning outcomes assessment methods,the engagement of a wide range of intellectual resources, the internalization of the philosophyof continuous quality improvement, the integration of evaluation management mechanism,the in-depth reform of curriculum and teaching, and the talents cultivation in line with theEC2000 standard.(2) Understand the concept of
researchcharacterizes STEM education through five essential aspects: the use of active learningstrategies, the influence of contextual factors, the development of student competencies, theimpact of individual conditions such as gender and motivation, and the critical role ofteachers in guiding and shaping STEM experiences. These findings highlight the shift fromtraditional educational models to more dynamic, problem-solving-based approaches, whichfoster meaningful learning and engagement in STEM fields. The study calls for earlyexposure to STEM for all students, with an emphasis on addressing gender disparities andensuring proper teacher training to support the growing STEM initiatives in Latin America.Keywords: STEM education, Active Learning, Competence
Paper ID #37831Research on the Construction of Artificial Intelligence andHuman Language Lab in China’s Universities: Progress,Challenges and ProspectsXi Xi LU Xixi LU is a graduate student at the Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China. Now, she is mainly engaged in research on curriculum and instruction as well as higher education. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comTHE CONSTRUCTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND HUMAN LANGUAGE LAB 1 Research on the
Clinic (FEC) I & II, and Calculus I, faculty and student mentors.The FEC, which had a positive impact on students’ academic progress and professional careerdevelopment. However, while the clinics received a high pre-survey rating (3.6/4.0) for academicimpact (n=16) and (3.4/4.0) for impact on job/internship (n=14), the post-survey revealed adecline to (3.3/4.0) for academic impact (n=16) and (2.8/4.0) for impact on job/internship(n=16), highlighting the need for sustained engagement. Hands-on learning experiences such asthe algae research project further supported academic integration by bridging theoreticalknowledge with practical applications. A scholar described the impact of these activities, stating,“We’re doing this algae project where
installation of a project in remote Amazonian villages. Studentslive and work with villagers on installations in accordance with the Engineers WithoutBordersTM model. Other components involved the student generated planning andparticipation in a teaming exercise and deconstruction study of the ancient engineeringmarvel Macchu Picchu. This involved a three day hike from 9000 ft. to around 15,100 ftin the Peruvian Andes.Internal and external evaluations of student learning wereperformed using Likert Scale and open answer questionnaires. Assessing the experiencein a post-trip survey, students rated the development of teaming, communications, andexperiential learning skills as particular strengths of the program.Background The International
-2020include how students adapted to the remote learning environment that replaced their in-personinstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interestingly, (re)engaging in one’s RedShirt cohortor program was a common theme in the remote learning environment. The discussion addressesthe differences between sophomore versus junior years, the approaches used by the variousRedShirt programs, and provides comparisons with the pathways of traditionally admittedstudents in engineering.These results add to previous literature on RedShirt programs and similar initiatives inengineering. Previous research describes the positive impact on performance in the first year ofthe RedShirt program [6]. The current investigation extends this investigation to
which the students talked about their experiences withportfolios and their sense of themselves as engineers. The excerpts presented in the findingssection come from these data sources.We engaged the gathered data first by simply reading the transcripts through from beginning toend. We saw that in their portfolio work students consistently grappled with a wide variety ofissues. We conceptualized these issues as problems and reduced the disparate data sources into acollection of over 500 problems. We then sought to organize the problems, focusing on fourdifferent types: identity, experience, conceptual knowledge or portfolio construction (and also“other”). We created a codebook operationalizing definitions for these four kinds of problemsand
having performed well in the course would not mean they could communicate theirknowledge effectively to their almost-peer students. These 20-year-old UTAs had no teachingexperience, but were brilliant and very passionate, and we thought they could greatly benefitfrom any additional support in their training.This becomes an urgent issue when more and more UTAs were embedded in many of our multi-sectional courses. On a small scale, it is easy to find very good students as UTAs. At first, wewere teaching only 2 sections with this method, and it was easy to select 2-3 students extremelyadvanced, top 5%, with many additional personal skills beyond math. This is not any moresustainable when many sections are involved, and about 40-50 UTAs are needed
compared by analyzing the syllabi.ENGR1282(FEH)and Introduction of Life Science(EEC)Engineering 1282 is the second course in the fundamentals of engineering sequence andincludes engineering graphics, visualization, and engineering design. During the graphicsportion of the term, the class session will have a brief presentation followed by in-class studiotime. For the design portion, the class will consist largely of hands-on time and focusprimarily on the planning, management, execution, documentation, and presentation of theFEH design project. The purpose of this sequence is to build students’ knowledge ofengineering fundamentals, including engineering graphics, communication, problem solving,the design process, and experiences in a hands-on
type of assessment include self and peer reflections, contracts and portfolios. Competence-based assessment integrates Blooms Taxonomy to include case study analysis and simulations.In this type of activity, students must demonstrate what they “can do” (put into practice) notwhat they know (repeat back). Fundamentally, this educational theory expands assessment fromthe quiz/exam model to the need to analyze transferable skills such as the ability to work in ateam, search for information, analyze data and communicate effectively on a variety of levels.Benefits to both the students and the institutionOne of the greatest frustrations reported by faculty is student surprise at the receipt of a grade.Reality for some students does not include
can assume that women on average place a higher relevanceon such attributes, these ideas often do not consider if such preferences are the result ofthe differing social worlds men and women often occupy and may assume too hastily thatwomen will are best distanced from the technical elements of the work.The Nerd GirlsThe last outreach effort this essay focuses on is known as the Nerd Girls. According totheir website, “The Nerd Girls are a growing, global movement, which celebrates smart-girl individuality that’s revolutionizing our future.”48 The group is made up of Tuftsengineering students who aim to communicate to young women a simple message: Youcan be beautiful and girly- and be an engineer! Their key aim is to counter the oftenmasculine
process is of highimportance, particularly as engineering education moves toward more purposeful engagement infostering students' sociotechnical thinking in engineering design projects.This paper reports on our preliminary analysis of students’ learning in a course, titled InventiveDesign, designed to teach both design frameworks (e.g., traditional design models, sociallyengaged design, human-centered design, design justice), as well as critical social theories (CSTs)(e.g., critical race theory, feminist theories, (dis)ability studies) for analyzing social context anddesigning to address specific social, cultural, political, and ethical elements of community-baseddesign projects. Our goal was to implement a pedagogical strategy for teaching
course gradesbeyond standardized test scores [15]; further details on exam content are outlined in a relatedscale development study [16]. This measure is discussed further in the Method section.Interpretations of Past EventsStudents’ self-efficacy is their belief in their ability to perform tasks as well as desired [10]. Self-efficacy informs students about desirable courses of action and increases the likelihood that theywill act [17]. People tend to form goals and engage in tasks aligned with those activities in whichthey feel the most efficacious [18]. Academic self-efficacy beliefs may be the result ofperceptions of past performance in academic domains [19].Reflecting the predictions of the expectancy-value model, high school STEM
in the department has had the greatest positive and negative impact onthem. Interviews were conducted virtually over Zoom. On average, interviews 15 minutes. Bothvideo and audio were recorded during these sessions, and all audio was transcribed. Transcriptsof the interview were member checked for intention in the responses to the interview prompts.All participant transcripts and reporting of data are provided with pseudonyms to ensure theconfidentiality of the participants.ParticipantsThe participants include 88 students that completed the user experience survey in an engineeringdepartment from a medium-size private institution. 9 of the 88 participants provided a writtencomment. An additional 13 completed the interviews. The department