] between December 2020 and December 2023. The objective of the projectwas to evaluate the efficacy of critical narrative as a pedagogical tool for helping engineeringstudents engage with the broader impacts and professional responsibilities associated withengineering work. Motivation for the project was driven by a recognition within the researchteam that traditional engineering case studies often fail to engage students in critical thinkingbeyond the boundaries of the information provided in the specific case. Consistent with findingsby Martin et al. (2021)[2], traditional case studies are also limited to “decision-making inprofessional contexts and less on power relations, equity and the broader societal mission ofengineering.” As a novel
retention and engagement in the university community?This 1-unit introductory course has been developed around three themes: • Entering the Engineering/Computer Science Profession • Engaging in the University Community • Building Skills for SuccessTo develop students’ professional skills and knowledge of career paths available, the first-yearstudents in this course meet with student leaders, engage in breakout group discussions with theChairperson or a faculty member from their intended major, watch and reflect on brief videosabout each of the majors offered in the School of Engineering and Computer Science, andparticipate in classroom activities focused on professional communication and ethics.Active engagement in the university community is
, they need to understand the different stakeholders who are impacted by thedesigns they create. In a typical civil engineering design process, direct stakeholders (e.g. theclient) may be involved during the beginning of the process when establishing the criteria of theproject, with perhaps some limited community engagement during public outreach. This approachhowever limits the perspectives contributing to a project. Values Sensitive Design (VSD) is amethodology that asks the engineer to systematically consider values and norms, direct andindirect stakeholders, and the long-lasting impacts early and throughout the design process to craftmore equitable solutions and reduce or eliminate unintended consequences. In a senior technicalelective
-specific, outreach to high schools andcommunity colleges (speakers, open houses, and parental involvement), tutoring, mentoring, andadvising are main components of the program. Some NW-ETEP sites have engaged students inhands-on activities (e.g Human Powered Paper Vehicle Competition), conferences, living-learning communities, and site visits to industry. A key strategy of this program, however, is toconnect students to existing opportunities, not offering many new services.In terms of reaching the statewide goals of the grant, the data from WSU and UW suggest thatgoals 1 and 3 above may be achieved in the next two years. The data to accurately assess thesegoals lags two years behind (Department of Education IPEDS most recent year available is
often have a positive impact on student veterans’ educationalexperiences and outcomes [14], [15]. Persky and Oliver’s [16] study of student veteransattending community colleges identified characteristics of successful programs: (a) creditstreamlining; (b) streamlining of programs and services; and (c) faculty, advisor, and counselortraining (p. 113). Caton’s [17] study of student veterans services at a community college found ittakes an average of six years to fully develop student veteran programs; those programs thatbecame a part of the fabric of the institution had support from the highest level of universityadministration and leadership, and the most successful programs used a student-centeredapproach, focusing on student veteran
engineeringstudents to travel and to participate in service projects centered on international development.The club grew rapidly in membership and established relationships with a university in Peru aswell as an Andean community near Cuzco, Peru. This community has twice been the destinationof ISC students during summer trips. Although student interest in the program has been highbecause of its social, adventure and altruistic components, undertaking it as a university entityrequires justification from a student development standpoint. There are many venues throughwhich young travelers might make overseas excursions and engage in community service,however, students participating through a university would be expected to develop knowledgeand skills in the
andEydgahi (n.d.) approach this issue as it relates to curricula, by recognizing that non-STEM fields such as Social Sciences andHumanities “emphasize more on ‘soft skills’ and ‘social service’ and as such have naturally embraced ‘service-learning’” (p. 1). As aresult, integrating academic fields with “service-learning” that emphasizes, “‘technical’ and ‘scientific’ skills such asEngineering…[is] rare”33. Another difference in the definition of service learning provided through an evaluation of Jacoby (1996), who defines servicelearning as a “form of experiential education in which students engage in activities that address human and community needs togetherwith structured opportunities intentionally designed to promote student learning and
thisstudy to continue exploring women’s sense of belonging in the academic makerspaceenvironment. This study seeks to expand our understanding of women makers with differentlevels of making experience and what they attribute as meaningful to their sense of belonging.To further understand the nuances of sense of belonging in makerspaces for women, this studysought to answer the following question:RQ1: How does level of experience with making impact these women’s sense of belonging?In this paper, we explore this question by interviewing 4 women engineering students on theirlived experiences engaging with different makerspaces at the same academic institution, all withvarying degrees of previous making experience. This work can be used by
Resistance to Active Learning Through Instructor Development: Project UpdateIntroduction This work-in-progress paper will provide an update on our research studying instructordevelopment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) classrooms. Theoverall aim of this study is to increase the adoption of active learning in STEM classrooms. Wedefine active learning as any time an instructor engages students in the course content in waysthat go beyond simply lecturing to their students while their students are passively taking notes(e.g., think-pair-shares, in-class group projects). Previously, active learning has been shown toimprove student retention rates, grades, and understanding of course material
, communication net- works for utility and industrial automation, and data analytics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Pedagogical Approach for Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Engineering Students Salman Mohagheghi Electrical Engineering Department Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA Email: smohaghe@mines.eduIntroductionToday’s modern technology-centric world faces unique challenges that need forward-looking andtransformational solutions, rather than incremental ones. Solving these challenges requires traininga new generation of
, approximation techniques, anddesign tools (MATLAB, LTSpice). Additionally, this course provided activities and discussionsto support students in their international travel (e.g., passport & medical requirements, currency,food culture, inter-city and inter-country buses/trains) and collaboration with internationalfaculty (e.g., communication strategies, project requirements, documentation requirements).Students were required to maintain a digital notebook that captured their class activities,design/simulation work, and notes on important course readings. This notebook was reviewed atfour timepoints during the semester with feedback provided to improve documentation practices.This was to prime students to use a digital notebook to capture all of
campus camp experience “welcoming the Freshman class to Texas A&M eachyear with the purpose of giving them an opportunity to have fun, make friends, and learn moreabout life at Texas A&M.” Based loosely on lessons learned through Texas A&M, E2 Campaspires to the notoriety and impact of FISH Camp while engaging engineering student’s in a fun,challenging, and engineering-specific experience.Camp Staffing and ProgrammingDesigned to support over 900 first-time, fulltime freshmen entering the Engineering Schools at Page 15.256.4ASU, E2 Camp is a series of five camps that accommodates approximately 180 students each.The Engineering Schools
research.However, class size is only one part of the institutional setting. Therefore, we also consider theimpact of the larger context in which students learn: institution type.Institution Type: As with class size, there are some commonly held ideas about the impact ofinstitution type on students’ academic experiences. For example, several studies suggest thathigher levels of student engagement are associated with small liberal arts colleges18-21. Otherstudies have also found links between institution type and student learning outcomes, such asKuh and Hu’s22 examination of the learning productivity of undergraduate students at researchuniversities, in which they found that, “different types of institutions have differential effects onstudent quality of
.REFERENCES[1] WWC Intervention Report. (2016, July. [Online] Available:https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_firstyear_071916. pdf. [Accessed on: Jan 15, 2024][2] G.D. Kuh, High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities. 2008.[3] L.M. Boettler, R.A. Goldfine, D.W. Leech, and G.R. Siegrist, Academic Skills, Community Engaged, Leadership, and Global Themed First-Year Seminars: Comparisons in Student Success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 24(1), 213- 233. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025120912696.[4] D.G. Young and J.M. Hopp, 2012-2013 National survey of
educational impact of interdisciplinary skill-building and the broader outreach potential of HAM as an interactive STEM platform. To date, students have successfully established APRS communication with the payload at dis-tances of 20 and 200 feet, verifying baseline functionality between the visual payload, telemetry,and APRS. The system continues to perform reliably and remains on track for full integration bythe end of May 2025. Additional validation through a preliminary tethered launch is planned toassess data transmission capabilities under simulated flight conditions. Notably, neither of HAM’s lead students comes from a traditional background in mechani-cal or electrical engineering—disciplines upon which this renovation heavily relies
Paper ID #47424BOARD # 298: RET: Year One Lessons-Learned from a Sensing and MeasurementFocused Site for Middle School Math and Science TeachersDr. Todd Freeborn, The University of Alabama Todd Freeborn, PhD, is an associate professor with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at The University of Alabama. He has coordinated REU, IRES, RET, IUSE, and S-STEM programs supported by the National Science Foundation, with many of these programs focused on increasing engagement of engineering students in research. His research focuses on techniques to collect and analyze the electrical impedance of biological
approach was to first identify critical areas for graduate student development. Aninitial list was created that grouped potential competencies in three areas, shown inTable 1. Competencies in this list were drawn from work on developmental assessment centersfor managers [2, 3], with input from the faculties in the different engineering disciplines at theUniversity of Tulsa, as well as their Industrial Advisory Boards.Table 1. Initial set of professional competencies. Technical Communication Cultural Information Seeking Oral Communication Cultural Adaptability Planning and Organizing Leadership Teamwork Problem Solving
University of Virginia in Biomedical Engineering. She is committed to developing more inclusive teaching and research practices.Ms. Abigail T Stephan, Clemson University Dr. Abigail (Abby) Stephan is a Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychology and an affiliated faculty member at the Institute for Engaged Aging at Clemson University in South Carolina. Her research explores a) the influence of intergenerational relationships in family, community, and educational contexts on learning, development, and well-being across the lifespan and b) examines social and psychological factors that promote healthy aging. In addition to taking an ecological, systems-oriented perspective, her work often employs a mixed
vertical curves and geometric design in an engaged project. 3. Earthwork The main purpose of this section is to introduce students to the concept of earthwork, andspecifically the concept of cut and fill. In this part of the project, students were asked to definestations, one thousand feet apart on the selected road. At each station, students read the elevationof the ground ten feet to the right and ten feet to the left of the station (It is assumed that thewidth of the road is 20 feet). They drew the cross-section of the profiles and calculated theamount of soil needed to be cut and fill. This process was completed for all stations and the totalamount of soil needed to be cut and fill was calculated. Figure 5 shows the method
. Furthermore, with regard to improvements for next year,23% of students asked for more hands-on activities and 15% asked for fewer lectures. It appearsthat the hands-on activities and active learning were more engaging than the lectures. Thisobservation is critical because research has shown that students’ retention is superior when theyare engaged and find relevance in their work6. Therefore, the teaching methods used throughoutthe program may potentially have an impact on content knowledge and possible confidence gainsin relation to STEM fields.DiscussionFindingsThis program was designed to enhance the understanding of each engineering field along withinspiring high school students to pursue engineering as a professional career. Our analysesexamined
Work-In-Progress: Broadening Participation in Engineering: Exploring the Burdens and Benefits of Student VolunteerismAbstractAcross the United States, organizations are engaged in ongoing efforts to broaden participation inengineering (BPE). Because of the lack of persistent representation in engineering, these efforts focusacross the elementary, secondary, and postsecondary levels of education, primarily targeting women andpeople of color. Although extensive literature has documented the impacts of BPE efforts on participantsthemselves, less research examines the experiences of those who engage in efforts to broadenparticipation. Such an investigation is important because much of the labor that goes into BPE is
clubs, internships or co-ops, undergraduate research, study abroad, etc. [1, 3, 18].As suggested by previous researchers, co-curricular involvement has been linked to a range ofpositive student outcomes, including: career-related professional skills acquisition andcompetencies developed, such as communication, leadership, and teamwork [3, 5, 16], academicachievement and persistence [19], ethical development [18], and cognitive development [20, 21].Students, for example, are aware of the importance of co-curricular experiences in their futureemployment [22]. In a recent study, Jackson and Bridgstock [23] investigated students’perceptions of the impact of certain activities on enhancing undergraduate graduates’employability at three Australian
the beginning of the semester. Maybe the time could be optimized to promote awareness.” (CIVE 2400—Civil Engineering Materials and CIVE 2500—Statics and Mechanics of Materials II are both offered in the Spring semester and students usually take them at the same time.)• “I think hands on in class projects on direct impacts of designing/building sustainable energy can be helpful for a lot of students. The projects would have to be engaging to multiple types of students and grab interest in different ways. I also [think] that writing essays on sustainable energy would have a directly negative effect and would make students unengaged and dislike the [concept].”In response to Q1, almost all responding students said they
integral part of the ongoing activities. One research and assessment method beingemployed is the Delphi method. This formal communication process will be used to gatherconsensus among faculty, industry leaders and students in an effort to identify sets ofcomputational skills vital for engineering professionals. Descriptions and reflections of the firstyear of project activities will be presented as well as plans for future activities. Preliminaryassessment data will also be available.1. IntroductionTwo decades ago to say that an engineering graduate was highly competent in computing meantthat he or she had mastered the FORTRAN programming language. A decade later it meant, inaddition, mastering basic skills in a few key discipline-specific
interpersonal skills, but to understand the terminology,processes, and challenges of management as well. As one might well imagine, such asweeping change in capstone design raised many questions and issues. How wouldSystems Engineers (SE) and Systems Engineering Management (SEM) majors beassigned to teams in the traditional engineering majors? What expectations would facultymentors have for these managers? How could they be assessed appropriately? Wouldthe management students be accepted and integrated effectively? Would the managershave a positive impact on the design experience? In retrospect, the challenges involvedin creating, mentoring, and assessing these engineer-manager capstone teams were notnearly as insurmountable as they might seem
validity in the application of codes across all utterances. During these discussions,the researchers reconciled discrepancies across their individual coding, refined coding decisions,and documented key teacher supports and actions that emerged during interaction with students.This whole process not only strengthened the reliability of the findings but also provided a richerunderstanding of the teacher’s role in facilitating students’ engagement with EPEs.Finally, in the third phase of analysis, the impact of the teacher’s discourse moves on students’engagement with EPEs was determined by reviewing the behavior and discourse of the groupafter the teacher left to interact with another small group. This approach allowed for anevaluation of how
performance expectations, andcore ideas. The final guide is found in Appendix C.ResultsRQ1: What are the trends in research?Of the included studies, 70% were research articles. The predominant methodology wasqualitative (43%), followed by quantitative (14%) and mixed-methods (10%). These studieswere categorized by research method (Table 1). Most of the research focused on understandingstudent behaviors and thinking during engineering instruction (38%) primarily through aqualitative approach. For example, researchers observed or interviewed students engaging indesign activities to describe design decisions [16] [17], behaviors during team activities [18], andviews related to design thinking [19] [20]. Research around understanding teacher
engaging, due in large part to the closeness ofmy small cohort of four students, including myself. Initially I wanted to do community workwith the Latino/a/é population, speaking to my own struggles attending inner city schools withlittle representation and few STEM opportunities. However, my previous PhD experienceslingered. I wanted to know what was being done in the space to help PhD students, so that peoplewould not endure the struggles that I or my friends did at ABC university.I was surprised. The problems in doctoral education were being studied as attrition issues.Researchers were asking questions related to why students were choosing to leave their doctoralengineering programs. For me the answer was obvious. PhD programs are difficult
search and subsequently made its way into our dataset, but did not. Theproprietary nature of the WOS search algorithm precludes our ability to explain all of itsbehaviors. Future research could identify earlier research in this topic area, examine how onemight be able to include these items, and if inclusion of earlier items would impact the resultinganalyses.This study presents several avenues for future research and engagement for librarians workingwith students with disabilities. As Trainor et al. identified, there has been little work on disabilityand intersectionality, identifying where students with disabilities might face additional barriers tosuccess in higher education [49]. Librarians can also use the thematic evolution analysis
pandemic is still unfolding and the fulleffects of COVID-19 on education will not be known for quite some time. COVID-19 hasalso spurred the need for virtual learning as an alternative to face-to-face learning. Thedisruption of educational activities due to COVID-19 can have a negative impact onstudents’ social wellness, mental health, and sense of community. The environment hasalso caused many educators to adjust and modify their curriculum to fit virtual learning.As noted by Barnett-Braddock [4], individuals’ behavior and environment impact howthey learn, and online learning comes with the challenges to sustain student attention ina virtual learning environment especially for those students with attention and learningproblems. Gottfried [5