Annual Conference for Australian Association for Engineering Education, 2003, Melbourne.(5) Ciglarlic, M. and Vidmar, T. European Journal of Engineering Education, Use of Internet Technologies for Teaching Purposes, 1998, 23, 497.(6) Crosthwaite, C. and Simmons, J. “Curriculum Diversity in the First Year”; 14th Annual Australian Association Engineering Education Conference, 2003, Melbourne.(7) Lemckert, C. “Enhancement of Internet-Mediated Laboratory Experiments”; 13th Annual Conference of the Australian Association of Engineering Education, 2003, Conference.(8) Gillet, D., Latchman, H. A., Salzmann, C. and Crisalle, O. D. Journal of Engineering Education, Hands-On Laboratory
experiences in communication courses,(3) analyze pedagogical strategies or curriculum design processes for teaching engineering students to communicate, or(4) provide fundamental understanding of engineering writing and speaking. 2Examples of papers retrieved through the search that were not relevant for our purposes includedthose on “community;” “communications” as that term is used in electrical and computerengineering; and writing or speaking used simply as a means to understand another aspect ofengineering education—for example, the effect of a global experience; and courses designed fornon-engineering student groups. A few of the papers in our study
compressed prototyping timeline and ensure that all studentsparticipate in the structural analysis portion of the exercise. It is the intention of our program tomake the Wooden Bike Frame Challenge, which is now entering its sixth year, a permanent partof the curriculum in mechanical engineering. The PBL exercise and evaluative results presentedin this study may be valuable for other programs looking to embed realistic, hands-onengineering design scenarios into core mechanics courses.References[1] R.A. Atadero, K.E. Rambo‐Hernandez and M.M. Balgopal, "Using social cognitive careertheory to assess student outcomes of group design projects in statics," J Eng Educ, vol. 104, pp.55-73, 2015.[2] N.A. Brake and F.A. Adam, "Integrating a 3-D printer and a
College where he taught electronics for 5 years. He still teaches at ACC as an Adjunct Professor. Lou has 25+ years experience in the electronics industry. He holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of Houston and a master’s degree from the University of Maryland. He is author of 19 books on computer and electronic subjects. He has worked with MATEC as a contractor for 5 years on several NSF grants and is the principal author of the Work-Ready Electronics series and participates in the Esyst project. Page 14.674.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 HOW SHOULD
UniversityMs. Briceland McLaughlin, Boise State University Briceland McLaughlin is an academic advisor at Boise State University. She graduated with an M.Ed. from the University of Kansas in 2011 and has worked at higher education institutions across the country over the last decade in both student affairs and academic support roles. Briceland is interested in the intersectionality of student development theory and curriculum design.Dr. Donald Plumlee P.E., Boise State University Dr. Plumlee is certified as a Professional Engineer in the state of Idaho. He has spent the last ten years es- tablishing the Ceramic MEMS laboratory at Boise State University. Dr. Plumlee is involved in numerous projects developing micro-electro
Social Impact Consideration," Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 145, no. 3, 2022.[11] A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2014.[12] S. S. Joshi, K. A. Davis, A. Shermadou, and B. S. Garcia, "Exploring How Engineering Students Respond to Challenges While Working in Global Virtual Teams," in 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2022, pp. 1-9.[13] M. Hernández-de-Menéndez, C. A. Escobar Diaz, and R. Morales-Menéndez, "Engineering education for smart 4.0 technology: a review," International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, vol. 14, pp. 789 - 803, 2020.[14] J. M. Smith, J. Lucena, A. Rivera
designedto best fit the needs of the building and configured to fit the available land on the property. Thispaper will address the methods used to collect the data as well as the analysis used to determinethe feasibility of using a ground source heat pump. This will include an estimate of the costsavings along with the pay-back period and other considerations for a ground source heat pump.The Undergraduate Research Educational ExperienceEastern Washington University is regionally known for their engineering students having both avery strong practical background along with the theoretical knowledge learned from their coursework. The senior capstone is a very important part of the curriculum and provides a final projectwhere the students demonstrate
standard four-year curriculum for engineering education.”27In every case, these documents call for more broadly educated engineers who can bring a moreholistic approach to problem-solving—engineers who understand systems thinking, businessprinciples, public policy, and leadership; who can communicate effectively and adopt a globalperspective; and who display adaptability, entrepreneurial spirit, creativity, and practicalingenuity. How can all of these new competencies be addressed in the already strained four-yearengineering curriculum? The most frequent answer is that they cannot—that adequatepreparation for professional practice must include additional formal education beyond thebaccalaureate degree, and that the baccalaureate degree itself must
accredited programs. Industrial andchemical engineering programs are awaiting their first class tor graduate to apply foraccreditation per ABET’s rules. The curriculum for the Department of Civil Engineering at IUMis reproduced in Appendix 2 for illustration purposes. Other engineering programs at the IUMand at other universities are similar. This specific curriculum can be used as a reference only asnext discussions apply to the engineering curriculum in general and across the board. 1st Year Introductory Mathematics and Introductory Science (Algebra, Calculus I & II, Physics I, Chemistry … etc.)` 2nd Year Advanced Mathematics and Introductory Science (Calculus III, Differential Equations, Linear
available project-based teaching/learning initiatives inengineering education and how the UCCRP differs from all of these. Over the years, many pedagogical activities, which fall under the umbrella of project-basedlearning, have been developed and successfully implemented in many higher education institutions.These project-based learning initiatives can be classified into five categories. The first category en-compasses courses offered early in the curriculum, such as the I-Series at the University of Maryland,SUMMER 2020 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2 5 ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Undergraduate Cross-Class
Paper ID #20882Examples of Free Choice Open-Ended Design Projects in a First-Year Engi-neering CourseDr. Jack Bringardner, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Jack Bringardner is an Assistant Professor in the First-Year Engineering Program at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. He studied civil engineering and received his B.S. from the Ohio State University and his M.S and Ph.D. at the University of Texas at Austin. His primary focus is developing curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly in the Introduction to Engineering and Design course at NYU. He is the Webmaster for the ASEE First
Committee for the developmentand piloting of “CAMP IE”, a collaborative education project. The funding agent’s primaryinterest was to encourage educational collaboration between the local public schools and theUniversity of Louisville that involve both the JCPS teachers or administrators and the UofLfaculty or administrators. In addition, as the project evolved, enhanced funding was receivedfrom the CPMSA Program Office via a National Science Foundation ComprehensivePartnership for Minority Student Achievement (NSF/CPMSA) grant, which is a 5-yearpartnership with JCPS and NSF to address the critical problem of preparing moreunderrepresented minority students to enter college and pursue math/science/technology -relatedcareers.The “CAMP IE” model is a
” 104(2) 167–188 [4] Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989. [5] BesterfieldSacre, M., Ozaltin, N. O., Robinson, A., Shuman, L., Shartrand, A., & Weilerstein, P. (2013). Factors related to entrepreneurial knowledge in the engineering curriculum. Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 31–38. [6] DuvalCouetil, N., Kisenwether, E., Tranquilo, J., & Wheadon, J. (2013). Exploring the alignment of entrepreneurship education with ABET accreditation criteria. In National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance Open Conference. [7] Ferguson, D.M., Jablokow, K.W., Ohland, M.W
involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction.Prof. Debbie Chachra, Olin College of Engineering Debbie Chachra is a Professor of Engineering at Olin College of Engineering. Her education-related research interests include self-efficacy, design, intrinsic motivation, and gender. She speaks and consults on curricular design, student-centered learning, and gender and STEM.Dr. Kate Roach, UCLMrs. Emanuela Tilley, University College LondonDr. Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University Dr. Kyle Gipson is an Associate Professor at James Madison University (United States) in the Department of Engineering (Madison Engineering) and the Director of the Madison Engineering Leadership Program
improvement.Below is a list of questions educators could consider in the planning and development phases ofdesigning a laboratory experience that connects engineering standards, students' prior knowledge,and real-world applications. Idea Generation: • Review the required courses in the curriculum and list all the most important topics within the domain you want to emphasize. Research: • What local resources do you have? • What are the research specialties of your institute and department? • Who are the colleagues that can support your development? Analysis and Planning: • Review the answers to the above questions and connect the dots
labsession. Due to COVID-19, this course was delivered in a HyFlex format, meaning in-personattendance was optional. Students could choose to watch the class live online or watch a recordinglater. If students choose to not attend class or the lab session, there is no penalty to their grade. 8 Success in this course is not only necessary for future courses within the curriculum, but itis also necessary within the ISE industry. Statistics can aid manufacturing companies in makingbetter informed decisions that are backed by data as opposed to guesswork. It is crucial for studentsto have a solid foundation of the topics in this course while also
, manyengineering programs have incorporated international service projects4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11.. In his Ph.D.dissertation regarding humanitarian aspects engineering in the engineering curriculum, Page 15.896.2Vandersteen provides and eloquent history of the evolution of engineering education discussinghow the profession has evolved to see the interconnection between technology and humanity.He further states that the “2000s (have seen an) increased interest in social, environmentalimpact of engineering”12. In fact, six years after the advent of ABET‟s EC-2000, thefundamental change in engineering accreditation, the International Journal for Service
. Keil and M. Basantis, An industrial internship program to enhance student learning and marketability, proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 845-850.18 I. Dabipi and J. Arumala, Enhancing engineering education through real-life projects, proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, paper AC 2007-3031.19 M. Aggarwal, College-industry partnerships at its best, proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition, paper AC 2010-52.20 K. Korhonen-Yrjänheikki, T. Tukiainen, and M. Takala, New challenging approaches to engineering education
2005, American Society for Engineering Education References1. Boronkay, T. G., and Janak, D. “Introduction of Finite Element Methods in the Lower Division Mechanical Engineering Technology Curriculum.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Milwaukee, WI, 1997. Session 2238.2. Cole, W.: “Graphical Applications: Analysis and Manufacturing”. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, Spring, 1999, pp 43-49.3. Howell, S.: “Finite Element Analysis in a Freshman Graphics Course?” Engineering Design Graphics Journal, Winter, 1993, pp 29-32.4. Juricic, D., Howell, S., Jenison, R., and Barr, R. “Extending Engineering Design Graphics Laboratories to have a CAD/CAM Component – Part II
organization of industrial facilities. Another goal is to familiarize students withthe responsibilities of technicians, technologists, and engineers working in various technicalpositions. Delivery of the course involved three mechanisms: lectures, laboratory lessons, andfield trips. This paper describes how lectures, laboratory lessons, and field trips contributed toaccomplishing the course objectives. The paper also presents the results of a survey wherestudents showed satisfaction with their learning experiences but made some important suggestionsfor improving the course.IntroductionEngineering and engineering technology programs have recognized the importance of involvingindustry in the educational process1-6. Similarly, the engineering technology
tailored integration ofcourse content with librarian partners leads to significant improvements in students’ use of high- Proceedings of the 2005 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 2quality information resources5. In addition, the expansion of technical writing courseoutcomes to include IL is consistent with achieving objectives in TAC of ABETCriterion 2, h. ability to engage in lifelong learning; i. knowledge of contemporaryprofessional, societal and global issues, and j. knowledge of contemporary professional,societal and global issues6.These
Workplace: Results of a Survey on Technical Communication Skills,” no. October, 2001.[4] S. Cerri, “EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION SKILLS FOR ENGINEERS,” pp. 625– 629, 2000.[5] A. Keane and I. S. Gibson, “Communication Trends in Engineering Firms: Implications for Undergraduate Engineering Courses,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 115–121, 1999.[6] Society of Manufacturing Engineers Education Foundation, “Manufacturing Education Plan: Phase 1 Report—Industry Identifies Competency Gaps Among Newly Hired Engineering,” 1997.[7] L. A. Riley, P. Furth, and J. Zelmer, “Assessing Our Engineering Alumni: Determinants of Success in the Workplace,” 2000 ASEE/Gulf-Southwest Sect. Annu. Conf., 2000
; manufacturing engineering; quality; environmental, health and safety; and others. Before joining National University, he acquired 12+ years of voluntary involvement with higher education, including adjunct teaching and research in engineering at the University of Colorado and formal advisory involvement in both science and engineering at the University of Texas. Other past professional and academic activities include being a founding member and officer in the Central Texas Electronics Association; past chairman of IBM’s Materials Shared University Research Committee; Ph.D. Recruiting Coordinator for IBM’s Systems Technology Division; and executive sponsor for 3M division’s
Graduate Schol- arship in 2012. He currently serves as the reviewer for IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, IEEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPONENTS, PACKAGING AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPAT- IBILITY and IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS I: REGULAR PAPERS. He also currently serves as the guest associate editor for IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPONENTS, PACK- AGING AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY. His student has won the Best Poster Paper Award at the 23rd IEEE Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems (EPEPS) in 2014.Mr. Adam C. Hicks, Colorado State University c American Society for Engineering Education
AC 2007-1475: UPGRADING A MICROCONTROLLER SYSTEMS COURSE WITHTHE CYPRESS PSOCKevin Bolding, Seattle Pacific UnivDave Van Ess, Cypress Semiconductor Page 12.1521.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Upgrading a Microcontroller Systems Course Using the Cypress PSoCAbstractAs our society continually embraces technology to greater and greater degrees, the need forengineers with the skills to develop microcontroller based systems is constantly growing.Microcontroller systems design courses are meant to equip students with the understanding,skills, and methods needed to design and develop systems built around a microcontroller
hardware implementation of the real-time electromagneticfield analysis system for the energy conversion laboratory. The initial work was originally developed using the Visual Basic environment (VB5), but with ahardware manufactured by the American Data Acquisition Corp. (ADAC), based on a DataAcquisition board 5500MF. With the continuous development of computer tools, that packagebecame obsolete and considerably limited in I/O channels and control capabilities, compared withthe options offered by the newly acquired National Instruments package [6], based on a DataAcquisition Card PCI-6025E and the Component Works™ software. It was necessary to continuewith the conversion of the existing program code to match the National Instruments package
technicians in Moreover, these technicians should also be skilled in customerthe electric vehicle (EV) sector. This initiative has inspired service to assist EV owners adequately. Myers, Kenar, etboth existing and prospective EV technicians, who are now al.[12] highlight the critical importance of these aspects,seeking monetary and educational support from the indicating the clear need for specialized training programsgovernment. Nevertheless, educational bodies must establish designed for those servicing electric vehicles. Therefore, thestrong curriculums tailored for EV technician training to fulfill proposed training initiative is designed to meet
Political Science (Summa Cum Laude). Prior to UNL, she was a professor at Bellevue University for 26 years, where in 1994 as part of her teaching portfolio she developed and taught the first fully online asynchronous web-based course offered by that institution. Her interests lie in engineering management, quality management, pedagogy, and assessment of teaching and learning, particularly in the online space. She is active in the American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM) and the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). In recent years she has served as Secretary, President, and Past-President of the Council of Engineering Management Academic Leaders (CEMAL), as a LEAD officer, and is currently serving
several other upper division courses. They are also used to satisfy ABET-Engineering Accreditation Commission’s (EAC) requirements for the accreditation of theprogram. ABET-EAC general criteria for accreditation of programs at the baccalaureate levelconsists of eight components: (1) Students, (2) Program Educational Objectives (PEO), (3) StudentOutcome (SO), (4) Continuous Improvement, (5) Curriculum, (6) Faculty, (7) Facilities, and (8)Institutional Support [1, 13, and 14]. In addition to the general criteria, each program must satisfythe Program Criteria established by the lead professional society related to the program andapproved by ABET. For the mechanical engineering programs, ASME is the lead society. Criterion(3)-SO and Criterion (4) are
beenconstantly increasing. Automotive communication networks are evolving rapidly to assist theincrease in bandwidth requirements necessary to support new functionality, interaction betweenmodules and the growing demand for information accessibility. Despite the fact that thesecommunication networks are broadly applied in the automotive industry, the offering ofengineering courses in this area is very limited. To address this gap in the curriculum, a newautomotive communications network course was developed to educate students in ElectricalEngineering (EE) and Mechanical Engineering (ME) programs. This paper provides details onthe course content, textbook and reference selection, lab experiments, student feedback and otherlessons learned.Keywords