of transportation engineering education. This paperdocuments the results of a survey of how traffic operations concepts are integrated intoundergraduate level civil engineering curricula in the United States and how these topics aretaught. A survey was distributed to faculty at universities with civil engineering programs acrossthe United States. The survey responses reveal concepts related to traffic operations are coveredin a large majority of introductory transportation courses and many universities offer a secondarycourse covering concepts related to traffic operations. The survey also reveals that, while mostinstructors utilize active learning strategies in their classrooms, there is little collaborative effortthat goes into developing
Paper ID #29519WIP: Entrepreneurially Minded Learning in a Physiological SignalsAnalysis LabJennifer Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Dr. Jennifer Bailey is a Senior Lecturer of Biomedical Engineering at Rochester Institute of Technology, where she has taught since January of 2014. She previously taught at the University of Illinois and the University of Southern Indiana after graduating from Purdue University. Bailey’s passion is lab course development and improving student learning through enhancing lab and other hands-on experiences.Dr. Michael Scott Richards American
of wireless/mobile technology inclassroom instruction to improve teaching and learning. A wireless LAN (Local Area Network)composed of Tablet PCs was setup. Special interactive software was installed. The platform todeliver some of the EET (Electronics Engineering Technology) courses was developed. TheseEET courses were redesigned to adapt to the new system. Evaluations from the students showedthat they are learning more and concentrating on the subject matter. They overwhelmingly gavepositive feedback to this new instructional system. Feedback from all the instructors is positiveas well. We plan to include more courses using this new system in the future.IntroductionOne of the challenges facing faculty in Electronics Engineering Technology
2006-1139: DESIGN VERSUS RESEARCH; ABET REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGNAND WHY RESEARCH CANNOT SUBSTITUTE FOR DESIGNJohn D. Gassert, Milwaukee School of Engineering John D. Gassert, Ph.D., P.E., is currently a Professor and Biomedical Engineering Program Director at Milwaukee School of Engineering. He received his Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering in 1995 from Marquette University and his BS and MS degrees in Electrical Engineering in 1971 and 1974 also from Marquette University. Gassert is a member of BMES and the Accreditation Activities Committee of the BMES, a Senior Member of the IEEE, an ABET EAC program evaluator for Biomedical Engineering, and a member of the NSPE. He has developed and taught
Paper ID #27204Assessing the Data Analysis Training of Engineering UndergraduatesMrs. Eunhye Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette Eunhye Kim is a Ph.D. student and research assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests lie in engineering design education, especially for engineering stu- dents’ entrepreneurial mindsets and multidisciplinary teamwork skills in design and innovation projects. She earned a B.S. in Electronics Engineering and an M.B.A. in South Korea and worked as a hardware development engineer and an IT strategic planner in the industry.Nathan M. Hicks, Purdue
Paper ID #8624The EPICS Program: Innovative Education for Authentic LearningMrs. Jean M. Trusedell, Purdue University Jean Trusedell is a Nationally Board Certified Teacher with extensive experience working with K-12 Ed- ucators and students. Her current project is working with the EPICS (Engineering Projects in Community Service) at Purdue University to create curriculum that can be used with students throughout the coun- try to integrate best classroom practices with engineering principles. Previously, she was the Science and Technology Coach for MSD of Decatur Township in Indianapolis, IN. Ms. Trusedell is pursuing a
simulation of multiphase flows while acquiring skills in high-performance parallel computing and scientific computation. Before that, Dr. Ayala held a faculty position at Universidad de Oriente where he taught and developed courses for a number of subjects such as Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics, Multiphase Flows, Hydraulic Machinery, as well as different Laboratory courses. Additionally, Dr. Ayala has had the opportunity to work for a number of engineering consulting companies, which have given him an important perspective and exposure to the industry. He has been directly involved in at least 20 different engineering projects related to a wide range of industries. Dr. Ayala has provided service to
enrolled.Because it addresses the role of engineering in society and the effect of societal forces ontechnology development, it might prove to be a good concept for a springboard course forengineering curricula. It may also be useful as a source of ideas to those teaching orcontemplating delivering similar courses, or courses which intersect this course in some way incontent, objectives, etc.Course Outcomes, Content and PedagogyThe common university curriculum, known as the Clarkson Common Experience Curriculum,requires all undergraduate majors of the university to complete courses in six Knowledge Areasand complete at least one Tech course along with other requirements relating to communicationsoutcomes and professional experience. These curriculum
AC 2011-1829: EXCHANGE-ENGINEERING IS ELEMENTARY LESSONSTHAT HIGHLIGHT SUSTAINABILITYSharlene Yang, Museum of Science, Boston Sharlene Yang is the professional development director for the Engineering is Elementary project. She has ten plus years of experience as both a science educator and researcher that includes teaching biology, environmental outreach education, and research in biopsychology. Prior to joining the EiE team, Sharlene was a founding teacher at an alternative school for ”at risk” teens; she understands the challenges of working with children that struggle in a mainstream school environment and the importance of creating a classroom that fosters inquiry and student-centered learning. With that in
. His research spans optical sensors, dielectric spectroscopy, and engineering education, with multiple peer-reviewed publications. Dr. Habibi is also active in mentoring undergraduate students, curriculum development, and securing research grants.Tina Alaei ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work In Progress: Enhancing Engineering Education through Course Alignment: A Structured Approach to Integrating Learning Outcomes, Content, and AssessmentAbstractEffective course design is critical in engineering education to ensure students achieve theintended learning outcomes. This paper introduces a structured approach to course alignment andmapping, with a focus on
sophomore-level course introducing students to tools and techniques, such assurveying, understanding maps and plan sets, and field sampling, required for their CivilEngineering curriculum as well as throughout their professional career. This course wasoriginally a project-based course that included many of these core aspects of Civil Engineeringbut used outdated equipment such as theodolites for surveying and planimeters for measuringareas on maps, rather than modern technologies. Subsequent iterations of the course haveincluded more up-to-date technologies but lacked cohesion, covering a range of topics and CivilEngineering disciplines but not in a way that clearly connected them together.Project-based learning is a type of inquiry-based learning
science and math K-12 issues, teacher education, and teacher professional development. She managed federal and state grant programs focused on teacher professional development. For ten years she served on the Board of Examiners for the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. She was also at the University of South Carolina for 17 years where she taught undergraduates, had an active research program in paleo-oceanography, and numerous graduate students. She has a B.S. in Zoology from the University of Rhode Island and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Geological Sciences from the University of South Carolina.Joyce Palmer Allen, National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network Joyce Palmer Allen is the Assistant
improved understanding of the science they use in the service of designcompletion.6 In this paper, we describe a curriculum research and development project devotedto exploring this hypothesis. We consider the theoretical background that supports this endeavor,the initial set of four engineering design-based science curriculum units that have been created,and the preliminary findings on the science content learning that occurs during unit enactment.The purpose of our project is to explore an overarching research question: what are theconsequences of using engineering-design-based activities as contexts for specific sciencecontent instruction in the upper elementary grades? To investigate this question, we havecollaborated with local teachers to
support and revenue from various funding agencies including United States Agency for International Development, US Department of Defense, and Florida Department of Ed- ucation and through his international conferences. He is the author of four books and has also published extensively (over 150 publications) in international journals and conferences in his areas of expertise. Dr. Ahmed is currently on the editorial board of more than 6 international journals and serves as the Associate Editor of ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering & Management and the Associate Editor of the Built Environment Project & Asset Management (BEPAM) Journal.Ms. Kiersten Marie Mahaffy, East Carolina UniversityDr. Lincoln Harding
AC 2007-830: LESSONS LEARNED IN ADOPTING A CFD PACKAGEDavid Blekhman, California State University Los Angeles David Blekhman is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering at Grand Valley State University. He holds M.S. in Thermal Physics from St. Petersburg State Technical University, Russia and a Ph. D. in Mechanical Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo. Since joining GVSU, he has taught courses in the Mechanics and Thermal-Fluids sequences. He has also focused on developing courses in Combustion and Alternative Energy. Page 12.1017.1© American Society for
between the students and theirindustry sponsors and instructors. In addition, the approach emphasizes that just as theengineering design process is scrutinized, analyzed, reworked, and adapted, so is thecommunication design process.As Paretti notes, it is essential that faculty understand this, so that they can create and implementcommunication assignments that help students develop an “analytical, metacognitive approach”to reports and presentations that resembles, to a large degree, the engineering design process.4Finding SolutionsIn an effort to explore better methods of helping students transfer essential knowledge and skills,the engineering faculty piloted an SDP course incorporating industry sponsors and a facultyconsultant from the
learning tool for the Purdue AAE students.3. MethodsIn order to incorporate the use of VLs as a part of curriculum, we analyzed the course context ofAAE 20401, Aeromechanics II Laboratory. Furthermore, we characterized the course content,assessed student learning, and developed the pedagogy of the course using the Backward CourseDesign Model [37] so that we were able to identify how VLs could (and should) be integratedinto the curriculum. Using the knowledge we gained from these analyses, we integrated VLs asa part of AAE 20401 curriculum during the Fall 2018 semester as a preliminary implementationfollowed by a full-on implementation with the SoTL activities during the Fall 2019 semester.For SoTL results and discussion on the research questions
practices —shifting from lecture to active learning forexample—there is a direct impact on student learning that is relatively straightforward tomeasure. However, every course is also part a curriculum that is developed by the faculty, oftenin line with a college or university’s present vision, and shaped by national values and policiessurrounding engineering education and higher education. These factors have indirect but equallysignificant impacts on student learning, and constitute the larger ecosystem in which studentlearning takes place. These indirect effects are more difficult, and likely impossible, to fullyunderstand. If the higher education system in the United States was more centrally governed byan educational ministry, as is found in
assist incoming freshmen cope with first year mathematics classes. She developed teaching modules to improve students’ learning in mathematics using technology.Dr. M. Javed Khan, Tuskegee University Dr. M. Javed Khan is Professor and Head of Aerospace Science Engineering Department at Tuskegee University. He received his Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from Texas A&M University, M.S. in Aero- nautical Engineering from the US Air Force Institute of Technology, and B.E. in Aerospace Engineer- ing from the PAF College of Aeronautical Engineering. He also has served as Professor and Head of Aerospace Engineering Department at the National University of Science and Technology,Pakistan. His research interests include
Computer Science Engineering at the University of Louisville’s Speed School of Engineering in 2008. Since completing his degree, Jeff has been teaching engineering mathematics courses to first and second year engineering students and continuing his dissertation research with Dr. James H. Graham. The focus of their research has been on high assurance security solutions for industrial control system field devices. For the past three years their research has been funded by the National Institute for Hometown Security. Jeff is also interested in educational technology, working to develop and evaluate effective uses of Tablet PCs for classroom instruction.Dr. Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A
. Greg earned his bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice from UC Berkeley where he acquired a passion for using engineering to facilitate developing communities’ capacity for success. He earned his master’s degree in Structural Engineering and Risk Analysis from Stanford University. His PhD work at CU Boulder focused on how student’s connections of social responsibility and engineering change throughout college as well as how engineering service is valued in employment and supported in the workplace.Ms. Cassidy Laurel Grady, Colorado School of Mines Cassidy is currently a junior attending Colorado School of Mines. She is majoring in Geological En- gineering and minoring in
survey,instructors viewed themselves as a guide or facilitator, bringing students through the textbookmaterial in a “rational way” and providing alternate explanations to the text. Others attempt togive a “big picture” view, tying various elements of the course (and the curriculum) together into Page 22.788.13a cohesive whole. For some, the role shifts as needed, from mentor to partner to coach dependingon the student and the situation. Some express the need for them to make the topic interestingand accessible, and to develop new examples and homework problems. The role as an evaluatorwas
University (USA) and was 2014-15 Fulbright Scholar in Engineering Education at Dublin Institute of Technology (Ireland).Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and Development
assessment of student learning.Dr. Scott Streiner, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded research explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has
stress, strain, safetyfactors, etc., that can be used to update designs as necessary in real-time. These activities can besimplified to the extent where freshman first-year students can successfully engage with the toolsand develop a working product without having any significant engineering background. Thistechnology has been shown to improve student outcomes [7] and creative competence [8],increase student motivation, enable the creation of interdisciplinary learning communities [9],and improve metacognitive skills [10].The implementation of peer mentoring activities into the curriculum can help to both enhancestudent learning by improving higher-level thinking skills, communication, and teamwork [11],and offer opportunity for mentor
greatly reduces its conductivity. In simple circuitbuilding, it isn‟t necessary to include the insulating dough. However, when making morecomplex shapes and structures to incorporate squishy circuits, insulating dough can be used toprevent short circuits4. This provides potential to develop more sophisticated designs thatincorporate genuine creativity.Making Squishy Circuits3,8Recipes and instructions, which can be found on the project website, to make both conductive Page 22.672.2and insulating play dough are reproduced below:Conductive Dough Ingredients: 1 cup Water 1 cup Flour ¼ cup Salt 3 Tbsp. Cream of Tartar 1
implement the FFT algorithm will also be discussed.The rest of the paper is organized as follows. First, existing work is briefly reviewed in thebackground section. The implementation is described in detail next, followed by assessmentplan. The paper ends with conclusion and future work.BackgroundEnabling technological advances in artificial intelligence, computing power and mass storage,computer-aided design, software analysis and simulation techniques, multimediacommunications, virtual reality, etc. have been identified as the most promising methods toimprove the development and delivery of electrical and computer engineering curriculum [3].It has now become a common practice to use technologies to enhance learning. For example,computer
developing world. Entrepreneurial education is not solely the domain of business schools. Increasingly,there is interest in innovation and new ventures in technical disciplines such as engineering andscience. A study among Canadian universities10 shows support (although not always throughformal courses) among deans in science, medicine and engineering. Organizations such as theNCIIA (National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance) have sparked interest inentrepreneurship among science and engineering students through a variety of programs.Notably, the recent NCIIA conferences in Portland (2006), Tampa (2007) and Dallas (2008)included significant numbers of non-business school researchers and practitioners. Theconference schedules for
transition from high school to college, and the retention and recruitment of women and minorities to STEM fields.Ordel Brown Ph.D., West Virginia University Ordel Brown, Ph.D., is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University. She currently teaches first-year courses in the Freshman Engineer- ing program, and her research interests include the identification of variables that impact the recruitment, the first-year experience and retention of underrepresented populations in STEM fields, and the develop- ment of strategies to increase their persistence.Ms. Mary L. Strife, West Virginia University Mary Strife has been at West Virginia University since
mathematics and science classroom incorporate hands-ontesting, creative design, and relevance to real life. Consider the notorious question asked by astudent to a teacher: “When am I ever going to use this?” Because students are naturallyinquisitive, everyone benefits when we constructively use this trait in the learning environmentand help students to answer their own questions. The purpose of this paper is to describe a lessonthat engages high school mathematics and science students in an interactive relevant engineeringdesign problem. As part of the CREAM (Culturally Relevant Engineering Applications in Mathematics)program at Washington State University, graduate students developed a lesson that revealsscience and mathematics principles