Intelligence, Robotic ProcessAutomation, and both soft and physical bots [5]. Additionally, the nature and structure of thework itself is changing as remote work becomes mainstream [6]. The first iteration of the courseincluded research readings and in-class discussions on the future of work systems andimplications for workers, case studies from industry discussing the implementation of AI andother technology, and the impacts on workers, guest speakers from industry who are engaged indigital transformation, two in-class debates on the future of work topics, and a pitch presentationwhere students propose innovative ideas on how future work systems should be designed.Research Readings and In-Class DiscussionsThe in-class discussion was structured by
valuable resources to their learningenvironments [17]. In the context of engineering education, FoK highlights the ways in whichstudents’ cultural and community-based knowledge can inform problem-solving, creativity, andinnovation [18-20]. For example, a student from a farming community might draw on theirunderstanding of irrigation systems or sustainable practices when engaging in engineering designtasks [19]. Recognizing and integrating these funds of knowledge into the curriculum not onlyvalidates students’ identities but also broadens the scope of engineering education to includeother ways of being, knowing and doing.Bilingualism, as both a cognitive and sociocultural phenomenon, further enriches this frameworkby highlighting the unique skills
engineers. The main research question this poses is how doesconcept mapping affect STEM students' understanding of entrepreneurial mindset?ABET Computing Criteria lists these three student outcomes: 1. Communicate effectively in a variety of professional contexts. 2. Recognize professional responsibilities and make informed judgments in computing practice based on legal and ethical principles. 3. Function effectively as a member or leader of a team engaged in activities appropriate to the program’s discipline. [2] 1In order to implement these principles effectively, the research team integrated an activity that
Page 12.907.6interdisciplinary five-week summer residence class called the Engineering Math AdvancementProgram (E-MAP) sponsored by the National Science Foundation, to prepare incoming freshmenfor calculus. The program aims to increase retention by preparing students to 1) be successful incalculus and 2) be excited about engineering. In addition to a non traditional math class, theprogram includes hands-on “Living-Lab” experiences, field trips and a community serviceproject led by professional engineers. The non-math aspects of the program were developed tostrengthen mathematical skills indirectly through engagement of the students in laboratory andreal world engineering problems, in the idea that solving skills are best nurtured through hands
(SWID). Page 24.1032.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014Redesigning an online executive Master’s class for a large number of students I. IntroductionDesigning an online class especially for a large number of executives and workingprofessionals is a challenge. The focus of the class moves more towards learningfrom teachingi. The class should be designed not only to have a high impact onthe learning but also to be mindful of the availability of the students. Commononline education tools such as discussion boards and one-on-one conference callsbecome very
summer camps geared towards middle school, high school, and community college students to expose and increase their inter- est in pursuing Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields. Dr. Astatke travels to Ethiopia every summer to provide training and guest lectures related to the use of the mobile laboratory technology and pedagogy to enhance the ECE curriculum at five different universities.Prof. Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Kenneth Connor is a professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering (ECSE) where he teaches courses on electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, plasma physics, electric power, and general engineering. His research
persistence” research, one of the mostfoundational scholars is Vincent Tinto (1989, 2006), who posited that persistence to graduationdepends on the level in which students successfully transition and integrate into the institution,both academically and socially. Over the last 20 years, Tinto’s theories of integration and studentdeparture have been critically examined for its limitations in addressing departure ofunderrepresented student populations (Braxton & Lien, 2000; Hurtado & Carter, 1997; Tierney,1999). Scholars have proffered that Tinto’s theory does not consider the impact separation fromfamily and sociocultural communities have with students who come from collectivist orinterdependent cultural backgrounds (Tierney, 1999). Another
Assessing Doctoral Students’ Employability SkillsAbstractA significant number of STEM doctoral recipients are employed by industry. The goal ofthis study is to investigate PhD students’ competency level at different skills andexpertise they need to be successful at their jobs after graduating from university. Thispaper examines the results of a survey, based on Vitae Researcher DevelopmentFramework, of student perceptions of their skills and competencies in preparation forcareers in industry, consulting, or government. The survey had four main domainsincluding knowledge and intellectual abilities, personal effectiveness, researchgovernance and organization, and engagement, influence and impact. In general, studentsmostly acknowledged the importance
account for the realities of a student workforce, and to manage in aproactive, vigilant, and responsible manner.3.1 Promote interdisciplinary awareness and systems perspectiveIn relatively complex, top-tier projects like TSIX (Tethered Satellite Ionospheric eXplorer, atethered nanosatellite pair for ionospheric characterization and a validation testbed for on-orbitrendezvous and formation flying sensors), where a large team of thirty or more students is splitup into subsystems, it may be easy for team members to develop tunnel vision. Students maybecome so consumed with optimizing their own subsystem’s design that they fail to recognizethe critical impact that their engineering decisions have on other subsystems. Interfaces betweensubsystems may
. Students engage in the full data science lifecycle, from data wrangling andanalysis to visualization and communication of results. Although DSC-WAV promotescollaboration, it lacks a formalized instructional framework to teach collaboration skills explicitly.It relies more on the general experiential learning process to simulate a collaboration with thehope that students will learn how to collaborate by working with each other. However, this workmay not address specific collaborative challenges systematically. For example, while studentswork in teams, they may not receive direct instruction on how to apply and understand thestrengths and weaknesses of a team, effective communication techniques, or methods for buildinga shared understanding of a
is a program created at Purdue University where students participate in engineering service- learning projects. Service learning (sometimes called community engagement) has students solve problems related to social impact. These types of projects have shown a great deal of improved retention, especially for female engineering students [9]. They allow students to experience first-hand how engineers benefit mankind. b. Technical Skill Sessions: Since the program starts with sophomores, some students have not started taking engineering-level coursework. Introducing technical skill sessions allows students to confidently work on their respective
Teamwork has increasingly gained the interest of educators as an effective pedagogical toolfor the preparation of students for the “real-world” (Gantasala, 2016). Collaborative assignmentsand projects, which invariably involve teamwork are considered high impact practices (HIPs) inhigher education (Adrade et al, 2020). High impact practices engage students in purposeful,interactive learning aimed at developing skills such as communication, problem solving,teamwork, critical thinking, quantitative reasoning, and information literacy (Kuh, 2008). Pastresearch shows that students who participate in HIP, including those who are historicallyunderserved by higher education, improve their performance, and have higher persistence andgraduation rates
UG students to foster growth moreeffectively.MethodsUG Student Survey A UG student survey was created to assess the impact of graduate students on the growthof UG students in these collaborative projects. This survey aimed to measure the perceivedgrowth in skills of UG students who were engaged in these projects. UG students assessed theirperceived growth in skills and their perception of how graduate students influenced that growththrough a twenty-question survey (see Appendix A). In this survey, the first question was amultiple-choice question that asked what class they were in: freshman, sophomore, junior, orsenior. The first section of the UG survey, ten questions using a Likert scale from 1 to 5, 1representing minimal growth and 5
Paper ID #13332U.S. Construction Management Students Comfort Level With and Knowl-edge of Mobile TechnologiesDr. R. Casey Cline, Boise State University Casey Cline is an associate professor in the Construction Management Department within the College of Engineering at Boise State University. Dr. Cline earned a BS in Business Administration from Ok- lahoma State University, an MS in Construction Science from the University of Oklahoma, and a Ph.D. in Education (Adult Development Organizational Learning) from The University of Idaho. His educa- tion and research interests are focused on Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Paper ID #35153Can online summer camps work? Evidence from adapting a high schoolhands-on water quality module for online deliveryMary Elizabeth Foltz, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Mary E. Foltz is a PhD candidate in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her research focuses on denitrification in agricultural systems and ways to decrease nitrous oxide emissions from denitrification. She has developed and taught five high school science courses and been involved in engineering outreach programs through the university and community. After
studentsregistered for EMBER, representing over 86% of the incoming class. Some 600 studentsaccessed the online modules, around 550 students attended at least one live tutorial, andapproximately 250 students actively engaged in the live tutorials throughout the two weeks.From the 125 survey responses collected, 96% of the students felt more prepared for first year,agreed that the modules were engaging, and would recommend EMBER to incoming first-yearstudents.EMBER provided incoming first-year engineering students with an opportunity to acclimate touniversity and online learning before the school year started. Next year, we will investigatestudent-participants’ specific learning experiences with EMBER across the cohort’sdemographics to further examine how
can succeed in aSTEM career (mean = 4.45, SD = 1.63). These findings suggest that while students may feelneutral about their social connections within the classroom, they do perceive a positive impact ontheir overall academic engagement and motivation when they feel included and supported withinthe academic community.9Table 3- Sense of Belonging Measures Peer Panel A Support Std. Variables Observation Mean Min Max Dev. Peer Help
University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches design and en- trepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes.Ms. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a PhD student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan. She also earned a Master’s in Higher Education at Michigan and a Bachelor’s in
) outreach and recruitment efforts, (2) undergraduate research, (3) learningcommunities, (4) international research experiences, and (5) community college recruitment,transfers, and retention. Since these five areas are closely interwoven, they have been condensedto (A) recruitment, (B) retention, and (C) continuation and recruitment to graduate school. Thefollowing sections highlight these areas and best practices employed on each Alliance institution.RecruitmentRecruitment to STEM majors was the first focal point for the NSF LSAMP programsolicitations. The emphasis was placed on increasing the number of URM STEM majors. Itinvolved the engagement of feeder community colleges and recruitment of transfer students tothe universities. The focus also
focus on students to developprofessional competencies such as communication and professional responsibility as the focus onstudents learning disciplinary technical knowledge [4, 18]. However efforts in the United Statesto develop education to bring enough emphasis on professional competencies in engineeringprograms have been successful to only a limited extent [19, 20]. There are some engineeringprograms which have attempted to integrate liberal education with engineering education [21,22] by engaging students in solving sociotechnical problems. However such programs aremostly peripheral to the more mainstream engineering education [19]. Engineering facultygenerally consider disciplinary knowledge as the core of engineering curriculum and are
internet tool use affect conceptual change and impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and persistence. The other is on a large-scale NSF faculty develop- ment program and its effect on change in faculty teaching beliefs, engagement strategies, and classroom practice. Recent honors include coauthoring the ASEE Best Paper Award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013 and the ASEE Mike Ashby Outstanding Materials Educator Award in 2018.Kara L. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University Kara Hjelmstad has been a faculty associate and student teacher supervisor for Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University since 2010. Previously, she earned an M.Ed. degree in curriculum and instruction, and spent
ET scholarship involves students, enhances studentlearning, enhances our teaching, and enhances the critical-thinking, life-long learning, creativeand innovative skills of our students. Employers seek students who possess such skills.” Severalengineering programs in the United States already have mechanisms developed for involvingundergraduate students in research. The National Science Foundation has funded severalResearch-Experience-for-Undergraduate (REU) programs across the country,4, 5, 15 but most ofthese programs are focused on the scholarship of discovery. Since most ET faculty scholarship isfocused on the scholarship of application1, 2, it is imperative that the ET community developstrategies to involve our undergraduate students in
visual interfaces and information richness. The proposed app-based tool will facilitate students’ learning by engaging them with rich information resources and virtual hands- on activities. Acknowledgement This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. EEC 1343749. References1. Crawford, M. 10 Ways Nanotechnology Impacts Our Lives. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2016).2. Roco, M. The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years. J. Nanoparticle Res. 427–445 (2011).3. Jeschke, S. Collaborative Working Environment for Virtual and Remote Experiments in Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies. in Interactive Mobile and
: • participants are engaged in building and sustaining a learning community focused on the development of each member (also emphasized by Baron in his study about developing AL [18]) • student-centered experiential learning experience [19] • research-grounded continuous program developmentThe author agrees with Eich’s findings whole-heartedly and argues that in addition to thoseattributes the role of emotions must also be considered when designing an ALD program.Jennifer M. George [20] suggests that “…feelings play a central role in the leadership process.”and de Vries [21] points out in his study about transformational education programs, that“cognitive and emotional processes need to be taken into consideration to create changes
StudentsAbstractThe Study Cycle is a set of guidelines rich with self-regulated learning (SRL) techniques thatenables students to plan, prepare, and enact their studying by focusing on five comprehensivesteps: previewing before class, engaging in class, reviewing after class, holding study sessions,and seeking help as a supplement. This paper reports on initial findings of a qualitative study inwhich a workshop on the Study Cycle was taught to a class of second-year IndustrialEngineering students as an intervention, aiming to understand effects of the module onengineering students’ SRL strategy use in an engineering course. Students self-reported SRLstrategy use in a one-minute paper pre-workshop and two sets of post-workshop reflections. Thispaper examines
hones students’ skills in soliciting community stakeholderfeedback in order to generate innovative solutions. In PFE I, students are introduced toengineering and ethical best practices, as well as various career opportunities. In PFE II, studentsare further introduced to careers in technology development, research, and academia. Studentstour engineering labs, experience faculty guest lectures, and consider how to solicit and integratecommunity stakeholder perspectives as they generate solutions to engineering-related problems.Finally, in PFE III, students learn how to use ethical engineering principles to create designs thatmeet societal needs. In each PFE I–III course, about 50 out-of-class hours are allocated forworking on students’ capstone
practice their skills in communication,leadership, and creativity in how they help their team overcome obstacles. These skills, evenmore than technical competencies (programming, prototyping, data analysis, etc…) arecommonly listed by industry as being the most important skills for graduate level hires [25]. One challenge with combining these courses arises from the additional complexity ofsupporting more complex team dynamics which will heavily impact student experience [2,4,9].A 2013 review of engineering team effectiveness from a psychological perspective found thatwhile many reports focus broadly on teamwork, a smaller proportion focused on interdisciplinaryor complex teams [4]. Another more recent (2019) review captured multiple
, and 2) to study the impactof the mentorship experience on the graduate student and postdoctoral mentors. The specific research questions explored included the following: 1) How did participationas a mentor impact mentors’ self-efficacy in research, leadership, or mentorship?; 2) Didworking with an REU student increase the mentors’ perceived research productivity, teachingskills, or communication skills?; 3) What types of approaches did the mentors utilize to superviseand mentor the REU students?; and 4) What challenges related to mentoring and/or the REUprogram did mentors report?Methods The study took place at a large mid-Atlantic research university. The REU program,funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), was in its
academically talented students with financial need inearning their 4-year STEM degrees in a timely manner. The grants have recently expanded toinclude collaborations between 2-year and 4-year colleges, in which community college studentsapply for a scholarship which is transferable to the participating four year college or colleges. S-STEM programs are required to add social science as well as external evaluation elements todocument and assess the benefits of the programs, as well as any unanticipated challenges. Thefirst author serves as social science researcher on multiple S-STEM projects. In that role, theauthor utilizes quantitative and qualitative research methods to understand the impact of the S-STEM funds on students in different academic
posters about the Academy placed in the targetschools. Page 9.1137.3 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationCurriculum improvements could include adoption of more topics and approaches whichare better suited for the engagement of female students: communicative and socially-focused interactive, co-operative tasks for instance5,6,7.Additionally, more immediate instruction on presentation and communication skills couldbe conducted to prepare for the parental presentation on the final day of the Academy.(This is